President Donald Trump made his pitch to acquire Greenland to international leaders in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 21, saying for the first time he did not plan for the U.S. to take the land by force.
Trump, who talked up his tariff-based negotiation strategy, cited Greenland’s strategic position between the U.S., Russia and China as the main reason he wants to acquire the territory.
Retelling United States’ history with Greenland and Denmark, Trump said that during World War II, “We saved Greenland and successfully prevented our enemies from gaining a foothold in our hemisphere.”
This much is accurate: After Germany invaded Denmark, the U.S. assumed responsibility for Greenland’s defense and established a military presence on the island that remains today, albeit in diminished scope.
But Trump overstepped when he said that after World War II, “We gave Greenland back to Denmark.”
“All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland, where we already had it as a trustee, but respectfully returned it back to Denmark not long ago,” Trump said.
Although the U.S. defended Greenland during World War II, it never possessed the nation — and could not have given it back. Experts have told PolitiFact that Greenland’s status as part of Denmark is not in question, and hasn’t been for more than a century.
Denmark’s colonization of Greenland dates to the 1720s. In 1933, an international court settled a territorial dispute between Denmark and Norway, ruling that as of July 1931, Denmark “possessed a valid title to the sovereignty over all Greenland.”
After the 1945 approval of the United Nations charter — the organization’s founding document and the foundation of much of international law — Denmark incorporated Greenland through a constitutional amendment and gave it representation in the Danish Parliament in 1953. Denmark told the United Nations that any colonial-type status had ended; the United Nations General Assembly accepted this change in November 1954. The United States was among the nations that voted to accept Greenland’s new status.
Since then, Greenland has, incrementally but consistently, moved toward greater autonomy.
Greenlandic political activists successfully pushed for and achieved home rule in 1979, which established its parliament. Today, Greenland is a district within the sovereign state of Denmark, with two elected representatives in Denmark’s parliament.
Gullfoss Falls in Iceland on Aug. 10, 2025. (Louis Jacobson / PolitiFact)
What about Iceland?
Four times in the Davos speech, Trump referred to Iceland instead of Greenland.
“Our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland,” Trump said. “So Iceland has already cost us a lot of money, but that dip is peanuts compared to what it’s gone up, and we have an unbelievable future.”
U.S. markets reacted negatively to Trump’s Greenland comments the day before his Davos speech, falling about 2% in value.
But in recent weeks, Trump has said nothing about acquiring Iceland, an independent island nation with nearly 400,000 residents, located east of Greenland.
Traditionally, Icelanders have maintained strong ties to the United States, dating back to World War II, when Iceland’s government invited U.S. troops into the country. In 1949, Iceland became a founding member of NATO, and in 1951, the two countries signed a bilateral defense agreement that still stands.
Its location — between the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans, a strategic naval choke point in the Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom gap — means that Iceland, despite its lack of a standing military, is geographically important for both North America and Europe.
In 2006, the U.S. gave up its permanent troop presence at the Keflavík Air Base — a 45-minute drive south of the capital of Reykjavík — but U.S. troops still rotate through. Icelandic civilians now handle key NATO tasks such as submarine surveillance and operations at four radar sites on the nation’s periphery. Iceland also makes financial contributions to NATO trust funds and contributes a small number of technical and diplomatic personnel to NATO operations.
Trump’s pick for ambassador to Iceland, former Rep. Billy Long, R-Mo., attracted criticism earlier this month when he was overheard saying Iceland should become a U.S. state after Greenland, and that he would serve as governor.
Long apologized during an interview with Arctic Today.
“There was nothing serious about that, I was with some people, who I hadn’t met for three years, and they were kidding about Jeff Landry being governor of Greenland and they started joking about me, and if anyone took offense to it, then I apologize,” Long told the publication. (Trump tapped Landry, Louisiana’s Republican governor, to be the U.S. envoy to Greenland.)
Silja Bára R. Ómarsdóttir, an international affairs professor who now serves as rector, or president, of the University of Iceland, told the Tampa Bay Times in August that newfound attention to Iceland’s security, including concerns over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the rest of Europe, is “definitely very noticeable at the political level.”
Multiple analysts in Iceland told the Times, only half-jokingly, that the key to surviving the Trump era has been to remain out of sight, something Greenland — for whatever the reason — was unlucky enough to do.
“You could say Icelandic policy towards the U.S. has been to try to keep under the radar,” said Pia Elísabeth Hansson, director of the Institute of International Affairs at the University of Iceland.
