Wednesday, November 19, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 61

U.S. Supreme Court extends its order blocking full SNAP payments : NPR

0


A cashier scans groceries, including produce, which is covered by the USDA Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), at a grocery store in Baltimore on Monday.

Stephanie Scarbrough/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Stephanie Scarbrough/AP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended an order blocking full SNAP payments, amid signals that the government shutdown could soon end and food aid payments resume.

The order keeps in place at least for a few more days a chaotic situation. People who depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to feed their families in some states have received their full monthly allocations, while others have received nothing.

The order will expire just before midnight Thursday.

The Senate has approved a bill to end the shutdown and the House of Representatives could vote on it as early as Wednesday. Reopening the government would restart the program that helps 42 million Americans buy groceries, but it’s not clear how quickly full payments would resume.

The justices chose what is effectively the path of least resistance, anticipating the federal government shutdown will end soon while avoiding any substantive legal ruling about whether lower court orders to keep full payments flowing during the shutdown are correct.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only one of the nine justices to say she would have revived the lower court orders immediately, but didn’t otherwise explain her vote. Jackson signed the initial order temporarily freezing the payments.

Beneficiaries in some states have received their full monthly allocations while in others they have received nothing. Some states have issued partial payments.

How quickly SNAP benefits could reach recipients if the government reopens would vary by state. But states and advocates say that it’s easier to make full payments quickly than partial ones.

Carolyn Vega, a policy analyst at the advocacy group Share Our Strength, also said there could be some technical challenges for states that have issued partial benefits to send out the remaining amount.

An urgent need for beneficiaries

In Pennsylvania, full November benefits went out to some people on Friday. But Jim Malliard, 41, of Franklin, said he had not received anything by Monday.

Malliard is a full-time caretaker for his wife, who is blind and has had several strokes this year, and his teenage daughter, who suffered severe medical complications from surgery last year.

That stress has only been compounded by the pause in the $350 monthly SNAP payment he previously received for himself, his wife and daughter. He said he is down to $10 in his account and is relying on what’s left in the pantry — mostly rice and ramen.

“It’s kind of been a lot of late nights, making sure I had everything down to the penny to make sure I was right,” Malliard said. “To say anxiety has been my issue for the past two weeks is putting it mildly.”

The political wrangling in Washington has shocked many Americans, and some have been moved to help.

“I figure that I’ve spent money on dumber stuff than trying to feed other people during a manufactured famine,” said Ashley Oxenford, a teacher who set out a “little food pantry” in her front yard this week for vulnerable neighbors in Carthage, New York.

SNAP has been the center of an intense fight in court

The Trump administration chose to cut off SNAP funding after October due to the shutdown. That decision sparked lawsuits and a string of swift and contradictory judicial rulings that deal with government power — and impact food access for about 1 in 8 Americans.

The administration went along with two rulings on Oct. 31 by judges who said the government must provide at least partial funding for SNAP. It eventually said recipients would get up to 65% of their regular benefits. But it balked last week when one of the judges said it must fund the program fully for November, even if that means digging into funds the government said need to be maintained in case of emergencies elsewhere.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to pause that order.

An appeals court said Monday that full funding should resume, and that requirement was set to kick in Tuesday night before the top court extended the order blocking full SNAP payments.

Congressional talks about reopening government

The U.S. Senate on Monday passed legislation to reopen the federal government with a plan that would include replenishing SNAP funds. Speaker Mike Johnson told members of the House to return to Washington to consider the deal a small group of Senate Democrats made with Republicans.

President Trump has not said whether he would sign it if it reaches his desk, but told reporters at the White House on Sunday that it “looks like we’re getting close to the shutdown ending.”

Still, the Trump administration said in a Supreme Court filing Monday that it shouldn’t be up to the courts.

“The answer to this crisis is not for federal courts to reallocate resources without lawful authority,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in the papers. “The only way to end this crisis — which the Executive is adamant to end — is for Congress to reopen the government.”

After Tuesday’s ruling, Attorney General Pam Bondi posted on social media: “Thank you to the Court for allowing Congress to continue its swift progress.”

The coalition of cities and nonprofit groups who challenged the SNAP pause said in a court filing Tuesday that the Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP, is to blame for the confusion.

“The chaos was sown by USDA’s delays and intransigence,” they said, “not by the district court’s efforts to mitigate that chaos and the harm it has inflicted on families who need food.”



This story originally appeared on NPR

2025’s Most Exquisite High Jewelry Creations

0


Each year, the world’s great maisons remind us that fine jewelry is more than adornment — it is emotion cast in metal and light. The year 2025 brings a new chapter in creative brilliance, where artistry, heritage, and innovation converge in pieces that transcend time. From Parisian ateliers to Dubai’s design studios, these jewels embody the modern spirit of luxury: bold, intimate, and impossibly beautiful.

Mariyeh Ghelichkhani Blush ring in 18K rose gold with South Sea pearl, Australian opal, tourmaline, and diamond accents.

Mariyeh Ghelichkhani

From Dubai’s rising jewelry visionary comes a masterpiece of poetic design. The Blush Ring, part of Mariyeh Ghelichkhani’s Orchid Collection, captures the fragile grace of a bloom at dawn. Crafted in 18-karat rose gold, it unites a South Sea pearl, Australian opal, and radiant tourmaline. Brilliant-cut diamonds shimmer like morning dew, while delicate enamel accents add warmth to the floral silhouette. It is a jewel that celebrates both craftsmanship and emotion — an orchid forever in bloom.

2025’s Most Exquisite High Jewelry Creations2025’s Most Exquisite High Jewelry Creations

Dior Milly Dentelle High-Jewelry Collection

Dior’s Milly Dentelle collection pays tribute to Christian Dior’s beloved estate in Milly-la-Forêt. Designed by Victoire de Castellane, the 76-piece line transforms the softness of lace into gold — white, yellow, and rose — interwoven with luminous diamonds, sapphires, rubies, and pearls. The pieces evoke gardens in perpetual spring, where asymmetry feels natural and beauty effortless. Each creation reflects Dior’s signature duality: couture precision and feminine poetry.

Riviera Freshwater Pearl Necklace by Brochu Walker featuring hand-knotted cultured pearls and 18K gold bead clasp.Riviera Freshwater Pearl Necklace by Brochu Walker featuring hand-knotted cultured pearls and 18K gold bead clasp.

The Riviera Freshwater Pearl Necklace

Known for minimalist luxury, Brochu Walker extends its aesthetic into fine jewelry with the Riviera Freshwater Pearl Necklace. Each pearl, hand-knotted and measuring between 9.5 and 11.5 mm, reveals subtle individuality. Finished with an 18-karat yellow gold bead clasp, the necklace embodies understated refinement. Designed as a future heirloom, it bridges timeless craftsmanship with the ease of modern elegance — a piece meant to be worn, not stored.

Piaget Essence of Extraleganza rose gold cuff with Milanese mesh, diamonds, and vivid pink sapphire centerpiece.Piaget Essence of Extraleganza rose gold cuff with Milanese mesh, diamonds, and vivid pink sapphire centerpiece.

Piaget’s Essence of Extraleganza High Jewelry Collection

Piaget once again turns gold into movement with the Essence of Extraleganza collection. Its rose gold cuff flows like fabric, its Milanese mesh edging glimmering with diamonds. At the center, a 4.42-carat Madagascar pink sapphire meets a 6.40-carat spessartite garnet, balanced in harmony and color. The piece captures the maison’s genius for creating jewelry that feels alive — sculptural, sensual, and distinctly Piaget.

Louis Vuitton Maestria high-jewelry necklace with Colombian emerald centerpiece surrounded by diamonds in signature geometry.Louis Vuitton Maestria high-jewelry necklace with Colombian emerald centerpiece surrounded by diamonds in signature geometry.

Maestria Necklace by Louis Vuitton

With the Maestria necklace, Louis Vuitton transforms precision into art. A vivid 8.88-carat Colombian emerald anchors the composition, flanked by two matching stones and framed in a lattice of diamonds shaped by the house’s iconic geometry. Every facet reflects mastery and control, turning craftsmanship into architecture. Maestria is not simply worn; it commands attention — a declaration of modern grandeur.

Annamaria Cammilli Hypnosis ring in 18K white gold with Black Lava finish, sculptural wave design and diamond halo.Annamaria Cammilli Hypnosis ring in 18K white gold with Black Lava finish, sculptural wave design and diamond halo.

Annamaria Cammilli’s Hypnosis Ring

Italian designer Annamaria Cammilli draws inspiration from water’s fluid rhythm in her Hypnosis ring. Crafted in 18-karat white gold with the brand’s signature Black Lava finish, the design wraps around the finger in elegant waves. A halo of brilliant diamonds adds a touch of movement and light. Blending sculptural lines with satin textures, it captures a rare balance between innovation and serenity.

Sethi Couture stackable Shadow rings in 18K gold with mixed diamond shapes, designed for layering and personalized elegance.Sethi Couture stackable Shadow rings in 18K gold with mixed diamond shapes, designed for layering and personalized elegance.

Sethi Couture’s Stackable Shadow Rings

Effortless, versatile, and endlessly personal, Sethi Couture’s Stackable Shadow Rings embody the new era of self-expression in fine jewelry. Each ring, crafted in 18-karat gold and set with diamonds, can be layered to create a signature combination. The collection’s beauty lies in its freedom — a modern jewel box that invites play and individuality.

Graff high-jewelry emerald and diamond necklace featuring emerald-cut and round stones in a sculptural intertwined design.Graff high-jewelry emerald and diamond necklace featuring emerald-cut and round stones in a sculptural intertwined design.

Graff Emerald-Cut & Round Emerald Necklace with Diamonds

Graff once again demonstrates its unrivaled craftsmanship with a necklace that fuses symmetry and sensuality. Strands of emeralds and diamonds intertwine gracefully around the neck, while three central stones — a 3.31-carat emerald-cut emerald, a 2.92-carat octagonal emerald, and a 3-carat diamond — radiate brilliance. With more than 34 carats in total, this masterpiece reflects the brand’s devotion to perfection and prestige.

Tiffany & Co. Retro aquamarine pendant with 201-carat blue gemstone, surrounded by sapphires, diamonds, and sculptural gold scrolls.Tiffany & Co. Retro aquamarine pendant with 201-carat blue gemstone, surrounded by sapphires, diamonds, and sculptural gold scrolls.

Tiffany & Co. Retro Aquamarine Pendant Carats

From Tiffany & Co., a Retro-era pendant returns to center stage in a design that feels bold yet timeless. The 201.08-carat aquamarine, cut in a sleek octagonal silhouette, glows with oceanic clarity. Sculptural gold scrolls embrace the stone, while diamond-set platinum accents and sapphire halos lend depth and drama. The result is architectural elegance that bridges past and present.

David Webb ruby and diamond Art Deco pendant necklace in 18K yellow gold, totaling over 31 carats of gemstones.David Webb ruby and diamond Art Deco pendant necklace in 18K yellow gold, totaling over 31 carats of gemstones.

David Webb Ruby Pendant Necklace, 31.50 Carats

Few houses capture color and character like David Webb. This Ruby Pendant Necklace, totaling 31.50 carats of rubies and 15.80 carats of diamonds, radiates with Art Deco intensity. The bold geometry of its design — enhanced by polished 18-karat yellow gold — evokes the glamour of a bygone era. Its detachable pendant allows effortless transformation, from gala statement to intimate jewel.

The Art of Modern Adornment

From the serene grace of pearls to the daring geometry of rubies, 2025’s high-jewelry creations tell stories beyond sparkle. They speak of emotion, heritage, and the pursuit of beauty refined by imagination. These are not simply jewels to be worn — they are modern heirlooms, each one a dialogue between art and eternity.



This story originally appeared on Upscalelivingmag

What Happened to Cleto Escobedo? About Jimmy Kimmel’s Bandleader – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images

The cast and crew of Jimmy Kimmel Live! are grieving a significant loss. Jimmy Kimmel announced the heartbreaking death of his childhood friend and Cleto and the Cletones bandleader, Cleto Escobedo III, on November 11, 2025. Escobedo was 59 when he died, which prompted viewers to wonder what happened to the pro saxophone player.

“To say that we are heartbroken is an understatement,” the late-night host wrote, in part, in an Instagram post alongside a photo of Escobedo.

“Early this morning, we lost a great friend, father, son, musician and man, my longtime bandleader Cleto Escobedo III,” Kimmel continued. “Cleto and I have been inseparable since I was 9 years old. The fact that we got to work together every day is a dream neither of us could ever have imagined would come true. Cherish your friends and please keep Cleto’s wife, children and parents in your prayers.”

How Long Did Jimmy Kimmel & Cleto Escobedo Know Each Other?

Kimmel and Escobedo were long-time friends. They’ve known each other since the comedian was 9 years old, after growing up as neighbors in Las Vegas.

In 2015, Kimmel recalled witnessing his friend grow up from a “child prodigy” to a professional musician.

“Like, the whole school would gather to watch. He’d get standing ovations. It was a crazy thing,” Kimmel said in 2015, according to ABC7. The comedian also pointed out that Escobedo had toured with multiple talents, including Earth, Wind and Fire and Paula Abdul. This and his undeniable stage presence helped the saxophone player land a gig as Kimmel’s bandleader.

What Happened to Cleto Escobedo? What We Know About Jimmy Kimmel's Bandleader
(Photo by Jonathan Leibson/Getty Images for Samsung)

“And I just thought, oh my God, you know? I have a talk show. Cleto has to be my bandleader,” Kimmel explained, before recalling how “nervous” he was if Disney had told him, “We don’t want your friend to be the bandleader.”

“So, I took the president of ABC to see him play with his band, and he loved it,” Kimmel said. “Of course, I wanted great musicians, but I wanted somebody I had chemistry with. And there’s nobody in my life I have better chemistry with than him.”

What Happened to Cleto Escobedo?

It’s still unclear what happened to Escobedo. Kimmel did not disclose a cause of death for his late friend, and no one from Escobedo’s inner circle or family has spoken out by the time of publication.

Was Cleto Escobedo Married With Children?

Yes, as Kimmel noted in his announcement, Escobedo is survived by his wife and children.




This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Ryanair boarding pass rules change today – Brits warned they risk £55 fee | Travel News | Travel

0


Ryanair’s new boarding rules take effect today, with Brits warned not to get caught out and risk incurring a large fee.

Today, the budget carrier has switched entirely to digital boarding passes. This means travellers who have purchased tickets will no longer be able to download and print them before arriving at the airport – an option currently used by 20 per cent of Ryanair passengers, according to the airline.

Desks at the airports will no longer offer the option to print them, which incurred a fee of £55. It is likely that a similar fee will be charged to those who arrive at the airport without having downloaded their digital boarding pass.

All Ryanair has said is that “If you have already checked-in online and your smartphone or tablet is lost, you will receive a free of charge boarding pass at the airport.” That implies that a £55 late-check-in fee will be levied on those who don’t or aren’t able to check-in online before they get to the airport.

There are significant concerns that passengers without use of a mobile phone, or those who are less tech-savvy, may be caught out. A sizeable 2.06 million Brits aged over 55 do not have one of the handy devices, according to MoneySuperMarket. This equates to around 10 per cent of the age group.

With the new rule, customers will have to use the digital boarding pass created by the myRyanair app after they check in. Ryanair stated that 206 million of its passengers already use digital boarding passes, suggesting approximately 40 million journeys could potentially be affected.

The company’s chief executive, Michael O’Leary, said that his 86-year-old mother uses the Ryanair app to travel. Nevertheless, the decision has sparked criticism, with several campaign groups accusing the airline of ageism.

Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, told The Telegraph: “It’s a disgraceful move. They are effectively saying they don’t want older people as passengers. There’s a strong argument to say that it’s discriminatory.”

Several worried readers contacted The Mirror to voice their concerns about the change. One said: “I have elderly in-laws who live in Spain. They won’t be able to download anything onto their phone. They’re not tech-savvy, so what will happen when they travel to the UK? I appreciate the need to utilise technology, but that will not work for a lot of passengers.”

Another said: “This seems discriminatory to people, such as the elderly, who, for various reasons, are not able to use smartphones. By Ryanair’s own admission, some 20% of passengers do not use smartphones currently for boarding passes. It may backfire. Ryanair will lose these customers who will turn to alternative providers without such a policy.”

Mr O’Leary, aged 64, was swift to dismiss such concerns. He said: “I’m old, and I travel with Ryanair on a very, very regular basis, and I use the Ryanair app, it is pretty simple, pretty easy to use.” For those especially worried about the change, Mr O’Leary indicated the airline would show flexibility, assuring that “nobody would be cut off at the knees.”

He stated it would be “reasonably forgiving” of passengers arriving with paper boarding passes throughout Christmas and into January.

“The critical thing: If you’ve checked online before you get there and you lose your phone, we’ll have your name in the system,” he said. “We will manually board you at the boarding gate so if your phone goes off, you lose your phone, your phone gets stolen, it is not going to make any issue as long as you checked in online before you got to the boarding gate, which, by the way, would eliminate all the check-in fees at the airport.”

Mr O’Leary dismissed suggestions that elderly passengers would struggle with the changes as patronising.

“Actually, what you find is the old people firstly just get their kids or grandkids to make bookings for them, and then pretty quickly they’re adopting it themselves. And it is slightly patronising, this notion that old people can’t and won’t move to mobile technology or to the apps,” he said, MailOnline reported.

The switch was pushed back by a week to November 12 to avoid the UK and Irish half-term period.

Ryanair chief marketing officer Dara Brady said: “To ensure a seamless transition to 100 per cent digital boarding passes for our customers, we will make the switch from November 12, which is traditionally a slightly quieter time for travel following the busy mid-term break period.

“Ryanair’s move to 100 per cent digital boarding passes will mean a faster, smarter, and greener travel experience for our customers, streamlined through our best-in-class ‘myRyanair’ app, where passengers will also benefit from helpful in-app features, like Order to Seat and live flight information.”

Have you been impacted by this change? Email webtravel@reachplc.com



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Fan Video Brings ‘The Real Ghostbusters’ to Life in AI “Live-Action”

0


Dan Aykroyd recently teased that a new Ghostbusters movie is in the works, along with the highly anticipated animated series coming to Netflix, but it seems that someone couldn’t wait and enlisted the help of some AI-animation to create a “live-action” interpretation of the original cartoon series in the franchise, The Real Ghostbusters.

While the controversy around the use of AI continues to rage on, and despite YouTube drastically pulling back on revenue made, there are still several creators who continue to use various AI-driven programs to create non-profit videos paying tribute to, or reimagining, some iconic franchises. AI Fanatics is such a creator, and their new Ghostbusters video features plenty of familiar-looking spooks for anyone who grew up watching The Real Ghostbusters.

Along with Peter, Egon, Ray, Winston, Janine, Lewis Tully, and Slimer, the video runs through an incredible range of classic and obscure spooks from the cartoon. From the Boogeyman to Samhein, through those that you will recognize but not be able to name, and to the iconic Stay Puft Marshmallow Man, this nostalgia-fueled two-and-a-half-minute video will have Ghostbusters fans hunting down The Real Ghostbusters to relive some of the classic stories. You can check out the full video below.

The ‘Ghostbusters’ Franchise Has Been Reborn

Ghostbusters was a massive hit in 1984, leading to a hugely popular animated spinoff in The Real Ghostbusters, a sequel, and other animated adventures for new Ghostbusting teams. While Aykroyd reprised his role as Ray Stantz for a fun cameo in the live-action Casper movie in 1994, the chances of seeing the Ghostbusters getting back together seemed destined to remain a big “what if” to fans.

Then, after the 2016 reboot of the franchise did not exactly take off, the unthinkable happened and the Ghostbusters returned to cinemas in 2021 with Ghostbusters: Afterlife. The film delivered a lot of throwbacks to the original 1984 movie, with Terror Dogs and Gozer being the focus of the story, and this was more than enough for fans to welcome back the team with open arms.

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire was released in 2024, delivering a continuation of Afterlife, with the old team reuniting with new ‘busters Paul Rudd, Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard, and Mckenna Grace, to take on a new threat to the world, the Death Chill. The film played out like a live-action episode of The Real Ghostbusters, with a new villain and less of a reliance on the franchise’s past.

Despite neither movie becoming a massive blockbuster, the Ghostbusters are not going anywhere just yet. Netflix is set to release a brand new animated show, which may or may not feature the original cast providing their voices to the characters they brought to life over 40 years ago, and, as Aykroyd recently teased, it looks like another new movie is also in development. Jason Reitman, son of original director Ivan Reitman, has been a driving force behind the Ghostbusters franchise’s rebirth, directing Afterlife, executive producing Frozen Empire, and having a big role in Ghost Corps, the company that now produces Ghostbusters content in various forms.

We have no idea what the next official entry in the Ghostbusters franchise might look like, but it certainly won’t look like the AI video above. Whether you see that as a good or bad thing will depend on your view of AI, but it seems almost certain that whatever the next iteration of the franchise looks like, it will be created by some very talented humans and not the next version of Grok.



Release Date

June 8, 1984

Runtime

105 Minutes





This story originally appeared on Movieweb

A Promising Harry Potter Replacement With A Major Advantage

0


Disney has an Impossible Creatures movie on the way, and this project has a major advantage over HBO’s Harry Potter remake. Like the Wizarding World screen adaptations, Disney’s new fantasy film franchise will be based on a series of books. Impossible Creatures, by Katherine Rundell, has been heavily compared to Harry Potter, largely because the author’s success is so similar to J.K. Rowling’s.

The Impossible Creatures books follow a boy named Christopher who discovers the magical Gilmouria Archipelago, home to a variety of magical creatures. The first book was released in the US in 2024, with the second, The Poisoned King, arriving a year later. With over 4 million copies sold around the globe, Rundell has officially become the first UK author to top the charts in both the UK and the US since Rowling.

Given the very Harry Potter-like success of the Impossible Creatures books, it’s no surprise that Disney was so eager to purchase the film rights. This generation is all set to get its own film-series phenomenon, but Impossible Creatures will be up against HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter TV show—and that’s no small thing. Still, Disney has a significant advantage.

Impossible Creatures’ Original Author Will Write The Disney Movies’ Screenplays

Impossible Creatures cover art
Cover art illustrated by Ashley Mackenzie

The biggest challenge when adapting a book series to the screen is typically maintaining faithfulness. The massive changes made from the Harry Potter books to the movies are a significant reason why the series is being remade into a television show. Disney’s Impossible Creatures may avoid this issue entirely, since the films’ screenplays are being written by Rundell herself.

The same is not true for HBO’s Harry Potter TV show, which is being written by Francesca Gardiner and Andy Greenwald. Though HBO has promised a book-faithful adaptation this time, it would be impossible to perfectly adapt the Harry Potter novels every step of the way. A screen adaptation necessitates changes of some kind. At least with Impossible Creatures, viewers can trust that any shifts in the story or presentation are coming straight from the mind that created this world.

J.K. Rowling Is A Producer, Not Writer, For The Harry Potter TV Show

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) holding the snitch in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) holding the snitch in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone

While Impossible Creatures has a leg up on HBO’s Harry Potter, it’s not as if the TV remake’s writers are on their own. Rowling is serving as a producer on the series, a role that gives her greater influence on the project than she had as a consultant on the films. This is a benefit in terms of book faithfulness, but that may be cancelled out by the controversy surrounding Rowling.

Rundell’s new fantasy franchise is fresh, optimistic, and wholly unproblematic.

It remains to be seen whether Rowling’s social views will affect the Harry Potter remake’s success. What we can more certainly predict, however, is that Impossible Creatures will be free of such conflict. Rundell’s new fantasy franchise is fresh, optimistic, and wholly unproblematic. With the author remaining at the creative wheel, this could be the answer to all our Harry Potter troubles.


Harry Potter Updated 2026 TV Show Teaser Poster


Showrunner

Francisca Gardiner

Directors

Mark Mylod

  • Cast Placeholder Image

    Dominic McLaughlin

    Harry Potter

  • Headshot Of Janet McTeer

    Janet McTeer

    Minerva McGonagall

  • Headshot Of John Lithgow

  • Headshot Of Nick Frost




This story originally appeared on Screenrant

Why did Grizzly Bear reunite after eight years? ‘We needed to see who else we were’

0


Twenty years ago, Grizzly Bear emerged as unlikely torchbearers of the early-aughts indie rock boom, a moment when the genre still felt like a testing ground for young adulthood. Ed Droste, then in his early 20s, began the project alone in a Brooklyn bedroom, and as Chris Taylor (bass, vocals), Daniel Rossen (vocals, guitar), and Christopher Bear (drums) joined, their twilight psych-folk came to reflect that fragile in-between stage of postcollegiate life: a period defined by experimentation and risk, shot through with both hope and ambivalence.

After an eight-year hiatus, the members of Grizzly Bear return as middle-aged men with separate lives and evolving expectations. Playing a limited run of shows — including their first Los Angeles performance in years, on Wednesday at the Shrine — they remain open to the idea of new music, but understand they have to start where they can. For now, that means simply gathering in a room, playing songs together and feeling their way forward.

For Grizzly Bear, there’s never been a line between performance and personhood. What you see onstage is what you get: four ordinary men in plaid shirts, comfy pants and sensible shoes. Yet from their unassuming beginnings, they became unlikely architects of a movement. Once synonymous with Pitchfork at its cultural peak, Grizzly Bear embodied the moment when indie music crossed into the mainstream, when Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s presence at their 2012 show could be read as a generational shift. They’d outgrown the Brooklyn lofts where they started, landing Top 10 albums, soundtracking Super Bowl commercials, opening for Radiohead, and earning the kind of cultural cachet that briefly made indie rock feel like the center of the universe.

But at the height of success, the lifestyle of tour bus toilets, hotel room pizzas and public opinion began to take its toll. “There was never a formal breakup,” Rossen says now, his voice jumping around with nervous energy, after years away from the spotlight. “We just needed to step back, to see who else we were outside of the band.” For years, none of them seemed eager to look back.

After an eight-year hiatus, the members of Grizzly Bear return as middle-aged men with separate lives and evolving expectations.

(Caroline Safran)

It has been eight years since Grizzly Bear’s last album, 2017’s “Painted Ruins.” Over time, their lives quietly scattered. Droste — the only one who left music behind entirely — retrained as a therapist in L.A.; Rossen retreated to Santa Fe, N.M., raised a daughter, released a woodsy solo record, and collaborated with Bear on the Oscar-nominated film “Past Lives”; Bear, in turn, became a prolific film and TV composer; Taylor turned producer. The machinery of band life had run its course. “There were good reasons why we stopped,” Rossen says. “But if you have a whole catalog like that, it’s a shame to never play it again.”

Everyone in the band has their own answer for why they’ve decided to revisit Grizzly Bear. For Rossen, he says he “felt like there was enough distance from it to really start missing it,” his voice beginning to settle. “It was emotional to revisit some of that material,” he continues. “A nice thing about going back to these songs is that I felt I’d lost some of my emotional connection to them. I realized how beautiful they really were.”

Grizzly Bear bassist Chris Taylor

Grizzly Bear bassist Chris Taylor became a producer during the band’s hiatus.

(Caroline Safran)

The decision to reunite came especially slowly for the band’s frontman. “There was a part of me that didn’t want to be opened up to criticism,” Droste admits. “I just was like, I don’t want to write and release something and then be nervous about reviews again.” Now, he says, he feels better equipped to handle it. At the same time, Droste — moving between therapy jobs — found himself with a rare opening. “The rest of the band had asked a few times over the years,” he says, his voice friendly and bright despite his initial hesitation about this interview, “but it never felt right until now.” Adding to the moment, Victoria Legrand of Beach House — one of their closest contemporaries — offered to join the shows. “That was the cherry on top,” Droste says.

The members of Grizzly Bear gathered earlier this year for eight days in a windowless soundstage deep in the Valley to rehearse. There was a teething period the first couple of days as they reconvened, trying to get back on the same page that they’d left off eight years ago. Droste spent some eight or nine hours a day singing. It was an intense reimmersion, given that Droste says he doesn’t even sing in the shower or around the house. “I sing maybe twice a year,” he says. “I hardly listen to music even.” He can’t say why. The band’s relationships to music and their own voices have changed with age: ragged choirboys as they are now, but still tuneful and beautiful.

After years apart, the band feels lighter and less freighted with expectation. “We’re able to respect each other’s boundaries now,” Rossen says. “The stakes are completely different. It allows us to be more patient with one another.” Droste’s work as a therapist has also reshaped his approach. “You can’t do that kind of work and not learn about yourself,” he says. “You get better at understanding what works for you and what doesn’t, what’s sustainable.” He laughs softly. “It’s been great. Everyone’s getting along better than we ever have.”

That sense of care carries into the logistics of their tour, too. In a moment when the road is more expensive and precarious than ever — marked by rising costs, slimmer margins, and a frazzled post-pandemic music landscape — they’ve made deliberate choices to preserve the experience: forgoing a tour bus, above all, to ensure that the spiritual reward of being onstage outweighs its physical toll.

If Grizzly Bear’s early years were about convergence — four young men building a sound that felt both communal and claustrophobic, this chapter is about calibration: finding equilibrium after a long season apart. Their set list spans their catalog but leans surprisingly on “Horn of Plenty,” those loose, bedroom-born sketches that predated any sense of grandeur. It feels fitting.

With most of the band’s members now approaching 50, they’re keen to recapture the sense of discovery and daring that once propelled them as young men, to step back into the unknown with the same restless curiosity, when creative sparks were in abundance.

Grizzly Bear drummer Christopher Bear

Grizzly Bear drummer Christopher Bear has become a prolific film and TV composer. He collaborated with bandmate and guitarist Daniel Rossen on the Oscar-nominated film “Past Lives.”

(Caroline Safran)

They refound that feeling when they played their first shows in New York City, where it all began, in October. Back onstage, the sensory overload was total: the roar of the crowd, the strobing lights, the sub-bass rattling through their bodies. It was a marked contrast to Rossen’s current life, which is largely hermetic and domestic, confined to the four walls of his home. But a few shows in, he’s started to adjust. “It’s extreme,” Rossen says, “but it’s felt amazing to reclaim the sense that I can still function as a musician.”

Their kids have now met each other, too. Rossen’s daughter got to see him perform for the first time. “She got to understand that I don’t just make dinner or hang out at home. I actually do something out there in the world. That was great.”

For all their readjustments, Grizzly Bear remains an emblem of what indie rock once promised: that a group of thoughtful people could build something meaningful together, without needing to distort themselves to fit the market. Grizzly Bear may not have outlasted that era, but they’ve learned to come back from it on their own terms: as four regular dudes capable of creating great works of beauty, and finally, at long last, at ease with the sound.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Free Trial Offer, Discount, Join for 50% Off

0


All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.

While Walmart has daily rollback deals online, one of the best ways to score a deeper discount at the department store is by signing up for Walmart+. And there’s no better time to do it, as the retailer is offering annual memberships at 50% off ahead of Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

While Walmart offers daily deals for everyone, a Walmart+ membership offers loads of benefits, exclusive perks and early access to sales before everyone else. The best part: you can currently sign up for Walmart+ for free with this free trial offer. That’s right, new users can get a 30-day day trial to Walmart+ without having to pay a single cent.

With Walmart+, members cans take advantage of a whole suite of exclusive perks, including access to new music and entertainment platforms. One of them is a free subscription to either Peacock or Paramount+. Users can choose between the two streaming services that lets you watch your favorite blockbuster movies, hit TV shows and live events online without cable. But whichever streaming service you pick, as part of Walmart+, you can switch after 90 days if you want — or just keep what you’ve got.

Use the free trial to get instant access to shop all the Walmart+ deals online. Ready to get started? We’ve rounded up a list of everything you need to know about Walmart+ — including how to subscribe for 50% off once your free trial is up. See below for more details.

How to Join Walmart+

Walmart+ is free for 30 days right now and then costs $98 for the annual membership (about $8.17/month) or $12.95 for the monthly membership after the month-long free trial is over.

What Is Walmart+?

Walmart+ is Walmart’s subscription program, that unlocks instant access to a load of benefits including shopping certain sales earlier than everyone else, special pricing and product releases. Walmart+ members also get a ton of freebies.

Walmart+ features member-only offers such as a whopping 50 cents/gallon off fuel at Exxon & Mobile stations, and up to 5% back in Walmart Cash on flights, hotels, car rentals and activities booked through Walmart+ Travel.

What can you get for free with Walmart+? Members can enjoy free shipping with no order minimum, so you won’t have to worry about adding things to your cart that you might not even need just to get free shipping.

The membership also includes free grocery delivery, contact-free checkout with mobile-scan and go, travel deals, free subscriptions to Paramount+ with Showtime, up to five months of free Apple Music and up to four months of free Apple Fitness. New perks include free pharmacy delivery too.

But wait, there’s more. Walmart+ members get free flat tire repair and other auto care and lots of other member benefits. Some of the limited-time offers available to Walmart+ members (as of this writing) include free access to eMeals, 25% off Turbo Tax (just in time for tax season), free online pet care through Pawp and 25% off Burger King (with a free whopper every three months).

Best Walmart+ Discounts, Promotions, Offers (2025)

The best Walmart+ deal right now is to take advantage of their 30-day free trial here.

If you’re interested in more discount options, there’s another ways to join Walmart+ for $49 or 50% off the regular price. Customers currently on government assistance are eligible for this 50% off deal through this sign-up link.

The retail giant introduced its Walmart+ Assist discounted subscription pricing last year. The Walmart+ Assist discount is available to eligible new and existing Walmart+ members. Existing members who qualify for the price cut will receive a prorated refund and the discounted price will begin immediately, per Walmart.

College students and grad students can also save 50% off when they subscribe to Walmart+ Student at a discounted rate of $49/year (or $6.47/month after the free trial).

How else can you save on Walmart+? Subscribing to the Walmart+ annual plan saves you 37% versus paying monthly. You’ll pay a one-time rate of $98 (roughly $8/month) versus paying $12.95 when you go month to month.

You can also give a Walmart+ membership as a birthday or holiday gift. A Walmart+ membership is perfect for shoppers who want access to special benefits such as free shipping and sweet deals.

How do you gift someone with a Walmart+ membership? Simply purchase a Walmart gift card, which can be used to cover the annual membership fee.



This story originally appeared on Billboard

Dramatic Game Comes Down to Gutsy Final wager

0

What To Know

  • The November 11 episode of Jeopardy! featured a dramatic finish, with Harrison Whitaker overtaking four-day champion Allegra Kuney thanks to a bold Final Jeopardy wager.
  • Kuney and Whitaker battled for the lead throughout the game, but Whitaker’s correct Final Jeopardy response and large bet secured his victory with $34,801.
  • Despite losing her champion streak, Kuney is expected to return for the Tournament of Champions due to her impressive performance.

[Warning: The following post contains MAJOR spoilers for the Tuesday, November 11, episode of Jeopardy!]

The November 11 Jeopardy! game was determined by a gutsy final wager that caused one contestant to take home a shocking win. Did Allegra Kuney make it to an upcoming Tournament of Champions, or was there a new champion crowned?

Kuney, from New Brunswick, New Jersey, played against Harrison Whitaker, from Terre Haute, Indiana, and Jessica Marshall, from Madison, Wisconsin, for her fifth game. Kuney, a Ph.D. candidate, has a four-day total of $92,600.

Kuney took an early lead of $3,600 by the first commercial break. Whitaker, a researcher, found the Daily Double. He had $3,800 and made it a true Daily Double. In “The Rules of the Game,” the clue read, “‘A player can make only one accusation during any one game.’” “What is mafia?” he answered incorrectly. The correct response was Clue. He dropped down to $0.

By the end of the round, Kuney led with $4,600. Marshall, an adjunct English professor, was in second place with $3,200. Whitaker had $600.

In Double Jeopardy, Kuney found the first Daily Double at $11,400. She wagered $4,000 in “Antonyms.” The clue was “Of dull: A 9-letter word from the Latin for ‘Life.’” “What is vivacious?” she answered correctly, giving her $15,400.

A few clues later, Whitaker found the last DD. He had $11,400 and wagered $4,400. In “Flying Colors,” the clue read, “The first U.S. aircraft designed to fight at night, the Northrop P-61 was nicknamed for this appropriate arachnid.” “What is a black widow?” he answered correctly, giving him $15,800 and the lead.

It was a battle between Kuney and Whitaker for first place until the end of the round. Whitaker had the lead with $19,000. Kuney had $17,400. Marshall was in third place with $10,000.

The category for Final Jeopardy was “Romans.” The clue was ‘In a work likely written in the 170s, this leader wondered what were ancient generals’ compared to Diogenes… & Socrates?” The correct response was Marcus Aurelius.

Marshall answered, “Who is Julius Caesar?” Since she was wrong, she dropped down to $2,500, for a total of $7,500. Kuney had the right answer. She wagered $5,000 and ended with $22,400. Whitaker wagered $15,801, ending with $34,801. He became the new champion, ending Kuney’s reign.

“D**n. I wish Allegra had gone further. I really liked her, at least she’ll be back in the toc though!!” one Reddit user said.

Jeopardy!, Weekdays, check local listings, stream next day on Hulu and Peacock




This story originally appeared on TV Insider

European Commission moves to loosen GDPR for AI and cookie tracking – Computerworld

0



AI training gets green light

The proposal directly addressed one of the most contentious issues in EU privacy law: whether companies can train AI systems using personal data.

The draft stated that AI training, testing, and validation may be conducted under the GDPR’s “legitimate interest” basis, as long as companies implement safeguards such as data minimization, transparency, and an unconditional right to object.

“Processing of personal data for AI training may therefore be carried out for purposes of a legitimate interest,” the draft said, adding that developers must ensure the training is “beneficial for the data subject and society at large.”



This story originally appeared on Computerworld