Thursday, October 2, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 249

‘At night we don’t sleep’: How a West Bank family are facing harassment by young Israeli settlers | World News

0


The further we go, the rougher the terrain becomes, jolting the car as we drive along a mountain track strewn with rocks.

And then we round a corner and there is a sleeping dog, a circle of chairs and two women smiling and beckoning us to follow them.

This is Fatima and her mother-in-law, Fadda. They live in a makeshift camp perched on a rocky ledge.

Image:
Fatima (left) and Fadda say they are afraid their homes could be set alight

Behind their tent is a cave, in which there are chickens and a bed. In front of it is the path where we now stand, and then a precipice that looks down upon a ravine.

They invite us into a tent to talk. Sweet tea is brought out, and so is the story of how their home was demolished, their car stolen, their peace destroyed and why they now have to hide their flock of sheep.

But before all that, Fatima takes us out and points at a ridge behind their camp.

We can see a small black structure, just visible against the dark rock. “That is where they are,” she says. “The settlers come down from there.”

The family say settlers are constantly coming to their camp home to harass them
Image:
The family say settlers are constantly coming to their camp home to harass them

Every day, people come down to her home. Unwelcome visitors.

“We’d be baking bread, and they would come, lay out their mattresses and just sit there. When we told them to leave, they’d return with more settlers and an armed soldier.”

And the soldier, always, would be on the side of the settlers.

“At night we don’t sleep,” says Fadda, smiling through the pain.

“We stay awake waiting for the settlers. Four or five of them come in their cars each night, sometimes on motorcycles, right up to our doorstep to terrify the children.

“We sit through the night, afraid they’ll set fire to our homes and belongings, trying to force us to flee with our kids.”

We see videos, shared widely on social media, of Fadda confronting a young settler who has come to menace the family.

Fadda confronted a young settler in a video shared on social media
Image:
Fadda confronted a young settler in a video shared on social media

He stands right in front of her, staring her straight in the eyes, trying to push her forward. Fadda responds by standing her ground, smiling gently at him.

“This happens every single day,” says Fatima. “If we didn’t stand up for ourselves, we would have left long ago. The problem is, they’re children.

“They send the kids down on purpose to provoke us, to push us off our land. That’s why we’ve had to build this resilience.”

Fadda says the settlers come 'right up to our doorstep to terrify the children'
Image:
Fadda says the settlers come ‘right up to our doorstep to terrify the children’

Their tale of suffering is desperate. They tell me the family used to live in a house, which was demolished by the Israel military.

An hour later we drive past its remains – a huge pile of twisted metal and rubble. Their car has been taken so they have to walk to distant shops under the baking sun.

Mobile phones have been stolen along with computers and animals. Their flock of sheep is now kept in another place, hidden from sight.

‘This is our land’

“The situation has become really bad,” says Fatima. “Not just for us, but for the whole West Bank.”

And yet the family is determined to stay. “This is our land,” say both women, almost in unison. The brutal truth is also that they have nowhere else to go.

The West Bank is dotted with Israeli settlements, from top to bottom, some large and long-established, with thousands of residents and a sprawling infrastructure; some small and very new, with just a few caravans parked on a hilltop.

All of them are based on the idea of extending the reach of the Israeli state by placing its people all over the West Bank, or at least turning a blind eye to them moving there.

The fact that these settlements are, by widespread consent, illegal under international law has not stopped them from proliferating. Quite the opposite.

Not only are they growing in number and size, but the Israeli government is lending them ever more support and legitimacy.

Read more:
Inside the conflict forcing Palestinians from their homes
West Bank: The city locked down by armed troops

Bezalel Smotrich wants Israel to annex more than 82% of the West Bank. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Bezalel Smotrich wants Israel to annex more than 82% of the West Bank. Pic: Reuters

Now, the far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, has declared that it’s time for Israel to annex more than 82% of the West Bank.

His logic can be summed up like this: we’re not safe with neighbours like this, and according to the Bible, it should be our land anyway.

Not everyone will agree, and perhaps most outside Israel will strongly disagree, but Smotrich is, as always, unapologetic and unabashed.

“Beyond our Biblical, historical and moral right to the entire land of Israel, the political and security role of sovereignty is to ensure that a Palestinian Arab terror state is never established in our land,” he said.

“Enemies should be fought, not provided with comfortable lives.”

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

The West Bank has, for decades, been a crucible for ever-growing mistrust and dislike. It has seen waves of terrible violence and chronic divisions.

There is no sign of things improving, but plenty of suggestions that they are getting worse.



This story originally appeared on Skynews

Trump asks Supreme Court to reverse tariffs ruling finding them illegal : NPR

0


President Donald Trump listens during a meeting with Polish President Karol Nawrocki in the Oval Office of the White House on Sept. 3, 2025, in Washington.

Evan Vucci/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Evan Vucci/AP

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration took the fight over tariffs to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, asking the justices to rule quickly that the president has the power to impose sweeping import taxes under federal law.

The government called on the court to reverse an appeals court ruling that found most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs are an illegal use of an emergency powers law.

It’s the latest in a series of Trump administration appeals to a Supreme Court he helped shape, and one that is expected to put a centerpiece of the president’s trade policy before the justices.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit left the tariffs in place for now, but the administration nevertheless called on the high court to intervene quickly in a petition filed electronically late Wednesday and provided to The Associated Press. It was expected to be formally docketed on Thursday.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the justices to take up the case and hear arguments in early November.

“That decision casts a pall of uncertainty upon ongoing foreign negotiations that the President has been pursuing through tariffs over the past five months, jeopardizing both already negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations,” he wrote. “The stakes in this case could not be higher.”

But the stakes are also high for small businesses battered by tariffs and uncertainty, said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel and director of litigation at the Liberty Justice Center.

“These unlawful tariffs are inflicting serious harm on small businesses and jeopardizing their survival. We hope for a prompt resolution of this case for our clients,” he said.

The businesses have twice prevailed, once at a federal court focused on trade and again with the appeals court’s 7-4 ruling.

Their lawsuit is one of several challenging the tariffs and erratic rollout that have shaken global markets, alienated U.S. trading partners and allies and raised fears of higher prices and slower economic growth.

But Trump has also used the levies to pressure the European Union, Japan and other countries into accepting new trade deals. Revenue from tariffs totaled $159 billion by late August, more than double what it was at the same point the year before.

Most judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, did not let Trump usurp congressional power to set tariffs. The dissenters, though, said the law does allow the president to regulate importation during emergencies without explicit limitations.

The ruling involves two sets of import taxes, both of which Trump justified by declaring a national emergency: the tariffs first announced in April and the ones from February on imports from Canada, China and Mexico.

The Constitution gives Congress the power to impose taxes, including tariffs. But over the decades, lawmakers have ceded authority to the president, and Trump has made the most of the power vacuum.

Some Trump tariffs, including levies on foreign steel, aluminum and autos, weren’t covered by the appeals court ruling. It also does not include tariffs Trump imposed on China in his first term that were kept by Democratic President Joe Biden.

Trump can impose tariffs under other laws, but those have more limitations on the speed and severity with which he could act.

The government has argued that if the tariffs are struck down, it might have to refund some of the import taxes that it’s collected, delivering a financial blow to the U.S. Treasury.



This story originally appeared on NPR

2 UK stocks that could protect one’s ISA from a stock market crash!

0


Image source: Getty Images

Speculation about a stock market crash is intensifying as the bond market sell-off deepens and investors seek safe havens like gold. With September historically being a weak period for UK stocks anyway, many Stocks and Shares ISA investors are fearing a sharp retracement on equity markets.

But this doesn’t mean share pickers should retreat, in my opinion. Indeed, here are two top UK shares to consider even in the current uncertain climate.

Brand hero

Consumer staples producers like Unilever (LSE:ULVR) often outperform the broader stock market during bearish periods. Foods, and personal care and household goods products tend to remain broadly stable over time, providing these companies with good earnings visibility that supports their share prices.

That’s not all. In the case of this FTSE 100 share, it enjoys exceptional brand power through labels like Dove soap and shower gel, Magnum ice cream, and Persil detergent. This supports consumer demand even during economic downturns, and even allows the firm scope to raise prices to grow earnings even when consumers feel the pinch.

Indeed, latest financials showed underlying sales up 3.4% between January and June despite tough broader conditions. Volumes and sales were up 1.5% and 1.9% in the same 2024 period.

With its successful advertising campaigns and strong record of innovation, Unilever has proved a robust stock to own over time. Be mindful, though, that its marketing costs aren’t small and sometimes prove a significant challenge to earnings growth.

On balance, I think the Footsie company’s a top stock to consider in uncertain times like these.

Gold star

As mentioned at the top, gold demand is rising as investors seek out classic defensive assets. One that I think is worth serious attention right now is the VanEck Gold Miners (LSE:GDGB) exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Gold prices are surging right now, and earlier today struck new peaks near $3,450 per ounce. The yellow metal is now up 42% in the year to date, and is tipped for further gains as inflationary and growth pressures rise.

Funds like this VanEck one track the gold price, as their profits are naturally linked closely to metal prices. However, they can also rise in value more sharply than the precious metal. This is thanks to the ‘leverage’ effect, where — thanks to their relatively fixed costs — each extra dollar of revenue drops straight into the bottom line, meaning profits can grow more sharply.

Remember, though, that this phenomenon works in both directions, so earnings falls can be more pronounced if gold prices drop.

I like the VanEck Gold Miners fund because of the way it allocates capital. A focus on large-cap miners like Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, and Wheaton Precious Metals can provide stability not afforded by ETFs that concentrate on junior miners.

Furthermore, it holds shares in 62 different companies. This broad footprint provides decent protection for investors in the event of one or two miners experiencing operational issues.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Anger over TikTok video of Santa Barbara clinic staff mocking patients

0

A group of healthcare workers in Santa Barbara were fired on Wednesday after posting a video apparently showing patients’ bodily fluids on TikTok, according to their employer.

The now-deleted post, made by a former employee at Sansum Clinic — a nonprofit outpatient care facility owned by Sutter Health — showed eight workers mocking what appeared to be the bodily fluid of patients on exam tables with the on-screen caption, “Are patients allowed to leave you guys gifts?” and “Make sure you leave your healthcare workers sweet gifts like these!” In one image, the medical staff are seen pointing and smiling at a spot with their thumbs up. The caption reads, “Guess the substance!”

A spokesperson for Sacramento-based health system Sutter Health said that, although the original poster was not an employee at the time the video was posted, others who appeared in it had been terminated.

“This unacceptable behavior is an outright violation of our policies, shows a lack of respect for our patients and will not be tolerated,” the company said in a statement shared with The Times.

The video spread over the weekend on platforms including X, Instagram and Reddit, sparking an outpouring of anger among commenters along the way.

“No place for shaming the patient in medicine,” one user on Reddit wrote.

“My question is what is the culture of your clinic because why did this many employees feel comfortable participating in this?” another user inquired on Instagram.

According to an online statement from Sansum Clinic, officials were notified of the post by concerned patients and immediately conducted a review of the video.

“Within 24 hours of becoming aware of the posts, we placed the employees on administrative leave, and within another 24 hours, we terminated those involved,” the health system posted.

The video was deleted soon after it was posted once commenters questioned the participants’ ethics. But it was reposted by multiple other accounts and disseminated further through “stitches” of individuals reacting to the post on TikTok and other platforms.

A Sansum spokesperson said the clinic remained steadfastly committed to patient privacy and dignity.

“We expect all team members to live our patients-first mission and uphold the highest standards of compassion, professionalism and respect,” he said. “We are using this inappropriate incident to reinforce our comprehensive policies with all our team members across the organization.”




This story originally appeared on LA Times

H&M Studio’s Fall 2025 Line Deserves a Closer Look

0


The future meets the past, and it looks intriguing. H&M Studio’s fall 2025 collection is serving serious attitude with bold shapes, raw edges, and major throwback vibes. From sleek tailoring to balloon jackets, the pieces play with contrasts in every stitch.

Think São Paulo’s heat meets Stockholm’s chill. It’s high fashion with a raw edge. One standout H&M look? A sharp black blazer over a matching split skirt, paired with chunky boots. It’s minimal, but with power. Another? A white oversized sweater layered over lace, styled with massive chocolate boots that are basically a whole mood.

The brown nylon jacket is pure puffed-up drama, and the red bodycon dress exudes confidence. Then there’s a ruffled brown set that feels vintage and fresh at the same time. The colors range from rusty browns and concrete greys to soft pinks and sky blues.

Add in ear cuffs, giant bags, and sculptural boots with removable buckles, and you’ve got a collection that’s tough, tender, and totally wearable. Mark your calendar, because these pieces hit select stores and hm.com on September 25.



This story originally appeared on FashionGoneRogue

Former Chicago Police Chief Says Democrats Fear a Trump Crime Crackdown in the City Because it Would Work (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

0


Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Jody Weis, the former police chief of Chicago, said that when it comes to Trump cracking down on crime in the city, what Democrats really fear is that it would work. This is undoubtedly correct.

Just like with Washington, DC, when people see that crime can be handled, they will realize that the Democrat leaders in Chicago are allowing this to happen. It is a matter of choice. Trump’s success at the southern border was the exact same thing.

When the people who live in Chicago see that they don’t have to live this way, some of them are going to start questioning these Democrats and they certainly don’t want that.

FOX News reports:

Former Chicago police official says Democrats are ‘afraid’ a Trump crime crackdown in the city would work

Former head of the Chicago Police Department Jody Weis called out the two top Democrats in Illinois, arguing they are afraid of being humiliated by President Donald Trump successfully bringing down crime in the city.

After Trump caused shockwaves with his crackdown on crime in Washington D.C., Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson warned the president against trying to interfere in Chicago. But Trump declared in no uncertain terms on Tuesday, “We’re going in. I didn’t say when, we’re going in.”

Weis spoke to National News Desk that same day, chastising Pritzker and Johnson for opposing Trump’s federal assistance efforts to combat crime…

“I think they are afraid that people will see what can be done if politicians commit to taking action and really want to make a difference,” Weis said. “That’s really the only reason I can think of because otherwise, it makes no sense.

Watch below:

Here’s more:

Weis is correct about all of this. It’s just amazing to watch Democrats oppose making a great American city safer because they don’t want to give Trump a win. They care more about that than the people.




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

‘Sleeping in comfy granny pants left me in hospital with agonising injury’

0


A woman ended up in hospital in excruciating pain after sleeping in a pair of ‘granny pants’ she’d worn ‘a hundred times before’. The garment rubbed and left Kaela Tucker, 26, with a cut inside her vagina, which then became infected. Within a matter of days, she had to be rushed to hospital after the initial cut formed a ‘bubble’ cyst.

Kaela was left in extreme pain and needed months of treatment, during which the cyst reopened and became infected once again. Unsurprisingly, the incident has left its mark on Kaela, who has decided to forego her underwear entirely. “I don’t wear underwear at all anymore,” the assistant property manager, from Dallas in Texas, told NeedToKnow. “The only underwear I use since my injury is period underwear, because tampons seem so unsafe after everything [I’ve been through].” Kaela’s ordeal began in March 2024, when she went to sleep in underwear she had worn “100 times before”. When she woke up, she felt pain in her vagina but assumed it would heal on its own. But over the coming days, she experienced an “intense burning” and visited her doctor for some antibiotics. After 48 hours, however, she felt she would “die” if she didn’t go to the hospital. “I couldn’t sit, stand or even lay down,” Kaela recalled. “My only option was to ride to the hospital lying on my left side because it was on the right side of my vagina.”

At the hospital, doctors used an ultrasound wand to confirm that a 4.8cm Bartholin cyst – a fluid-filled blockage in a Bartholin’s gland in the labia – had formed.

Blood work additionally showed she had a ‘raging’ infection as a result. Kaela added: “They were worried I had waited any longer, that I would have gone septic.

“They had me on several different IV antibiotics, hoping that the cyst would burst on its own instead of having to do it surgically. Thankfully, the cyst did burst on its own, but not without excruciating levels of pain.”

She continued: “It was the second night at the hospital that I was practically screaming in pain that not even morphine could cure.

“I have even had two feet reconstructive surgeries that I thought would be the most painful I would ever experience in this lifetime – until I met an infected vaginal cyst.”

It was on the morning of her third day in hospital that Kaela stood up and felt a “massive burst of liquid gushing” down her legs. Her cyst has burst.

“Now I could sit, stand and lay normally. They kept me for two more days until they were happy with my white cell count, indicating that I no longer had an infection,” she said.

But unfortunately for Kaela, her ordeal was far from over. She claims she was sent home with an “open wound”, which became infected and was untreated for months, leaving her feeling “constantly exhausted, frustrated and close to losing my mind”.

She saw a number of OBGYNs who prescribed more antibiotics and yeast-fighting creams – but the open wound continued to get worse.

Three months after the initial incident, she started to feel just as poorly as she had before and went back to the hospital. Doctors confirmed that the cyst was back and was, once again, infected.

Kaela – who claims she was mistreated by staff members who “discredited” her pain and experience – ended up in the hospital for five days, but says no one knew how to treat her. She added: “I really thought I would die if no one would help me.”

At the end of July, Kaela moved to a new doctor’s office at the end of July and was finally diagnosed with a fungal infection.

She said: “She had me start taking this antifungal medication, and within a week, I started to feel so much better. You never know how sick you are until you aren’t sick anymore.”

Over the next few months, the wound slowly healed and Kaela was finally cyst and infection-free. “It’s so silly and insane that a pair of underwear caused mass torment and pain for me for nine months,” she reflected.

“Each time I had to tell a family member, friend, or doctor that this all started because of a pair of underwear, I died a little inside from embarrassment, but now I think it’s quite hilarious. It’s a great comedic relief story that people would never expect to hear.”

Happily, Kaela says her life has taken a “positive turn” since healing from the terrifying incident, with her able to exercise again and even losing 50lbs.

And after sharing her story on TikTok, Kaela has been in touch with a community of women sharing their own experiences with intimate injuries and issues.

She added: “I even have girls and women reach out in my DMs asking for advice on their own vaginal cysts. I feel like a big sister.

“Even though I’m scared my boss will find my videos and know too much about me, I will never take them down. They offer too much value to my fellow sisters!”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

U.S. Parents Charge Kids Interest on Loans. Here’s How Much.

0


As young Americans struggle with high costs of living and salaries that haven’t kept pace with inflation, some of them rely on loans to make ends meet.

Nearly half (46%) of Gen Z between the ages of 18 and 27 depend on financial assistance from their family, according to a 2024 report from Bank of America.

What’s more, even though some parents are willing to help their kids out with cash, those loans don’t always come without strings attached — sometimes in the form of interest.

Related: Gen Z Is Turning to Side Hustles to Purchase ‘the Normal Stuff’ in ‘Suburban Middle-Class America’

Financial media company MarketBeat.com‘s new report, which surveyed more than 3,000 parents, found that an increasing number are charging their adult children interest on family loans.

“The Bank of Mom and Dad has always been generous, but even generosity comes with boundaries,” says Matt Paulson, founder of MarketBeat.com. “What’s striking is that while most parents don’t expect repayment — and certainly not at commercial interest rates — inflation and rising costs are starting to reshape how families think about money.”

The average interest rate charged by parents was 5.1%, according to the data. That’s still well below the costs their children might incur elsewhere: The average personal loan rate is 12.49% for customers with a 700 FICO score, $5,000 loan amount and three-year repayment term, per Bankrate.

Related: This Stat About Gen Alpha’s Side Hustles Might Be Hard to Believe — But It Means Major Purchasing Power. Here’s What the Kids Want to Buy.

Only 15% of parents would be comfortable with lending their kids $5,000 or more at one time, according to MarketBeat’s research.

Family loan repayment terms can also vary significantly by location. The top five toughest state lenders based on the interest rates parents charge were Nebraska (6.8%), Oregon (6.8%), Mississippi (6.5%), Georgia (6.4%) and Arkansas (6.3%), the report found.

Parents in Delaware and Maine tended to be the most lenient when it came to charging their children interest on loans, with 2% and 4% rates, respectively, according to the findings.

Related: Baby Boomers Over 75 Are Getting Richer, Causing a ‘Massive’ Wealth Divide, According to a New Report

Many parents who expect repayment also have a fast-tracked timeline in mind. Twenty-one percent anticipated seeing their loan repaid in one month, 15% within one year and just 8% more than a year later, per the survey.

Although 59% of parents reported being happy to help their kids with money, 27% said they would only do it if necessary, and 4% admitted to feeling resentful.

In many cases, family loans don’t just provide financial support — they’re also “emotional transactions that test trust, responsibility and family dynamics,” Paulson notes.

As young Americans struggle with high costs of living and salaries that haven’t kept pace with inflation, some of them rely on loans to make ends meet.

Nearly half (46%) of Gen Z between the ages of 18 and 27 depend on financial assistance from their family, according to a 2024 report from Bank of America.

What’s more, even though some parents are willing to help their kids out with cash, those loans don’t always come without strings attached — sometimes in the form of interest.

The rest of this article is locked.

Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

Google must pay $425 million in class action lawsuit over invading users’ privacy, jury rules

0


A federal jury determined on Wednesday that Alphabet’s Google, must pay $425 million for invading users’ privacy by continuing to collect data for millions of users who had switched off a tracking feature in their Google account.

The verdict comes after a trial in the federal court in San Francisco over allegations that Google over an eight-year period accessed users’ mobile devices to collect, save, and use their data, violating privacy assurances under its Web & App Activity setting.

The users had been seeking more than $31 billion in damages.

A federal jury ruled Google must pay $425 million for invading users’ privacy by continuing to collect data for millions of users who had switched off a tracking feature in their Google accounts. somemeans – stock.adobe.com

The jury found Google liable on two of the three claims of privacy violations brought by the plaintiffs.

The jury found that Google had not acted with malice, meaning it was not entitled to any punitive damages.

A spokesperson for Google confirmed the verdict.

Google had denied any wrongdoing.

The class action lawsuit, filed in July 2020, claimed Google continued to collect users’ data even with the setting turned off through its relationship with apps such as Uber, Venmo and Meta’s Instagram that use certain Google analytics services.

At trial, Google said the collected data was “nonpersonal, pseudonymous, and stored in segregated, secured, and encrypted locations.”


Illustration of a cracked Google logo.
Google users have wanted more than $31 billion in damages amid the jury’s ruling in the class action lawsuit. REUTERS

Google said the data was not associated with users’ Google accounts or any individual user’s identity.

US District Judge Richard Seeborg certified the case as a class action covering about 98 million Google users and 174 million devices.

Google has faced other privacy lawsuits, including one earlier this year where it paid nearly $1.4 billion in a settlement with Texas over allegations the company violated the state’s privacy laws.

Google in April 2024 agreed to destroy billions of data records of users’ private browsing activities to settle a lawsuit that alleged it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including in “Incognito” mode.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

The Dems have nothing better to do than to portray a ‘fantasy’ of Trump’s demise

0

Over the Labor Day weekend, instead of enjoying the last days of summer with family and friends, Democrats and other Trump-deranged folk had nothing better to do than indulge in sick fantasies about the president’s death.

Hashtags like #trumpisdead and #whereistrump trended on X, with countless TikToks, Google searches and posts saying “TRUMP DIED” garnering millions of likes and views.

This was not a harmless meme or politics as usual. It was seeded by anonymous left-wing social media accounts and amplified by journalists and influencers to create a permission structure to fantasize about Trump’s demise.

Despite photos of Trump golfing with his grandchildren and his numerous long missives on Truth Social — including about the landscapers who ruined the new limestone paving in the Rose Garden — the rumor went viral.

Politifact traced the rumor’s origin to a tweet from a virulently anti-Trump “foreign policy” reporter named Laura Rozen, from Al-Monitor, who shared a screenshot of the White House presidential schedule and faux-innocently noted that Trump hadn’t been seen in two whole days!

Her post was viewed 34 million times and gave rise to countless copycats who dreamed up a White House coverup and all manner of ailments that might have felled the president.

Hearing of own ‘death’

“How did you find out over the weekend that you were dead?” Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked Trump at an Oval Office press conference Tuesday.

“1.3 million user engagements as of Saturday morning about your demise.”

In the style of Mark Twain, who once famously said “reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated,” Trump made light of the rumor, and dismissed it as “fake news.”

He pointed out that he had a “very active” weekend.

“Last week I did numerous news conferences . . . and then I didn’t do any for two days, and they said, ‘There must be something wrong with him.’ Biden wouldn’t do them for months. You wouldn’t see him. And nobody ever said there was ever anything wrong with him.”


Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here!


Exactly.

Joe Biden was AWOL ­almost his entire presidency and on the few occasions he was encountered by the press, he alternately whispered, yelled, fell over or shuffled about like a cadaver. Yet all the same people who turned a blind eye to Biden’s infirmities and routinely castigated the rest of us — “He’s sharp as a tack! Stop being ageist! Cheap Fakes!” — are now questioning Trump’s health.

In a 2,000-word piece written by three reporters Tuesday, The New York Times revisited the bruises on Trump’s hand that they keep pretending are sinister but just come from vigorous handshaking with large numbers of people, something Biden was never at risk of doing.

“His ankles are swollen. He is the oldest person to be elected president,” they wrote, while acknowledging a “wishful-thinking industry around Trump’s health [and] legal woes.”

At 79, the president demonstrates an enormous capacity for vigorous action, morning, noon and night. What drives his opponents mad is they can’t keep up.

That’s why the entire Democratic Party apparatus is keyed in to the elimination of Trump.

No answer to victories

He has shown them up badly, and they have no answer to his victories, whether on illegal migration, big-city crime, cutting taxes, ending wars, boosting the economy, kicking biological boys out of girls’ sports, canceling vaccine mandates, Making America Healthy Again and all the other commonsense prescriptions he is energetically putting into place.

They can’t seem to counter him or change course and have no leader other than a snake oil salesman named Gavin with slicked-back hair and bizarre hand gestures who tries unsuccessfully to imitate Trump.

So they have retreated into the delusion that, if only Trump were gone, all their problems would vanish.

Their constant framing of Trump as “Hitler,” “authoritarian fascist” and an “existential threat” who must be stopped at all costs fosters a climate in which death threats against the president are normalized.

This week, Washington, DC, grand juries let off two nutjobs charged with repeatedly threatening to assassinate the president.

One was a New York woman who posted on Facebook that she wanted to “sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea” and was arrested by the Secret Service at a “No Fascist Takeover of DC” rally outside the White House.

After Trump survived two assassination attempts during the 2024 election campaign, liberal feeds lit up with regret.

One-third of Democratic voters surveyed by a British politics professor in a small snap poll published in UnHerd in July 2024 agreed with the statement, “I wish Trump’s assassin hadn’t missed.”

Former FBI Director James Comey typified the casual malice when he posted an Instagram photo of seashells that spelled out the numbers “8647,” which he captioned: “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.”

The number 86 is a slang term meaning “to get rid of” or “kill,” and Trump is the 47th president.

So Comey’s message was a pretty clear incitement to violence for which he was investigated by the Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security.

Of course, he pretended he had no idea what the numbers meant: “I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence.”

As if a guy with decades in law enforcement who rose to the top of an intelligence agency that specializes in national security threats wasn’t adept at interpreting coded assassination threats.

Trump knew better: “That meant assassination, and it says it loud and clear. Now, he wasn’t very competent, but he was competent enough to know what that meant.”

Chi-town incitement

Then there is Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has no solution to the violence that claimed eight lives in his city over the weekend.

On Monday at a protest rally, he bordered on inciting violence against federal troops whom Trump has threatened to send in to clean up crime.

“Are you prepared to defend this land that was built by slaves?” he shouted.

“Are you prepared to defend this land?”

Earlier he told MSNBC: “The people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny and if that’s necessary, I believe the people of Chicago will stand firm.”

Rise up or stand firm.

The message is clear.

Violence is encouraged, or at least condoned, by Democrats with nothing to offer, just as it was in 2020 when luminaries from ­Kamala Harris to Minnesota First Lady Gwen “I want to smell burning tires” Walz welcomed the mayhem of the George Floyd anti-cop riots.

This is not normal.

A collapsing political party is as dangerous as an animal in its death throes.



This story originally appeared on NYPost