Friday, October 3, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 273

NYC needs a mayor like Rudy Giuliani again — a bold, sensible leader in the face of rampant decline

0

Whew, better late than never!

That was my first reaction to the news that President Trump intends to give Rudy Giuliani the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The announcement followed the serious weekend car crash in New Hampshire that sent the 81-year-old Giuliani to the hospital.

Thankfully, his injuries, said to include a broken vertebrae, are not life-threatening and he has been released from the hospital.

A likely result is Trump’s presentation will focus almost exclusively on Giuliani’s greatest achievement: His stellar tenure as New York’s mayor.

Although he later served as Trump’s pugnacious lawyer during the disputed aftermath of the 2020 election, it was during Giuliani’s two terms as Gotham’s fearless leader that he proved he is fully worthy of America’s highest civilian honor.

His first term established a political standard for big achievements in a range of areas that may never be matched.

And all that happened before Oprah Winfrey bestowed on him the halo of “America’s Mayor” for his undaunted courage in the aftermath of the 9/11 horrors.

His leadership following the terror attack was, in fundamental ways, possible only because of the enormous challenges he had tackled over the previous seven-plus years.

It’s almost as if he had known that he and his hometown would be tested beyond measure.

To watch him direct city recovery efforts at Ground Zero while the pile was still burning, then seamlessly slip to a church to walk a bride down the aisle, and then deliver a eulogy at St. Patrick’s Cathedral for a beloved firefighter or police officer was to witness leadership at its absolute finest.

If only his likeness were on the horizon now, when the city is in desperate need of bold, sensible leadership as it once again faces rampant decline in the midst of a mayoral election.

NYC is governable

Rudy was first elected in 1993, and chief among his many breakthroughs was this: He proved that New York is governable.

That may seem like an elitist topic, but until Giuliani proved it was governable, doubts about whether the basics could be fixed were eating away at the city’s confidence in itself, and leading to a depressing malaise.

He took office when there were serious doubts about whether the city could survive relentless waves of crime, job and population decline, soaring welfare cases and terrible schools.

Those who didn’t flee were generally beset with cynicism, with much of the so-called smart set subscribing to the sad idea that slowing the rate of decline was the best that anybody in City Hall could do.

A Republican and former federal prosecutor, Giuliani took office after a narrow victory over Democrat David Dinkins, the city’s first black mayor, with an ­attitude that there were no sacred cows.

“Why can’t we do it differently?” was Rudy’s approach to virtually every city service and to every dollar it spent.

On education, he sparked wailing in the establishment by arguing that it was more important for the city to spend the money it had wisely than to rattle the tin cup and get more money from Albany.

He made Bill Bratton his first police commissioner, and they shared a commitment to the “broken windows” theory of policing.

They combined the separate Transit and Housing police forces into the larger NYPD and adopted “Compstat,” a relentless, real-time management system that gave precinct bosses more freedom while holding them accountable for everything that happened on their turf.

It was so successful that it is now a common feature of urban police forces everywhere.

Gov’t-wide ‘Compstat’

But Giuliani went further, and basically applied “broken windows” and “Compstat” to all of government.

Early on, he actually cut the budget — not just the rate of growth, but in total dollars spent, and yet the crime rate went down every year in that first term and other services improved.

By the end of those four years, the number of annual murders had fallen by more than 60%, from nearly 2,000 to under 700.

New York has never again been America’s murder capital, as many of the reforms he and Bratton started have been kept by subsequent administrations.

Giuliani tackled the ballooning welfare situation with the same gusto.

Dinkins had left office predicting it would continue to climb until one out of every six New Yorkers was getting the handout.

Some in City Hall actually saw that as economic boom of free money from the feds and Albany.

Giuliani and his team thought that was crazy both as social and economic policy, and cruel to doom another generation to the dole in the land of opportunity.

City Hall actually pushed Bill Clinton’s new administration to impose more rigorous work requirements.

Using those and existing rules, the city rolls soon were declining every month, a pace that lasted for years.

It was a sort of liberation that even most liberals saw as a good thing for the families involved.

Giuliani was succeeded by Michael Bloomberg, a fellow Republican whom Rudy endorsed, and their combined five terms over two decades ushered in a new Golden Age in Gotham.

The city was never better, a fact that has made the subsequent years of decline a bitter pill for many and a lesson in the power of leadership, and why elections matter.

Unfortunately, the city is once again consumed with doubts as a mayoral campaign offers little hope.

Indeed, the current crisis is driven home by the fact that Bill de Blasio, who succeeded Bloomberg, took the city backward for the better part of eight years.

And now de Blasio, known as Mayor Putz in my book, is endorsing socialist Zohran Mamdani, and claiming Mamdani has “the right ideas.”

In fact, Mamdani, an anti-cop socialist and an antisemite, has all the wrong ideas for New York.

His election would take the city in the wrong direction, to a version of the bad old days that Giuliani and Bloomberg overcame.

Trump took notice

Ah, but that’s not to say that the Rudy model has vanished.

In fact, a certain president was a close witness to Giuliani’s operatic performance and the changes he brought about in his hometown.

Although Trump was never accused of being a shrinking violet in the business world, I’ve long believed that he was largely inspired by Rudy’s take-no-prisoners approach to politics, and realized it was a viable path for him to follow as he, too, crashed the ­political establishment.

Trump, of course, personalized that approach to twice capture the White House, surpassing Rudy and his own dreams of sitting in the Oval Office.

Even now, the similarities between the two men remain striking.

In both of his terms, Trump has been, like Rudy, a perpetual motion machine who rarely sleeps and is always ready for the next fight.

He, too, has an endless stream of big ideas in the works, waiting their turn in the limelight.

Both are New Yorkers to the core, and were born to lead.

Fortunately for the rest of us, they chose public service.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Microsoft researchers develop new tech for video AI agents – Computerworld

0



VLMs excel at 2D surroundings, but the visual world is in 3D, and MindJourney provides better viewpoints of real-world scenarios, and ultimately aims to forecast how scenes change over time, according to the Microsoft researchers.

MindJourney “sketches a concise camera trajectory, while the world model synthesizes the corresponding view at each step. The VLM then reasons over this multi-view evidence gathered during the interactive exploration,” the researchers wrote in a paper.

MindJourney’s technologies could improve assistive robots and remote inspection, and enrich virtual and augmented reality experiences, the researchers wrote in the paper.



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

Google doesn’t have to sell Chrome, judge in monopoly case rules

0


Google will not have to divest its Chrome browser but will have to change some of its business practices, a federal judge has ruled. The ruling comes more than a year after the same judge ruled that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in internet search.

Following the ruling last year, the Department of Justice had proposed that Google should be forced to sell Chrome. But in a 230-page decision, Judge Amit Mehta said the government had “overreached” in its request. “Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” Mehta wrote. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

Google will, however, no longer be permitted to strike exclusive deals around the distribution of search, Google Assistant, Gemini or Chrome, Mehta ruled. For example, Google can’t require device makers to pre-load its apps in order to get access to the Play Store. It also can’t condition revenue-sharing arrangements on the placement of its apps. But Google will be able to continue to pay partners — like Apple — for pre-loading search and other apps into their products. Mehta said that ending these arrangements could cause “downstream harms to distribution partners, related markets, and consumers.”

Mehta also ruled that Google will need to share some of its search data with competitors going forward. “Making data available to competitors would narrow the scale gap created by Google’s exclusive distribution agreements and, in turn, the quality gap that followed,” he wrote. The company is not required to hand over data related to its ads.

Mehta’s ruling is largely a win for the search giant, which had argued that divesting Chrome or Android “would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.” In a statement Tuesday, Google said it had “concerns” about some aspects of the ruling.

“Today’s decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people so many more ways to find information,” the company said. “Now the Court has imposed limits on how we distribute Google services, and will require us to share Search data with rivals. We have concerns about how these requirements will impact our users and their privacy, and we’re reviewing the decision closely.”

The company previously indicated it plans to appeal Mehta’s original decision, but said in June it would wait for a final decision in the case.

Update, September 2, 2025, 4:28PM PT: This post has been updated to add a statement from Google on the ruling.



This story originally appeared on Engadget

Ovios Unveils Space-Saving, Style-Forward Sofas for Modern Living – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Ovios

As the air turns crisp, there’s no better time to refresh your living space. Ovios, a leading name in smart, stylish home furniture, is introducing four new sofa designs tailored for modern lifestyles—from compact city apartments to cozy student dorms and spacious family homes.

This fall lineup is all about flexibility, comfort, and a sense of aesthetic ease. Whether you’re hosting weekend guests, squeezing furniture into small corners, or simply seeking a statement piece with cozy vibes, Ovios has a solution.

1. Molly – The Ultimate 3-in-1 Bean Bag Bed

Designed for dorm rooms, studios, and any nook where space is tight, Molly is a genius 3-in-1 sofa that works as a chair, a recliner, and a guest bed. Its high-density memory foam core ensures comfort, while the soft corduroy cover adds a warm, tactile feel.
Thanks to vacuum compression packaging, there’s zero assembly—just unbox and relax. Lightweight and compact, Molly is your space-saving solution with maximum comfort and minimalist style.

Ovios

2. Mega – The Plush Sofa That Needs No Tools

Say goodbye to frustrating assembly manuals. Mega arrives compressed and fluffs up beautifully once unpacked—no tools, no fuss.
It functions as a chic living room sofa, a nap-friendly lounger, or a kid-friendly play zone. The modern, frameless silhouette pairs with plush corduroy upholstery and a spring-filled core for cloud-like comfort that won’t sink over time.

Ovios

3. Vivo – Oversized Comfort with Leather Luxe

For families or anyone who loves to stretch out, Vivo is a large L-shaped sectional designed to impress. Wrapped in sleek leather with modern lines, it offers a sophisticated look while delivering maximum comfort.
Its high-density sponge + spring combo creates reliable, resilient support, and the whole piece arrives in compressed form—no tools, no installation required.

Ovios

4. Popo – An Upgraded Classic, Now Better Than Ever

Taking all the best features of its predecessor Vivi and refining them, Popo is the upgraded version of a customer favorite. From comfort to craftsmanship, everything has been fine-tuned to deliver an even better lounging experience.
Like all of Ovios’s new releases, Popo is compression-packed, tool-free, and built to offer lasting comfort and visual appeal.

Ovios

This Fall, Make Room for Comfort That Works
Whether you’re moving into a new space, redecorating for fall, or simply looking for smarter, easier furniture—Ovios has designed its latest collection with your lifestyle in mind. Minimalist yet practical, soft yet structured—these are pieces that live with you, adapt with you, and upgrade your everyday.



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Tourist hit with £55k bill after ‘Majorca’s most expensive meal’ | Travel News | Travel

0


A restaurant in Spain has shared a picture of a receipt with a huge €63,000 (£55,000) bill racked up on it.

The restaurant hinted the group may have included a famous American sports star. Located in Palmanova, the seafront restaurant teased followers with a caption which read: “Whose bill is this? Tag them below, please – we’d like to talk…” Observant followers can see that a huge amount of the bill was spent on “various fish”.

With such a hefty price tag, people in the comments have been trying to work out who could possibly spend so much money on a meal.

A huge debate has been started in the comments with people trying to figure out who would spend this amount at the restaurant.

The restaurant later confirmed that 18 diners were seated at the table and hinted the group may have included a famous American sports star, reports Majorca Daily Bulletin.

Whoever ate this meal didn’t only splash the cash on food but also spent a large sum on high-end drinks.

Another item on the bill is valet parking which is part of the restaurant’s luxury service.

On Instagram, the post went viral with many people fascinated to discover the identity of the mystery diner.

It has since become the talk of Majorca with locals trying to decipher who purchased one of the island’s most expensive ever meals.

Majorca is one of the largest islands in the Balearics and it’s known to be a popular holiday hotspot.

The island is home to beautiful clear waters and stunning beaches making it an unmissable destination.

Majorca is home to several national parks and the island attracts millions of visitors each year.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Alarm Grows As Trump Tells Bizarre Lies About His Health

0


Be sure not to miss a single word of every story from PoliticusUSA by becoming a subscriber.

In the video above, I break down Trump’s strange answers about his health and activity level. Please give it a watch.

It became very obvious when the White House was promising a major announcement on Monday that wasn’t major at all that the talk about Trump’s health was bothering the administration.

It was not a coincidence that one of the first questions Trump got at the event was from Fox News’s Peter Doocy, who asked about Trump’s health.

Then things got weird:

 I didn’t see that. I have heard it’s crazy, but last week I did numerous news conferences, all successful. They went very well. This is going very well. And then I didn’t do any for two days and they said there must be something wrong with him.

Biden wouldn’t do ’em for months, you wouldn’t see him. And nobody ever said there was ever anything wrong with him. And we know he wasn’t in the greatest of shape. No, I heard that. I get reports. Now you knew I did an interview that lasted for about an hour and a half with somebody and everybody saw that was on one of your competitors.

I did numerous shows and also did a number of truths, long truths, and I think pretty poignant truths now. I was very active over the weekend. They also knew I went out to visit some people at the club that I own pretty nearby on the Potomac River. No. I’ve been very active actually over the weekend.



This story originally appeared on Politicususa

JMGO N1S Ultra 4K Triple Laser Projector review: Great picture, but needs support

0



The JMGO N1S Ultra 4K Triple Laser Projector is a decent choice for the living room, but its excellent picture quality really should be supported by an Apple TV and better speakers.

JMGO N1S Ultra 4K Triple Laser Projector review: Set and ready to go

A projector can deliver a more cinematic feel while watching movies at home. However, it’s never just the projector, as you also have to work on cutting light from coming through windows to get a better picture, let alone acquiring a screen.

Laser projectors have become one answer to the light issue, with models often producing an image in low-light situations that can thwart traditional projectors.

Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums


This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Come Hell and High Water’ Is So Heartbreaking

0


The bustling city of New Orleans, known for its vibrant music, rich history, and unbeatable spirit, was forever altered when Hurricane Katrina struck in late August 2005. Now, over two decades later, Netflix’s explosive three-part docuseries, Katrina: Come Hell and High Water, released on August 27, 2025, exposes painful truths authorities would have preferred to let slip beneath the floodwaters. By weaving harrowing survivor testimonies with never-before-seen archival footage and a scorching examination of governmental oversight, or, frankly, the lack thereof, the series thrusts audiences back into that fateful summer.

Katrina: Come Hell and High Water reframes the hurricane not simply as a natural disaster, but as a human-made calamity, spotlighting racial and economic inequities that shaped who could escape and who could not. As such, the series channels emotional resonance alongside prompt investigative action, exposing how systematic neglect turned a storm into an embodiment of institutional failure and broken promises.

‘Katrina: Come Hell and High Water’ Reveals That the Storm of Neglect Was Man-Made

Netflix

At first glance, Katrina seems like a tale of nature’s fury, but this docuseries makes it clear that the disaster was born of human error and bureaucratic fault. With levees that collapsed under pressure they were never designed to bear, and evacuation policies that failed to protect the most vulnerable in society, Katrina: Come Hell and High Water exposes how governance and infrastructure fell dramatically short. Survivors recount how evacuation orders came too late, resources never arrived, and the policies in place failed those who had no vehicles or means of leaving. Many of these shortcomings affect people of color living in low-lying neighborhoods.

Diving deeper, the series also sheds light on the transformation of the Louisiana Superdome, which evolved from a refuge to a sort of prison. What was meant to be a “shelter of last resort” instead became a space of desperation and neglect. It was overcrowded and undersupplied, and despite guaranteeing safety for those evacuating, it did not offer what it promised to evacuees. The docuseries also chronicles accounts of families trapped in their attics, homes lifting off their foundation, and people writing SOS messages from rooftops, becoming a chilling testament to how quickly human error and ill-prepared response turned a tragedy into absolute mayhem.

Despite all it reveals, the most searing part of the docuseries is perhaps the critique of systematic inequity rooted in race and poverty. Media described Black people desperate for food as “looters,” yet labeled white people doing the same as “finding” food. Aid and rebuilding funds were funneled away from historically Black neighborhoods, and interventions such as the Make It Right housing initiative, backed by celebrity goodwill, turned out to be rife with structural failings, leaving homeowners with crumbling foundations and legal battles.

‘Katrina: Come Hell and High Water’ Reveals Dark Truths

Footage from Katrina: Come Hell and High Water with people on a roof Netflix

Through rare, never-before-aired footage, and intimate home videos recorded by residents, viewers witness the raw, unmediated chaos that the mainstream media overlooked or brushed past. From family-shot clips of houses floating in murky water to images of desperate pleas scrawled across rooftops, Katrina: Come Hell and High Water exposes heartbreaking visuals that authorities likely hoped would fully fade from collective memory.

Beyond visuals, the narrative also contrasts the portrayal of different communities in real time. The docuseries draws attention to the blatant differences in how news outlets choose to describe white individuals and Black individuals, vilifying the latter. These jarring juxtapositions compel viewers to confront how language ultimately holds the power to shape empathy, and how narrative control can become another form of erasure.

Another striking revelation in the docuseries is the extent to which official records downplayed the death toll and concealed the scope of the tragedy. Survivors describe entire blocks where bodies went unrecovered for weeks, while authorities released figures that vastly underestimated the human cost. Archival documents and on-the-ground footage reveal how numbers were quietly revised and data manipulated, raising questions about accountability and transparency. These buried details elevate Katrina from being a weather disaster into a cautionary tale about institutional dishonesty.

‘Katrina: Come Hell and High Water’ Depicts the Resilience of Survivors

Footage from Katrina: Come Hell and High Water with a man playing a saxaphone
 
Netflix

Amid devastation, the true heart of New Orleans emerges in the docuseries, carrying a truth that threatens mainstream, polished narratives. Katrina: Come Hell and High Water immortalizes survivors telling their own stories, including residents who returned despite lacking support, artists who keep traditions alive, and community leaders rebuilding their neighborhoods from the ground up. Their voices insist that resilience was not an option, but the heartbeat that kept the community going even when official accounts chose to sideline them.

Resilience also shines through in how communities resisted policies that threatened to erase their neighborhoods and culture. Even as gentrification and redevelopment plans displaced families and reshaped historic areas, residents pushed back, holding on to traditions, reopening local businesses, and preserving spaces that defined their identity. The series highlights how this defiance and determination to rebuild on their own terms became as vital as food or shelter in the aftermath of Katrina.

Although a harrowing account, Katrina: Come Hell and High Water concludes on a fiery note of hope. Doing more than simply commemorating the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, the series tears back the veneer of collective amnesia, unmasking the ugly mechanics of neglect, racism, and bureaucratic failures. However, it also offers a powerful counter-narrative that values culture, community, and resistance over trauma. In doing so, it reminds audiences that memory is a form of justice and that storytelling is the groundwork for accountability. Katrina: Come Hell and High Water is now streaming on Netflix.



This story originally appeared on Movieweb

Welcome To Plathville Villains’ Concerns About New Family Member May Be Valid

0


Welcome To Plathville’s newest family member may be accepted by some, but the show’s most villainous Plaths haven’t found their footing yet, and it could be valid that they’re feeling distrustful. While Welcome To Plathville season 7 has been consistently building up to the exciting wedding of younger daughter Lydia Plath and her new beau Zac Wyse, something feels amiss.

Throughout Welcome To Plathville season 7 thus far, several of Lydia’s siblings have found issue with Zac’s behavior and demeanor. While Ethan Plath and Micah Plath, two of Lydia’s older brothers, shouldn’t be asking Lydia’s soon-to-be husband about his sexual orientation, their assessment of Zac had a lot to do with how quickly his relationship with Lydia shook out ahead of the wedding.

Similarly, Lydia’s mother Kim Plath took issue with the pace of her daughter’s impeding nuptials, feeling like it echoed her own relationship with her now-estranged husband Barry Plath. With Kim’s marriage to Barry coming together in a matter of weeks, her stress surrounding Lydia’s choices has seemed valid. Now, Zac’s behavior may be proving the most villainous Plath family members right.

Zac’s Tone With Lydia In Recent Welcome To Plathville Episodes Hasn’t Been Kind

He Wasn’t Happy About Her Finishing His Sentences

Welcome to Plathville Zac Wyse
Image via TLC

In the most recent episode of Welcome To Plathville, which featured Zac and Lydia going to visit Micah and his girlfriend Veronica Peters in their new Florida home, saw the almost newlyweds talking about their relationship at the top of the episode. While Lydia seemed to be happily hanging on Zac’s every word, he wasn’t as kind with his future wife.

Lydia was continually finishing Zac’s sentences during an interview moment on the series, which left Zac frustrated while Lydia was confused about his tone shift. Zac, clearly a bit aggravated at the way Lydia was speaking for him, made a tough comment and stopped her from talking alongside him. His shift in demeanor was concerning for long-time Welcome To Plathville viewers.

Welcome To Plathville Villains Ethan, Micah, & Kim May Be Right To Distrust Zac

His Demeanor Was Concerning Toward Lydia

Welcome to Plathville's Lydia Plath leaning on Zac Wyse
Welcome to Plathville’s Lydia Plath and Zac Wyse
Warner Bros. Discovery

As Ethan, Micah, and Kim have all found issue with Zac and Lydia’s relationship in the past, it’s possible after seeing him become more directly domineering on camera with Lydia that their issues about Zac could be more valid than expected. Though Zac seems like a generally nice person who’s move into a good spot with some of the family, his behavior wasn’t acceptable.

While Ethan, Micah, and Kim’s judgement has been questionable in the past, the fact that they’ve all picked up on some unexpected energy from Zac in the past made it more jarring to see it on display. The comfort Zac felt in reprimanding Lydia was strange to see on screen, and the Welcome To Plathville audience may see similar discomfort moving ahead.

Welcome To Plathville airs Tuesdays at 10 p.m. EDT on TLC.



This story originally appeared on Screenrant

Cardi B wins civil assault trial brought by security guard

0


Cardi B has prevailed in a civil lawsuit brought against her by a Beverly Hills security guard after two days of testimony from the rapper that was sometimes colorful and drew laughter from jurors.

Emani Ellis sued Cardi B for $24 million, accusing her of assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress in the aftermath of a confrontation in a hallway outside of an obstetrician’s office. Ellis claimed that, during the set-to, the rapper scratched her with a long nail extension, leaving a facial scar.

The hip-hop star was found not liable on all counts by jurors after less
than an hour of deliberations.

“I swear to God, I will say it on my deathbed, I did not touch that woman,” Cardi B said outside the courthouse following the conclusion of the trial. She added that she had missed her kids’ first day of school because of the civil trial.

“I want to thank my lawyers,” she said, “I want to thank the jurors, I want to thank the judge, and I want to thank the respectful press.”

Cardi B, whose real name is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, testified that she never touched, scratched or spat at the security guard, who she believed was taking video of her with her cellphone. The rapper was four months pregnant and had an appointment on the day of the incident — Feb. 24, 2018.

Ellis worked as a security guard at the Beverly Hills building where Cardi B had her medical appointment, and she testified that she was doing her rounds when she saw the celebrity exit the elevator. She testified that she was overcome with excitement and declared, “Wow, it’s Cardi B.”

Ellis alleged that the performer then turned to her and said, “Why the f— are you telling people you’ve seen me?” Cardi B then accused her of trying to spread news about her being at the doctor’s office, she testified during the four-day trial.

Cardi B cursed at her, used the N-word and other slurs, called her names, threatened her job, body-shamed her and mocked her career, Ellis said. She alleged Cardi B spat on her, took a swing at her and scratched her left cheek with a 2- to 3-inch fingernail.

But jurors believed Cardi B’s version of events, which was that Ellis was the aggressor.

The rapper blasted the plaintiff in an Alhambra courtroom, saying she was looking for a payout. Cardi B said the pair went chest-to-chest and exchanged angry words but nothing more.

She told jurors that she said to Ellis: “B—, get the f— out of my face. Why are you in my face? Why are you recording me? Ain’t you supposed to be security?’

“I’m thinking to myself, ‘Girl is big!’” she testified.” “She’s got big black boots on. I’m like, ‘D—, the hell am i gonna do now?’”

The rapper said that she’s 5 feet 3 and was 130 pounds and pregnant at the time of the incident. She wouldn’t have tried to fight the guard, who was far larger, she said.

Asked if she was “disabled” during the incident, Cardi B’s comments drew laughter in the courtroom: “At that moment, when you’re pregnant, I’m very disabled,” she said with a roll of her eyes. “You want me to tell you the things I can’t do?”

Tierra Malcolm, a receptionist for Dr. David Finke, with whom Cardi B had an appointment that day, told jurors that she saw Ellis corner the celebrity. The receptionist said she then got between them, and the guard reached for the rapper. Malcolm said she ended up with a cut on her own forehead.

Finke testified that he saw the guard cause that injury and also hit the receptionist’s shoulder. He further said that Ellis had no injuries. Both testified they never saw Cardi B hit Ellis.

During closing arguments on Tuesday, Ellis’ attorney, Ron Rosen Janfaza, told jurors, “Cardi B needs to be held accountable.” “There was no video camera … so really it comes down to one thing — do you believe, Ms. Ellis, a guard with a good record? She is a model citizen,” he told jurors.

Rosen Janfaza noted that, under cross-examination, the rapper acknowledged that she and Ellis were chest-to-chest as expletives were exchanged, and that alone is an unwelcome touch and battery on his client, he said. He told jurors that the receptionist and doctor did not see the 40 to 50 seconds where Cardi B labeled his client fat, spat on her and took a swing at her.

He said his client suffered for seven years, and “this was a violent attack.”

Cardis B’s attorney, Peter Anderson, said jurors needed to employ common sense to reject the security guard’s story and that the preponderance of evidence showed his client did nothing more than yell and curse, and “that isn’t something you can sue over.”

“The question is whether Cardi ever struck the plaintiff,” Anderson said. And the evidence is overwhelming that she did not, he said. Anderson said that the guard testified that she never made a police report, did not seek immediate medical attention, did not even use a Band-Aid on the scratch, but went home and took a nap.




This story originally appeared on LA Times