Fans of The Rockford Files probably wondered, “Is that all there is?” when James Garner’s private-eye drama ended abruptly in 1980, midway through Season 6. The NBC show, which celebrates another anniversary on September 13, ended with a sixth season only half the length of the others — cut short due to an ugly, protracted legal battle between Garner and Universal Studios. It wasn’t until the 1990s, after the lawsuit was resolved, that a series of CBS TV movies continued Jim Rockford’s story.
Here’s what happened in the last episode of the original series, and why it all came to a screeching halt.
Passive income refers to generating revenue from minimal effort. My favourite method is picking up dividends from UK shares. But in some respects, I think the term can be misleading. There’s nothing to be gained from being passive when it comes to choosing stocks. The more time spent on up-front research, the more likely the right shares will be picked.
The most common measure used to identify stocks paying the most generous dividends is to look at the yield on offer. And because there are no guarantees when it comes to future payouts, it’s common to only consider amounts paid to shareholders during the previous 12 months. Even so, it’s important to exercise some care.
Buyer beware
For example, a look at the league table of the five highest-yieldingFTSE 100 shares shows WPP (LSE:WPP) in first place.
Stock
Yield (%)
WPP
9.9
Taylor Wimpey
9.7
Legal & General
8.9
Phoenix Group
8.3
M&G
7.9
But in August, the advertising and marketing agency reported its results for the six months ended 30 June. These showed a 7.8% fall in revenue compared to the same period in 2024. More significantly, pre-tax profit fell 71%.
The group’s chief executive said: “It has been a challenging first half given pressures on client spending and a slower new business environment.”
As a consequence, the group’s now expecting full-year revenue less pass-through costs (its preferred performance measure) to be 3-5% lower than last year. The group also announced a 50% cut in its interim dividend. If the final payout was reduced by the same amount, the stock would be yielding 5%. This is still above the FTSE 100 average but nowhere near the 9.9% reported.
And while a return like this is still better than that offered on most savings accounts, I think there’s too much uncertainty over the state of the global advertising market to make me want to invest. Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions are making it easier for firms to make their own creative content. Also, while WPP retains an impressive blue-chip client base and has a huge global reach, I think there are currently better opportunities elsewhere.
Something else to think about
For example, there’s one stock listed in the Footsie top five that last cut its dividend in 2009. And if it wasn’t for the pandemic – when it kept its payout unchanged for one year — Legal & General (LSE:LGEN) could boast about having increased it every year since. The savings and retirement group has pledged to increase its payout by 2% a year from 2025-2027. It’s also buying back its own shares.
Although the group faces increased competition from challenger brands — often with a lower-cost base — and it’s vulnerable to uncertainty in global stock and bond markets, it sees great potential from acquiring new pension schemes to manage. It reckons £1trn of these assets are up for grabs across the globe. The group also calculates that the future profit from its insurance business is worth £13.1bn in current (at 30 June) prices.
For its impressive yield and long track record of dividend growth — underpinned by a huge pipeline of future pensions business and a strong balance sheet – I think Legal & General could be a stock to consider.
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is asking a U.S. appeals court to reject the Trump administration’s latest bid to remove her from her post ahead of the central bank’s next vote on interest rates.
In a filing with the court Saturday, attorneys on behalf of Cook asked the court to refuse an emergency request by the Trump administration for a stay of a lower court ruling that would clear the way for President Donald Trump to remove Cook from the Federal Reserve’s board of governors.
Lawyers for Cook argue that the Trump administration has not shown sufficient cause to fire her, and stressed the risks to the economy and country if the president were allowed to fire a Fed governor without cause.
“A stay by this court would therefore be the first signal from the courts that our system of government is no longer able to guarantee the independence of the Federal Reserve. Nothing would then stop the president from firing other members of the board on similarly flimsy pretexts. The era of Fed independence would be over. The risks to the nation’s economy could be dire,” according to the filing.
The court has given the Trump administration the option to respond to Cook’s filing by 3 p.m. Eastern on Sunday.
At stake is whether the Trump administration will succeed in its extraordinary effort to shape the board before the Fed’s interest rate-setting committee meets Tuesday and Wednesday. At the same time, Senate Republicans are pushing to confirm Stephen Miran, President Donald Trump’s nominee to an open spot on the Fed’s board, which could happen as soon as Monday.
Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud because she appeared to claim two properties as “primary residences” in July 2021, before she joined the board. Such claims can lead to a lower mortgage rate and smaller down payment than if one of them was declared as a rental property or second home.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb ruled the administration had not satisfied a legal requirement that Fed governors can only be fired “for cause,” which she said was limited to misconduct while in office. Cook did not join the Fed’s board until 2022.
The administration then appealed the decision and asked for an emergency ruling reversing the lower court order by Monday. In their emergency appeal, Trump’s lawyers argued that even if the conduct occurred before Cook’s time as governor, her alleged action “indisputably calls into question Cook’s trustworthiness and whether she can be a responsible steward of the interest rates and economy.”
If the Trump administration’s appeal succeeds, Cook would be removed from the Fed’s board until her case is ultimately resolved in the courts, and she would miss next week’s Fed meeting, when the central bank is set to decide whether to reduce its key interest rate.
If the appeals court rules in Cook’s favor, the administration could seek an emergency ruling from the Supreme Court.
The Fed is under relentless pressure from Trump to cut rates. The central bank has held rates steady since late 2024 over worries that the Trump administration’s unpredictable tariff policies will reignite inflation.
Last month, Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that Fed officials are increasingly concerned about weaker hiring, setting the stage for a rate cut next week. Most economists expect the Fed will cut its benchmark interest rate by a quarter-point to about 4.1%.
When the Fed reduces its key rate, it often, over time, lowers borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and business loans. Some of those rates have already fallen in anticipation of cuts from the Fed.
Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.
Donald Trump’s state visit next week will stand the UK in good stead to have “a better bilateral relationship with the US than any other country in the world”.
That’s the view of the man who was the head of the UK’s Foreign Office and Diplomatic service during Trump’s last state visit in 2019, as other British diplomatic insiders from the first Trump presidency say it’s essential he gets the honour again to keep onside “a man who changes his mind easily”.
Yes, we’ve seen Donald Trump in the UK for one of these before but brace yourselves for a supercharged state visit this coming week.
In April, Trump told reporters: “They’re going to do a second, as you know, a second fest… that’s what it is: a fest, and it’s beautiful, and it’s the first time it’s ever happened to one person.”
I wouldn’t be surprised if there were a few people in the Foreign Office and the palace who spat their tea into their china cups in surprise at that description, but it illustrated just how excited the president was and set the bar very high for what he expects.
Which is why they are literally rolling out all the red carpet they can find. The president and first lady are due to stay at Windsor Castle, they will get a carriage ride with the King and Queen, and we’ll see more military pageantry than we’ve seen for any other world leader on recent state visits.
Image: Donald Trump and Queen Elizabeth II during the State Banquet at Buckingham Palace in 2019. Pic: PA
Everything has been organised to be bigger and look more spectacular, and the White House will no doubt be delighted.
We have been here before. In 2019, it was a different monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, and a different location, Buckingham Palace. But again it was a huge display of how hard we were working to keep the US president on side.
Lord Simon McDonald was the permanent under-secretary at the Foreign Office and head of the Diplomatic Service at the time of that visit. He told me they didn’t have any trouble filling the seats for the “full monty” state banquet, and it was a trip that cemented President Trump’s relationship with the United Kingdom. “It’s not just about carriages and tiaras. It’s about the world agenda,” he said.
“India right now is suffering as a country because of a spat between Donald Trump and the prime minister of India. So, having Donald Trump in a positive frame of mind, I think, means that the UK has a better chance, probably a better bilateral relationship with the United States than any other country in the world.”
Keir Starmer, producing the invitation letter with such flourish from his inside top pocket in the Oval Office back in February, is another moment that may have made a few diplomats and palace staff splutter, with the King’s carefully chosen words wafted around for all the cameras to see.
Image: The president was hosted by the Queen in June 2019. Pic: Reuters
But the main reason that would have made some cringe is that state visits are seen as the ultimate diplomatic gift. Hence, the questions over whether Donald Trump deserves the unprecedented honour of a second state visit.
But it is a powerful card that only the UK can play when we need to. And the government believes now is one of those moments.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:39
Is the UK ready for a ‘Trump-fest’?
Lord Kim Darroch was the UK’s ambassador to the US at the time of Trump’s first state visit – a trip, where despite him criticising prime minister Theresa May in the run-up, the president “was absolute charm personified”.
He explained that this time, while the president is being wined and dined by the Royal Family, others will be pressing the flesh behind the scenes on matters of defence, business, and more.
“I mean, our relationship with Europe, with the European Union, is very important, but in terms of bilateral relationships, this is the biggest,” Lord Darroch told me. “If we had bad relations with the US, which translated into high tariffs, people would be losing their jobs in this country, and industries would be going bankrupt.
“So this is pure British interests at base. This really matters to us. We’ve made a good start for Donald Trump’s second term, but he’s a man who changes his mind easily.
“There’s always a threat of further tariffs out there. We need to keep that relationship as close as we can for the duration of his second term.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:39
Is the UK ready for a ‘Trump-fest’?
Lord McDonald agrees and can understand why this visit has happened so quickly.
“Donald Trump, in his second administration, is doing things more quickly and more comprehensively than any of his predecessors. So getting in early, making your points effectively when there’s still three and a half years of the presidency to run, I think, is a better investment for the UK than waiting until the last six months he’s in office.”
It is still controversial, protests are planned, although the president won’t see them from the confines of Windsor Castle, where he’ll spend most of his time.
But the glamour of the castle can’t erase the backdrop of the recent Epstein scandal for both the UK government and the White House, and the ongoing geopolitical turmoil.
Image: Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at Trump International Golf Links in July 2025. Pic: PA
Trump won’t want any of that to overshadow his time with the Royal Family, but more of that may play out when he meets the prime minister at Chequers on Thursday.
However, author and journalist Michael Wolff, who has written several books on the president, including Fire And Fury, believes Trump will see this trip as a good distraction.
Wolff also travelled to the UK for the 2019 visit with Steve Bannon, the White House strategist fired by Trump. “One of the things is that (visit) left the president feeling great,” he said.
“Often, the president doesn’t feel great. He feels angry… So they were all grateful that the Queen had been nice to him.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:46
Will Trump address parliament on UK state visit?
Talking about what we should expect this time, he told me: “Remember, Trump is a performer. It is all about Trump and Trump’s image.
“So what he’s looking for are some photo ops which are not just even helpful to him, but ones that can make him feel good, bolster the sense of himself. You know, I can’t see anything meaningful coming out of this on a policy basis or particularly on a political basis. I mean, this is a vanity trip.”
No doubt the US president will get the memories he wants, and this time everyone knows what to expect… who can forget the pictures of Trump walking in front of the Queen in 2018, even though that turned out to be Her Majesty’s mistake.
Once again, the interactions with the Royal Family will be something to behold – they always are on these state visits. Just look at those pictures of French President Emmanuel Macron winking at any royal he could clap eyes on during his recent state banquet.
But whether or not you agree that Trump deserves every bell and whistle of pageantry we can muster, ultimately the cost of it all has already been declared worth it in diplomatic circles before he’s even stepped off the plane.
A demonstrator stands on the head of the South Bank lion that sits on the side of the Westminster Bridge, during a Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally in London, on Saturday.
Joanna Chan/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Joanna Chan/AP
LONDON — A London march organized by far-right activist Tommy Robinson drew more than 110,000 people and became unruly on Saturday as a small group of his supporters clashed with police officers who were separating them from counterprotesters.
Several officers were punched, kicked and struck by bottles tossed by people at the fringes of the “Unite the Kingdom” rally, Metropolitan Police said. Reinforcements with helmets and riot shields were deployed to support the 1,000-plus officers on duty.
Twenty-six police officers were injured — four who were seriously hurt, including broken teeth and a concussion, a possible broken nose and a spinal injury. At least 25 people were arrested for offenses including violent disorder, assaults and criminal damage, and the investigation continues, police said.
“There is no doubt that many came to exercise their lawful right to protest, but there were many who came intent on violence,” Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said. “They confronted officers, engaging in physical and verbal abuse and making a determined effort to breach cordons in place to keep everyone safe.”
The rally drew an estimated crowd of between 110,000 and 150,000 people, far surpassing expectations, police said. The rival “March Against Fascism” protest organized by Stand Up To Racism had about 5,000 marchers.
Tommy Robinson speaks during the Unite the Kingdom march and rally near Westminster, London, on Saturday.
Joanna Chan/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Joanna Chan/AP
Anti-migrant theme
Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, founded the nationalist and anti-Islam English Defense League and is one of the most influential far-right figures in Britain.
The march was billed as a demonstration in support of free speech — with much of the rhetoric by influencers and several far-right politicians from across Europe aimed largely at the perils of migration, a problem much of the continent is struggling to control.
“We are both subject to the same process of the great replacement of our European people by peoples coming from the south and of Muslim culture, you and we are being colonized by our former colonies,” far-right French politician Eric Zemmour said.
Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO and owner of the X platform who has waded into British politics several times this year, was beamed in by video and condemned the left-leaning U.K. government.
“There’s something beautiful about being British and what I see happening here is a destruction of Britain, initially a slow erosion, but rapidly increasing erosion of Britain with massive uncontrolled migration,” he said.
Robinson told the crowd in a hoarse voice that migrants now had more rights in court than the “British public, the people that built this nation.”
The marches come at a time when the U.K. has been divided by debate over migrants crossing the English Channel in overcrowded inflatable boats to arrive on shore without authorization.
Numerous anti-migrant protests were held this summer outside hotels housing asylum-seekers following the arrest of an Ethiopian man who was later convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in a London suburb. Some of those protests became violent and led to arrests.
Sea of flags
Participants in the “Unite the Kingdom” march carried the St. George’s red-and-white flag of England and the union jack, the state flag of the United Kingdom, and chanted “we want our country back.”
U.K. flags have proliferated this summer across the U.K. — at events and on village lampposts — in what some have said is a show of national pride and others said reflects a tilt toward nationalism.
Supporters held signs saying “stop the boats,” “send them home,” and “enough is enough, save our children.”
At the counterprotest, the crowd held signs saying “refugees welcome” and “smash the far right,” and shouted “stand up, fight back.”
Several speakers paid tribute to Kirk, who was remembered in a moment of silence, followed by a bagpiper playing “Amazing Grace.”
One demonstrator held a sign saying: “Freedom of speech is dead. RIP Charlie Kirk.”
Crowd covered blocks of London
The crowd at one point stretched from Big Ben across the River Thames and around the corner beyond Waterloo train station, a distance of about three-quarters of a mile (around a kilometer).
The marches had been mostly peaceful, but toward the late afternoon, “Unite the Kingdom” supporters threw items at the rival rally and tried to break through barriers set up to separate the groups, police said. Officers had to use force to keep a crowd-control fence from being breached.
Counterprotesters heckled a man with blood pouring down his face who was being escorted by police from the group of Robinson supporters. It wasn’t immediately clear what happened to him.
While the crowd was large, it fell far short of the one of the biggest recent marches when a pro-Palestinian rally drew an estimated 300,000 people in November 2023.
Robinson had planned a “Unite the Kingdom” rally last October, but couldn’t attend after being jailed for contempt of court for violating a 2021 High Court order barring him from repeating libelous allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him. He previously served jail time for assault and mortgage fraud.
Netflix has officially green-lit Season 2 of the provocative drama series “The Hunting Wives.” The statement of renewal from the show’s official Instagram page hints at more unfolding drama filled with romantic tension and small-town secrets. Fans of the series, with its bold storytelling and LGBTQ+ representation, had already started to celebrate.
Advertisement
The post read simply: “More hunting, more wife-ing, more Margophie – Season 2 of #TheHuntingWives is officially on its way! 🤠.” A short clip followed with the caption, “I think this party just got a whole lot better.” The website kept with the playful vibe of teasing hard-hitting drama with a dash of dark humor.
The reactions from ecstatic viewers could be heard almost instantly. A fan commented, “Yessssss I am soo happy that Netflix didn’t kill another wlw crazy drama,” referring to Netflix’s sometimes controversial resume of canceling queer-led shows. Another commented simply, “this is my roman empire,” an expression from pop culture used to mean that this show is the only thing on their mind.
Much of the commentary came in relation to the Margo-Sophie, or “Margophie,” compatriotship coined by the fandom. “I’m so curious when Margo finds out what Sophie did.. 🫣 how the show is going to start! .. so mannyyy questions,” one off-kilter commentator set forth on the cliffhanger that had audiences begging for an answer. Clearly, the biggest selling point for this series is the anticipation that this relationship generates and how they look to work this into their narrative.
Not all comments were celebratory as some international fans complained about the limited distribution of the series. “Why isn’t it in UK yet?!!” wondered one Twitter user, while others from Norway, France, and Germany were begging for releases in their countries. Demand is truly global; however, availability is not.
Soon following came requests for the series to be extended: “We need a 12 episode season 2, I’m just saying! 8 episodes just isn’t enough,” said one fan, echoing the sentiments of most binge watchers, who savor these storylines. “Bring Bridget Regan and Sophia Bush in Season 2!! 🤭❤️🔥❤️🔥” went another comment, likely from a fellow dreaming fan.
There is also book-to-screen speculation: “Its true Margon will die?” responded by “no. she dies in the book. in the series, they killed jill instead.” Such very involved and detail-oriented discourse is just another example that shows this audience’s investment in their characters and their fates.
Advertisement
The renewal is big for a show that parades queer women in a genre usually dominated by heteronormative storytelling. Just like a fan said, “it’s a good day for the lesbians.” The renewal promised more episodes but it also confirmed the show’s position as one of the most-shared and beloved programs in the loudest voice from amongst his friends made by the passionate fans. Filming has not yet ceased, while no official release dates have been set for Season 2.
Ellen DeGeneres may have traded her loud life in LA for a quieter one in the United Kingdom. However, that doesn’t exempt her from remaining at the center of controversies in the US. Ellen DeGeneres has allegedly been been sued over a car crash accident.
The alleged car crash happened in October 2023
As per TMZ, DeGeneres has been served with a negligence lawsuit based on an alleged car accident. The accident is said to have taken place in October 2023, in the Santa Barbara county. The court documents reportedly state that the comedian failed to halt at a posted sign, crashing into a Tesla at a 4-way intersection.
The unnamed woman involved in this car accident had apparently stopped her car completely. After checking for all the signs, she advanced forward. However, as she moved, Ellen’s car allegedly collided with hers. She contends that as a result of that, she sustained several injuries, and is now pursuing compensation.
The lawsuit comes after a whirlwind of scandals that Ellen has been a part of. She faced severe backlash for encouraging a toxic work environment. Following that, she had a public altercation with Rosie O’Donnell. In addition, she once again found herself in hot water after claiming that she was kicked out of show business for being mean.
Once the host of a hugely popular talk show, Ellen has faced a series of incidents and revelations that have left her at a disadvantage.
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett came to my mind this week. His approach of being fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful was specifically what I thought about, as I added a share back into my Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) after selling it years ago.
That share was sportswear retailer Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ: LULU). Investors seemed to be fearful after the company issued a profit warning last week.
The Lululemon share price fell sharply after that and is now 57% lower than at the start of 2025. To me, that looks like it might turn out to be a terrific bargain over the long term.
Not for the impatient
At face value, the current valuation looks cheap. The price-to-earnings ratio is just 11, for a company with a loyal fanbase and impressive pricing power. Last year, for example, Lululemon’s net profit margin was 17%.
But the prospective price-to-earnings ratio is likely well above 11, as the company’s earnings look set to fall.
The retailer has seen enthusiasm among its key North American customer base fall. Comparable sales in the Americas for the second quarter fell 4%. Lululemon also announced an expected $240m hit to full-year gross profit due to US tariff and import rule changes, even after taking actions like raising prices and pushing manufacturers for lower costs.
With the US economy looking fairly weak, consumers might delay splashing out on its pricy core yoga gear. One fear a lot of investors seem to have is that things may get worse at Lululemon before they get better.
Profit warnings sometimes follow one another in fairly rapid succession (UK-based sportswear retailer JD Sports has demonstrated that over the past couple of years).
I see a potential opportunity
I accept that, as I am a believer in long-term investing. But I decided to add Lululemon shares to my SIPP because of its long-term business model and short-term management actions.
Management’s response to the disappointing second results had candour. The company recognises that it has been lacking sufficient newness is some of its product ranges in North America and plans to fix that.
That sounds simple but could already go a long way to stemming the revenue decline in the Americas, in my opinion.
What really excites me about Lululemon though, is not the immediate fixes but the longer-term growth story.
Strong international sales momentum
While comparable sales in the Americas fell in the second quarter compared to the prior year period, net revenue for that region actually inched up as Lululemon has been opening stores.
Meanwhile, international net revenue grew by more than a fifth year-on-year. While Americans may be showing some signs of fatigue, international consumers clearly still cannot get enough of Lululemon.
The company has a strong brand, limited large-scale competition with a yoga focus, proven business model and strong economics. It remains solidly profitable despite the profit warning and is sitting on over $1bn of cash and cash equivalents.
In coming months and perhaps years, Lululemon shares may move even lower. Over the long term though, I am optimistic the growth story combined with current share price make this a smart buy for my SIPP.
Absent a Hail Mary, Glenn County’s only hospital is set to close its doors in October.
Tucked between two national forests, the rural county is home to 28,000 people. Without a local emergency room, they’ll instead have to travel at least 40 minutes to a neighboring county for critical care. One hundred and fifty health workers will lose their jobs; they’re already resigning to seek work elsewhere.
The planned closure of Glenn Medical Center follows a decision by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to strip the hospital’s federal “critical access” designation, a status that has provided Glenn Medical increased reimbursement and regulatory flexibility. Without that status, the hospital’s $28 million in net annual revenue will take a hit of about 40% — a gap too large to fill any other way than closing the hospital, said Lauren Still, the hospital’s chief executive.
“It’s heartbreaking that we come to this. I am still kind of praying for that 11th-hour miracle to come through,” Still said. “But honestly, we just have to be realistic, and this is the hand we’ve been dealt.”
Over the last several months, Still and her team have been attempting to make their case with the federal health agency, even flying to Washington, D.C., in July in an attempt to lobby their case.
At the crux of the issue is a federal rule, newly reinterpreted, that requires critical access hospitals to be at least 35 miles from the next closest hospital when traveling by main roads. Officials at CMS now say that the next closest hospital, Colusa Medical Center, is only 32 miles away — three miles short of the required distance.
Glenn Medical Center and county health officials argue that most people and ambulances take a different route, I-5 to Highway 20. That route is 35.7 miles, a distance that would qualify.
“We really felt that by getting all of our stories out there … showing all of the different people that would be impacted by this decision, we really thought that would be enough information for them [CMS] to consider the human and practical considerations of their decision,” Still said. “Unfortunately, the only thing that matters is how they’re measuring the distance on the roads.”
The feds first notified Glenn Medical in April that a recertification review found the hospital was not eligible for the critical access program. Hospital officials clung to hope that an appeal and communication with the agency would clarify the situation. But in a letter dated Aug. 13, the agency told the hospital it was standing by its original decision.
“After reviewing the hospital’s additional information, CMS found that the hospital continues to not meet the distance requirement,” the letter reads.
The locations of Glenn Medical Center and its neighbor a county over have not changed since Glenn Medical first became eligible for the critical access program in 2001. CalMatters asked the federal agency why it was seeking to revoke the hospital’s designation now after more than two decades of eligibility at the same distance. The agency did not directly answer the question, but in an email simply reiterated the requirements to qualify for the program.
CMS said Glenn Medical Center could convert to another provider type in order to continue participating in the Medicare program. But Still said no other Medicare reimbursement model would pay the hospital at a financially sustainable rate. Under the critical access program, the federal government pays hospitals 101% of their costs for inpatient and outpatient services provided to Medicare patients.
U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Richvale Republican who represents Glenn County, said he continues to have conversations with Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator at CMS. He said they last spoke last week.
“We’re not giving up by any stretch; we’re going to pull out all the stops,” LaMalfa said. “We had a really good conversation with Dr. Oz and are looking for a way to make it work because the closure is not acceptable. It’s a technical issue that we ought to find a way to work through.”
LaMalfa said he is considering introducing a bill that could update the mileage requirement or give CMS more discretion when evaluating rural hospitals. But it’s unclear that something could get done before October.
Glenn Medical Center and its staff cannot wait for much longer. The hospital announced it would keep its clinics open, but inpatient services will cease Oct. 21. Still said that’s when she expects to no longer have enough staff to be able to operate.
“We had to start talking to staff and telling staff that, “Hey, we don’t have a future here. There’s no viable path forward for us without that critical access designation,’” Still said. “At that point, we started getting staff resignations.”
With the announced closure, most Glenn County residents will have to seek emergency services either at the hospital in Colusa County or further away at Butte County’s Enloe Medical Center, a larger Level II trauma center in Chico.
“We are actively reviewing available resources to ensure our readiness to absorb anticipated increased patient volumes at the Enloe Health Emergency Department,” wrote Enloe Health in an unsigned statement.
Glenn County’s two ambulances will also have to travel further and be outside the county for longer periods of time, leaving residents with even more limited emergency resources.
The announced closure is a stark reminder of the precarious state of California’s rural hospitals. Even with increased Medicare reimbursement, Glenn Medical Center’s annual financial statements show that the hospital consistently operated in the red.
Two years ago, the state bailed out 17 rural and community hospitals – Glenn Medical was not one of them – by loaning them close to $300 million altogether. That loan program was largely prompted by the closure of Madera Community Hospital, which also left an entire county without emergency services. After bankruptcy proceedings, Madera Community is now owned and operated by American Advanced Management, a for-profit company that has made a business out of rescuing distressed and shuttered hospitals. The company also owns Glenn Medical Center.
“It’s devastating for our group from a personal perspective because we really do pride ourselves in being somebody who comes in and reopens hospitals,” Still said. “When we go into a community, we make that promise to the community that we’re not going to bail on them.”
Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson is on “special watch” in the Utah County Jail while he is being evaluated to determine if he is a risk to himself, CBS News reported.
Tyler Robinson, 22, was taken into custody on Friday morning after his father confronted him about the murder.
Charlie Kirk was murdered in cold blood on Wednesday at an event at Utah Valley University after Robinson opened fire from an elevated position from a rooftop.
Robinson’s father, a veteran police officer, confronted him after Utah authorities released new photos of the suspect on Thursday.
According to the probable cause affidavit, a family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to the murder.
Authorities tracked Robinson walking across a grassy area north of Campus Drive at 11:50 am, approximately 23 minutes before he assassinated Kirk.
Robinson was also captured on surveillance video running across the rooftop of the Losee Center building at 12:23 – seconds after he shot Kirk.
On Saturday it was reported that Robinson lived with his transgender lover, Lance Twiggs.