Tuesday, October 28, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 2726

The reason you may be tired all the time – and when to see a doctor

0


Feeling tired can be down to a multitude of factors, from a bad night’s sleep to mental or physical health issues.

While these problems can often be sorted quickly, some people suffer from constant fatigue. According to YouGov, 13% of Brits are always tired, while a quarter say they’re worn out ‘most of the time’.

It’s no shocker that being tired can have a negative effect on your wellbeing and other parts of your life.

Fatigue can be split into three categories – psychological, physical, and lifestyle-related. The NHS lists several common causes for this:

However, if you’ve been feeling tired for a long time and can’t work out why, it could be a sign of a medical condition.

Anxiety and depression have also been linked with chronic fatigue, causing some people to feel tired even after getting the recommended six to nine hours of kip. Physical health conditions such as sleep apnoea, anaemia, and menopause could also be the reason for regular tiredness.

Other conditions that can lead to fatigue include diabetes, an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism), or myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Before you start panicking and self-diagnosing (which you should avoid doing), the NHS recommends several daily routine changes that can help fight tiredness and fatigue.

  • Have a healthy diet and exercise regularly.

  • Try to stick to the same sleep times and aim for six to nine hours of sleep.

  • Try to relax a couple of hours before your sleep time (read, or listen to music or a podcast).

  • Have a relaxing sleeping area (not too bright, noisy or warm).

It’s wise to dodge habits like smoking, boozing too heavily, munching on enormous meals, guzzling caffeine or engaging in vigorous exercise just before hitting the sack. It’s also smart to dial down smartphone and screen use an hour before heading off to dreamland.

Yet, how can you tell when it’s more than just standard tiredness and time to see a doc? Dr Leyland, Clinical Advisor at myGP, told The Metro: “Fatigue can result in slower reactions, reduced ability to process information, memory lapses, absent-mindedness and reduced coordination.

“These can lead to accidents or reduced productivity, for example at work. Where possible you should consider lifestyle changes to improve sleep but seek advice from your GP if tiredness symptoms persist. There may be an underlying health issue requiring a GP prescription.

If you find yourself worn out for weeks on end, if fatigue is tossing a spanner in the works of your daily life, if other signs like surprising weight loss or mood wobbles are tagging along, or if someone’s heard you making choking, snorting or gasping noises when you’re snoozing – it’s probably time to chat with your local GP, as per NHS advice.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Who Is Lara Rigby, the New BDDU Season 3 Chief Stew?

0


Below Deck Down Under Season 3 is nearly upon us. Sadly, the only Chief Stew this series has ever known, Aesha Scott, will not be onboard. Instead, Lara Rigby is taking over the interior department alongside two brand-new Bravo stews. Hopefully, Lara and her team can handle the weight of their positions as the cameras follow them around their yacht 24-7.

Lara is an experienced yachtie. But, as the Season 3 trailer proves, she will still face a fair amount of struggles on BDDU. From overworked and underperforming crew members to demanding guests who want what they want right now, Lara might try to jump overboard before this season wraps. However, the trailer also teases that a department head might have to walk the plank, so an early exit might be in the cards for Lara, no matter what.

Or not. Only time will tell. As we wait for this new season to land on Bravo, let us investigate all things Lara. Hopefully, she does not have to check herself, like a few others who came before, bearing her same name.

Lara Rigby has a solid resume  

Photo Credit: Fred Jagueneau/Bravo

Leading an interior team on a luxury yacht is no small feat. This role requires expert-level organizational skills and an ability to pivot as needed. From wild weather patterns to whining workers to weary charter guests, Lara will face many aspects that will be out of her control this season on BDDU. Therefore, Lara will also need to know how to be fair(ish) and impartial when handing out the roles and the necessary rebukes on board.

So, is Lara knowledgeable enough to tackle these sorts of demands? According to her Bravo bio, this answer is a yes, as Lara has 14 years of experience in the yachting industry. According to all other bios, Captain Jason Chambers is the only other department head on board who can top this number. Our hunk of the high seas has been dodging waves and drunken women in this industry for 24 years now, which, whew.

Unfortunately, Lara owns a locked Instagram account. She does have another account for a passion project, the Crown Barn, but this account is also private. The only visible note on this page states that Lara is building a house. Therefore, our sneaky deep dive on this new Chief Stew sadly ends here.

Still, we cannot help but wonder why her accounts are closed to the chaos chasers like us. Is this a clue that Lara might face more than just a few annoying arguments during Season 3?

Only time will tell.

Fun facts about Lara Rigby

Lara Rigby BDDU
Photo Credit: Fred Jagueneau/Bravo

We stan a good bio before a new season kicks off. Luckily, Lara filled hers out well, so we have many clues about how this Cornwall native might present on Bravo.

Stewardess Brianna Duffield and Lara will be fast friends on BDDU. In her bio, Lara gushes that Bri is her “little soul sister” this season. In contrast, Marina Marcondes de Barro, the remaining stew, is not mentioned by Lara. However, Mariana follows Lara and Brianna online, so this tiny oversight likely means nothing.

Before joining this series, Lara knew at least one face in this franchise. Chef Johnathan Shillingford last graced our screens on Below Deck Mediterranean Season 9. He twerked and worked. And then he sailed away at the end of the season.

We want him back on Bravo. Lara probably agrees as she knows “Chef Jono well,” she noted, after revealing that she “can talk with a mouth full of water.”

Personality-wise, Lara is “very social.” She likes getting her crews “together” for “quiz nights, theme nights, and cocktail competitions,” she stressed. But as she works, travels the world, and plays, her heart remains on land with her dog. “I rescued her from Romania, and she is my shadow when I’m home,” Lara explained.

We love that. Dogs > drama.

What the sneak peek for BDDU Season 3 teases about Lara Rigby

Brianna and Marina will join Lara as stews this season on BDDU. These women are both coming on board with experience in this industry. Their non-empty resumes likely helped ease tensions as these three women readied for their first charter guests on board. But, as the sneak peek for Season 3 reveals, tensions will still be the name of the game for Lara, as chaos seems to follow our new Chief Stew all around the motor yacht Katina.

“The cabins have to be perfect. Iron the creases. Polish the cutlery. No fingerprints on the table. I want the glassware spotless. Remember, don’t pour too much. It’s not great, [so] do it again,” Lara commands, as flashbacks show her stews hard at work, trying to appease their boss.

Not listening to Lara, however, is Tzarina Mace-Ralph. This Season 2 Chef is going to butt heads with her fellow department head, which, ugh. In these released clips, Lara tells Tzarina that she is a “d*ckhead,” as Tzarina explains that Lara is unorganized and controlling. Things get so bad that Captain Jason has to enter the chat, but after Lara tells her boss that Tzarina is a bully, Captain Jason starts talking about firings.

We hate this for you, Captain Jason. Take your shirt off and hold me us for a minute. We are here for you, always.

Oh, Lara is also going to butt heads with one of the males onboard. But hopefully, these leaked narratives are not as bad as they appear. Overall, Aesha left massive yacht-sized shoes to fill. So we hope Lara is up to the task in Season 3 of Below Deck Down Under.

Below Deck Down Under is streaming on Peacock.

TELL US – WILL YOU BE WATCHING BDDU SEASON 3? WILL LARA THRIVE IN THIS FRANCHISE?




This story originally appeared on Realitytea

‘Jeopardy!’ Champion Explains True Daily Double Error & ‘Aggressive’ Strategy

0

[Warning: The below contains MAJOR spoilers for the January 13 episode of Jeopardy!]

Sometimes, all it takes is one letter to end up losing out on Jeopardy!, and that’s exactly what happened with Paul Clauson as the Champions Wildcard tournament got underway. (The tournament features 15 champions who missed out on qualifying for the Tournament of Champions during its initial run and are competing for its last spot.)

Clauson, a tax analyst from Madison Heights, Michigan, faced off against Jen Feldman, a high school teacher from Brooklyn, New York, and Will Yancey, a lecturer of history from Banquete, Texas.

While Clauson was leading with 4,600 heading into the Double Jeopardy! round (Feldman had 2,800 and Yancey 2,600), he lost all his 3,400 by being just off by a letter in his response for a (true) Daily Double (the second one found in the game). In People of the Book, the clue read: “Paralyzed Clifford, amorous Constance, manly Oliver.” Clauson answered with, “Lady Chatterley’s Lovers,” whereas the correct response was Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Yancey had 7,800, and Feldman 4,400 at the time. In the end, Yancey advanced with 13,800. Clauson (8,000, doubling his score heading into Final Jeopardy and Feldman (8,200, losing 2,000 with an incorrect response) will have to see if their scores are enough to secure a spot (the top four non-winners with the highest money totals advance to the semifinals as wildcards.).

Zoe Grobman, who competed in the Second Chance Tournament (and came in second to Enzo Cunanan in the January 7 game) cheered on Yancey’s win and sympathized with Clauson over his error in that Daily Double response in the Reddit thread for this episode. “Obviously I’m biased towards the Second Chancers, but I’m real glad to see Will pull out the win here. Shows that us Second Chancers are able to hang with the big leagues!” she wrote.

“Paul, if you see this, I feel for you so much, and I know firsthand how much it stings to have a small mispronunciation cost you the win (I’ll be ruing Amontillado til the day I die),” Grobman continued. “You put up a phenomenal performance though, and going big on the DDs was absolutely the right move even if it didn’t pay off. You should be proud of fighting back not once but twice from TDD misses.”

Clauson chimed in and thanked Grobman for her words. “No regrets on the aggressive DD strategy – I knew how tough the competition would be,” he shared. “I had Lady Chatterley’s Lover on my flashcards but I think I psyched myself out because of the multiple listed characters. That potentially combined with a Michigan linguistic quirk of adding unnecessary s’s to the ends of brands and titles, lol.”

One fan wrote that “they really did Paul dirty on that DD. At no point did they explain that the category was looking for specifically for the book title,” but another chimed in with, “Having ‘amorous Constance’ in the clue is what made his response incorrect beyond the issue with the title. But yes, they should explain they’re looking for the book title.” Clauson also commented on this thread, writing, “Would’ve known it had I read the book! Or the full Wikipedia page,” with the grinning face with sweat emoji.

Grobman also commented on the lack of diversity in the Champions Wildcard tournament. “I do think it’s important to point out that this tournament has only 1 woman and 14 men (12 of whom are white). Obviously in this particular case it’s simply because of how the games won stats fell, but I do think this lack of diversity highlights the importance of Jeopardy! continuing its work in embracing diverse contestants and a diverse trivia canon,” she wrote.

In response, Clauson noted that it wasn’t lost on the competitors: “The clear lack of diversity smacked us all in the face, but it was how the chips fell for this particular tournament. Lots more ladies representing in the ToC though!”

What did you think of that Daily Double clue? Let us know in the comments section below.

Jeopardy!, Weekdays, check local listings




This story originally appeared on TV Insider

JPMorgan’s Return-to-Office Mandate Spurs Internal Pushback

0


JPMorgan Chase informed its 300,000 employees on Friday that it is implementing a strict return-to-office policy and almost all workers are required to work in the office five days a week beginning in March, according to an internal memo seen by Barron’s.

“We feel that now is the right time to solidify our full-time in-office approach,” the memo reads. “We think it is the best way to run the company.” The only exceptions to the mandate are teams with work that “can be easily and clearly measured.”

According to Bloomberg, more than half of JPMorgan staff, or about 60%, are already working in the office five days per week. These employees are managing directors, bank branch workers, and salespeople, among other senior or client-facing roles. The shift from hybrid to fully in-person work will most likely affect back-office roles, like call center workers, the outlet noted.

JPMorgan Employees React to RTO Mandate

The bank posted the news to an internal company website, and the return-to-office mandate was met with pushback by employees.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Photographer: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Related: ‘Five Is Ideal’: JPMorgan Will Reportedly Follow Amazon, Walmart With Strict Return-to-Office Policy

Employees could leave comments attached to the news with their first and last names on display — and they did, with more than 300 sharing worries about the return-to-office mandate’s effects on their commute, childcare costs, and work-life balance.

According to people familiar with the matter who spoke with the WSJ, one person even brought up unionizing to keep the hybrid schedule.

This reportedly led JPMorgan to shut down comments on Saturday, though parts are still available for employees to see, per the WSJ.

Related: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon Isn’t Worried About AI Taking Over Jobs — Here’s Why

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told the Wall Street Journal in April that he prefers people work in the office five days per week, though in some cases, “taking a day or two at home is fine.”

JPMorgan is the largest bank in the U.S. with $3.9 trillion in assets.

In implementing a fully in-person schedule, JPMorgan follows the example of companies like Amazon and Walmart, both of which have received pushback from employees.

Some Walmart employees opted to quit instead of comply and 73% of Amazon corporate employees stated in September that they were looking for a new job, shortly after Amazon announced the return-to-office mandate.

Related: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon Says Bankers Are ‘Dancing in the Street’ Following Donald Trump’s Win



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

Ukraine strikes Russia with massive drone and ATACMS attack, Russian Telegram channels By Reuters

0

MOSCOW (Reuters) – Ukraine struck Russian regions with a massive drone attack and with U.S.-made ATACMS missiles overnight, according to Russian Telegram channels and pro-Russian war bloggers.

The Shot Telegram channel said that Russia had downed more than 200 Ukrainian drones and five ATACMS missiles.

“The enemy has organized a massive combined strike on the territory of the Russian regions,” the Two Majors war blogger said.

The Russian defence ministry, which reports on such attacks, made no immediate comment. Reuters was unable to immediately confirm the reports.

In the Russian city of Engels, home to an air base where Russia’s nuclear bombers are based, Saratov Governor Roman Busargin said an industrial enterprise had been damaged by a drone but gave no more details.

Busargin said that classes in schools in Saratov and Engels would be held remotely. Flight restrictions were imposed in Kazan, Saratov, Penza and Ulyanovsk, Russia’s aviation watchdog said.




This story originally appeared on Investing

China mulls potential sale of TikTok US to Elon Musk: report

0


Chinese officials are mulling a potential option that involves the sale of TikTok’s US operations to billionaire Elon Musk if the company fails to fend off a potential ban, Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Chinese officials are mulling a potential option that involves the sale of TikTok’s US operations to billionaire Elon Musk. Jack Gruber / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Chinese officials prefer that TikTok remain under the control of parent Bytedance, the report said, adding that the company is contesting the ban with an appeal to the US Supreme Court.

Under one scenario, Musk’s social media platform X would take control of TikTok US and run the business together, the report said, adding that the Chinese officials have yet to reach any firm consensus about how to proceed and their deliberations are still preliminary.


A person holds a placard on the day justices hear oral arguments in a bid by TikTok and its China-based parent company, ByteDance, to block a law intended to force the sale of the short-video app by Jan. 19
A person holds a placard on the day justices hear oral arguments in a bid by TikTok and its China-based parent company, ByteDance, to block a law intended to force the sale of the short-video app by Jan. 19. REUTERS

TikTok declined to comment, while Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. X could not immediately be reached for a comment.

The Cyberspace Administration of China and China’s Ministry of Commerce, government agencies that could be involved in decisions about TikTok’s future, could not be immediately reached for comment.

Last week, the Supreme Court seemed inclined to uphold a law that would force a sale or ban of the popular short-video app TikTok in the United States by Jan. 19, with the justices focusing on the national security concerns about China that prompted the crackdown.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Trump must wage all-out war on obesity to boost US longevity

0

Brace yourself for a food fight in Congress as President-elect Trump presents his health nominees and lays out plans to combat America’s plummeting life expectancy.

New Jersey Democratic Sen. Cory Booker rails that “nearly half the population is pre-diabetic or has type-2 diabetes” and “more than 40% of Americans are obese” — but insists that Trump “has no intention of bringing needed change to our food system.”

Such hyperpartisanship is both counterproductive and dumb.

Fortunately, a growing number of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle — including such unlikely bedfellows as Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and, on the GOP side, the Senate’s newly formed Make America Healthy Again caucus — are looking at new scientific evidence about eating.  

They’re getting ready for a consequential battle against unhealthy food producers and the lackadaisical federal agencies that pander to them.

Not a day too soon. 

Americans’ life expectancy is stagnating. The United States ranks a disappointing 49th in longevity, even lower than Costa Rica and Chile, and is losing ground every year.  

Drug overdoses account for 10 to 18% of these lives cut short, but the biggest culprit is obesity.

For starters, the new administration is promising a disruptive campaign against ultraprocessed foods, which one Trump adviser, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, calls “the new tobacco and should be treated that way.”

Ultraprocessed means foods manufactured using synthetic ingredients and additives — think packaged fish sticks instead of plain frozen fish, or potato puffs instead of a baked potato.

These foods actually encourage overeating: Controlled studies show them to increase levels of hormones associated with hunger, making you crave more. A handy feature for their manufacturers.

Perhaps not surprisingly, then, they make up a staggering 60% of the American diet. 

A 2019 study by National Institutes of Health researcher Kevin Hall gave one group of test subjects a diet of ultraprocessed foods and another group a diet of natural foods. 

The ultraprocessed food eaters overate, adding about 500 calories a day, and put on weight, while the natural-foods group lost weight. After two weeks, Hall switched the groups — and again the consumers of processed foods craved more, ate more, and gained weight.

Hall’s results, which have been duplicated by other scientists, are driving the movement to curtail ultraprocessed foods, though the idea is facing stiff resistance from the food industry and its lobbyists. 

Pathetically, the Food and Drug Administration is dithering, claiming more studies need to be done. 

On Dec. 11, an FDA advisory group reported that the agency would not take a stand against ultraprocessed foods.

“This is a pretty uncourageous report,” nutrition researcher Marion Nestle told The Washington Post. In a Senate hearing, Sanders scolded FDA head Robert M. Califf for his inaction.

The incoming Trump administration can disregard the FDA’s timidity and immediately overhaul the “Dietary Guidelines for America,” which are due to be revised in 2025, to align with the science.  

These guidelines will directly impact the food industry: School lunch programs must follow them, for example, and changing them could lead federal food aid programs such as SNAP to stop paying for such items as sugary sodas. 

A shakeup is also needed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has taken a ho-hum attitude toward obesity — saying it’s still “studying what works” for people to “have a healthier diet.” Ridiculous. 

The public health agencies, including the CDC, “don’t want to take responsibility” for obesity and lives cut short, says Dr. Ravi Sawhney, a former NIH researcher who studied Americans’ shortened life expectancy.

Meanwhile, Trump advisers Elon Musk and Mehmet Oz are pushing for wider insurance coverage of semaglutides such as Wegovy and Ozempic, which in Oz’s words do “massive good.”  

Although incoming Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr has expressed skepticism, he needs to consider the evidence. 

Recent research published in the journal Current Cardiology Reports confirmed the benefits of semaglutides to prevent cardiovascular, kidney and other metabolic conditions.

In December, the US obesity rate declined for the first time in more than a decade, reflecting the success of semaglutides.

The House will soon vote on the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act, a bipartisan bill to extend semaglutide coverage under Medicare. The big issue is cost.

The Congressional Budget Office and a study by pharmacy benefit manager Prime Therapeutics both found that semaglutides do not save money. 

No surprise there, though: Almost no form of preventive care — including mammograms and lung scans — saves money over the long term. 

The point of preventive care is to save lives. And reducing obesity in the United States will do just that. 

Let the food fight begin.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

£20,000 invested in Tesla shares just 3 months ago is now worth…

0


Image source: Getty Images

Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) shares were heading for an underwhelming 2024 until the final third of the year. In fact, just three months ago the Tesla share price was roughly where it was four years prior.

Then it accelerated like one of the company’s electric vehicles (EVs), rising 81% to reach $394. This means a £20,000 investment made three months ago would now be worth approximately £36,200!

And with a market cap of $1.24trn, Tesla is again worth more than Toyota, BYD, NIO, Hyundai, Stellantis, Ford, and General Motors combined.

The Trump card

Tesla stock enjoyed a big boost after Donald Trump’s election victory in November. The assumption is that the incoming administration will cut corporate taxes, regulations, and prevent cheap Chinese-made EVs from flooding the US.

All of this could benefit Tesla, as could CEO Elon Musk’s close relationship with Trump. Specifically, red tape might be cut around self-driving vehicles, which could lead to an accelerated rollout of the company’s robotaxis (or Cybercabs, as Tesla calls them).

Setting a high bar

We won’t get Q4 results until later this month. But in Q3, Musk said he’s confident the Cybercab will not just start production in 2026, but reach “substantial” volume production. The aim is to ramp up to 2m units per year.

When it was finally unveiled in October, Tesla’s Cybercab had no steering wheel or brake and accelerator pedals. The company plans a ride-hailing network, which would presumably be a high-margin business given that there would be no human drivers that need paying.

Meanwhile, Musk is predicting 20%-30% vehicle growth this year. That’s a high bar, considering interest rates are still high and the firm’s growth has stalled. Last year, it delivered 1.79m cars, a 1% drop from 2023.

Where next?

The current period is a bit of a strange one for Tesla. The once-hot EV market has hit a major speedbump, while the company’s next-generation products (robotaxis, full self-driving software, and humanoid robots) aren’t ready yet. Consequently, Musk has said Tesla is “between two major growth waves“.

Given this, it’s somewhat surprising that the stock’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is above 100. This extreme valuation has been reached despite the likelihood that Trump will scrap the $7,500 tax credit for new EV purchases.

Admittedly, this cancellation might benefit Tesla in the short term as US consumers rush to take advantage of the credit before it disappears. But it surely can’t be positive for overall sales after that.

Consequently, I see 2025 as a potentially more challenging year for Tesla and its share price.

Staying on the sidelines

I’ve owned Tesla stock a couple of times over the past few years. In hindsight, I would have done splendidly if I’d just held it through thick and thin.

However, that’s easier said than done. It’s incredibly volatile and can often look ridiculously overvalued.

Meanwhile, Musk continues his quest to eliminate what he calls the “woke mind virus“, which he sees as a threat to Western civilisation. Politics aside, I fear the forthright manner in which he’s pursuing this could damage the Tesla brand and alienate many potential future EV customers.

I have great admiration for Tesla as a company. But due to the sky-high valuation, I have no plans to reinvest right now.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

How much would an investor need in a Stocks and Shares ISA to earn £2,000 a month in passive income?

0


Millions of us in the UK invest through a Stocks and Shares ISA. The main advantage to this is that we don’t pay tax when we sell shares for a profit and we don’t pay tax on any dividends we receive.

This means the Stocks and Shares ISA’s an excellent vehicle for creating a passive income stream, possibly one to complement a pension or retirement fund.

Please note that tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each client and may be subject to change in future. The content in this article is provided for information purposes only. It is not intended to be, neither does it constitute, any form of tax advice. Readers are responsible for carrying out their own due diligence and for obtaining professional advice before making any investment decisions.

The passive income formula

At its core, the passive income formula focuses on maximising tax-free returns from dividends and capital growth. With an annual ISA contribution allowance of £20,000, investing in dividend-paying stocks or funds can generate a steady income stream.

For example, a portfolio with an average dividend yield of 4% could produce £800 annually — completely tax-free. Reinvesting these dividends or investing in growth-oriented companies accelerates gains through compounding, a key driver of long-term wealth.

Capital growth adds another dimension. Diversified investments in stocks or funds have historically delivered average annual returns of 6-8%, depending on market conditions. This combination of regular dividends and appreciation makes the Stocks and Shares ISA an effective tool for building a passive income stream, particularly over the long term.

Moreover, discipline, diversification, and regular reviews ensure the formula works to its fullest potential.

Making the figures add up

In order to earn £2,000 a month in dividends, an investor would need £600,000 invested in stocks averaging a 4% dividend yield. However, a higher dividend yield would allow an investor to achieve the same passive income with a smaller portfolio — for example, a 5% yield at £500,000 would generate £25,000 annually.

Of course, many Britons may say “well, I don’t have £500,000”. But the answer lies in compounding and starting early. If an investor were to start with £5,000 today, and contribute £500 a month for 22 years, achieving 10% annualised growth, they’d have more than £500,000 at the end of the period.

However, to achieve that 10% growth each year, an investor must make wise investment decisions. Poor decisions can result in them losing money.

Dividends can rise

There’s another angle too, and perhaps one I sometimes neglect. Many are keen to invest in Dividend Aristocrats, stocks with a track record for continually increasing their dividend yield.

A well-known UK Dividend Aristocrat is Diageo (LSE:DGE). Diageo, a global leader in alcoholic beverages, has a strong track record of consistently increasing its dividends. The company owns well-known brands such as Johnnie Walker, Guinness, and Tanqueray, which contribute to its steady revenue and profit growth.

While Diageo’s current dividend yield stands at 3.3%, its track record of consistent dividend growth makes it a compelling long-term investment. Over the past decade, the company’s steadily increased payouts, reflecting its resilience and commitment to shareholders.

This growth can significantly enhance returns over time, particularly when dividends are reinvested to compound gains. For example, a modest yield today could effectively double in 10 years if Diageo maintains its historical growth rate. As such, the effective yield for an investment today would be 6.5% in a decade’s time.

However, it’s worth bearing in mind that changes in alcohol consumption, especially among younger generations, presents a risk to Diageo’s long-term prospects. The company has moved towards prioritising more premium brands in recent years, reflecting consumer demand shifts.

It’s not a stock I hold, but I think it’s worth considering.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

After rising 2,081%, has Nvidia stock peaked?

0


The performance of Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) over the past five years has been mind-boggling. During that period, Nvidia stock has soared 2,081%.

But the chipmaker now has a market capitalisation of $3.3trn and trades on a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 54.

While that is far from unheard of – Amazon is on 47, for example – it is far higher than some investors such as myself would feel comfortable paying.

Back to the future

Step back five years, however.

Amazon had then long been a darling growth stock and looked fully priced. Since then, however, its stock has grown 135%.

That is far less dizzying than Nvidia during that period. Longer term, though, Amazon had already delivered the sort of phenomenal growth we have seen from Nvidia in the past five years – but it still managed to more than double from the start of 2020 until now.

So, might the same turn out to be true for Nvidia stock?  

Could it be that, even if recent amazing gains are not repeated on the same scale, it nonetheless moves up even further in the next few years? Or has it peaked already?

The case against buying Nvidia today

To begin with, consider the bearish case about the chipmaker. I already said above that its current P/E ratio puts me off investing, as it looks expensive to me.

But earnings at the company have ballooned over the past several years. If they fell back to anywhere close to what they were just a few years back, the prospective P/E ratio would be in the hundreds, not at 54.

Might that happen?

There has been a rush by companies to buy up chips as they attempt to gain first mover advantage in their respective industries when it comes to AI. After the initial round of installations, though, demand for AI chips could fall back in years to come.

Meanwhile, competitive pressure could reduce the pricing power enjoyed by the current industry leaders such as Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Here’s how things could get better from here

On the other side of the coin, though, what if AI really is a transformative trend that is here to stay?

Just as Amazon was once seen as wildly overvalued for an online retailer, Nvidia could yet exploit its competitive advantages in chip design and manufacture to get even stronger in a fast-growing part of the economy then use that strength to expand its business footprint further.

In November, the company’s chief executive proclaimed, “the age of AI is in full steam, propelling a global shift to NVIDIA computing”.

While he may want to ask ChatGPT “how can I sound more modest?”, the underlying point could turn out to be accurate. The recent surge in demand for Nvidia chips may not be a one-off blip, but rather an indication of future sales potential for the industry leader.

I’m in no rush to buy

I think either of the above scenarios could yet play out.

So, while I think the company’s technology, customer base, and ambition could yet mean that its stock has more potential ahead, the current valuation does not sit comfortably with me, given the risks.

At the right valuation, I would buy Nvidia stock in a heartbeat. For now, though, I will sit on my hands.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool