Thursday, February 6, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 73

Many Boomers Hesitant to Transfer Wealth: Charles Schwab

0


So much for that “great wealth transfer” that’s on the horizon. Despite millennials and Gen Xers being poised to inherit around $84 trillion by 2045 during the “silver tsunami,” it looks like boomers want to stand pat.

According to a new report from Charles Schwab, almost half of boomers surveyed (45%) said they wanted “to enjoy my money for myself while I’m still alive” — while only 11% of Gen Xers and 15% of millennials said the same.

Schwab’s survey of 1,000 high net worth (HNW) Americans, which is defined as people with more than $1 million in investable assets, found a sizeable generational shift: Millionaire millennials and Gen X were more than twice as likely to opt for sharing their wealth during their lifetime than Boomers.

Related: Baby Boomer Businesses Are Up for Grabs — Here’s How Entrepreneurs Can Benefit In 2025

“Schwab serves over a million multi-millionaires, and as they move from building wealth to preserving and passing it, we see an increasing need for specialized services and support around estate planning, wealth transfer, and legacy planning,” said Andrew D’Anna, managing director of retail client experience at Charles Schwab. “According to our survey, younger Americans could be poised to reshape legacy planning and the future of how wealth is passed to the next generation.”

Still, just because younger Americans plan to give more away sooner, it doesn’t mean they’re making it easy. While younger HNW individuals are more keen to give their money away—it comes with a catch.

According to the report, these plans have “strings attached.” Of millennials and Gen Xers who already have wealth transfer plans, a whopping 97% and 94%, respectively, have put “stipulations” in the contracts. Meanwhile, only one in three (around 34%) of Boomers have the same.

For millennials, most people said the catch is about how money can be used (43%), while more of Gen X (46%) preferred to set an age for when the next generation receives the wealth.

According to USA Today, some financial planners are trying to convince their clients to pass their wealth to their children while they are still young adults.

“It’s the 20- and 30-year-olds who need it the most,” Michelle Crumm, a certified financial planner in Ann Arbor, Michigan, told the outlet. ”Those two decades are the ones that have the highest needs and the lowest ability to have any money coming in.”

But her clients aren’t budging, she said, responding with things like: “Nobody ever gave me anything.”

For the full report, click here.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

US Navy bans members from using China’s DeepSeek AI app out of security fears

0

The United States Navy has officially banned its members from using DeepSeek — an artificial intelligence chatbot created in China — out of fear the Chinese government could exploit sensitive data, according to a report.

In an email to members of the military branch, the Navy banned the use of DeepSeek AI “in any capacity” for fear of “potential security and ethical concerns associated with the model’s origin and usage,” CNBC reported.

Chinese-made DeepSeek is seen as a cheaper, newer AI option that seeks to displace ChatGPT from its spot as the most recognizable AI chatbot. AFP via Getty Images

DeepSeek immediately shot to the top of the charts of Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store — being downloaded over 2 million times since it debuted on Jan. 15, with most downloads coming in the last three days.

Experts have raised concerns over the app storing user data — as detailed as keystrokes — in China where it can be accessed by hands unfriendly to American citizens.

“What sets this context apart is that DeepSeek is a Chinese company based in China,” Angela Zhang, a law professor at the University of Southern California, told The Post, comparing DeepSeek to the other Chinese tech problem-child, TikTok.

“This raises the question of whether the collection of data such as IP addresses and keystroke patterns could pose a national security threat,” Zhang said.

All China-based companies are forced by the Chinese Communist Party’s cybersecurity laws to share any data with the government upon request.

All companies in China are required by law to share any data with the nation’s communist government. REUTERS

The American markets were rocked by the country’s announcement that they had developed an advanced AI program at a fraction of the cost it took Western rival OpenAI to produce ChatGPT.

Lian Wenfeng, the millennial math whiz founder of DeepSeek, supposedly designed the AI program over the course of just a few months — and spent just $6 million to bring it to fruition.

DeepSeek was reportedly developed for just $6 million, a fraction of the cost that it’s taking Western companies to create their programs. REUTERS

The app hit the market just days after President Trump announced a $500 billion AI initiative called “Stargate.”

Major US tech stocks lost $1 trillion in market value on Monday — a whopping 17% loss across the board on the Dow Jones — as hysteria reached a fever pitch over the implications of the supposedly game-changing AI advancement.

Billionaire tech-entrepreneur Marc Andreessen likened DeepSeek to the artificial intelligence equivalent to Sputnik — the Russian space vessel that beat the US, in 1957, to become the first man-made vessel to orbit the Earth.

The United States Navy is the first military branch to outlaw the controversial new app. Christopher Sadowski

But Trump seemed less threatened by the new development from the East, tamping down concerns at a press conference Monday.

“I’ve been reading about China and some of the companies in China, one in particular, coming up with a faster method of AI and much less expensive method,” Trump said in an address to House Republicans in Florida.

“And that’s good because you don’t have to spend as much money. I view that as a positive, as an asset. So I really think — if it’s fact, and if it’s true, and nobody really knows what it is — but I view that as a positive, because you’ll be doing that too,” Trump said.

“So you won’t be spending as much, and you’ll get the same result hopefully,” Trump said, adding that he believed the new company will be a “wake-up call” for American AI enterprises.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Kathy Hochul has been intolerable as governor and owes New Yorkers an apology

0

Gov. Hochul owes New Yorkers an apology.

For months she’s been promising to put “money back in your pockets.” 

It turns out she actually meant to say she’s determined to take more money out of your pockets and give it to the MTA. 

And why?

Because the MTA has big holes in its pockets and the more money she puts in there, the more money the agency needs. 

So pay up, suckers.

The gang that can’t shoot straight needs another bundle of your cash. 

Hochul has been in office since August of 2021 and only one in three voters say they plan to vote for her next year. 

All of which is to say it’s awfully late in the day for her to be making rookie mistakes and getting hoodwinked by the bureaucracy.

And those are the kindest possible explanations for her total mismanagement of the MTA’s finances. 

The agency is a sinkhole for honest New Yorkers’ money, and the governor either doesn’t know how to fix it or doesn’t care.

Neither is acceptable. 

The latest evidence of malpractice comes from the Post report that deadbeat drivers skipped out on the agency’s bridge and tunnel tolls to the tune of $5.1 billion over four years, including $1.4 billion last year alone. 

And that staggering sum is in addition to the nearly $800 million the MTA lost because bus and subway riders refused to pay their fares last year.

It’s an epidemic of cheating, with nearly half of riders not paying on some bus routes. 

Combined, the toll and fare losses hit a mind-blowing total of $2.2 billion in a single year! 

Have you heard even a peep of outrage or apology from the governor or anybody else in Albany?

Of course not. 

They hope nobody notices or, more importantly, holds them accountable. 

Their silence doubles the scandal and, unfortunately, offers a perfect case study of how the state’s fiscal house is riddled with waste and fraud. 

The $252 billion budget Hochul proposed for the new fiscal year represents an increase of $110 billion over the last decade.

And the total will grow even bigger by the time the Legislature is finished adding its favorite pork-barrel projects and union giveaways. 

The MTA, which has its own expense budget of $20 billion, is a smaller version of the same scandals.

When it fails to properly manage the gusher of money it collects, the state responds by raising taxes, tolls and fees even higher to plug the leaks. 

It isn’t working, and there’s no end in sight. 

Yet the governor never tried the best option — namely, fixing the MTA.

She rewards its incompetence by giving it more money to burn. 

One result is that agency leaders don’t worry about getting fired for failure.

All they need to do is threaten that service will get worse if they don’t get more money — and the governor opens the spigot even wider. 

DOGE has its day 

New York needs a DOGE — a department of government efficiency — like the one Elon Musk is heading for President Trump on the federal level. 

The $2.2 billion in MTA losses from cheating last year also throw another harsh spotlight on Hochul’s pernicious congestion tax of $9 a day to drive into Midtown Manhattan. 

The plan was discredited before it started because of the way she used it to play partisan football.

She was all for it until she learned it could be a killer of Dem candidates during the November elections. 

So she slammed on the brakes until the elections were over.

Then, seeing Trump’s victory and knowing he opposed it, she not only approved it, she rushed it through so it took effect 15 days before he was inaugurated. 

Savings are killing us 

Along the way, she cut the planned initial rate of $15 a day to $9, then had the nerve to claim the 40% reduction in the initial price would save commuters thousands of dollars a year. 

Any more savings like that and we’ll all be in the poor house. 

Even then, Hochul kept spinning the idea that the Midtown tax was necessary to shore up the MTA’s finances, when she had to know it wouldn’t even make up for half of the annual losses, not to mention the agency’s next round of spending increases. 

And despite the tax, Hochul and legislative leaders have said additional, broad-based levies on employers would probably be part of a budget deal to close the MTA deficit. 

There is also a plan to raise city subway and bus single-ride fares by 4%, to $3, this summer. 

Meanwhile, the agency continues to burn through money.

A relatively small but grating example includes the decision to spend up to $1 million from a federal grant to study why so many people cheat on the bus and subway fares. 

Let me guess: Because they can? 

And because there are no consequences.

It’s the same logic that has led to an explosion of shoplifting. Getting caught is no big deal. 

But that’s not obvious enough for officials who say they hope the study will help them better understand the mindset of the average fare evader, The Post reports. 

It says early research shows that the cheaters are “opportunists, rebels, idealists” or “low-income.” 

They also concluded that middle school and high school students do it because they “think it’s cool and edgy not to pay,” the agency found. 

Brilliant, just brilliant. 

Now do something about it! 

Mistake to drop guard on mullahs

President Trump’s decision to end federal protections for three of his top first-term aides is a mistake.

The three, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton and Brian Hook, have been targeted by Iran over Trump’s 2020 decision to eliminate the mullah’s terror leader, Qasem Soleimani, in a drone strike. 

By removing their protection and announcing it, Trump has sparked legitimate fears the men are in danger. 

GOP Sen. Tom Cotton, after noting that Iran has also targeted Trump, smartly summed up why he should reverse his decision. 

“As the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, I’ve reviewed the intelligence in the last few days,” Cotton said on Fox News, according to a Wall Street Journal transcript.

“The threat to anyone involved in President Trump’s strike on Qassem Soleimani is persistent. It’s real. Iran is committed to vengeance against all of these people.” 

He added “it’s not just about these men who helped President Trump carry out his policy . . . It’s about their family and friends, innocent bystanders every time they’re in public. It’s also about the president being able to get good people and get good advice. 

“If people are, say, going to work for the president now on Iran or China or North Korea or the Mexican drug cartels, they might hesitate to do so, or they might hesitate if they’re in office to give him the advice he needs or carry out the policies that he decides upon.” 

Amen. 

Do the right thing, Mr. President.

Before it’s too late. 



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Why’s Spirax Group a top-performing FTSE 100 stock this year?

0


Image source: Getty Images

While US markets shudder in the wake of Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) competitor DeepSeek, the FTSE 100‘s holding up well. The UK’s leading index climbed 70 points as the week began, edging ever closer to a new high above 8572.

An unlikely stock leading the charge on Tuesday (18 January) was steam management company Spirax Group (LSE: SPX). It’s up 16% year-to-date (YTD), making it one of the top Footsie stocks this month.

Formerly Spirax-Sarco Engineering, the British manufacturer designs and builds sustainable industrial solutions used in thermal energy and fluid technology. It’s comprised of three divisions: Steam Thermal Solutions, Electric Thermal Solutions, and Watson-Marlow Fluid Technology Solutions.

I don’t know much about steam and fluid energy but Spirax is far from some antiquated boiler maker. In fact, it’s a UK leader in industrial decarbonisation. According to the company, it’s “positioned to play a critical role in enabling the industrial transition to net zero”.

But that alone’s surely not the reason for this month’s rapid gains. So I decided to take a closer look.

Why the price surge?

Typically when a stock surges I check two things. Did it post a trading update, or has it been tipped by a broker?

Spirax’s most recent results were posted in November so that’s not it. But major broker Jefferies put in a Buy rating on the stock on 20 January. It’s climbed 7% since, but was already up almost 9% year-to-date at the time.

So what prompted the positive rating? Discussing the rating, Jefferies felt negative sentiment regarding the stock was overblown. It said “a number of the group’s recent issues are not yet fully resolved” but it expects a recovery in the next two-to-three years.

Before this year’s recovery, the stock price had slipped 60% from a five-year high of £170.45 in late 2021. It started this year around £68.50 but is now nearing £80. The reasons for the earlier decline aren’t clear but are likely due to a global industrial slowdown and uncertainty regarding the company’s valuation.

Addressing the issues, Spirax updated its name in early 2024 and then brought on a new CFO Louisa Burdett in July. It also launched a sustainability strategy dubbed ‘One Planet: Engineering with Purpose’.

Worth considering?

While the recent gains are impressive, I see little evidence to suggest a definitive turnaround. The stock enjoyed a similar recovery in late 2023, only to dip again just as quickly in the following quarter.

For investors looking for growth stocks on the FTSE 100, I think the following three look more promising to consider.

IT services provider Computacenter jumped 7.2% yesterday (27 January) after releasing record-breaking results for the second half of 2024. Jefferies put in a Buy rating on the stock and analysts expect on average a 25.7% gain in the coming 12 months.

Burberry‘s been blowing up the news lately after the famous luxury fashion house posted higher-than-expected sales for Q3 2024. The stock surged 16% last week, bringing the price to a six-month high. 

Airtel Africa, with results out this week, could make a surprise recovery this year. After selling off non-core assets, it aims to refocus on core markets and reignite growth.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

UK regulator may investigate AWS and Microsoft cloud businesses

0



If the various points made in the inquiry are dissected, said Maisto, “we can argue that: a) it is not actually true that cloud customers face a limited choice of providers as there are plenty of cloud vendors; b) it is unlikely that the US hyperscalers may not reflect the evolving business needs of UK clients; c) the significant barriers to entry and expansion in this market are not the hyperscalers’ fault but rather a matter of fact.”

He added that, while according to the inquiry, Microsoft is using its strong position in software to make it harder for AWS and Google to compete effectively for cloud customers, it “actually reached agreement with CISPE back in July 2024 related to CISPE’s competition complaint filed against Microsoft with the European Commission in November 2022.”

According to Maisto, “the inquiry group does have a point that the ability of UK businesses to put healthy pressure on cloud providers to offer better deals is key to ensuring good outcomes and to unlocking the potential benefits of cloud services, but does not consider that UK businesses can and should address these concerns from a concentration risk perspective.”

UK organizations, he said, are “still free to leverage multiple cloud vendors and/or cloud providers that are not hyperscalers. In our Forrester European Public Cloud Platform Wave, 2024, for example, we do provide a piece of evaluative research featuring at least seven alternative cloud vendors with the full spectrum of services available in the hyperscaling cloud market as well. All in all, the inquiry does address a right concern but fails to acknowledge the actual problems behind such a setup of the market.”   

The inquiry group next plans to “consult on its provisional findings and recommendations,” before making a final decision by August 4.

From there, it will be up to the CMA board to decide if and when to open SMS designation investigations, and, in an interesting twist, its chair is Doug Gurr, former country manager of Amazon UK.



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

Doom + Doom II now supports multiplayers mods

0


Old-school Doom fans have something new to chew on until The Dark Ages arrives. Doom + Doom II, the latest in a long line of rereleases of the two id Software classics, was updated on Tuesday with multiplayer mod support. And balance was restored in Hades.

At launch in August, the bundle — available for PC, PS5/PS4, Xbox Series X/S and Switch — supported mods and multiplayer, but not the two together. The game’s second update, which Bethesda pushed on Tuesday, only adds multiplayer mod support if everyone in your match does a little planning.

First, hosts need to activate each mod before entering the multiplayer menu. In addition, all players in the match have to subscribe to the same mod before joining. Only mods authored with Vanilla DOOM, DeHackEd, MBF21 or BOOM are compatible.

Doom: The Dark Ages is set to launch on May 15. It takes place in the medieval wastelands of Hell and adds new goodies like mech battles and a ridable cyber dragon. If that isn’t an elevator pitch for a Doom game, I don’t know what is.



This story originally appeared on Engadget

How Tall the Fighter Is – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images

Jake Paul garnered international fame from his 2024 win against legend Mike Tyson in the boxing ring. Since then, he hasn’t announced a new opponent, until today. Drum roll please! He will face off his brother Logan Paul next. Find out all the details below!

Who Is Jake Paul?

Jake, who goes by “problem child,” is an influencer-turned-boxer, and he has most famously won a match against boxing legend, Mike Tyson, which was streamed by more than 60 million viewers on Netflix. The Ohio-native first got his start on Vine before he transferred over to YouTube, and gained millions of followers, who enjoy watching his prank videos and comedic skits. He also became the star of the Disney series, Bizaardvark at 19.

In 2020, Jake went into the world of boxing and ended up unexpectedly beating former MMA champions Ben Askren and Tyron Woodley and even legend Anderson Silva, which gave him massive credibility in the boxing world, according to multiple reports. However, it was his surprising win against Mike, that garnered a huge amount of attention around the world. Ever since, Jake has signed with the Professional Fighters League. He also has many partnerships which include, boohooMan and DraftKings.

What Is Jake Paul’s Height and Weight?

Jake is 6-feet tall, and he weighs around 200 pounds.

Who Will Jake Paul Be Fighting in the Boxing Ring Next?

Jake and his brother Logan, both announced on January 28, 2025, that they will face off each other in an upcoming boxing match. The two took to social media to share their poster promo, featuring the duo looking at each other aggressively, with the caption: “The moment you’ve waited a decade for…March 27 on Max.” His brother Logan is also an influencer-turned-boxer.

How Does Jake Paul Feel About Facing His Brother Logan Paul in the Boxing Ring?

Jake shared that he was open to the idea and that he was originally supposed to face his brother in the boxing ring instead of Mike. He took to the All the Smoke Fight podcast to state: “I’m OK with fighting my brother because I wouldn’t have to be the one that dealt with losing. Seriously. Emotionally, if that would scar him, then he shouldn’t do it. But if he’s going to sign up, I don’t have to be the one to lose.”




This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Popular UK city to charge tourist tax to ‘make city more beautiful’ | UK | News

0


Edinburgh‘s new tourist tax will help make the city “more beautiful and welcoming”, the co-leader of the Scottish Greens has said.

Lorna Slater hailed the Scottish capital’s 5% visitor levy on overnight stays as capable of easing some of the pressures the city faces.

She said the rate agreed by city councillors last week could raise some £50million annually to be invested in Edinburgh’s public services and affordable housing.

Ms Slater, in an opinion piece published by the Edinburgh Evening News, said: “Visitor levies are a small and simple step that will help us to ensure tourists are able to contribute to the services they are using, and that will help us to make our city even more beautiful and welcoming.”

The Scottish Greens’ co-leader added that no one wants to stop people coming to the city, but locals have taken the strain of mass tourism’s toll on roads, paths and services.

Her comments come after members of the City of Edinburgh Council agreed the plans, which will bring in the charge on those staying in overnight accommodation.

Visitors staying in the city will have to pay a 5% fee per night, capped at seven nights under the changes.

Council leader Jane Meagher has described the levy as a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to invest in the city. It comes after the Scottish Parliament approved legislation giving councils the ability to introduce such a charge.

The 5% charge will apply to people staying in hotels, B&Bs and other types of accommodation, including holiday lets. Tourists, people staying for work or visiting the city for other reasons will be charged, including Scots.

Under the council’s plans, the levy will begin for stays taking place after July 24, 2026. There will now be a nine-month transition period, with bookings paid for in part or in full after October 1, 2025, being liable for the levy.

A full council meeting was held last week to discuss the proposal after it was backed by the local authority’s policy and sustainability committee.

Green and SNP groups on the city council urged the Labour-run administration to adopt a higher rate of the levy, proposing 7% and 8% respectively. They argued more money is needed for housing in the city.

Conservative councillor Iain Whyte said his group did not back the levy, arguing it would damage tourism. He put forward proposals in recognition it would happen anyway.

Ms Meagher said last week: “We have listened to many voices and come to a conclusion that is sustainable, consistent with legislation and and will enhance our city.

“I want to make this scheme a success. If there are reasons, outwith our control, the scheme is held up by other factors, I would like to point out that 4%, 5%, 7% or 8% of nothing is precisely nothing.”

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) warned councillors against a “headlong rush to be the first” to introduce the charge.

Garry Clark, FSB’s development manager for Edinburgh and the east of Scotland, said earlier: “Edinburgh’s small accommodation providers haven’t yet been given all the information necessary to plan for the potential impact on them.”

UK Hospitality Scotland’s Executive Director Leon Thompson said: “Not only has Edinburgh’s visitor levy been confirmed, but so too has the hit to the city’s competitiveness as a leading tourist destination.

“Our fundamental concern has always been that this levy will only serve to make visitors’ trips to Edinburgh more expensive, ultimately reducing their spending in the wider visitor economy and deterring future visits.

“It’s now the job of the council to use these funds wisely to improve the capital’s attractiveness as a visitor destination and mitigate the impact of the levy on businesses.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

How ‘The Fast and the Furious’ Might Have Looked With Timothy Olyphant as Dom

0


Timothy Olyphant is one of the greatest actors of our time, but the universe always conspires to give us less of him. We would have loved to see several Hitman sequels, but 20th Century Studios was never interested in making one. We’d also have loved to see more of Sheriff Seth Bullock, but Deadwood was canceled after only three seasons, despite getting approval from almost every critic who saw it. It’s painful to even talk about Santa Clarita Diet, and a few other projects. What do we have to do to get a lengthy Olyphant run anywhere?

Despite the interruptions, Timothy Olyphant has remained one of Hollywood’s most hardworking actors. In 2024, he did excellent voice work in Tales of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Terminator Zero, and in 2025, he is set to impress once again in Havoc, a star-studded action thriller that also features Tom Hardy and Forrest Whitaker. If fate had played out differently, he would now be filming the twelfth installment of the Fast & Furious franchise. Once upon a time, Olyphant was offered the key role of Dominic “Dom” Toretto, only to turn it down.

Timothy Olyphant Didn’t Think ‘Fast & Furious’ Would Be Big

Over the years, Timothy Olyphant has struggled to explain why he turned down the first Fast & Furious movie. He has given various reasons in different interviews, one of them being that he had just finished a car-related movie when he was offered the role of Dom, hence he wasn’t interested in signing up for another.

Just a year before The Fast and the Furious premiered, Olyphant starred in the remake of Gone in 60 Seconds alongside Nicolas Cage. In it, a car thief gathers a team after he is forced to steal 50 high-end vehicles if he wants to see his child again. Well, the first Fast movie also involves cars and stealing, so we can understand why Olyphant didn’t want to repeat himself.

Related


Is It Too Late for the Fast Franchise to Go Back to Basics?

The Fast & Furious franchise has gone from street racing to superhero antics over its long run which could make it difficult to go back to basics.

However, his most honest answer came during a sitdown on Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen.

“I just thought, well, this will just be stupid, and I thought no one is gonna wanna see this movie eight or nine different times. I mean, by the third or fourth sequel, people are gonna definitely get bored of it. Right?”

Wrong! The franchise became so big that Vin Diesel hardly ever felt the need to take on any other role. But Olyphant insists he doesn’t regret it, stating that there was no better person to helm a car franchise than a man whose name is Diesel.

“I haven’t seen those movies, but y’know, they’re part of the culture that I know what they are. And it feels like part of what makes that, [Vin Diesel] is a huge- he’s just unlike anything out there… I remember thinking “I can’t make this work,” I was like, “Why would I be in this?” at the time. But he seems like they got the right guy.”

The Fast & Furious series has been a major success commercially. It’s currently Universal’s biggest franchise and the eighth highest-grossing film series of all time, with a total gross of over $7 billion, a figure that’s set to increase with the upcoming installment.

With Timothy Olyphant, ‘Fast & Furious’ Might Have Been Less Corny, But It Probably Wouldn’t Have Lasted Long

The Fast & Furious franchise is extremely corny, and we love it for that. Still, such an approach needs the right cast. The movies remain in high gear because of the riveting presence of Vin Diesel, whose personal charisma and particularly ferocious driving style made him a global star. It’s hard to picture Timothy Olyphant doing all those cheesy lines about “family” with a straight face. The actor can crack a joke or immerse himself in a slapstick moment, as seen in his cameos in The Office and Curb Your Enthusiasm. However, he tends to lean more toward frown-y roles.

Diesel’s Dom is loud and confrontational. In addition to that, he is a daredevil, willing to do all kinds of stunts. Olyphant could have brought an earthier flair to the role. With his involvement, the franchise might have had a crime drama or spy thriller feel, rather than an action comedy. His character might have been quieter and more strategic, with morals that were as twisted as the people he sought to destroy. His films would have been more visceral, and far less flashy than standard Hollywood blockbusters, trailing disparate characters with an exigent, almost documentary assertion of social realism.

Would that have been a good thing? With a grittier approach, the films might have impressed critics more, but they likely wouldn’t have grossed billions of dollars.

Related


How the Fast & Furious Franchise Was Revived After Running Out of Gas

After the underperformance of Tokyo Drift, the Fast & Furious series brought back its key players in a fourth film that set the stage for its future.

Then there’s a question of whether the actor would even stick around for all the installments if he had been cast as Dom. In as much as we lament about a lack of continuity in Timothy Olyphant’s career, a look into his filmography proves he is more of a journeyman, and he isn’t much of a franchise-man either. His only ever appearances in a film series came in Scream 2 and Live Free or Die Hard.

He once told The Hollywood Reporter:

“I’ve passed on absurd projects, and they have become enormous, enormous hits spawning numerous sequels, and I’m not in them.”

Olyphant might have thus moved on after The Fast & the Furious, and there’d be no billion-dollar franchise today. This doesn’t seem like a pleasant alternate reality, so audiences should be thankful for what they have.

The ‘Fast & Furious’ Franchise’s Biggest Problem Isn’t the Cast

The ‘What if?” scenario surrounding Dominic Toretto creates room for nourishing discourse. Still, it’s worth acknowledging that casting is hardly the franchise’s biggest problem. Fast & Furious’ flaws might be as big as Dom’s ego, but all the actors fit in.

Vin Diesel is perfect in all his “I’ll never wear a long-sleeved shirt so that you keep seeing my arms” glory. Tyrese Gibson’s deadpan line readings and impeccable comic timing are part of what makes this saga so great, especially when he jokes during serious discussions and Chris “Ludacris” Bridges is convincing as a hacker and mechanic. It’s also hard to picture anyone other than Dwayne Johnson as Hobbs, or Frank Grillo as Shaw.

Related


Tokyo Drift: Why Vin Diesel Didn’t Appear in the Fast & Furious Installment

Vin Diesel has played Dominic Toretto for over 20 years, but find out why he took a break and did not appear in Fast & Furious: Tokyo Drift.

The franchise simply needs better scripts, and we hope the final installment gets things right. Even though the dialogue and spectacle tend to be first-rate, most plots are disjointed, formulaic, and incoherent, feeling like scenes were patched together from suggestions that were thrown around during Day One of the shoot. Audiences don’t mind seeing characters go into space, but there has to be a sensible explanation behind it. Universal Pictures sure can afford to consult NASA.

The characters also need to be fleshed out more. It would be interesting to see someone other than Dom having romantic relationships or personal problems. No one gets ill? No one has a stubborn child? No one’s finances are in a mess? Such little relatable things make a movie great, but the Fast & Furious films would rather dedicate all the minutes to heists, banter, and chases. Time for a change.



This story originally appeared on Movieweb

Quentin Tarantino Condemns The Current State Of The Movie Industry

0


Acclaimed filmmaker Quentin Tarantino has condemned the current state of the film industry. The Pulp Fiction director rose to Hollywood stardom with his stunning debut Reservoir Dogs in 1993 and has gone on to enjoy a critically and commercially successful career across nine feature films. The 61-year-old has long stated that his 10th movie will be the last of his career, but some of his recent comments suggest audiences could be waiting a while before he decides to make it.

While at the Sundance Film Festival (via Variety), Tarantino revealed his next project was to be a play, not a movie, before launching a scathing attack on the state of the movie industry currently, as well as the fact that theatrical releases are not the focal point anymore. He goes on to call the whole process a “…show pony exercise,” before reiterating the importance of theaters for helping to keep the movie industry ticking over. Check out Tarantino’s full comments on the matter below:

“That’s a big f*cking deal pulling [a play] off, and I don’t know if I can. So here we go. That’s a challenge, a genuine challenge, but making movies? Well, what the f*ck is a movie now? What — something that plays in theaters for a token release for four f*cking weeks? All right, and by the second week you can watch it on television. I didn’t get into all this for diminishing returns.

I mean, it was bad enough in ’97. It was bad enough in 2019, and that was the last f*cking year of movies. That was a sh*t deal, as far as I was concerned, the fact that it’s gotten drastically worse? And that it’s just, it’s a show pony exercise. Now the theatrical release, you know, and then, like, yeah, in two weeks, you can watch it on this [streamer] and that one. Okay. Theater? You can’t do that. It’s the final frontier.”

It Could Be Some Time Before His Next Movie

Tarantino’s comments come from a place of frustration, from a man who was first and foremost a movie fan before he was a filmmaker. His comments suggest that he is jaded with the direction the industry has taken, as well as the rise in the prominence (and dominance) of streaming services over long theatrical runs. It is worth noting, that this is not the first time Tarantino has taken aim at the industry, with the director famously criticizing Marvel movies as being formulaic, and suggesting they have contributed to the death of the classic movie star.

While the industry is struggling, there is more of a need than ever for talented and creative minds, and Tarantino’s 10th movie could be the perfect tonic to help boost box office takings and improve audience engagement in theaters.

Judging by what he has to say above, it seems Tarantino believes things have only gotten worse. The outspoken Oscar winner also recently proclaimed television as an inferior medium to movies, but it seems as though he believes there needs to be massive changes made across the industry, and he has little interest in returning to make his 10th and final film any time soon. This is likely one of the reasons that has inspired him to pivot creatively and write a play, while leaving his final movie project on the backburner.

The Director Does Have A Point, But His 10th Film Could Help Get Things Back On Track

Tarantino does have a point about the direction the movie industry is going in, though as a perfectionist, he is perhaps more critical than most audiences would be. Furthermore, while the industry is struggling, there is more of a need than ever for talented and creative minds, and Tarantino’s 10th movie could be the perfect tonic to help boost box office takings and improve audience engagement in theaters. Much will come down to how his play pans out, and Tarantino could be back behind the camera sooner rather than later.

There Have Been Great Movies Since Once Upon A Time…In Hollywood Was Released

While there is definitely merit to Tarantino’s criticisms, his comments also oversimplify the issues at hand. Increasingly shortened theatrical releases, the proliferation of streaming services, studios’ relying on already popular intellectual properties, and diminishing returns for those who work on movies are among the many problems that are currently plaguing the industry. That being said, it is an oversimplification to say that 2019 “was the last f*cking year of movies.”

Related


10 Best Movie Endings Of The 2020s So Far, Ranked

The 2020s have included iconic movies in every genre, and they’ve delivered shocking and powerful endings that stay with audiences for a long time.

Tarantino referencing 2019 is no accident, as it is the year he released his latest film, Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood, and the last year before the industry was upended by the Covid-19 pandemic. Since Tarantino’s last release and despite the challenges that came with the pandemic, there have been many phenomenal movies that have debuted and that have found critical and commercial success. Oppenheimer, Everything Everywhere All at Once, and Dune: Part Two are only a few of the best movies to be released so far in the 2020s.

Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood Tomatometer Score

Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood Popcornmeter Score

86%

70%

Tarantino’s The Movie Critic, which was originally going to be his 10th and final movie, has been canceled, and he is in no rush to create another moment right now, especially when there are many issues within the industry. Tarantino’s current creative stance and the industry’s widespread issues do not negate the success and diverse range of successful and beautiful movies that have debuted since 2019. By the time Quentin Tarantino makes his next movie, there will be many other impressive films that have been released, and hopefully, some of the industry’s issues will have been addressed.

Source: Variety

Headshot Of Quentin Tarantino


Quentin Tarantino

Birthdate

March 27, 1963

Birthplace

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Professions

Director, Screenwriter, Producer, Actor, Author



This story originally appeared on Screenrant