A federal judge on Tuesday rejected Sam Bankman-Fried’s bid to throw outmost of the US government’s criminal case accusing the FTX cryptocurrency exchange founder of orchestrating a multibillion-dollar fraud.
The decision by US District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan paves the way for an Oct. 2 trial of Bankman-Fried, a 31-year-old former billionaire.
Prosecutors accused Bankman-Fried of stealing billions of dollars in FTX customer funds to plug losses at his Alameda Research hedge fund.
They also accused Bankman-Fried of misleading investors and lenders, and contributing illegally to political campaigns in the names of colleagues.
Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty and denied stealing funds, while acknowledging that FTX had inadequate risk management.
Bankman-Fried in May asked Kaplan to dismiss at least 11 of the 13 fraud and conspiracy charges he faced.
Bankman-Fried said some charges relied on a fraud theory — where a defendant could be convicted for depriving someone of economically valuable information and not just tangible property — the Supreme Court last month deemed invalid.
But the judge agreed with prosecutors that the theory, known as right to control, did not apply to Bankman-Fried.
“The defendant’s assertion that the indictment does not allege any ‘economic loss’ to FTX customers appears to be factually incorrect,” and the alleged misappropriated funds clearly constituted property, Kaplan wrote.
A spokesman for Bankman-Fried declined to comment.
Bankman-Fried also argued that some charges were improperly brought without consent from the Bahamas, where he was arrested in December and extradited to the US.
An extradition treaty between the United States and the Bahamas, where FTX was based, says a country must consent before defendants can be tried on charges brought after their extradition.
Kaplan this month said a second trial will be held March 11 on the five charges prosecutors brought against Bankman-Fried after his extradition.
Prosecutors said they asked the Bahamas to agree to those charges, which include conspiracy to bribe Chinese officials and commit bank fraud, but did not know when the Caribbean country would grant its consent.
This story originally appeared on NYPost
