Friday, July 4, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 68

Looking for cheap shares to buy, here’s one I found

0


Image source: Domino’s Pizza Group plc

Recently, I have not just been looking for cheap shares to buy – I found some and have been adding them to my portfolio.

One of them is a well-known, profitable company with ongoing growth plans – and what I see as an attractive share price.

Strong brand and ongoing growth prospects

The company in question is Domino’s Pizza Group (LSE: DOM).

To be clear, this is the London-listed company that operates the local pizza business in the UK, not the New York-listed master franchisor.

Domino’s business model strikes me as a straightforward one. It offers economies of scale and the company can hopefully exploit those more by growing its business in Britain.

It has refocussed its business geographically in recent years though continues to operate outside the UK, for example in the Republic of Ireland and Poland. But it is the growth opportunities in its biggest market that have caught  my eye.

Simply by sticking to its knitting and continuing to execute well on its business plan, I reckon Domino’s could do well. Even though it fell 22% last year, the company’s profit after tax was still £90m. That equates to a net profit margin of 14%.

Why I see value

The fall in profit helps explain why Domino’s made it onto my list of shares to buy.

The share price has tumbled 17% over the past year, reflecting City nervousness about the business performance. But that puts it on a price-to-earnings ratio of 11.

I see that as attractively valued for a business that is strongly profitable, has proven it can succeed, benefits from a strong brand, and has a large customer base. Indeed, it has been trying out a loyalty programme with around 630,000 customers and now plans to expand that to roughly 3m pizza lovers.

There are risks. Net debt is £266m. I see that as manageable but it is higher than I would like. Pizza sales could fall if consumers tighten their belts (which would be hard to do in both senses if they eat too much pizza!)

But I essentially see this as a pretty straightforward business that simply by continuing to do what it has been doing lately ought to be able to create long-term shareholder value. Not only am I hopeful that the share price can grow, but I also consider the 4.3% dividend yield to be attractive.

Last year, the firm’s delivery business returned to growth. It sees opportunities to build on that momentum this year, although its focus on value-based marketing campaigns slightly concerns me. It suggests that buyers are indeed feeling the pinch economically. Competing on price can be bad for a business’s profit margins and Domino’s profitability is one of the things I like about the investment case.

On balance, to me, this share looks undervalued, which is why I decided to get a slice of the action.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Tariffs sparking a ‘reshoring’ boom could be double-edged sword, experts say

0

President Donald Trump has been adamant his tariffs will bring factory jobs back to American shores. Higher import taxes will likely push manufacturers to move operations back to the U.S., according to Bank of America economists, but so-called “reshoring” might incentivize firms to put more robots than humans on the assembly line.

A lack of skilled labor and high costs remain big impediments as companies come home, BofA warns. Automation might be the key to unlocking “reshoring,” potentially boosting the sluggish productivity of American manufactures without meaningfully increasing employment.

Evidence of a slowdown in the sector in mounting, according to a recent report from the Bank of America Institute. New orders for manufactured durable goods fell in April, while the famous manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index has signaled a contraction since March.

Focusing on small businesses, BofA’s internal client data shows deposit growth from manufacturers has also declined.

“It’s possible, right, that these [tariffs] could support momentum going forward and potentially reverse some of that slowdown, especially for certain sub sectors within the industry,” the report’s author, BofA economist Taylor Bowley, told Fortune. “But tariff costs and labor issues do exist.”

Reshoring has been all the rage in corporate America after Trump’s first trade war with China—and the COVID-19 pandemic—highlighted risks to global supply chains. The Biden-era CHIPS and Inflation Reduction Acts, meanwhile, heavily subsidized companies willing to make semiconductors and clean energy technology in the U.S.

While U.S. manufacturing accounts for just 8% of total employment, reshoring has created two million jobs in the last 15 years, according to a May note from BofA economists. Half of those new positions have been created in the past five years, they noted, though the trend has slowed since peaking in 2022.  

In a survey of 56 analysts across the bank, covering roughly 1,200 firms worth over $38 trillion in market cap, roughly 60% said production will continue to move back to the U.S.—at least modestly—if tariffs remain high. Those following industrials and manufacturing expect the greatest shift to the U.S.

U.S. lacks skilled workers

There are still obstacles to coming back stateside, though. In the BofA survey, 54% of the analysts said issues finding skilled workers would be a significant impediment for companies.

Higher labor costs are one of the primary reasons manufactures shifted away from the U.S. in the first place, Bowley said. While a 2024 survey from the Cato Institute found 80% of Americans think the country would benefit from increasing manufacturing employment, just a quarter believe they would be better off individually working in a factory.

If firms struggle to fill positions, Bowley said, they are forced to figure out how to improve productivity without hiring people.

“And that’s where this conversation around automation and productivity comes in,” she said.

Two-thirds of respondents to the BofA survey said any production shift to the U.S. would require significantly more automation than an offshore factory. That makes more advanced industries the best candidates for moving back to the U.S., BofA economists said, like auto assembly and high-end furniture. “Millions and millions of human beings screwing in little, little screws to make iPhones,” as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested? Not so much.

Meanwhile, Lutnick’s ability to continue making trade deals might matter most to small businesses. They account for 98% of American manufacturing, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration, and many rely on cheap imports.

“A lot of them depend on a specific part—for example, to complete their manufacturing process—that simply isn’t made domestically,” Bowley said.

Therefore, for smaller manufacturers, tariff uncertainty makes planning capital expenditures especially difficult, even if their products become more competitive domestically. With profit margins and productivity lagging other industries in the U.S., passing price hikes on to consumers is the obvious response. However, if firms need to absorb some of the cost to keep customers, Bowley said, reducing inventories, operations, or headcount are other potential options.

“Reshoring in that aspect for smaller firms is kind of a double-edged sword,” she said.

Nonetheless, sales are expected to grow in the coming months, Bowley said. But businesses might start feeling the squeeze, she added, when inventories start running low in the second half of the year.



This story originally appeared on Fortune

What Is Birthright Citizenship? A Closer Look at the 14th Amendment – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images

President Donald Trump has moved forward with efforts to end birthright citizenship as part of his second-term agenda, drawing sharp criticism and igniting a fierce legal battle. On December 8, 2024, he told NBC’s Kristen Welker on Meet the Press that he planned to issue an executive order ending birthright citizenship in the United States.

Now, with the Supreme Court limiting judges’ ability to block his order, the debate over the 14th Amendment has reached a new level of urgency.

Find out what birthright citizenship means, whether Trump has the authority to make this change, and who could be affected if it takes effect.

What Is the Meaning of Birthright Citizenship?

Birthright citizenship is the legal principle that grants automatic citizenship to any child born on the territory of a country, regardless of the citizenship or immigration status of their parents. In the United States, this principle is enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

This means that any child born on U.S. soil, whether their parents are citizens, legal residents, or undocumented immigrants, automatically acquires U.S. citizenship at birth.

Can Trump End Birthright Citizenship?

Trump has stated that he still intends to end birthright citizenship, a goal he previously listed as a priority for his first day in office. In December 2024, he said he planned to do so through executive action, though he has not provided specific details on how he would implement or enforce the change.

In June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling limiting lower courts’ power to block Trump’s executive order, giving his administration more leeway to pursue restrictions on birthright citizenship while legal challenges continue.

To formally amend the 14th Amendment, a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate would be required, followed by ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures—a process seen as highly unlikely despite Republican control of Congress.

Who Would Be Affected by the Change?

If Trump were to end birthright citizenship, it would primarily impact:

  1. Children Born to Undocumented Immigrants: The most direct impact would be on children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants. Currently, these children automatically receive U.S. citizenship under the 14th Amendment. Without birthright citizenship, they would not gain citizenship at birth.
  2. Children Born to Temporary Residents or Tourists: If birthright citizenship were revoked, children born to non-citizens, such as tourists, diplomats, or temporary workers, could also be denied automatic citizenship, despite being born on U.S. soil.
  3. U.S.-Born Children of Immigrants Seeking Citizenship: Families of immigrants could face increased challenges in securing citizenship or legal status for their children, particularly in cases where the parents are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Everyone going abroad urged to change 1 setting on phone | Travel News | Travel

0


British holidaymakers going abroad are being urged to change one setting on their mobile phone before boarding their flight.

There’s plenty to think about before jetting off, like double checking your passport and making sure you have your boarding pass, but it’s important not to neglect your phone settings or you could end up racking up a hefty bill. According to travel experts, switching off autoplay on your phone could be the difference between a smooth, budget-friendly holiday and an expensive roaming bill. If autoplay is switched on on your phone while data roaming is enabled, it can quietly eat up your data in the background from the moment you land at your destination and start scrolling.

Travel expert Georgia Brivida at eSIM provider Sim Local explains: “Autoplay is a feature that automatically plays videos as you scroll through apps like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook and YouTube, often without you even tapping play.

“It’s fine when you’re connected to Wi-Fi at home but when you’re abroad and paying per megabyte, it can quietly burn through your data in no time just from using your phone like you normally would. One small change before takeoff can save you a big headache later. It’s a simple fix that makes all the difference when you land.”

When the feature is enabled it can end up using your mobile data much faster than you might realise, with just 10 minutes streaming videos on YouTube and Netflix using up to 100MB, while scrolling through social media sites like TikTok and Instagram can use around 20MB, according to Sim Local.

Web browsing uses slightly less at around 10MB in just 10 minutes and using Spotify or podcast streaming can use up to 15MB of data.

So if you spend 30 minutes scrolling through TikTok while waiting for your taxi when you land, that’s roughly 60MB of data gone and watching just a few YouTube videos en route to your hotel will burn through another 200MB.

Over several days of your holiday it is all too easy to rack up several gigabytes of data and if without the right roaming plan, you could be looking at a phone bill of around £120 or more just from scrolling.

But luckily turning off autoplay is very simple and it’s worth doing to save yourself an expensive bill, plus it’ll give you more control over when your data is used.

To switch it off on iOS (iPhone), simply go to Settings, then Accessibility and tap on ‘Motion’. Find the toggle switch for Auto-Play Video Previews and turn it off

On Android phones, go to Settings then scroll down and select Google, select All Services, then tap ‘Search, Assistant & Voice’ and select ‘Other Settings’. From here click on Autoplay video previews and select ‘never’.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Some Brother printers have a remote code execution vulnerability, and they can’t fix it

0



Two others, CVE-2024-51980 and CVE-2024-51981, enable server-side request forgery (SSRF), allowing printers to send crafted requests into internal networks they shouldn’t be talking to. In corporate environments, this could let attackers probe internal services, bypass access controls, or pivot deeper into the network. Finally, CVE-2024-51984 exposes plaintext credentials for services such as LDAP or FTP to authenticated users, offering a potential jump-off point for wider compromise.

In addition to 689 models of Brother printers, scanners, and label makers, some of the vulnerabilities affect 46 Fujifilm models, 5 from Ricoh, 2 from Toshiba Tec, and 6 from Konica Minolta.

Except for Brother’s admin bypass flaw, all vulnerabilities have been addressed through respective firmware updates, Rapid7 added.



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

How to share your Wi-Fi password across iPhones, Androids and other devices

0


Whether you’re setting up a new device or helping a friend connect to your home network, sharing your Wi-Fi password doesn’t need to be a hassle. Today’s smartphones make it easy to share access without typing (or needing to remember) long strings of characters. Both iPhones and Android devices support features that let you send your Wi-Fi password quickly and securely, but the steps can vary depending on the devices involved.

Of course, you can still go into your Wi-Fi settings to view your password and show it to your guest or copy and paste it into a group chat. But the methods outlined here avoid having to tell anyone what your long, complicated password might be and are generally more secure.

Below are the most reliable ways to share Wi-Fi passwords between iPhones, between Androids and across mobile platforms.

Apple has built-in functionality to simplify Wi-Fi sharing between its own devices that was introduced in iOS 11. This feature works on iPhones, iPads and Macs provided they’re running the latest versions of iOS, iPadOS or macOS.

Before you start:

  • Make sure both devices are running the latest software.

  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth should be turned on for both devices.

  • Personal Hotspot should be turned off.

  • The Apple ID email address of the person you’re sharing the password with must be saved in your Contacts.

To share your Wi-Fi password:

  1. Unlock both iPhones.

  2. Ensure both devices are physically near each other.

  3. On the receiving iPhone, go to Settings > Wi-Fi and select the same Wi-Fi network.

  4. A pop-up will appear on the sender’s iPhone asking if you’d like to share the password.

  5. Tap Share Password.

  6. Once the password is sent, tap Done.

The receiving device will automatically connect to the Wi-Fi network without needing to type in the password manually.

While Apple devices don’t natively support sharing Wi-Fi passwords with Android phones, there are still a couple of effective workarounds using QR codes. The most user-friendly approach is to create a QR code that an Android phone can scan to connect to the Wi-Fi network.

Option 1: Create a QR code using the Shortcuts app

If you’re using iOS 17 or later, you can build a shortcut to generate a QR code that contains your Wi-Fi credentials.

  1. Open the Shortcuts app on your iPhone.

  2. Tap the + button to create a new shortcut.

  3. Select Add Action, then choose Text.

  4. In the text box, enter your Wi-Fi credentials using the following format:
    WIFI:S:NetworkName;T:WPA;P:Password;;
    Replace NetworkName with your Wi-Fi network name and Password with your actual password.

  5. Tap Add Action again and search for Generate QR Code.

  6. Add a final action: Quick Look, which displays the generated code.

  7. Run the shortcut. The QR code will appear on your screen.

  8. Ask the Android user to scan the QR code using their camera app or a QR scanner. This should automatically connect their device to your Wi-Fi network.

Option 2: Use a third-party QR code generator

Alternatively, you can use an online tool like qifi.org to create a QR code.

  1. Open your preferred browser and visit the QR generator website.

  2. Enter your Wi-Fi network name (SSID), security type and password.

  3. Generate the QR code.

  4. Display the QR code on your iPhone.

  5. Let the Android device scan the code to connect.

While not as seamless as iPhone-to-iPhone sharing, both methods are secure and help you avoid typing long passwords manually.

Most Android phones running Android 10 or later allow users to share Wi-Fi credentials through a QR code. This works well for sharing passwords with other Android devices and iPhones.

  1. Open the Settings app on your Android phone.

  2. Tap Network & Internet (or Connections, depending on your phone model).

  3. Select Wi-Fi, then tap the name of the connected network.

  4. Tap the Share or QR code icon. You may be prompted to verify your identity with a PIN or fingerprint.

  5. A QR code will appear.

  6. The iPhone user can scan the QR code using the Camera app or the built-in Code Scanner (found in Control Center).

Once scanned, the iPhone will automatically prompt you to connect to the network.

  • Avoid sending Wi-Fi passwords over text or unsecured messaging apps.

  • Use QR codes or password-sharing features when possible to reduce typing errors.

  • If using a public or guest network, consider setting up a separate SSID and password to keep your main network private.

  • Always update your devices to the latest operating system to ensure compatibility and security.

If you’re having trouble sharing your Wi-Fi password:

  • Double-check that both devices have Wi-Fi and Bluetooth turned on.

  • Restart both devices and try again.

  • Ensure both devices are unlocked and close to each other.

  • Make sure contact details are up to date and the correct Apple ID is saved.

For QR code scanning issues, check that the recipient is using a compatible QR code reader. iPhones can scan codes using the Camera app, while most Android devices have built-in scanners or third-party apps available.



This story originally appeared on Engadget

‘Black Panther’ Only MCU Film That Makes NYT’s Top 100 Movies of 21st Century

0


The MCU is one of the most popular movie franchises of all time, but that doesn’t mean it is as revered as other, more critically-acclaimed cinema. The Avengers franchise has made billions for Marvel Studios, but it’s not often they make the cut of the “Best Of” all-time lists. However, the New York Times just released their Best Movies of the 21st Century list, voted on by select actors and filmmakers, and the highest-rated MCU movie on Rotten Tomatoes has made the cut.

The New York Times has unveiled The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century, and while superheroes were mostly absent, one beloved MCU title made the list. The three-time Oscar-winning film Black Panther landed at the #96 spot on the list, sandwiched between Gravity (#97) and The Worst Person in the World (#95). Black Panther is one of two superhero movies to be voted in the top 100, while Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight is ranked at #28.

More to come.

Source: New York Times



Black Panther


Release Date

February 16, 2018

Runtime

135 minutes

Director

Ryan Coogler






This story originally appeared on Movieweb

Parks & Rec’s Best Celebrity Cameo Only Lasted 4 Minutes – And It Was Still Hilarious

0


Parks and Recreation had many celebrity cameos, and its best one was not only surprising but also very brief. One of the best TV shows of the 2010s, as well as one of the best TV shows of all time, is Parks and Recreation. Created by Greg Daniels and Michael Schur, Parks and Recreation premiered on NBC in 2009, and after a rough first season, it found its voice, and the rest of the show was a success. Parks and Recreation ran for seven seasons, ending on a high note in 2015.

Set in the fictional town of Pawnee, Indiana, Parks and Recreation introduced the audience to Leslie Knope (Amy Poehler), an eternal optimist working at the Parks Department. The show follows Leslie’s many ups and downs at the Parks Department and in her personal life, accompanied by her colleagues and friends, such as Ron Swanson (Nick Offerman) and April Ludgate (Aubrey Plaza). Throughout its seven seasons, Parks and Rec had some notable celebrity cameos, and its best one was only on-screen for around three minutes.

Bill Murray Made A Surprise Cameo As Mayor Gunderson In Parks & Recreation

Major Gunderson Finally Appeared In Parks & Recreation Season 7

Pawnee’s Mayor Walter Gunderson was mentioned many times throughout Parks and Recreation, but he never made a physical appearance… until season 7, at his funeral. Season 7’s 11th episode, “Two Funerals”, saw Leslie and Ben announcing that they would move to Washington D.C. as Leslie took a job at the Department of the Interior, with April and Andy also moving to D.C. Amid all these announcements, the crew learned that Mayor Gunderson passed away, and so they attended his memorial service.

There, Parks and Rec revealed that Mayor Gunderson was none other than Bill Murray, who simply lied there, in a coffin. Parks and Rec played a recorded message from Gunderson during his funeral. At the service, many paid their respects to the Mayor and shared some of their best memories of him. Among them was Ethel Beavers (Helen Slayton-Hughes), a court stenographer who worked on City Hall’s fourth floor and who had minor appearances throughout the show.

Ethel revealed at the Mayor’s funeral that he and his wife had an open marriage, and that she had a relationship with Gunderson for 46 years. Ethel regretted not expressing her love for him earlier, kissed him on the forehead, and said “Good night, you animal.” Mayor Gunderson’s funeral was not ordinary at all, and Bill Murray’s presence was not only surprising because of his legacy, but because he just lied there while the video played, and Parks and Rec made it even funnier with Ethel’s reveal.

How Parks & Rec Got Bill Murray To Play Mayor Gunderson

Mayor Gunderson Had To Be Played By Someone Big

Bill Murray is a legend, especially in the world of comedy, but he’s also known for his attitude, which is why it was even more surprising to see him in Parks and Recreation in such a small role. The team behind Parks and Rec originally didn’t consider showing Mayor Gunderson at all unless they could find the right actor for it, with Schur revealing in 2015 that they initially wanted Arnold Schwarzenegger to play the character (via EW). However, Schwarzenegger turned down the offer as he couldn’t take the role while he was still in office.

Related


Bill Murray’s 10 Best Movies, Ranked

Bill Murray’s best movies showcase his signature style of deadpan comedy, but he has also proven to be a capable dramatic actor over the years.

It then became a joke among the Parks and Rec team that they would only show the mayor if they got Bill Murray to play him, and in 2011, Poehler joked on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon that she would pay Murray $250 to do it. After that, Plaza, Poehler, and Rashida Jones tried on different occasions to convince Murray to join Parks and Rec as Gunderson, and in Plaza and Poehler’s final attempt, they told Murray he would be lying in a coffin, and he accepted.

Why Bill Murray’s Parks & Rec’s Cameo Is The Show’s Best

Parks & Recreation Knew How To Make Mayor Gunderson’s Only Appearance Memorable

Parks and Recreation Mayor Gunderson in his coffin

Saving Mayor Gunderson’s appearance until his funeral is already a brilliant and hilarious idea, very fitting with Parks and Rec’s tone and style, but the surprise of him being Bill Murray made it even better. Despite his role being very brief and simple, Parks and Rec knew how to seize Murray’s comedic genius, as even while he was in the coffin, he seemed to be slightly smiling, which was hilarious when the camera turned to him after Ethel’s big revelation.

The reveal of Ethel and Gunderson’s relationship made Murray’s brief Parks and Recreation appearance even funnier and more memorable.

Murray’s Parks and Rec cameo was also amazing thanks to his improv skills, as he added some improv to Gunderson’s recorded message – and Parks and Rec’s biggest strength was its cast’s improv skills. The reveal of Ethel and Gunderson’s relationship made Murray’s brief Parks and Recreation appearance even funnier and more memorable, further cementing it as the show’s best celebrity cameo, despite how brief it was.

Source: EW.



This story originally appeared on Screenrant

Bruce Springsteen’s ‘Tracks II’: The Boss and his lore

0


Fifty years after he became a sweat-soaked rock star with 1975’s “Born to Run,” Bruce Springsteen has opened up his vault of unreleased material for a new box set that spans nearly the length of the half-century he’s spent chasing a runaway American dream.

“Tracks II: The Lost Albums” collects 83 songs, the vast majority of them unheard by even devoted fans of the Boss. It’s a sequel of sorts to 1998’s “Tracks,” which offered up demos and outtakes to fill out the story of one of music’s most prolific and meticulous songwriters. But unlike the earlier set, “Tracks II” organizes its songs into seven distinct LPs, each with a different sound and theme; Springsteen says he came this close to releasing some of them at the time they were made but ultimately decided not to for various reasons related to his life and career.

As a project of pop archiving, “Tracks II’s” breadth and depth put it on par with Peter Jackson’s Beatles docuseries “Get Back” and with Taylor Swift’s series of “Taylor’s Version” re-recordings. And it arrives at a time when Springsteen, 75, is already in the headlines thanks to his war of words with President Trump over the latter’s aggressive deportation policies and to the recently unveiled trailer for this fall’s “Deliver Me From Nowhere,” in which Jeremy Allen White plays Springsteen. Times pop music critic Mikael Wood and staff writer August Brown gathered to discuss the box set and what to make of its bounty.

Mikael Wood: Let’s start with how Springsteen and his team are rolling out this behemoth. As I’ve interpreted the essays and videos and interviews that have set up “Tracks II,” they see the box set as an opportunity to reshape our understanding of the Boss in two ways.

The first is that he was ambivalent about rock stardom: “L.A. Garage Sessions ’83” is the earliest of the albums here, and it seems meant to disrupt the idea that Springsteen transitioned smoothly from the lo-fi “Nebraska” in 1982 to the arena-geared anthems of “Born in the U.S.A.” in 1984; this lost LP, which the singer cut mostly on his own in a little apartment above a house he’d bought in the Hollywood Hills, suggests that he was tempted to stay in that more writerly zone instead of lunging for the MTV of it all. To my mind, it’s making the argument that perhaps he didn’t go quite as eagerly as we thought — that even back then he was weighing the benefits and the costs of becoming a sex symbol in a pair of bum-hugging jeans.

The other thing I think “Tracks II” is trying to do is correct the record regarding Springsteen in the ’90s. He released three albums in the decade of grunge, none of which did particularly well (at least by Boss standards). Yet here are three more LPs that tell us he was busy experimenting at that time rather than merely waiting for Pearl Jam’s moment to pass: “Streets of Philadelphia Sessions,” which grew out of the moment that yielded his Oscar-winning theme from Jonathan Demme’s “Philadelphia,” has him dabbling in synths and drum loops; “Somewhere North of Nashville” is a frisky country record he made at the same time as the more contemplative “Ghost of Tom Joad”; “Inyo” takes inspiration from the Mexican music he says he heard while riding around Southern California on his motorcycle.

These acts of lore maintenance closely follow Springsteen’s memoir and his one-man Broadway show and a number of recent documentaries, and of course “Tracks II” is coming out right before the splashy biopic that promises to set off a Boss-aissance not unlike the one “A Complete Unknown” did last year for Bob Dylan. But what do you think, August, of this perceived need to adjust Springsteen’s framing? Does he strike you in 2025 as an artist that anyone might possibly have gotten wrong?

August Brown: I think you’re onto something, Mikael: This box is a reclamation of Springsteen as a challenging, skeptical songwriter even during the periods when his pop-culture status elevated him in ways that now seem inevitable — mythic, even.

There’s never been a more fruitful age for fans who want to dig under the hood of Springsteen’s process. The hugely successful Broadway show and his critically acclaimed book laid the groundwork for “Deliver Me From Nowhere,” which looks to capture him at the bleak, brilliant, transitional moment of “Nebraska.” That’s a time Springsteen has described as “depression … spewing like an oil spill all over the beautiful turquoise-green gulf of my carefully planned and controlled existence.” He compared depression to a “black sludge … threatening to smother every last living part of me.”

Can you imagine being a film exec who’s gotten the rights to a Bruce biopic only to be told you’re getting the story of his most impeccably miserable solo record?

But it comes alongside ”Tracks II,” which adds a ton of new texture and spiky context to the era when Bruce exploded from blue-collar ambassador into a global superstar. I agree that “L.A. Garage Sessions ’83” shows his mixed emotions about becoming the most famous tuchus in the country if that came at the expense of his literary aspirations. It’s wild to discover that as he was channeling the bombast of “Born In the U.S.A.,” he was also spinning out “The Klansman,” a brooding character study of American evil that promises, “When the war between the races leaves us in a fiery dream / It’ll be a Klansman who will wipe this country clean / This, son, is my dream.”

Wood: Talk about dancing in the dark.

Beyond the four albums we’ve mentioned, “Tracks II” also contains “Faithless,” which Springsteen describes as the soundtrack to an abandoned “spiritual Western” he was involved with in the mid-2000s; the snazzily orchestrated “Twilight Hours”; and “Perfect World,” which departs from the box set’s concept by simply rounding up 10 fist-pumping rock songs that never found a proper home as he recorded them over the last few decades. (In the essay that accompanies “Perfect World,” he says “If I Could Only Be Your Lover” almost made it on 2012’s “Wrecking Ball” — “but it wasn’t political enough.”)

Taken together, the variety of the work here makes you wonder: Is anyone more flexible among Springsteen’s boomer-royalty peers? I’d say Paul McCartney and Stevie Wonder are both capable of doing as many different things, though I’m not sure either has been driven to actually do them for ages. Taken one by one, the albums show how committed Springsteen was to each style he was taking up.

Brown: I especially like the horny-apocalyptic mode of “Waiting on the End of the World,” from “Streets of Philadelphia Sessions.” But I’ve been turning back most often to “Inyo,” which finds him squarely in the Townes Van Zandt mode of regally weary minimalism as he conjures scenes of the the California desert and border-town Mexico — a genre setting that feels especially resonant from our vantage point of an L.A. under siege.

Speaking of which: To me, one of the most interesting things about this set of narrative-upending albums is that it arrives at a Trump-dominated moment when Springsteen’s status as the bard of working-class white America is probably as inaccurate as it’s ever been.

I remember seeing Bruce back on 2004’s Vote for Change tour with openers Bright Eyes and R.E.M., imploring my fellow young Floridians to come out for John Kerry. (We all know how that turned out.) And it’s heartening to see him still on the road, laying into what he sees as the creep of totalitarianism every night in his eighth decade of life.

But who are we kidding? Any MAGA types who once would have listened to the Boss’ thoughts on organized labor and resisting fascism are probably gone forever — even if it does needle the actual ’80s Tri-State Area Guy currently occupying the White House. At best, those blue-collar dudes are in line today for Zach Bryan; more likely, they’re listening to Morgan Wallen.

Wood: I can’t imagine that the reported half-billion dollars Springsteen made in 2021 by selling his catalog did much to dissuade those inclined to view him as a coastal elite long since grown out of touch with the common man. (Bruce and Don: just two rich guys fighting for the soul of Lunchpail Larry.)

Your point about “Inyo” makes me think about how much of the “Tracks II” music grew out of Springsteen’s time in California, a place he seemed to view in the ’80s and ’90s as both a refuge from fame and a source of creative renewal. The essay accompanying “Streets of Philadelphia Sessions,” for instance, tells us that he cut the demos for that lost album at his place in Bel-Air, where he’d moved after his Hollywood Hills home was damaged in the Northridge earthquake; evidently, Springsteen started using drum loops because he’d gotten deep into West Coast hip-hop.

Given that this was early 1994, I wonder if he was also hearing Beck’s “Loser” on KROQ — something a song like the casually funky “Blind Spot” certainly suggests was the case. I like the idea that an artist so steeped in the history and mythology of New Jersey found his wheels turning in new directions here.

Brown: Whatever’s happened to his ability to rally the middle of the country, “Tracks II” shows that the one person Springsteen could always push was himself — wherever the muse took him, even at the height of his celebrity. I can see why he shelved these restless yet fully realized little albums, as they would have complicated his lore at a time when rock music was shifting underneath him, just before his 2000s renaissance with “The Rising.”

But they deepen and affirm what, I think, “Deliver Me From Nowhere” is trying to do for his ’70s era: demonstrate that Bruce’s ubiquity in the ’80s — and the new churn of rock in the ‘90s — left him uneasy and turning back to the sturdy craftsmanship and scene-setting experiments he loved. These records don’t reveal anything jaw-dropping about his ambitions, but they show that given the choice of being an artist or a hero, he never shortchanged the former even when the culture was begging for the latter.

I mentioned that “Inyo” is probably my favorite of the lost albums. How about you?

Wood: It’s probably the biggest outlier in the bunch, but I’m fascinated by “Twilight Hours,” which collects songs Springsteen cut during the sessions that yielded 2019’s “Western Stars.” That record had a gleaming Glen Campbell vibe, but this one is moodier and more downcast; it leans toward the Sinatra of “In the Wee Small Hours,” with Bruce singing about loneliness and regret amid arrangements lush with horns and strings. (For a comparison, you might think of Elvis Costello and Burt Bacharach’s “Painted from Memory,” from 1998.)

Springsteen’s vocals here are intimate yet highly theatrical — a mode of “doomed romanticism,” as he put it in an interview with the Times of London. It’s a nostalgic record, for sure, but there’s something mysterious about it too, as though he’s not quite sure what precisely he’s longing for, or why. Like “Tracks II” as a whole, “Twilight Hours” is about the road untaken, and it sounds both haunted and enriched by possibility.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Ariana Grande’s Birthday Celebrated by Empire State Building: Watch

0


Pop superstar Ariana Grande fielded messages from all manner of fans and celebrities on Thursday (June 26) as the singer-actress turned 32 years old. But one of the strangest well wishes came not from a person, but a 1,400-foot-tall building.

In a post to its TikTok account on Thursday, New York City’s Empire State Building shared a video celebrating the pop singer’s birthday. In the clip, the skyscraper’s iconic spire is shown through a series of aerial shots as it lights up with different colors, while a mashup of some of Grande’s biggest hits play in the background, including “Break Free,” “One Last Time,” “7 Rings” and “Popular.”

The building, which has a viral TikTok account that often includes celebrity appearances at the observation deck, kept its message for Grande short and sweet. “HAPPY B DAY QUEEN,” the caption read.

Plenty of other stars wished Grande a happy birthday on Thursday. After the singer posted a photo of herself as a child on her Instagram, her brother Frankie wrote in the comments section, “HAPPT [sic] BIRTHDAY MY SISTER I LOVE YOU SO MUCH!!!” Meanwhile, her Wicked co-star Cynthia Erivo shared a behind-the-scenes image of the two of them in costume, writing “Happy birthday love!! Have the best day.”

Earlier this week, Grande made headlines when she shared a message from New York’s Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who called for President Donald Trump to be impeached over his decision to bomb Iran without the proper authorization from Congress. “He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment,” the politician’s post read in part.

Check out the Empire State Building’s tribute for Grande’s birthday below:




This story originally appeared on Billboard