Charlie Kirk has tweeted a doozy that the conservative commentator sees as calling out for some Save-Me-Brazen kind of expenditures of taxpayer dollars and whatnots: The response was a raging cocktail of indignation, disbelief, and some conspiracy theories truly believed. He also told that federal loans were being purged for real live babies and dead ones while the education officials were partying around with money at Caesars Palace. Yeah, you read that right.
Advertisement
Kirk gave visibility to a Jesse Watters segment on Fox covering findings by DOGE-an apparent effort to curb government waste-by saying, To Kirk, this band of “incredibly intelligent, determined, patriotic Americans” is exposing a system that has basically turned into an all-out looting operation. Yet even as evidence presents itself, not all have taken it in.
One receipt-laden statement offered by Grok backs to some extent the Kirk allegations. It referred to articles reporting that the Small Business Administration had lent 333 dollars in loans to totally unqualified recipients under 11 years old and dead old persons, one case even showing a 9-month-old getting a $100,000 loan. Meanwhile, reports are saying that the Granite School District wastes $86,000 at Caesars Palace for a conference. Though some of those expenses might even be legitimately questioned by Grok, these instances ring out with cries of waste for lack of scrutiny.
Then, Modelie took things one step farther, labeling Kirk’s statements “unsubstantiated” and accusing him of inciting outrage without evidence. This led to exchanges in which Grok stuck to its position, citing further examples such as USIP paying $132K to a former Taliban member and the misuse of educational funds. It developed into a messy scene pretty quickly with some people inciting rape, with other things treating the entire thing like a propaganda scheme.
Thus, arrests were the mainstay in the replies. Derry Bryson and Lance Lee screamed how with a case this saturated in evidence, swift-string conviction would usually be called for. “Where are the arrests? All we get is stories?” Bryson fumed. Another user, Lance Lee, praised DOGE’s work but added fuel to the frustration by saying they had been waiting a really long time for an audit which would lead to something concrete.
And there, of course, stood the wildcards. A user named Татьяна Полищук went full conspiracy with a rant against Elon Musk and the KGB: “Lavrov said Musk owes KGB money. AI leaked the conversation! Why does the KGB need money from Musk?” Balance the scales, added DAN ZABORSKI, demanding a million-dollar tax rebate for everyone to make up for waste. Because, really, why not?
In terms of the mudslinging occurring in the political arena, there was, of course, sufficient evidence. Team Slinky accused DOGE of a data-gathering scheme for Musk, while DOGEai countered that the real thieves are the bureaucrats who spend taxpayer dollars in Vegas rather than on real priorities like veterans and border security.
Advertisement
The takeaway? Unquestionably, the tweet had an impact; some consider it an exposé long overdue, while many see it as mere outrage bait. The check was accountability: People want names, arrests, and consequences, not mere headlines to read about alleged misdeeds. Whether or not DOGE’s discovery will bring real change in the real world is not where the world will be watching but on how many titanic Twitter brawls will be unleashed because of it.
This story originally appeared on Celebrityinsider
