Saturday, July 19, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 1677

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of FTAI Aviation By Investing.com

0

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In FTAI To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in FTAI between July 23, 2024 and January 15, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York–(Newsfile Corp. – January 26, 2025) – Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against FTAI Aviation Ltd. (“FTAI” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FTAI) and reminds investors of the March 18, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company reported one-time engine sales as Maintenance Repair & Overhaul revenue when FTAI only performs limited repair and maintenance work on the engine assets sold; (2) FTAI presents whole engine sales as individual module sales, thereby overstating sales and demand; (3) the Company depreciates engines that are not on lease, which misleadingly lowers the reported cost of goods sold and inflates EBITDA; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On January 15, 2025, Muddy Waters (NYSE:) Research published a report alleging, among other things, that “FTAI materially manipulates its financials” by “exaggerating the size of its aftermarket aerospace business”, “misleading investors by presenting whole engine sales as individual module sales”, “inflating Aerospace Products’ EBITDA margins by means of over-depreciation in the leasing segment”, and “engaging in channel stuffing”.

On this news, FTAI’s stock price fell $37.21, or 24.3%, to close at $116.08 per share on January 15, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding FTAI’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/238365




This story originally appeared on Investing

Bill Gates calls divorcing wife Melinda Gates ‘the mistake I regret the most’

0

Billionaire Bill Gates admitted that he’s “cheerful now” but revealed that his divorce from Melinda French Gates after 27 years of marriage is “the mistake I regret the most.”

“The divorce thing was miserable for me and Melinda for at least two years,” Bill told The Times of London on Saturday.

The Microsoft co-founder had hoped his marriage to Melinda would be as successful as his parents Bill Sr. and Mary, who lived together for 45 years.

“There is a certain wonderfulness to spending your entire adult life with one person because of the memories and depth of things you have done and having kids together,” Gates said.

Bill admitted divorcing Melinda is “the mistake I regret the most.”
Getty Images for Robin Hood

Bill said he would have to put the public divorce “at the top of the list” of his failures throughout his life.

“There are others but none that matter,” the philanthropist added.

The couple met in 1987 during a Microsoft sales meeting when Melinda was a product manager and Bill was the company’s CEO.

He reportedly asked her out on a date in a parking lot.

The couple met in 1987 during a Microsoft sales meeting.
Getty Images
Bill and Melinda Gates got divorced in 2021 after 27 years of marriage. Getty Images

They got married on New Year’s Day in 1994 and went on to share kids Jennifer, 28, Rory, 25, and Phoebe, 22

“When Melinda and I met, I was fairly successful but not ridiculously successful — that came during the time that we were together,” the 69-year-old said. “So, she saw me through a lot.”

In 2021, Bill and Melinda announced their divorce after secretly separating the year before, saying they could no longer “grow together as a couple in this next phase of life.”

“When we got divorced it was tough and then she made the decision to leave the foundation — I was disappointed that she took the option to go off,” Bill said.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a nonprofit fighting poverty, disease, and inequity around the world, changed its name to The Gates Foundation when Melinda resigned in 2024 a few years after the split.

Bill admitted that he “caused pain” to his family when “Today” show anchor Savannah Guthrie asked the tech leader if infidelity played a role in the divorce during a 2022 interview — but didn’t share too many details.

That same year, Melinda went on “CBS Mornings” and hinted that her then-husband’s working relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was also a factor in their split.

“I did not like that he had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, no. I made that clear to him,” Melinda said. “He was abhorrent. He was evil personified.”

When Melinda, 60, filed the divorce papers, Bill was worth $130 billion.

“The divorce thing was miserable for me and Melinda for at least two years,” the billionaire shared. Getty Images

The couple did not have a prenup but they did have a “separation agreement” to lay out the terms of the split.

In 2023, Bill started dating Paula Hurd, a former tech executive at NCR Global and widow of Oracle CEO Mark Hurd.

Melinda went public with her boyfriend entrepreneur Philip Vaughn in October 2024.

“Melinda and I still see each other — we have three kids and two grandchildren so there are family events. The kids are doing well. They have good values,” Bill said.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Trump probes can de-weaponize justice system —starting with Alvin Bragg’s Daniel Penny case

0

In his second Inaugural Address, President Trump declared that “the weaponization of our Justice Department will end” and promised to “re-balance” its scales.

Hours later, he issued an executive order adding teeth to that pledge.

Because the Biden administration “engaged in an unprecedented, third-world weaponization of prosecutorial power to upend the democratic process,” Trump wrote, the president directed his administration to investigate the involvement of all federal agencies.

Much of the effort to end lawfare will focus, as it should, on the Democrats’ use of federal and state prosecution to cripple candidate Trump.

But the Trump Justice Department must also counter the misuse of prosecutorial authority against people with far less resources and fame.

The most glaring example comes from New York City, where Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg — when not busy exaggerating claims of bookkeeping mistakes into a case of election interference against Trump — prosecuted Marine veteran Daniel Penny for the chokehold death of a violent subway rider, Jordan Neely.

Bragg painted Penny as a lawless vigilante, but a New York jury acquitted him for his heroic protection of his fellow citizens.

This week’s executive orders show this White House understands the threat.

Trump’s Day 1 executive order on “Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government” condemned the Biden administration for unconstitutionally using its law-enforcement powers for political purposes, wielding them against “parents protesting at school board meetings, Americans who spoke out against [Biden’s] actions” and others.

To correct these misdeeds, Trump has at his disposal broad authority to fire federal agents and prosecutors who knowingly used their terrible powers for political purposes. He can order reforms in the federal bureaucracy to prevent abuse in the future.

But some of the most serious violations of constitutional rights in the last four years occurred at the state and local level. Trump cannot fire Bragg, who does not answer to the federal government, nor can he order changes at the Manhattan DA’s office.

To stop the progressives’ abuse of the criminal-justice system, Trump may have to rely on the same legal theory that the Biden Justice Department used against him —  and investigate them for depriving Americans of their constitutional rights.

With Penny’s case in mind, Justice Department prosecutors could examine whether Bragg and other New York officials violated a federal statute, 18 U.S.C. 241, which prohibits conspiring to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate” a person exercising constitutional rights or privileges.

Freedom from racial discrimination is a central constitutional right, so Trump’s Justice Department should investigate whether Bragg and his office considered race in making their decision to prosecute Penny for murder.

They should broaden their investigation to probe whether Bragg considered race when he announced, shortly after taking office, that he would cease prosecuting felonies like resisting arrest and low-level drug crimes, and water down other charges, such as robbery and burglary, for reasons of race-based “equity.”

Trump’s attorney general could expand such a federal civil-rights investigation beyond race, to examine whether Bragg and other New York officials, such as Attorney General Letitia James, have made charging decisions based on a partisan political agenda.

Another core constitutional right is the freedom to speak and associate without government interference. Both Bragg and James run in partisan elections, but once elected the Constitution forbids them from using their power to punish or reward based on political viewpoint.

New York City, like many progressive cities, chose not to bring serious charges against Black Lives Matter protesters, but brought high-profile cases against Republicans — most obviously, their cases against Trump.

Other Democratic prosecutors, such as Fani Willis in Atlanta, also seemed to target Republicans while leaving progressive lawbreakers alone. Meanwhile, state and local prosecutors’ efforts to target groups like Moms for Liberty who protested destructive COVID-19 lockdowns may also have violated rights of free speech and association.

Progressives cannot complain that Trump abuses federal civil-rights law by opening these investigations. If a Southern state prosecutor, during the awful years of segregation, had brought charges primarily against blacks and supporters of the Civil Rights movement, there’s no doubt the Justice Department could investigate under Section 241 — and rightfully so.

Even former Attorney General Merrick Garland would have to agree. He allowed special counsel Jack Smith to bring an unprecedented claim that Trump and his aides had violated voting-rights laws by challenging the 2020 election results.

That’s an unsupported legal theory the courts ultimately would have rejected — but an investigation based on actual racial discrimination, or the prosecution of political opponents, would fall squarely within the purpose of federal civil-rights laws.

Trump can strike a blow for the rule of law and restore public faith in the criminal-justice system if he uses his executive order not just to defend himself against lawfare, but to undertake the harder work of pursuing the abuse of state and local criminal justice, as seen most dramatically in New York City with the case of Daniel Penny.

John Yoo is a distinguished visiting professor at the School of Civic Leadership at the University of Texas at Austin, where he is also a senior research fellow at the Civitas Institute.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Aim for a million buying just 7 or 8 well-known shares? Here’s how!

0


Image source: Getty Images

The prospect of becoming a stock market millionaire can seem exciting, but it need not be daunting. In fact, I think one can aim for a million simply by buying and holding a limited number of well-known and long-established blue-chip shares.

What it takes to go from zero to a million

If one seriously wants to become a stock market millionaire, it takes not just ambition but also a practical plan.

Putting in just a few quid and hoping to stumble on some miraculous once-in-a-generation share will not cut the mustard, I reckon.

Not only is a proper investment strategy required — so is capital. It takes money to make money.

That means that, while it is possible to start with zero, a disciplined regular saving plan is a helpful tool to provide money to invest.

Everyone’s financial situation is different and that will affect how much any one person can invest in their share-dealing account or Stocks and Shares ISA. But the short of it is, the more one puts in, the faster one can aim for a million.

Why doing less can earn more

Imagine an investor puts in £800 each month and was able to grow their portfolio value at a compounded value of 5% annually by investing in 50 leading shares.

Doing that to aim for a million, the investor would be opening the champagne after 38 years.

But imagine if they bought just the 7 or 8 best-performing of those 50 shares and achieved a compound annual growth rate of 10%. They would be a millionaire in 26 years. At 15%, it would take just a couple of decades.

How the top shares perform will vary over time. But the same principle always applies: the best-performing few shares in any group (say, the FTSE 100) over a given time period will outperform the rest.

That can speed things up, perhaps significantly, as in the path towards a million.

That is just simple maths. What is not so simple, alas, is knowing (or even guessing well) which shares will be top performers in any given timeframe.

Going for great, nor merely decent

Many investors know the difference between finding what feels like a really good opportunity and a merely decent one. Great ones can be rare: Warren Buffett pins much of his success on “about a dozen truly good decisions” over many decades.

It can therefore feel tempting to invest in merely decent opportunities. But Buffett’s strong performance comes from being patient and going for brilliant chances in a big way.

As an example, consider ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM).

I expect demand for oil and gas to stay high. For decades people have been talking about use falling – and I do see that as a risk – but so far it has been resilient, as the global population grows.

Exxon is in prime position to benefit from this. It has a more focussed portfolio than some rivals, outstanding assets, and a proven business model over many decades.

In fact, not only has it proven its business over decades, the energy major has grown its dividend annually for decades.

The thing is, although I think it is a great business the share price does not strike me as cheap. So, for now, I am watching without buying.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Down 16% and 18% – are my 2 biggest FTSE 100 losers about to rally hard?

0


Image source: Getty Images

Not every FTSE 100 stock pick can be a winner. I hold around 20 blue-chips and two have suffered: mining giant Glencore (LSE: GLEN) and pharmaceuticals titan GSK (LSE: GSK).

Their shares are down 8% and 12%, respectively, over 12 months. Personally, I’m sitting on paper losses of 16% and 19%, despite picking up a few dividends and yes, it hurts.

While the declines are disappointing, I’m hanging on in the hope of a turnaround. So what are the chances?

Can the Glencore share price rebound?

As one of the world’s largest miners and traders, Glencore’s heavily exposed to the volatile prices of key resources like coal, copper, and zinc.

That was fine when China was posting double-digit GDP growth year after year, while gobbling up 60% of the global supply of metals and minerals. Those days are over and as one Beijing stimulus package after another underwhelms, we can’t assume they’ll come back.

Glencore also has to navigate the pivot towards renewable energy and a low-carbon future. Its substantial coal business remains highly profitable but is at odds with global decarbonisation goals.

President Donald Trump’s mooted tariffs are another concern. The Glencore share price jumped on Friday, along with the commodity sector generally, as Trump (for now at least) adopted a less strident stance. There will no doubt be further twists to come.

The shares look good value trading at 10.5 times earnings while its 2.6% yield may be topped up by one-off dividends in the spring.

The 15 analysts offering one-year share price forecasts have produced a median target of 493p. If correct, that’s a bumper increase of almost 30% from today. I’d hate to miss out if that happens. In a famously cyclical sector, I’d be daft to sell when the shares are down.

Long-term GSK investors can be forgiven for feeling grumpy. The stock’s down 18% on a decade ago. And although investors have received plenty of dividends in that time, they’d have hoped for more. Today’s 4.25% trailing yield’s solid but still below the 6% or so that investors used to expect.

GSK shares are down, but not out

Pouring money into R&D instead was supposed to boost the pipeline and share price. It’s not really happened yet. Spinning off consumer healthcare business Haleon didn’t add much shine to the mothership either.

I thought the GSK share price would rebound last year as it settled a US class action case over heartburn medication Zantac. The relief was short-lived. And with Trump targeting big pharma, investors have another worry.

GSK shares are cheap, trading at 8.8 times earnings, but there’s a lingering suspicion of a value trap here.

The 17 analysts offering one-year share price forecasts have produced a median target of 1,618p. If correct, that’s an increase of almost 19% from today. Combined with that yield, this would give me a total return of 23%. I can’t see it happening, but I’ll hang on just in case.

I could definitely see Glencore rallying hard from here. I think GSK will be a long, slow haul. I continue to hold both but I really should have bought Nvidia.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Rams vs. Eagles: Matthew Stafford, Jalen Hurts aim to be game-changers

0


Matthew Stafford played in one Super Bowl with the Rams and won. Jalen Hurts played in one Super Bowl with the Philadelphia Eagles and fell short.

Both quarterbacks aim to return to the NFL’s biggest stage.

One will take a step toward that goal on Sunday when the Rams play the Eagles in an NFC divisional-round game at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia.

“I’m enjoying the hell out of it,” Stafford, a 16th-year pro, said of the preparation. “I know the guys on our team are doing the same.

“Just trying to lead as best I can to help us give ourselves the best chance we can to get a win and keep it moving.”

Hurts, a fifth-year pro, is similarly wired.

“I don’t play the game for anything other than to win,” he told Philadelphia reporters this week.

Eagles running back Saquon Barkley dominated strategy discussion in the lead-up to the game, specifically focused on whether he could come close to repeating his 255-yard rushing performance against the Rams in November.

But Stafford and Hurts could dictate which team moves on to play the Washington Commanders in the NFC championship game.

Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford, left, and Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts have met at SoFi Stadium in 2023 and 2024, both Philadelphia victories.

(Michael Owens / Getty Images)

Under coach Sean McVay, the Rams are 1-4 against the Eagles.

Twice, Hurts played a key role in defeating them.

In 2023, he passed for 303 yards and a touchdown, with an interception, and rushed for 72 yards and a touchdown in a 23-14 victory at SoFi Stadium.

Two months ago, also at SoFi Stadium, Hurts passed for 179 yards and a touchdown and rushed for 39 yards in a Barkley-dominated 37-20 win.

Hurts’ ability to pass and run on designed and off-schedule plays makes him “a nightmare,” to play against, Rams defensive coordinator Chris Shula said.

He’s very calm back there in the pocket,” Shula said. “He has a great O-line that he trusts and he’ll stand back there forever if you let him.”

And if the pocket collapses?

“He’s able to find the little holes here and there, the little creases,” Rams edge rusher Jared Verse said. “He doesn’t always want to run. Sometimes, he can just make that big play, which is different from most quarterbacks.”

In last Sunday’s 22-10 wild-card victory over the Green Bay Packers, Hurts completed his first six passes. But his next seven fell incomplete. In the second half, he completed seven of eight, finishing the game with 131 yards passing and two touchdown passes.

“He wins,” Eagles coach Nick Sirianni told Philadelphia reporters this week. “He’s been playing efficient, and we do what we need to do to win every game.

“And Jalen does what he needs to do to win every game, and will continue to do that and not apologize for it.”

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts stiff arms a Green Bay Packers cornerback Carrington Valentine.

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts stiff arms a Green Bay Packers cornerback Carrington Valentine during the Eagles’ wild-card playoff win on Jan. 12.

(Derik Hamilton / Associated Press)

Hurts’ role, and the Eagles’ approach, is different every game, the quarterback told Philadelphia reporters.

“And you just want to go out there and do your job, take advantage of opportunities,” he said, adding, “Ultimately, it’s about winning the game. We’re talking about playoff football.”

In each of the last two games against the Eagles, Stafford passed for more than 222 yards and two touchdowns.

In last Monday’s wild-card victory over the Minnesota Vikings, he completed his first 10 passes and finished 19 of 27 for 209 yards and two touchdowns.

His most savvy play might have been his decision to flick the ball forward just as he was about to be sacked in the second quarter with the Rams holding a 10-3 lead. Officials initially ruled that Stafford had fumbled and that the Vikings had returned it for a touchdown. But upon review, it was ruled an incomplete pass.

“You don’t coach that,” McVay said. “That’s not something that we would be telling a young quarterback to go ahead and do if that same situation arises. Matthew has earned the right to be able to do some things differently.”

Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford throws a pass against the Vikings at State Farm Stadium.

Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford throws a pass during an NFC wild-card playoff win over the Minnesota Vikings on Jan. 13.

(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

Stafford’s “talent and his know-how” stand out, Eagles defensive coordinator Vic Fangio told Philadelphia reporters.

“He’s still one of the top passers in the league,” Fangio said. “Very, very smart, can read coverages better than most, if not one of the top two or three.

“Still has tremendous arm talent. Can put the ball anywhere.”

Stafford and Eagles cornerback Darius Slay were Detroit Lions teammates for seven seasons.

Slay, a 2017 All-Pro and six-time Pro Bowl pick, went against Stafford in practice, watched him in games and has played against him twice since signing with the Eagles in 2020.

Stafford remains a top-five quarterback, Slay said.

“I don’t know why folks [are] leaving him out of that conversation,” Slay said, “because there’s not many quarterbacks that have the arm talent, the guy that’s seen every coverage that’s possible, and can make all the throws.”

The Eagles must pressure Stafford, sack him on occasion and disrupt the Rams’ pass routes, Slay said.

“Because if they’re not disrupted enough, it’s going to be a good day for him,” he said, “and we don’t need a good day for him.”

Stafford is 5-1 in postseason games with the Rams. Hurts is 3–3 in the playoffs.

Three seasons ago, Stafford achieved a career highlight when he passed for two touchdowns in the Rams’ victory over the Cincinnati Bengals in Super Bowl LVI.

A year later, in Super Bowl LVII, Hurts ran for three touchdowns and passed for another only to see the Eagles fall short in the final seconds against the Kansas City Chiefs.

Whichever quarterback emerges with a victory Sunday puts another Super Bowl appearance within reach.

“I think back to the first day of training camp, how you’re feeling, and all the things that are going through your mind,” said Stafford, who will turn 37 two days before the Super Bowl LIX in New Orleans. “Looking at the end of the calendar and thinking about how long of a journey that is is sometimes overwhelming and a little bit daunting.

“But to be here now, to have worked through all the things that we’ve worked through as a team and as an individual, to get to this point and have the opportunities that we have in front of us is really fun.”



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Jarred Vanderbilt returns and helps lift Lakers over Warriors

0


Nearly a week ago, Lakers coach JJ Redick and LeBron James spoke about the margins of the game, the things that help provide cushion and cover for a team when it’s not perfect. Both said, internally, there weren’t great options for the Lakers to extend those margins.

In some ways, only a massive roster reconstruction would fix the problem. James will always be 40. Anthony Davis will always have his issues in transition defense because of the way he crashes toward the hoop. The Lakers will always lose the mathematical battle because of their lower volume of three-point attempts.

But on Saturday, one player showed in his first 12 minutes of the season the ways he could provide the Lakers with a little more room for error.

Jarred Vanderbilt, out since Feb. 1 because of foot injuries, checked in during the second quarter of the Lakers’ 118-108 win over the Golden State Warriors and immediately made an impact, delivering a much-needed boost that his skill set can provide.

“Vando was awesome,” Redick said. “Did all the things that we need him to do.”

Vanderbilt’s only bucket came on an offensive rebound, but he had three steals and four rebounds, extending possessions on the offensive end and closing them out on the defensive side.

“I knew I might be a little rusty coming in and as far as rhythm and knowing the plays and all that stuff,” Vanderbilt said. “So my main goal was just to go in there and play hard. Bring the energy and then everything else — just control the controllable and everything else will play its hand.”

It was these little things he provided that stood out as the Lakers turned in another 48 minutes of good basketball to win their third straight game.

“It looked like he didn’t miss a beat,” James said. “I mean, he’s flying around. What he does don’t even always show up in the box score.”

Vanderbilt’s contributions proved valuable for a Lakers team that was forced to make starter Rui Hachimura a late scratch because of a calf injury.

Max Christie and Gabe Vincent, two other players tasked with helping the Lakers with the little things, defended Stephen Curry wonderfully, limiting the Warriors star to 13 points on four-for-17 shooting, Curry missing all eight of his second-half attempts.

“It’s Steph, man,” James said. “Just hope that he miss. Put bodies in front of him and just hope that he miss.”

Davis dominated the Warriors’ depleted frontcourt, which was missing Jonathan Kuminga and Draymond Green, for 36 points and 13 rebounds. James had 25 points and 12 assists and Austin Reaves had 16 points and seven assists.

“The last two games, our three best players have played really well and everyone else has starred in their roles,” Redick said. “And that’s what a great team is, is guys starring in their roles. And so for Vando, him starring his role, Gabe starring his role, Max Christie starring his role, Jaxson Hayes starring his role, all those guys. … That creates a margin for us to become a great team.”

The Lakers (25-18) continue their Grammys trip Monday in Charlotte.

“We have to be ready to play every single game, regardless of who we’re playing,” Reaves said. “We need to go into every game playing to continue to get better. And we can’t take our foot off the gas. We gotta do that every single game and hopefully we have a good trip.”



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Brock Nelson’s OT goal leads Islanders to win over Hurricanes

0

What could overshadow Tony DeAngelo’s first game as an Islander — and his first game back in the NHL after a KHL stint that had looked like the end of his NHL career?

How about the roaring Islanders comeback that played out on Saturday night at UBS Arena, ending on Brock Nelson’s overtime winner to cap a 3-2 victory over the Mikko Rantanen and Taylor Hall-infused Hurricanes?

For good measure, how about the Islanders playing the whole game with five defenseman after Ryan Pulock got hurt on the first shift, then losing goaltender Marcus Hogberg to injury right before the extra period?

A jubilant Brock Nelson celebrates with Casey Cizikas (right) and Kyle Palmieri (left) after scoring the game-winning goal in the Islanders’ 3-2 overtime win over the Hurricanes on Jan. 25, 2025. AP

So much happened in 62:03 of game time on Saturday that you almost forgot: With their fourth straight victory, the Islanders are over NHL .500 for the first time since mid-November.

“There was a lot of energy and a lot of heart being given tonight,” Anders Lee said after a win that qualified as both the most emotional and most entertaining of the season for an Islanders team that has dug in its heels and absolutely refused to quit on their playoff chances, however minute. “I thought all four lines were skating as hard as they could. We were battling, grinding this one out. And look — these guys [Carolina] are the ones that have been knocking us out.”

Forty-eight games in, the Islanders’ season is hitting an inflection point in these weeks before the 4 Nations Face-Off break.

What happens now dictates whether or not a team that’s trying desperately to prove it can still be a contender will get a chance to do so post-March 7.

Just like their general manager, Lou Lamoriello, the team is refusing to cede an inch of ground.



There was an abundance of story here, but start with the comeback itself against a team that’s been a litmus test against which the Islanders have fallen short the past two postseasons.

After the Islanders spent much of the second period knocking on the door, the score stuck at 2-1 with the home side having given up a pair before Alexander Romanov cut the deficit in half at the end of the first period, their breakthrough finally came 6:26 into the third.

Anders Lee followed Bo Horvat’s initial shot by jamming it into the net, putting paid to the momentum the Islanders had steadily built for 30-plus minutes.

Islanders captain Anders Lee (left) celebrates with teammates after scoring the game-tying goal in the third period of the their comeback win over the Hurricanes. USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Con

That opened up what had been a tight match with the Islanders steadily controlling possession into a track meet, with the teams trading chances throughout the rest of a highly entertaining third period.

With Andrei Svechnikov’s shot off the crossbar being the closest either team got to a winner in regulation, though, it took three-on-three overtime to settle things.

Even that came with a twist, as Hogberg — who had played through an apparent injury that got steadily worse throughout the third — went up the tunnel before overtime, ceding the net to Ilya Sorokin.

Nelson then netted the winner from Kyle Palmieri on an odd-man rush, and the whole place went batty.

Brock Nelson is mobbed by his Islanders teammates after he scores the game-winning goal on Pyotr Kochetkov (52). AP

“We were resilient, but more than that, we showed character,” coach Patrick Roy said. “Down 2-0 in the past, it could have been worse. We stopped the bleeding. I was very proud of the way the guys played and stuck to it.”

Even with the Islanders on a decent run for the moment — they have won seven of nine and are inarguably playing their best hockey of the season — accomplishing the goal of making the playoffs is still the longest of long shots.

Most other general managers would have looked at the standings a few weeks ago and pivoted; not Lamoriello. Signing DeAngelo was another way of doubling down.

The newly minted No. 4 made his debut under tough circumstances, being asked to skate 25:10 in a system he does not know without so much as a full practice, the Islanders being forced to rely on five defenseman after Pulock got hurt.

Islanders captain Anders Lee scores the game-tying goal on Pyotr Kochetkov during the third period of their win over the Hurricanes. USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Con

DeAngelo held his own, which was about as much as anyone could have reasonably demanded.

“I don’t think I was expecting those minutes,” DeAngelo said. “I thought our team played really well.”

Pulock’s injury, though, complicates things even more. It was his three-point game in Boston early this month which helped kick the Islanders into high gear, and his renewed partnership with Adam Pelech has been a factor on a near-nightly basis.

There’s no timeline for now — all Roy would say after the game was Pulock and Hogberg both have upper-body injuries — but if Pulock does miss an extended period, the Islanders have just lost two of their most irreplaceable players in the span of a week.

Little about their situation was ideal before that became a factor. Things are now even tougher.

And still they march on.



This story originally appeared on NY Post

CNN Host Casually Mentions Biden May Have Secretly Pardoned Himself Before Leaving Office (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

0


Trump recently commented on the fact that of all the pardons issued by Biden, he didn’t pardon himself. Or did he?

CNN’s Jake Tapper was talking to NY Times journalist Maggie Haberman this week and casually suggested that it’s possible Joe Biden secretly pardoned himself before leaving office. That sounds like kind of a big deal, if true.

Wouldn’t it be nice if journalists actually did their jobs and found out if this happened?

RedState has details:

CNN anchor Jake Tapper is raising some eyebrows by speculating that there is a possibility former President Joe Biden may have issued a pardon no one knows about.

Tapper brought up the issue during an interview with New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman on CNN’s “The Lead” on Friday. He began by playing a clip from Wednesday, which has some leftists on edge, in which President Trump pointed out to Fox News host Sean Hannity that Biden didn’t deliver perhaps the most important pardon – his own…

“Although it is possible, we don’t know, but it is always possible for a president to pardon somebody and not announce it,” Tapper said, hypothesizing.

Haberman replied, “That’s true. That’s true.”

“I mean, so it’s possible Joe Biden pardoned himself, and we just don’t know about it,” Tapper said, while concluding the segment. “Who knows? Joe Biden set a lot of precedents on his way out the door.”

Here’s the video clip:

If it’s true that Joe Biden did this, we will probably find out eventually. Would anyone really be surprised at this point?




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

Thieves use explosives to steal Romanian prehistoric artefacts from Dutch museum | World News

0


Thieves used explosives to break into a museum in the Netherlands and steal several Romanian prehistoric artefacts, including a 2,500-year-old gold helmet.

They blasted open a door at the Drents Museum in the northeastern city of Assen and made off with the solid gold Geto-Dacian artefacts early on Saturday morning.

The stolen objects include the golden helmet of Cotofanesti, which dates from around 450 BCE, and three Dacian royal bracelets dated to 50 BCE. They were part of an exhibition about the Dacian empire, which was situated in present-day Romania.

The items were on loan to the museum and belong to the National History Museum in the Romanian capital Bucharest.

Image:
One of the solid-gold Dacian bracelets that was stolen. Pic: Rex

“This is a dark day for the Drents Museum in Assen and the National History Museum of Romania in Bucharest,” Drents Museum general director Harry Tupan said.

“In its 170-year existence, there has never been such a major incident.”

Romania’s President Klaus Iohannis said Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof had assured him the authorities were taking “all necessary measures to identify the suspects and recover the artefacts”.

The stolen Dacian bracelets were among around a dozen recovered by authorities after they were initially looted from the ruins of Dacian fortresses in Romania and sold off on the black market in the 1990s.

Read more from Sky News:
Mosques vandalised with graffiti in ‘shocking hate crime’
WH Smith in secret talks to sell historic high street arm
Tech companies ‘risk another Southport’, home secretary warns

No one was injured in the explosion at the museum, which damaged the building, and no arrests have been made.

Police believe several people committed the robbery and they have decided to involve Interpol in their investigation.

Officers found a burning car near Assen and suggested the suspects switched to another vehicle.

They have appealed for anyone with information on the suspects or the stolen artefacts to come forward.



This story originally appeared on Skynews