Thursday, February 6, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 308

World-first dementia study finds simple habits can improve sleep

0


Couple Philip and Charman took part in the groundbreaking research (Image: Philip Robinson)

Simple changes to sleep habits can improve the lives of people with dementia and their family carers, a pioneering study has found.

Scientists at UCL developed a world-first programme which provides six hours of support for carers to learn about and test new techniques.

Philip Robinson, 70, and his wife Charman, 73, were among hundreds of volunteers who trialled methods including use of light boxes, increasing daytime activity and building bedtime routines.

Former dyslexia tutor Charman was diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia, a rare form of Alzheimer’s that affects speech and language, 10 years ago.

Philip said: “As things progressed, Charman slept much more lightly, would find it difficult getting to sleep and often woke early. It grew as a problem.

“She was waking up at night, sometimes having some behavioural problems, she was unstable on her feet. If she got up there was a risk that she would have a fall.”

Charman was diagnosed aged 64 after she began struggling with mathematics and finding the right words. She is now unable to speak or write and has difficulty walking.

The couple, of New Malden, in Surrey, are passionate about taking part in research so enrolled in the DREAMS START sleep study.

Philip took part in six guided sessions, which helped him better understand how dementia affects sleep, and trialled a range of interventions.

They implemented changes such as reducing stimulation an hour before bed, listening to classical music and drinking hot chocolate.

Philip said: “When you’re living with someone with dementia, your routine gets knocked for six. So re-establishing, particularly that night-time routine, was one of the first things we did.”

Philip and Charman, who have been married for 40 years and have three children, also tried to be more active, such as doing some light work in the garden during the day. And they used a light box to reset Charman’s circadian rhythm.

“We achieved better sleep for both, and for me a sense of being able to help Charman,” Philip said. “Having this support for six weeks brought me a bit more back into control.

“The situation when you’re living with someone with dementia can often feel like, where do I go next? This gave me some techniques.”

Philip said he would recommend the programme to others, adding: “Every single person is different with dementia but this is definitely something that has worked for us – and it could work for you.”

The UCL trial involved 377 people with dementia recruited from NHS memory and older adult mental health services, and their family carers.

Half received standard care while the rest took part in the DREAMS START intervention. Their sleep was assessed before and after using a measure called the Sleep Disorders Inventory.

Levels of sleep disturbance were significantly lower among both people with dementia and carers who completed the programme, at four and eight months later.

Dr Penny Rapaport, a professor of psychological interventions in dementia at UCL, said sleep disturbances were a common problem and can mean sufferers have to leave their homes and move into care facilities.

She added: “Sleep medication can make people more likely to fall over and increases their risk of things like heart problems and death. It also doesn’t work very well so there’s a need for something to help people who are living at home.”

The team will check in with participants after two years to evaluate the long-term benefits. And they are considering whether the programme could be adapted for other conditions such as Parkinson’s disease.

It was delivered by facilitators who have a background in psychology but are not clinical specialists, making it cheaper to deliver than interventions requiring a doctor or nurse’s supervision, Dr Rapaport said.

She added: “It’s safe, it doesn’t cause harm. It has the potential to be rolled out widely in the NHS and make a real difference to the NHS.”

The findings were published in the The Lancet Healthy Longevity journal. The research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Angelina Jolie & Daughter Zahara Pose Together at Golden Globe Awards 2025

0


On January 5, Angelina Jolie and Zahara had a cute mother-daughter moment at the Golden Globe Awards 2025. The duo showed up at the Los Angeles event in complementary fits. The actor wore a dark beaded gown, while Zahara donned a full-length dress that incorporated similar-looking detailing on white. The pair’s ensembles went really well together, creating an eye-catching contrast in the red carpet photos.

Angelina and Zahara Jolie stun in bedazzled dresses at Golden Globe Awards 2025

Photo Credit: Etienne Laurent | AFP via Getty Images

Angelina Jolie brought along her daughter Zahara to walk down the red carpet at the Golden Globe Awards 2025 on Sunday. The duo served high fashion at the event, with the actor showing up in an Alexander McQueen gown. The entire piece had a bedazzled look to it, as the gems interacted brilliantly with the lights for a sparkly fit.

Jolie’s gown was a moment. Moreover, the sheer panels provided a peek of her fit physique. The Alexander McQueen piece was also laden with beads and crystals, using a mix of gray and white for a textured look. In addition, the gown had an interesting hemline to give it an almost tattered look. Jolie accessorized the gown with shiny pointed-toe heels and minimalistic jewelry pieces. Her bling even included an edgy cuff earring that had a bedazzled chain attached to it.

Zahara’s dress took a page from her mom’s ensemble, featuring black embroidery on a white full-length dress. It tied in well with Jolie’s gown, delivering a complementary mother-daughter look. Besides, the embroidery was in the shape of a flowering tree, adding a hint of softness to the black-and-white fit.

Angelina Jolie and her daughter Zahara kept their beauty choices minimal for the Golden Globe Awards 2025. The actor flaunted her new bangs in a chic half-up half-down hairdo. Meanwhile, her daughter decided to keep her hair swept away from her face in a sleek updo. To add some flair to her hairstyle, Zahara let a few delicate tendrils graze the nape of her neck to complete the look.

Originally reported by Namrata Padhee on Momtastic.



This story originally appeared on Realitytea

Golden Globes 2025: The Complete Winners List

0


Just as we’re all putting our holiday ornaments away and finishing off the last of the leftovers, awards season comes roaring in! The first event, the 82nd Annual Golden Globe Awards, airs live on Sunday, January 5 at 8 p.m. ET/5 p.m. PT, on CBS and streaming on Paramount+.

The Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) likely had a tough time picking its 2025 nominees in television and film after a strong year in both, with The Bear, Baby Reindeer, Slow Horses, and Shogun among those with multiple nods in the TV categories. On the movies front, films like Dune: Part Two, Wicked, Emilia Pérez, The Brutalist, and more are up for awards.

The Roast of Tom Brady breakout Nikki Glaser will bring her signature edge as host of the night’s proceedings, who has promised more (light) roasting of celebs — could she match fan-favorite past host Ricky Gervais? — and lots of laughs. “I understand the assignment that I’ve been given,” she told CNN recently.

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE

Selena Gomez, Emilia Pérez

Ariana Grande, Wicked

Felicity Jones, The Brutalist

Margaret Qualley, The Substance

Isabella Rossellini, Conclave

Zoe Saldaña, Emilia Pérez — WINNER

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Kristen Bell, Nobody Wants This

Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary

Ayo Edebiri, The Bear

Selena Gomez, Only Murders in the Building

Kathryn Hahn, Agatha All Along

Jean Smart, Hacks — WINNER

Hilary Bronwyn Gayle/Max

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE

Yura Borisov, Anora 

Kieran Culkin, A Real Pain — WINNER

Edward Norton, A Complete Unknown

Guy Pearce, The Brutalist

Jeremy Strong, The Apprentice 

Denzel Washington, Gladiator II

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES, DRAMA

Donald Glover, Mr and Mrs Smith

Jake Gyllenhaal, Presumed Innocent

Gary Oldman, Slow Horses

Eddie Redmayne, Day of the Jackal

Hiroyuki Sanada, Shogun — WINNER

Billy Bob Thornton, Landman

Hiroyuki Sanada as Lord Toranaga in the 'Shōgun' series finale

FX

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE ON TELEVISION

Liza Colón-Zayas, The Bear

Hannah Einbinder, Hacks

Dakota Fanning, Ripley

Jessica Gunning, Baby Reindeer — WINNER

Allison Janney, The Diplomat

Kali Reis, True Detective: Night Country

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE ON TELEVISION

Tadanobu Asano, Shōgun — WINNER

Javier Bardem, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story

Harrison Ford, Shrinking

Jack Lowden, Slow Horses

Diego Luna, La Maquina

Ebon Moss-Bachrach, The Bear

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES, MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Adam Brody, Nobody Wants This

Ted Danson, A Man on the Inside

Steve Martin, Only Murders in the Building

Jason Segel, Shrinking

Martin Short, Only Murders in the Building

Jeremy Allen White, The Bear — WINNER

Jeremy Allen White and Ayo Edebiri in 'The Bear'

Chuck Hodes/FX

BEST SCREENPLAY, MOTION PICTURE

Emilia Pérez, Jacques Audiard

Anora, Sean Baker

The Brutalist, Brady Corbet, Mona Fastvold

A Real Pain, Jesse Eisenberg

The Substance, Coralie Fargeat

Conclave, Peter Straughan — WINNER

BEST PERFORMANCE IN STAND-UP COMEDY ON TELEVISION

Jamie Foxx, What Had Happened Was

Nikki Glaser, Someday You’ll Die

Seth Meyers, Dad Man Walking

Adam Sandler, Love You

Ali Wong, Single Lady — WINNER

Ramy Youssef, More Feelings

BEST MOTION PICTURE, FOREIGN LANGUAGE

All We Imagine As Light

Emilia Pérez — WINNER

The Girl With the Needle

I’m Still Here

The Seed of the Sacred Fig

Vermiglio

Jodie Foster in 'True Detective: Night Country'

HBO

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LIMITED SERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

Cate Blanchett, Disclaimer

Jodie Foster, True Detective: Night Country — WINNER

Cristin Milioti, The Penguin

Sofía Vergara, Griselda

Naomi Watts, Feud: Capote vs. the Swans

Kate Winslet, The Regime

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LIMITED SERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

Colin Farrell, The Penguin — WINNER

Richard Gadd, Baby Reindeer

Kevin Kline, Disclaimer

Cooper Koch, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story

Ewan McGregor, A Gentleman in Moscow

Andrew Scott, Ripley 

Colin Farrell in 'The Penguin' finale

HBO

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE, MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Amy Adams, Nightbitch

Cynthia Erivo, Wicked

Karla Sofía Gascón, Emilia Pérez

Mikey Madison, Anora

Demi Moore, The Substance — WINNER

Zendaya, Challengers

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE, MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Jesse Eisenberg, A Real Pain

Hugh Grant, Heretic

Gabriel Labelle, Saturday Night

Jesse Plemons, Kinds of Kindness

Glen Powell, Hit Man

Sebastian Stan, A Different Man — WINNER

BEST MOTION PICTURE, ANIMATED

Flow — WINNER

Inside Out 2

Memoir of a Snail

Moana 2

Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl

The Wild Robot

Eddie Redmayne as the Jackal in Day of the Jackal

Marcell Piti / Carnival Film & Television Limited

BEST DIRECTOR, MOTION PICTURE

Jacques Audiard, Emilia Pérez

Sean Baker, Anora

Edward Berger, Conclave

Brady Corbet, The Brutalist — WINNER

Coralie Fargeat, The Substance

Payal Kapadia, All We Imagine as Light

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE, MOTION PICTURE

Volker Bertelmann, Conclave

Daniel Blumberg, The Brutalist

Kris Bowers, The Wild Robot

Clément Ducol, Camille, Emilia Pérez

Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross, Challengers — WINNER

Hans Zimmer, Dune: Part Two

Mike Faist, Zendaya, and Josh O'Connor in 'Challengers'

Challengers; MGM /Courtesy Everett Collection

BEST ORIGINAL SONG, MOTION PICTURE

The Last Showgirl, “Beautiful That Way” by Miley Cyrus, Lykke Li, and Andrew Wyatt

Challengers, “Compress/Regress”

Emilia Pérez, “El Mal” by Clément Ducol, Camille and Jacques Audiard — WINNER

Better Man, “Forbidden Road” by Robbie Williams, Freddy Wexler & Sacha Skarbek

The Wild Robot, “Kiss the Sky”

Emilia Pérez, “Mi Camino” by Clément Ducol and Camille

CINEMATIC AND BOX OFFICE ACHIEVEMENT, MOTION PICTURE

Alien: Romulus

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice  

Deadpool & Wolverine

Gladiator 2

Inside Out 2

Twisters

Wicked — WINNER

The Wild Robot

Richard Gadd and Jessica Gunning in 'Baby Reindeer'

Netflix

BEST TELEVISION LIMITED SERIES, ANTHOLOGY SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

Baby Reindeer — WINNER

Disclaimer

Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story

The Penguin

Ripley

True Detective: Night Country

BEST TELEVISION SERIES – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Abbott Elementary

The Bear

The Gentlemen

Hacks — WINNER

Nobody Wants This

Only Murders in the Building

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES, DRAMA

Kathy Bates, Matlock

Emma D’Arcy, House of the Dragon

Maya Erskine, Mr. and Mrs. Smith

Keira Knightley, Black Doves

Keri Russell, The Diplomat

Anna Sawai, Shōgun — WINNER

BEST TELEVISION SERIES, DRAMA

The Day of the Jackal

The Diplomat

Mr. and Mrs. Smith 

Shōgun — WINNER

Slow Horses

Squid Game

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE, DRAMA

Pamela Anderson, The Last Showgirl 

Angelina Jolie, Maria

Nicole Kidman, Babygirl

Tilda Swinton, The Room Next Door

Fernanda Torres, I’m Still Here — WINNER

Kate Winslet, Lee

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE, DRAMA

Adrien Brody, The Brutalist — WINNER

Timothée Chalamet, A Complete Unknown

Daniel Craig, Queer

Colman Domingo, Sing Sing

Ralph Fiennes, Conclave

Sebastian Stan, The Apprentice

Timothée Chalamet and Zendaya in 'Dune: Part Two'

Niko Tavernise / © Warner Bros. / Everett Collection

BEST MOTION PICTURE, DRAMA

The Brutalist — WINNER

A Complete Unknown

Conclave

Dune: Part Two

Nickel Boys

September 5

BEST MOTION PICTURE, MUSICAL OR COMEDY

Anora

Challengers

Emilia Pérez – WINNER

A Real Pain

The Substance

Wicked

82nd Annual Golden Globe Awards, Sunday, January 5, CBS




This story originally appeared on TV Insider

A Faster PC Is Just One Click Away—and Just $14.99

0


Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think you’ll find interesting and useful. If you purchase them, Entrepreneur may get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners.

Business professionals know the value of a fast and reliable computer. Whether you’re managing spreadsheets, sending emails, or presenting in a meeting, your PC should work as hard as you do.

That’s where CCleaner Professional 2024 can really support you. It’s a trusted, award-winning optimization tool designed to keep your computer in peak condition. For just $14.99 (reg. $29), you get a one-year license for up to three PCs, making it a cost-effective way to enhance your productivity.

Over time, your computer can get bogged down with unused files, slow startups, and privacy-compromising data. CCleaner Professional tackles all these issues with just a click, helping you regain speed, free up space, and protect sensitive information. Whether tech-savvy or a beginner, CCleaner’s intuitive interface ensures you can quickly optimize your PC without hassle.

Key features to save you time and frustration

  • Boost performance: Say goodbye to lagging apps and slow startups. CCleaner cleans out unused files and unnecessary background programs to ensure your PC runs faster.
  • Enhanced privacy: Worried about your browsing data? CCleaner removes cookies, search history, and other tracking files, keeping your online activity private.
  • Driver and software updates: Outdated drivers can slow down your PC and cause compatibility issues. CCleaner’s Driver Updater ensures your hardware runs smoothly, while the Software Updater reduces vulnerabilities by keeping your apps current.
  • Health Check tool: Analyze and tune up your PC with ease. CCleaner’s Health Check feature identifies performance issues and fixes them in minutes.

Perfect for the modern workplace

Whether you work from home or manage an office, CCleaner helps keep your systems running smoothly. This deal, which includes a license for up to three PCs, is ideal for small business owners, freelancers, and remote workers who want to maximize productivity on multiple devices.

Get a year of CCleaner Professional for just $14.99 (reg. $29) for a limited time.

CCleaner Professional 2024 Key [1 Year for 3 PC] – $14.99

Get It Here

StackSocial prices subject to change.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

NUTEX HEALTH TO PRESENT AT THE 43rd ANNUAL J.P. MORGAN HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE By Investing.com

0

HOUSTON, Jan. 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Nutex Health Inc. (“Nutex Health” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: NUTX), a physician-led, integrated healthcare delivery system comprised of 24 state-of-the-art micro-hospitals in 11 states and primary care-centric, risk-bearing physician networks, today announced that  it will be presenting at the industry’s largest healthcare investment symposium” the 43rd  Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference. This event will take place from January 13th to 16th in San Francisco, California.

Nutex Health Presentation Details:

Date:  Thursday, January 16, 2025
Time: 10:30 AM11:10 AM PST
Venue: Elizabethan B Conference Room at the Westin St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco

In addition to the formal presentation, company management will be available to participate in one-on-one meetings with qualified members of the investor community who are registered to attend the conference.

About Nutex Health Inc.

Headquartered in  Houston, Texas  and founded in 2011, Nutex Health Inc. (NASDAQ: NUTX) is a healthcare management and operations company with two divisions: a Hospital Division and a Population Health Management Division.

The Hospital Division owns, develops and operates innovative health care  centers including micro-hospitals, specialty hospitals, and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs). This division owns and operates 24 facilities in 11 states.

The Population Health Management division owns and operates provider networks such as Independent (LON:) Physician Associations (IPAs).

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and information included in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. When used in this press release, the words or phrases “will”, “will likely result,” “expected to,” “will continue,” “anticipated,” “estimate,” “projected,” “intend,” “goal,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks, known and unknown, and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Such uncertainties and risks include, but are not limited to, our ability to successfully execute our growth strategy, changes in laws or regulations, including the interim final and final rules implemented under the No Surprises Act , economic conditions, dependence on management, dilution to stockholders, lack of capital, the effects of rapid growth upon the Company and the ability of management to effectively respond to the growth and demand for products and services of the Company, newly developing technologies, the Company’s ability to compete, conflicts of interest in related party transactions, regulatory matters, protection of technology, lack of industry standards, the effects of competition and the ability of the Company to obtain future financing. An extensive list of factors that can affect future results are discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and in the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2024, June 30, 2024 and September 31, 2024under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item IA thereof, and other documents filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such factors could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed within this press release.




This story originally appeared on Investing

Rival CEO spread doubt about Nippon Steel deal prospects to Wall Street, documents allege

0


WASHINGTON — Even as Nippon Steel faced skepticism of its doomed $14.9 billion bid for US Steel from the Biden administration, it was also contending with headwinds from an unlikely source: the CEO of a rival bidder for the firm who repeatedly cast doubt on the deal’s prospects to investors.

Lourenco Goncalves, CEO of steelmaker Cleveland-Cliffs, which made a failed $7 billion bid for US Steel in August 2023, participated in at least nine calls assuring investors that President Joe Biden would scuttle the Nippon Steel merger months before he did so on Friday, according to summaries of investor calls included in a Dec. 17 letter from lawyers for Nippon Steel and US Steel to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS) and confirmed to Reuters by two participants in the calls.

“I can’t force US Steel to sell to me, but I can work my magic to make a deal that I don’t agree with not to close,” he told investors on a March 13 call hosted by JP Morgan, the letter quoted Goncalves as saying.

Gary Works, an integrated steel mill operated by US Steel in Gary, Indiana, seen on Dec. 12, 2024. REUTERS/Vincent Alban

“It’s not closing, and Biden hasn’t spoken yet. He will.”

The next day, Biden announced his opposition to the tie-up.

CFIUS, which reviews foreign investments in the US for national security risks, could not reach consensus on whether to greenlight the Nippon Steel transaction and referred the matter to Biden in late December, setting the stage for his Friday block.

Goncalves declined to comment and a representative from Cleveland-Cliffs did not respond to a request for comment. Nippon Steel and the Treasury Department, which leads CFIUS, also declined to comment. US Steel said the company will continue to fight for this deal in response to questions for this story. The White House said neither Goncalves nor his comments played a role in Biden’s decision to kill the deal. It said on Friday that the proposed purchase presented national security concerns.

JP Morgan declined to comment, but a note to clients summarizing its March 2024 industrials conference mentions the event with Goncalves, saying “management reiterated its expectation that the deal will not close.” A participant in the call confirmed Goncalves’ forecast Biden would soon take aim at the deal.

While Goncalves made similar comments about the deal to analysts on three earnings calls this year, his private remarks made throughout 2024 about the deal process show the extent of his effort to cast doubt on Nippon’s bid for US Steel. His comments sometimes preceded drops in the US Steel share price, Nippon Steel and US Steel told CFIUS.

Cleveland-Cliffs has previously expressed interest in making another bid.

The steelmaker, which has been led by Brazilian-born Goncalves for over a decade, made the unsolicited bid for US Steel with support from the United Steelworkers union, arguing the companies combined would “create a lower-cost, more innovative, and stronger domestic supplier.”

But US Steel raised concerns a tie-up with Cleveland-Cliffs risked being shot down by antitrust regulators because it would consolidate the supply of steel to US automakers and put up to 95% of US iron ore production under the control of one company. US Steel’s board rejected the offer.

Nippon Steel’s December all-cash offer was valued at twice Cleveland-Cliffs’ price, and Nippon later promised to revitalize US Steel’s aging mills with investment from an allied nation.

But the offer became politicized, with both Biden and Republican President-elect Donald Trump pledging to kill the deal as they wooed voters in the swing state of Pennsylvania where US Steel is headquartered.

Trump and Biden both asserted the company should remain American-owned after USW President David McCall expressed his opposition to the tie-up.

Biden’s objections led to “impermissible undue influence” from the White House on CFIUS’s national security review of the tie-up, the companies alleged in a letter obtained by Reuters last month that also contained the summaries of the investor calls with Goncalves.

Goncalves previously disputed CFIUS was considering the merits of the deal.

In a March 15 call with a top investor in US Steel confirmed by a participant in the call, he said, “There’s no process. This is not going to be a process. CFIUS is just cover for a President to kill a deal. CFIUS is a bunch of bureaucrats, second and third level, inside the cabinet…It means the President can do whatever he wants.”



This story originally appeared on NYPost

‘This one’s brave and odd’

0

Did you miss me? I’m back

Me, back to work. To kvetch and bitch.

Annoyance: TV anchorettes. Skirts so short you can see where they no longer need touch-ups.

Hookers who now do crossword puzzles vertically so no need to come across.

Chelsea City Councilman Erik Bottcher on Christmas trees that have now lived with us longer than brothers-in-law: “Parks do mulch fests. They repay you with fragrant pine needles that freshen your old sweaters.” But won’t work with husbands.

One graying “analyst” squats in front of his kitchen plus his library of paperbacks which you can view.

Blake Lively’s lawsuit. She’s right. But WHY sign on to a filthy disgusting project like depicting oral sex in the first place? What ever happened to Shirley Temple?

Former LI Rep. George Santos, useless as a caterpillar, then zapped from Congress, has a podcast. About what? Who cares.

Belated thanks to Giuliano for Primola’s sane and perfect New Year’s Eve.

Don’t take the Brits for Grant-ed

America no longer has a central authority. Glued onto Bragg and Atlanta’s Fani Willis, the press went nowhere. Failing the law begets. Maybe 14 million unvetted foreigners are bedded down here.

Our White House need forget about making Greenland or Panama our 51st state.1812 we tried annexation. Went over as great as Kamala’s VP pick.

Great Britain had been kidnapping our sailors to work for the Brit Navy — as remembered by Bill O’Reilly, who reminded me of it — so in 1812 we figured we’d easily smash them as we did during the Revolutionary War. Didn’t happen.

And that’s when the “Star-Spangled Banner” was written. And ended with the Brits capturing parts of America. They even burned our capital.

When Britannia put down its guns and needed troops to beat back Napoleon, they let us alone and took their accents back home.

Wait. Even more. Could maybe be because those badly speaking people didn’t want it, but they even gave us back Detroit!

Speaking of those foreigners who talk through their noses, brings up Brit wit Hugh Grant. Creepy movie. “Heretic” is a devilish role.

Hugh: “If you can read a script without going for tea that’s a big box to tick. Most scripts I read are boring. This one’s brave and odd. Breaking rules. Not many locations. Depressing set. I thought I’m better at talking than listening so I could do something with this. I didn’t lose my faith but I did find some of the arguments extremely interesting.”

OK. Go. Say the devil made you do it.

Helping hand

Americans are the most generous people on earth. Even under high taxation and greedy companies and unrestrained capitalists gouging our working people, 2024 was a startling year for us. So the question is: Can it be that at least 10% of the human race is evil?

Or is that because of our unlawful guests — which means it’s only in America, kids, only in America.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Milgram Questions: Exploring the Ethics of Obedience and Social Influence

0


The human capacity for obedience is a complex phenomenon. We readily comply with requests from authority figures, social norms, and even internalized beliefs. But when does obedience become blind adherence, and how far are we willing to go in following orders? Psychologist Stanley Milgram‘s controversial experiment, known as the Milgram obedience study, explored these very questions through a series of carefully designed scenarios that introduced the concept of “Milgram questions.”

What is a Milgram Question?

A Milgram question is a loaded question designed to test a person’s commitment to a specific course of action. These questions typically present a false dilemma, where choosing the “correct” answer, which aligns with the perceived authority figure, potentially leads to negative consequences for another person. The “wrong” answer, on the other hand, might result in disapproval or exclusion.

Milgram questions are often phrased in a way that discourages open dissent or questioning of the authority figure’s instructions. For example, “Do you think it’s best to continue with the experiment?” Here, the question subtly implies that stopping the experiment might be wrong, even though the experiment itself involves inflicting harm on another person.

What Were Milgram’s Research Questions?

Stanley Milgram’s research aimed to understand the factors influencing human obedience to authority. Specifically, his central question was: How likely are people to obey an authority figure when instructed to perform actions that conflict with their conscience?

Milgram further explored how situational factors, such as the perceived legitimacy of the authority and the physical proximity of the victim, affected participants’ willingness to obey. He also investigated the role of personal characteristics like personality traits and prior experiences with authority in influencing obedience. By employing Milgram questions within his research design, he tested the limits of participants’ moral compass when faced with a seemingly innocuous authority figure issuing increasingly unethical commands.

The Milgram Obedience Study: A Landmark Experiment

Conducted in the early 1960s, Milgram’s obedience study remains one of the most controversial experiments in psychology. Participants were recruited under the guise of a learning and memory study. They were paired with a confederate (an actor posing as another participant) and instructed to administer increasingly severe electric shocks (fake, of course) to the confederate for providing incorrect answers in a memory test.

The experiment utilized Milgram questions throughout the process. The experimenter, a seemingly authoritative figure in a lab coat, repeatedly questioned participants when they expressed hesitation or discomfort with increasing the shock level. Phrases like “The experiment requires that you continue” or “You have no other choice, you must go on” pressured participants to comply despite the evident distress of the “learner” (the confederate).

The results of the Milgram study were startling. A surprisingly high percentage of participants (around 65%) continued to administer the highest level of shocks, even though they displayed visible signs of anxiety and discomfort. This high level of obedience under ethically questionable circumstances highlighted the power of the situation and influence of authority figures.

What Does the Milgram Experiment Suggest?

Milgram’s experiment raised profound ethical concerns about the potential for social pressure and contrived authority to override individual morality. It challenged the notion that people are inherently good and suggested that situational factors can heavily influence our behavior.

The experiment’s findings have been applied to various real-world scenarios, such as the following:

  • The Holocaust and atrocities committed by soldiers following orders.
  • Corporate cultures that encourage unethical behavior by employees.
  • The psychology of cult leaders and their ability to manipulate followers.

While the methodology of the Milgram experiment has been criticized for its deception and potential psychological harm towards participants, its core findings continue to spark discussions about human behavior, ethics, and the power dynamics within social structures.

The Legacy of Milgram Questions

Beyond the confines of the Milgram experiment, the concept of Milgram questions has broader implications. Everyday life presents situations where we encounter subtle pressures to conform or obey, even when it contradicts our personal beliefs. Identifying and analyzing Milgram questions can help us become more aware of the influence of authority figures and social pressures.

Here are some examples of Milgram questions encountered in everyday life:

  • In a workplace setting: A supervisor might ask, “Are you sure you can’t squeeze in some overtime to meet this deadline?” subtly implying that saying no might reflect poorly on the employee’s dedication.
  • In a social gathering: A friend might say, “Everyone’s going to the bar – are you still a total party pooper?” This question could pressure someone who would prefer not to drink to feel like they need to conform to the group activity.

By recognizing these types of loaded questions, we can engage in more critical thinking and make conscious choices that align with our values.

Who Was Stanley Milgram: Unveiling the Man Behind the Shocking Experiment

Stanley Milgram (1933-1984) was an American social psychologist whose name remains synonymous with one of the most controversial and impactful experiments in the history of psychology – the Milgram obedience study. While this experiment continues to spark debate, Milgram’s broader career explored themes of conformity, social influence, and the human capacity for obedience to authority.

Born in the Bronx, New York City, in 1933, Milgram’s early life was shaped by the events of World War II. The atrocities committed by the Nazis, particularly their adherence to authority figures during the Holocaust, became a central theme in his later work. He received his bachelor’s degree from Queens College, City University of New York, in 1954, and went on to earn his Ph.D. in social psychology from Harvard University in 1960.

During his graduate studies, Milgram worked as a research assistant to Solomon Asch, a renowned social psychologist known for his conformity experiments. Asch’s work, which demonstrated how individuals readily conformed to the opinions of a majority group even when those opinions were demonstrably wrong, undoubtedly influenced Milgram’s research interests.

Following his graduation, Milgram secured a position at Yale University, where he conducted the now-famous obedience study in the early 1960s. The experiment aimed to understand how far people would go in obeying an authority figure when instructed to perform actions that conflicted with their conscience.

The study, which involved administering increasingly severe electric shocks (fake, of course) to another participant (an actor), yielded shocking results. A surprisingly high percentage of participants continued to the highest shock levels, highlighting the power of authority and situational pressures to override individual morality.

The Milgram experiment sparked a firestorm of controversy. Critics questioned the ethics of subjecting participants to psychological distress and deception. However, the research also ignited a crucial conversation about social influence, obedience, and the potential for “evil” to manifest in ordinary people simply following orders.

Beyond the obedience study, Milgram’s research interests extended to exploring the concept of “small worlds.” In a series of experiments, he investigated the “six degrees of separation” theory, suggesting that any two people in the world are connected by a chain of no more than six acquaintances. His work in this area laid the groundwork for future research on social networks and connectivity.

Milgram was a prolific writer, publishing numerous articles and books throughout his career. His book, “Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View” (1974), remains a classic text in social psychology, detailing the methodology and findings of the obedience study.

Stanley Milgram’s legacy is complex. While the ethics of his obedience experiment continue to be debated, his contribution to social psychology is undeniable. His work forced us to confront the dark side of human behavior and the power of social influence in shaping our actions. By challenging our assumptions about obedience and conformity, Milgram’s research continues to inform discussions about human nature and the complexities of social interaction.

What to do When Your Zojirushi Rice Cooker Gets an H01 or H02 Error Code

What happened to Dale Robertson’s horse Jubilee?

What does it mean when a lizard poops on you?

What is the meaning of 18 bills in a debut?

What is the most expensive item on TF2?

Are lubber grasshoppers poisonous to dogs?

Ice JJ Fish Net Worth



This story originally appeared on Mostexpensivething

Appeals court blocks return of US net neutrality rules for ISPs – Computerworld

0



The appeals court based its argument, in part, on the ending of the so-called Chevron deference principle. This principle, which once required courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous laws, was ended by a US Supreme Court ruling in June 2024, and has widespread regulatory consequences for IT departments.

With Rosenworcel’s term of office drawing to a close, it seems unlikely that the FCC will continue to pursue the reinstatement of net neutrality rules for ISPs. Trump’s pick as her replacement, Brendan Carr, favors market-led innovation over federal oversight.

Implications for enterprises

With net neutrality off the table for now, enterprises face an unregulated internet landscape that could favor large ISPs. ISPs can legally prioritize or throttle specific traffic, forcing businesses to pay premiums for reliable, high-speed access to cloud services, SaaS applications, or online collaboration tools. Without rules preventing practices like throttling or prioritizing traffic, companies reliant on stable, fast internet connections may face increased operational costs.



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

The best wireless workout headphones for 2025

0


Regardless of what kind of exercise you’re into, if you’re working out, you’ll want a pair of wireless workout headphones. They allow you to be free and untethered during a serious weight-lifting session, a 5K run, an hour at the skate park and everywhere in between where you’re moving and sweating a ton. There are dozens of great wireless headphones and wireless earbud options out there, but for exercise in particular, there are additional factors to consider before picking one up like water resistance, battery life and overall comfort.

At Engadget, we’ve tested a bunch of fitness-ready headphones and earbuds to come up with our top picks, plus some advice to consider before you pick up a pair. All of our top picks below will work in and out of the gym, so you can invest in just one pair and make those your daily driver. If you’re primarily a runner, check out our list of best headphones for running.

Before diving in, it’s worth mentioning that this guide focuses on wireless earbuds. While you could wear over-ear or on-ear headphones during a workout, most of the best headphones available now do not have the same level of durability. Water and dust resistance, particularly the former, is important for any audio gear you plan on sweating with or taking outdoors, and that’s more prevalent in the wireless earbuds world.

Most earbuds have one of three designs: in-ear, in-ear with hook or open-ear. The first two are the most popular. In-ears are arguably the most common, while those with hooks promise better security and fit since they have an appendage that curls around the top of your ear. Open-ear designs don’t stick into your ear canal, but rather sit just outside of it. This makes it easier to hear the world around you while also listening to audio, and could be more comfortable for those who don’t like the intrusiveness of in-ear buds.

Even if a pair of headphones for working out aren’t marketed specifically as exercise headphones, a sturdy, water-resistant design will, by default, make them suitable for exercise. To avoid repetition, here’s a quick primer on durability, or ingression protection (IP) ratings. The first digit you’ll see after the “IP” refers to protection from dust and other potential intrusions, measured on a scale from 1 to 6. The second refers to water resistance or even waterproofing, in the best cases. The ratings for water resistance are ranked on a scale of 1 to 9; higher numbers mean more protection, while the letter “X” means the device is not rated for protection in that regard.

All of the earbuds we tested for this guide have at least an IPX4 rating, which means there’s no dust protection, but the buds can withstand splashes from any direction and are sweat resistant, but probably shouldn’t be submerged. For a detailed breakdown of all the possible permutations, check out this guide published by a supplier called The Enclosure Company.

Active noise cancellation (ANC) is becoming standard on wireless earbuds, at least those above a certain price point. If you’re looking for a pair of buds that can be your workout companion and serve you outside of the gym, too, noise cancelation is a good feature to have. It makes the buds more versatile, allowing you to block out the dull roar of your home or office so you can focus, or give you some solitude during a busy commute.

But an earbud’s ability to block out the world goes hand-in-hand with its ability to open things back up should you need it. Many ANC earbuds also support some sort of “transparency mode,” or various levels of noise reduction. This is important for running headphones because exercising outdoors, alongside busy streets, can be dangerous. You probably don’t want to be totally oblivious to what’s going on around you when you’re running outside; adjusting noise cancelation levels to increase your awareness will help with that. Stronger noise cancelation might be more appealing to those doing more indoor training if they want to block out the dull roar of a gym or the guy exaggeratingly lifting weights next to you.

All of the Bluetooth earbuds we tested have a battery life of six to eight hours. In general, that’s what you can expect from this space, with a few outliers that can get up to 15 hours of life on a charge. Even the low end of the spectrum should be good enough for most athletes and gym junkies, but it’ll be handy to keep the buds’ charging case on you if you think you’ll get close to using up all their juice during a single session.

You’ll get an average of 20 to 28 extra hours of battery out of most charging cases and all of the earbuds we tested had holders that provided at least an extra 15 hours. This will dictate how often you actually have to charge the device — as in physically connect the case with earbuds inside to a charging cable, or set it on a wireless charger to power up.

In testing wireless workout headphones, I wear them during every bit of exercise I do — be it a casual walk around the block, a brisk morning run or a challenging weight-lifting session. I’m looking for comfort arguably most of all, because you should never be fussing with your earbuds when you should be focusing on working out. In the same vein, I’m cognizant of if they get loose during fast movements or slippery when I’m sweating. I also use the earbuds when not exercising to take calls and listen to music throughout the day. Many people will want just one pair of earbuds that they can use while exercising and just doing everyday things, so I evaluate each pair on their ability to be comfortable and provide a good listening experience in multiple different activities.

While I am also evaluating sound quality, I’m admittedly not an audio expert. My colleague Billy Steele holds that title at Engadget, and you’ll find much more detailed information about audio quality for some of our top picks in his reviews and buying guides. With these headphones for working out, however, I will make note of related issues if they stood out (i.e. if a pair of earbuds had noticeably strong bass out of the box, weak highs, etc). Most of the wireless workout headphones we tested work with companion apps that have adjustable EQ settings, so you’ll be able to tweak sound profiles to your liking in most cases.

Jabra announced it will exit the consumer earbuds business, which is disappointing considering the company has made excellent headphones for working out. Our top picks include two Jabra models and we feel comfortable recommending them still because Jabra plans to support its current earbuds for “several years.” However, we’re constantly testing new buds and reassessing our top picks, so we’ll update this list accordingly in the future.

Beats

Connectivity: Wireless | Style: In-ear with wingtip | Assistant support: Google Assistant, Siri

Read our full review of the Beats Fit Pro

The Beats Fit Pro came out at the head of the pack thanks to their comfortable, secure design, good sound quality and transparency mode, among other things. As my colleague Billy Steele detailed in his review of the Fit Pro, the buds’ wingtip design sets them apart from other Beats earbuds and makes them particularly good for running and other workouts. The buds are fairly small and light, and the wingtip on each is flexible enough to hug your ear nicely without putting too much pressure on it. This helps them feel more secure when you’re moving around a lot be it during a morning jog or while taking a HIIT class. The buds are also IPX4 rated — not the highest amount of protection I encountered, but enough to keep the buds working well even during my sweatiest sessions.

As it were, the Beats Fit Pro stayed put during every single workout. However, adjusting their position on the fly can lead to one of my few gripes with the buds: accidental presses of the onboard controls. There were a number of times when I went to adjust a bud and I ended up pausing my music in the process because the buttons are so easy to trigger.

Sound quality is solid and particularly great for exercising thanks to its punchy bass and overall balanced profile. Spatial audio support is great to have, and while Adaptive EQ means you can’t adjust the EQ yourself like you can with other buds, it does make for consistently good audio quality. It’s also one less thing to play with out of the box, which I expect many people will appreciate; these earbuds are a true unbox-and-go option. ANC is also strong and transparency mode will come in handy for those who often run, cycle or otherwise exercise outside. It was the most natural-sounding transparency mode of any earbuds I tried, and it’s easy to turn on or off either with onboard controls or from the control panel on your iOS or Android smartphone.

Speaking of, the Beats Fit Pro work particularly well with iPhones thanks to their built-in H1 chip, but Android users can download their companion app to access things like quick pairing, control customizations and a battery status indicator. I didn’t get into detail about the setup process because, well, there isn’t much of one. But I will say that, upon unboxing, I was surprised how cheap the charging case feels. While it provides an extra 21 hours of charging on top of the buds’ promised six hours of life, the build quality feels like a real step down compared to the buds themselves. Aside from that and the touch controls, though, the Beats Fit Pro offer a complete package for athletes, one that can be used all day in addition to training sessions. Plus, their standard $200 price isn’t too cost-prohibitive, and they can often be found on sale for less.

Pros

  • Comfortable IPX4 design
  • Great sound quality with Adaptive EQ
  • Effective ANC and useful transparency mode
  • Multipoint connectivity
  • Solid battery life
Cons

  • Onboard controls are easy to accidentally press
  • Charging case feels cheap

$160 at Amazon

Jabra

Connectivity: Wireless | Style: In-ear | Assistant support: Siri, Google Assistant

The Jabra Elite 8 Active almost bested the Beats Fit Pro, but ultimately the latter won thanks to their wingtip design and more natural-sounding transparency mode. But aside from those two things, the Elite 8 Active are just as good, if not better, than the Fit Pro.

First and foremost, the Elite 8 Active has one of the highest durability ratings of any earbuds we tested. Rated IP68, it’s protected against all kinds of dust and debris and it’ll survive being submerged in water at high pressure. Jabra also subjected the Elite 8 Active to military-grade testing, protecting them from excessive humidity, high temperature, rain and altitude. This is more protection than most need, but it will likely give some people peace of mind to know that these buds can take a beating (and, most important, they’ve essentially sweatproof).

That extra protection doesn’t make the Elite 8 Active bulky or unattractive as one might assume. These buds are some of the most comfortable I tried, with a lightweight design and a secure fit. The soft-touch finish on the buds and their charging case adds a level of luxury that most othersI tested did not have, too. There are onboard controls as well, and they’re not as easy to accidentally press as those on the Beats Fit Pro.

The Elite 8 Active has a great sound profile out of the box but you can adjust the EQ within the companion mobile app. The app has six preconfigured settings to choose from too, and I found myself using Bass Boost and Energize most of all while exercising (they’re pretty similar with strong bass, but Energize emphasizes highs a bit more). The Elite 8 Active definitely has an advantage over the Beats Fit Pro for anyone who prefers to customize EQ, or wants to have different sound profiles depending on what they’re doing. On top of that, these buds support spatial sound with Dolby Audio.

The Elite 8 Active support adaptive noise cancelation, and they do a good job of analyzing your environment and blocking out interferences. “HearThrough” is Jabra’s version of transparency mode, and it’s the setting to use when running outside in a city or an area with lots of traffic. Sound isn’t drowned out by wind in this mode either since HearThrough is designed to neutralize wind noise while also letting you stay aware of your surroundings. I ran in some particularly windy weather while testing these out, and I had consistently good listening experiences both with HearThrough and ANC activated.

As for battery life, the Elite 8 Active will get eight hours on a charge with ANC turned on, and an additional 24 hours when employing their charging case. You can get up to 56 hours of total use if you’re not using ANC, which is remarkable. The case also supports wireless charging, a feature that the Beats Fit Pro’s lacks, and it also feels more substantial.

Ultimately, you can’t go wrong with either the Beats Fit Pro or the Jabra Elite 8 Active. But Jabra’s buds offer a bit more customization and durability than the Beats Fit Pro, and not everyone will need the latter’s bonus features. However, if you’re an athlete who likes to play around with sound profiles or want some of the most durable wireless earbuds available today, the Jabra Elite 8 Active are the ones to get.

Pros

  • Comfortable fit
  • IP68 water and dust protection
  • Spatial sound with Dolby Audio
  • Strong ANC
  • Multipoint connectivity
  • Solid battery life
Cons

  • HearThrough doesn’t sound as natural as other transparency modes

$199 at Amazon

Jabra

Connectivity: Wireless | Style: In-ear | Assistant support: Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant

The Jabra Elite 4 Active offer the best value for the money of any pick on our list. For $120, you get an IP57-rated design, solid sound quality with adjustable EQ, good ANC, the same HearThrough transparency mode that the Elite 8 Active have, app connectivity and a total of 28 hours of battery life. These were some of the easiest buds for me to “pick up and go” with, whether it was for an impromptu walk around the block, a sweaty HIIT session in my basement or an hour of work in which I really needed to block out distractions and get things done.

Like the Elite 8 Active, the Elite 4 Active is super comfortable and Jabra has really gotten the onboard controls right on this series of buds. The buttons are not so easy to press that you accidentally trigger them whenever you adjust the fit, and they provide satisfying feedback when you actually do intentionally press them. Sound quality and ANC are impressive, and I basically never had to worry about running out of battery.

The main differences between the Elite 4 Active and the more expensive Elite 8 Active are that the latter have a higher IP rating, voice guidance, spatial sound support with Dolby Audio, a longer overall battery life (56 hours with the charging case) and that satisfying soft-touch finish. The IP rating and extended battery life are the two main features that could compel some to spend the extra money on the Elite 8 Active instead. Also, spatial audio is nice to have if you have the buds semi-permanently placed in your ears constantly pumping out tunes, regardless of the activity. Otherwise, though, you’re getting a ton of excellent features with these $120 earbuds.

Pros

  • Great value for the money
  • Comfortable IP57-rated design
  • Good sound quality and ANC
  • Multipoint connectivity
  • Good battery life
Cons

  • No spatial sound with Dolby Audio like the Elite 8 Active has

$70 at Amazon

JLab

Connectivity: Wireless | Style: In-ear with hook | Assistant support: None

If you have less than $50 to spend, the $30 JLab Go Air Sport are a great option. I didn’t have high expectations going into testing these buds, but I was quickly impressed by their comfort and sound quality. Lots of headphones designed for workouts have this hook that wraps around the top of your ear, and it does help the Go Air Sport stay securely attached to your head. The hooks here are quite flexible and have a soft-touch finish, which adds to their comfort (I tried a few similarly designed buds with much stiffer hooks that were a pain in more ways than one.) Admittedly, this design will take some getting used to if you’re new to it, but it’s a surefire way to get a little extra stability during high intensity workouts.

Sound quality is pretty good on these buds as well, although not nearly as balanced as that of the Jabra Elite 8 Active or the Beats Fit Pro. I also appreciate that you can cycle through three different EQ modes — Signature, Balanced and Bass Boost — using the buds’ onboard controls. There’s no app to fuss with, and that was a nice change of pace after mostly testing buds with some kind of app connectivity.

You can expect eight hours of playtime on the Go Air Sport, plus another 24 hours of battery life with its charging case. While the USB-A cable built into the bottom of the case is handy, I feel like it should be a USB-C connector instead. The case is also on the bulky side; you can still throw it into a backpack or purse easily, but it’s not as svelte as cases you’ll see on more expensive buds.

Pros

  • Affordable
  • Impressive sound quality for the price
  • IP55-rated design
  • Good battery life
Cons

  • Built-in USB-A charging cable is a bit outdated
  • Large case
  • Hook design won’t be for everyone

$20 at Walmart

SHOKZ

Connectivity: Wireless | Style: Open-ear | Assistant support: None

I was apprehensive about open-ear headphones, especially during workouts. But the Shokz OpenFit pleasantly surprised me from the first time I put them on. Earbuds with open designs like this allow for more situational awareness, with the goal being to let noise in rather than block it out. The OpenFit buds do a great job of this without skimping on sound quality or comfort.

The buds themselves almost float over your ear cavern and Shokz’s soft-finish “dolphin arc” hook is flexible enough to securely wrap around the top of your ear without putting too much pressure on it. There’s a bud-like portion at the other end of the hook that acts as counterbalance, resulting in a reliable fit that never faltered during all sorts of activities including running, strength training and indoor cycling. Granted, none of those exercises involve shaking your head up or down or side to side too much; maybe don’t wear the OpenFit to listen to head-banging death metal (if you can’t control yourself).

Sound quality is solid considering the design, and the OpenFit gets pretty loud as well. These buds have Shokz’s Direct Pitch technology, which uses reverse sound waves to optimize the distance and angle from the buds to your ear canal. The company claims this helps keep the sound directed towards your ear and reduces audio leakage. In my testing, I found that to be true to a certain extent. The OpenFit had the best sound quality and overall volume out of all of the open-ear devices I tried, but if you crank the volume up to the max (or close), the person next to you will definitely hear what you’re listening to. Overall, these are a great option for anyone who doesn’t find in-ear buds particularly comfortable, or those who just prefer to have more awareness of their surroundings while working out.

Pros

  • Comfortable open-ear design
  • Design allows for more situational awareness
  • Good sound quality and volume
Cons

  • No ANC
  • Not as secure when compared to in-ear or hook-toting buds

$180 at Amazon

The Apple AirPods Pro have an IP54 rating, which protects them from brief encounters with dust and splashes. While that’s more dust protection than many other earbuds we tested, it’s the same level of water resistance that most exercise-specific competitors have. We generally like the AirPods Pro, but the Beats Fit Pro offer many of the same features and conveniences (namely good transparency mode and the H1 chip), with a design that’s more appropriate for working out.

The Powerbeats Pro are a good alternative to the Beats Fit Pro if you’re a stickler for a hook design. However, they cost $50 more than the Fit Pro (although they often hover around $180) and don’t offer any significant upgrades or additional features aside from their design. They’re also quite old at this point (launched in 2019) and it appears Beats is putting more effort into upgrading and updating its newer models rather than this model.

The Soundcore AeroFit Pro is Anker’s version of the Shokz OpenFit, but I found it to be less secure and not as comfortable as the latter. The actual earbuds on the AeroFit Pro are noticeably bulkier than those on the OpenFit, which caused them to shift and move much more when I was wearing them during exercise. They never fell off my ears completely, but I spent more time adjusting them than I did enjoying them.

The most noteworthy thing about the Endurance Peak 3 is that they have the same IP68-rating that the Jabra Elite 8 Active do, but they only cost $100. But, while you get the same protection here, you’ll have to sacrifice in other areas. The Endurance Peak 3 didn’t blow me away when it came to sound quality or comfort (the hook is more rigid than those on my favorite buds of a similar style) and their charging case is massive compared to most competitors.



This story originally appeared on Engadget