Saturday, September 20, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 89

Teen who died watching Tipping Point could have survived if mum got her medical help | UK | News

0


A teenager who died in front of the television could have survived if her mother had got her appropriate help, a court has ruled. Robyn Goldie, 13, passed away in great pain as a result of a perforated stomach ulcer while watching the ITV game show Tipping Point in July, 2018 in Wishaw, Lanarkshire. Her mum, Sharon Goldie, 49, had gone to the pub. Robyn could still be here today if medical attention had been sought, Sheriff Linda Nicolson ruled at Hamilton Sheriff Court. Goldie refused to seek medical attention for her daughter after she developed peritonitis and suffered a perforated duodenal ulcer.

A friend offered to take Robyn to a hospital in a taxi which her mum refused, and, on July 25, Robyn begged a neighbour from her garden to help her get an ambulance, insisting that she could not breathe. But her mother interrupted and told Robyn to go back inside. A day later, she died in front of the TV alone.

At Hamilton Sheriff Court, Sheriff Linda Nicholson concluded that Robyn’s mother seeking medical attention for Robyn would have been a reasonable precaution, the Daily Record reported.

Either this or, at least, allowing her to access medical attention.

Sheriff Nicholson said: “Had that precaution been taken, it might realistically have resulted in the death being avoided.”

It was also found that North Lanarkshire Council social work policies and procedures were not complied with.

A written comprehensive assessment, a written child’s plan, and adequate supervision of workers were lacking.

The Sheriff added that child protection measures should have been put in place, and a referral made to the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration, earlier than they were.

Sheriff Nicholson concluded: “I conclude that there was systemic failure on the part of social work to the extent of failure to comply with policy and procedures in Robyn’s case.

“That included not only the lack of a written comprehensive assessment and child’s plan but also a lack of supervision.

“However, the evidence did not support that the systemic failure contributed to Robyn’s death.”

A spokesperson for North Lanarkshire Council said: “The death of Robyn Goldie was a tragedy. The sheriff found that Robyn’s death could have been prevented by her mother seeking appropriate medical assistance. Robyn’s mother was convicted of neglect and ill-treatment at the High Court in 2020.

“However, the sheriff also found that some of the systems of work used by the council were not effective or fully complied with, and some decisions about Robyn’s case could have been taken earlier.

“A serious case review after Robyn’s death made similar findings. The sheriff concluded that alternative approaches would not have prevented Robyn’s death, and has made no recommendations to the council as part of the inquiry.

“The council agrees with the sheriff’s findings and those of the serious case review. New systems of work, both nationally and within the council, have been adopted with the aim of improving recording, sharing of information and decision-making.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Dry Skin Sparked This Eight-Figure Men’s Skincare Brand

0


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

When Jared Pobre and his wife, former WWE star Stacy Keibler, moved to Jackson Hole, Wyoming, he expected more time outdoors, skiing, hiking, fly-fishing. What he experienced was how extreme conditions accelerate skin aging and damage, leaving his skin raw and red. When searching for solutions for his skincare, not only were options limited, but nothing seemed to help. Out of frustration, he tried one of Keibler’s pricey serums.

“Within a week it cleared everything up,” he says. “That’s when I asked myself, why doesn’t something like this exist for men?”

Pobre is the founder and CEO of Caldera + Lab, a high-performance skincare brand helping men take a proactive approach to skin health. The company launched its first skin product in 2019, a serum called The Good, which quickly became a national bestseller. What began as a mission to create effective, science-backed skincare for men has since grown into a profitable eight-figure business with a loyal following. Caldera + Lab now offers a full range of products, including cleansers, moisturizers, serums, eye treatments, sunscreen, and hair care.

In the men’s category, where “innovative skincare” sounds like an oxymoron, Pobre wants to build something that approaches ingredients and science with the same care as leading women’s brands like Estée Lauder and L’Oréal. Getting there required more than surface-level fixes, it required investing in clinical research, sourcing high-performance ingredients and formulating with precision.

Related: After This LGBTQ Couple Lost Their Jobs Within 30 Days of Each Other, They Started a Business — With Goats. It Led to More Than $150 Million.

Digging into the details

After Pobre’s aha moment, he started researching what might make a men’s brand different. A former ad tech CEO who had built a nine-figure company from scratch, he knew how to spot a market gap and saw one right in front of him. In Jackson Hole, he wasn’t the only man stealing his wife’s skincare; the region’s extreme climate made the effects on men’s skincare more obvious and urgent, but even beyond Wyoming, men’s skin faces challenges that are sometimes less visible but equally damaging

“I found other men in Jackson Hole buying $185 serum for women, just like I was,” he recalls. “And these were rugged guys—not the type you’d expect to be using high-end serums. That’s when I knew there was a real customer here.”

Pobre met with botanists and ethnobotanists to learn how indigenous people in the region had used local plants like fireweed, yarrow, and nettle for centuries. These “survivor plants” endured freezing winters and harsh elevations by producing unusually high levels of antioxidants. That resilience, he realized, could be translated into skincare.

Related: After Losing $5 Million Overnight at Age 25, He Started a Business on Track for $50 Million. Here’s the ‘Lightbulb Moment’ That Made It Happen.

Building the brand

Naming the brand took some real thought. Ultimately, Pobre landed on Caldera + Lab, a tribute to the volcanic caldera at Yellowstone and the science behind the product formulations. The visual design was both modern and rustic, a reflection of Jackson Hole’s unique identity, where city slickers live out their outdoorsman fantasies.

“That balance—the ruggedness of Jackson with the polish of a professional life in the city—is what we tried to capture,” Pobre says.

Finding customers

The true test arrived when The Good went to market. Exercising caution, Pobre ordered the smallest production batch he could—10,000 units—aware of the risks with launching a new brand in an unproven category. To his surprise, by the end of the first year, he was already reordering and growing momentum.

Much of the traction came through social media ads that funneled customers to a clean and simple landing page. “What gave us conviction was when guys started asking for more,” Pobre says. “They wanted a cleanser, a moisturizer, SPF. That’s when I knew this wasn’t just me. There was a real market here.”

Related: Rishabh Pant Backs Skincare Startup Amantyacare in Pre-Seed Funding Round

Lessons from missteps

Caldera + Lab’s path wasn’t perfectly smooth. Early marketing agencies failed to deliver. Brand identity work dragged on as he pieced it together through multiple firms. But those bumps became lessons.

“In every company I’ve built, I’ve learned that taking shortcuts doesn’t pay off,” Pobre says. “Whether it’s product development, marketing, or hiring, you’ve got to do the hard work.”

Eventually, he pulled all his marketing in-house, a decision that reshaped the business.

Scaling the vision

This week, Caldera + Lab launched two new products: The Great, an anti-aging serum, and The Hydro Layer, an anti-aging moisturizer. Pobre sees this as the next frontier: not just formulas with clean ingredients, but science built specifically for men’s skin.

“It all started with me borrowing my wife’s serum in Jackson,” he says. “I’m still just as curious—and just as committed—as I was that first day.”

When Jared Pobre and his wife, former WWE star Stacy Keibler, moved to Jackson Hole, Wyoming, he expected more time outdoors, skiing, hiking, fly-fishing. What he experienced was how extreme conditions accelerate skin aging and damage, leaving his skin raw and red. When searching for solutions for his skincare, not only were options limited, but nothing seemed to help. Out of frustration, he tried one of Keibler’s pricey serums.

“Within a week it cleared everything up,” he says. “That’s when I asked myself, why doesn’t something like this exist for men?”

Pobre is the founder and CEO of Caldera + Lab, a high-performance skincare brand helping men take a proactive approach to skin health. The company launched its first skin product in 2019, a serum called The Good, which quickly became a national bestseller. What began as a mission to create effective, science-backed skincare for men has since grown into a profitable eight-figure business with a loyal following. Caldera + Lab now offers a full range of products, including cleansers, moisturizers, serums, eye treatments, sunscreen, and hair care.

The rest of this article is locked.

Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

US companies ‘upset’ over 10% spike in health insurance costs

0

US employers are bracing for the steepest jump in health insurance costs in at least 15 years, with premiums projected to climb nearly 10% next year — on top of years of already sharp increases.

Benefits consultants Aon and WTW told the Wall Street Journal that employer health-coverage costs are set to surge about 9.5% and 9.2% in 2026, respectively, the fastest rise since at least 2011.

The average family plan now runs roughly $25,500 annually — equivalent to the price of a small car.

Employers are facing nearly 10% premium hikes next year, the steepest increase in 15 years. Natee Meepian – stock.adobe.com

“It’s an unsustainable number for a lot of employers,” said Shawn Gremminger, head of the National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions. He said the reaction from companies “ranges between upset, shocked, freaked out and resigned.”

Insurers say premiums are being driven up by rising hospital bills, wider use of medical services and expensive new drugs — particularly the GLP-1 weight-loss and diabetes treatments like Ozempic, Wegovy and Zepbound.

More cases of cancer and chronic conditions among working-age Americans are also straining coverage.

Some businesses are pushing costs onto employees through higher payroll deductions or bigger deductibles. Others are exploring plan redesigns to limit access to certain hospitals or specialists.

A WTW survey found 60% of large employers plan to consider switching insurers or pharmacy-benefit managers in the next few years.

The average cost of family health coverage now tops $25,500 annually, according to consultants Aon and WTW. utah51 – stock.adobe.com

Troy Morris, CEO of space-services company Kall Morris Inc. in Marquette, Mich., said his firm pays 100% of employee premiums but was hit with a 20% increase for the plan year beginning in August, after a 9% hike in 2024.

Out-of-pocket maximums for families rose to $10,000, from $8,150.

“It’s a hard choice that makes you sick to your stomach,” he said.

Mutual of Omaha, with 6,300 workers, saw double-digit cost growth this year and dropped coverage of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss.

The insurer said its pharmacy-benefit manager warned it would lose lucrative rebates if it tried to create a program to manage patients’ weight-loss maintenance.

“We’re certainly frustrated,” said Steven Schlange, the company’s vice president of human resources.

Many companies are weighing higher payroll deductions and plan redesigns to blunt surging insurance costs. volgariver – stock.adobe.com

Pam Kehaly, CEO of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, called the escalation “the worst I’ve seen.” She said aggressive billing by some providers, sometimes aided by artificial intelligence, is adding to the surge.

Kirk Roy, chief actuary at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, said conditions once considered illnesses of old age — including atrial fibrillation and joint problems — are increasingly showing up in younger, working-age employees.

“Diseases that we usually thought of as for elderly, we’re seeing more and more,” he said.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar was fair game — and can speed an end to the Gaza war

0


Israel took a big step toward ending the war in Gaza with Tuesday’s strike on Hamas leadership in Qatar.

It wasn’t immediately clear if any top terror bosses met their maker, but the strike left no doubt for any who survived: Israel is coming for them.

If the hostages in Gaza aren’t returned and Hamas fighters don’t disarm, the terror kingpins’ days are numbered. No matter where they hide.

Smoke rises from an explosion, allegedly caused by an Israeli strike, in Doha, Qatar, on Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025. AP

Some reports suggested Israel took out a leader or three, though Hamas denied any were among five people it said died.

Either way, the attack had huge value: Hamas’ chiefs thought they had safe refuge in Qatar — far from the fighting and squalor in Gaza.

They lived lives of luxury in five-star hotels, reportedly sitting on an $11 billion stash, even as Gaza civilians suffered.

They could turn down cease-fire deals with no fear of personal consequences, especially since Qatar is a US ally.

Now any who survived must know that fear.

“The days when the heads of terror enjoyed immunity anywhere are over,” warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Hear, hear.

Critics charged that the attack (which many actually claimed was unjustified!) jeopardized talks toward a peace agreement that can get hostages home, and violated Qatar’s sovereignty.

Nonsense. After the terror group repeatedly turned down generous offers for temporary cease-fires, Israel refused to entertain any deal that didn’t include the return of all hostages and Hamas’ disarmament.

Either the group agrees to that or it doesn’t, and never mind more talks.

Meanwhile, Israel has threatened a full-scale invasion of Gaza City to take out Hamas remnants and prevent the terrorists from regrouping.

Between that and the Qatar strike, Hamas clearly faces enormous pressure to end the war.

As for being justified, Israeli leaders decided to hit Hamas leadership in Qatar after the group publicly claimed responsibility for a barbaric shooting attack in Jerusalem that left six innocents dead.

The leaders in Qatar are also responsible for Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, atrocities, which killed 1,200 Israelis and saw another 251 taken hostage.

As for Qatari sovereignty, sorry: It goes out the window when the country harbors mass murderers. Especially after having funded Hamas for years.

True, the terror group may now dig in its heels and refuse any terms to end the war. But that doesn’t change Israel’s goals: to rescue the hostages and defeat Hamas.

With or without a deal, Tuesday’s strike puts the terrorists’ leaders on notice — and moves the Jewish state closer to achieving those goals.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Study Finds Trump To Cause Income To Drop For 99% Of Americans

0


PoliticusUSA is committed to reporting the truth about what your government is doing. Please support us by becoming a subscriber.

The Trump administration’s policies represent a historic transfer of national wealth and resources to the top 1%. The scope and degree of this take from everyone else to give to the very rich policymaking was revealed in a new study by the Center For American Progress (CAP).

CAP found:

The combination of new tariffs announced by the Trump administration in 2025 and new policies implemented in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will cause Americans’ incomes after taxes and transfers to decrease across the board in 2027, relative to 2025. Indeed, only the top 1 percent of U.S. households by earnings will see an increase. Despite some lawmakers’ attempts to rebrand the bill as a “working families tax cut,” middle-income households will experience a net income decrease of 1.2 percent, or $1,300, in 2027. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent will receive a net income increase of nearly $5,000.

In 2027, the poorest 20 percent of American households will be $160 worse off because of the new policies in the OBBBA and will lose $1,490 in income to tariffs, for a net decrease of $1,650, or 3.4 percent of their income. (see Figure 1) At the same time, the middle 20 percent of American households, who have an average income of $109,000, will see that income decrease by $1,300 after they receive a tax cut (net of spending cuts) of $950; but the Trump administration’s massive tariffs increase their costs by $2,250. In contrast, new provisions in the OBBBA give the top 1 percent a $17,800 benefit, which exceeds their average $12,800 tariffs costs by $5,000.

The real-life impact on the wallets of Americans who aren’t the one percent is going to be brutal.

The Trump administration rejects the findings of the study by claiming that the tariffs and tax cuts for the rich are going unleash a wave of job growth and prosperity, just like in Trump’s first term.

However, Trump’s first round of tax cuts for the rich did not unleash prosperity and growth.

The Center For Budget and Policy Priorities found that Trump’s first round of tax cuts actually decreased business investment and consumption. Overall, economic growth only ticked up due to increased government spending, which was eliminated in the second round of Trump’s tax cuts for the rich.

The CFBPP wrote:

Rigorous research into some of the law’s key provisions also shows the lack of evidence for the Trump Administration’s claims. For example, despite Republicans’ promises that the special 20 percent deduction for pass-through business income would boost investment and create jobs, researchers have found no evidence that the deduction significantly increased investment, wages for non-owners, or employment.

Similarly, though the Trump Administration promised the corporate rate cut would “very conservatively” lead to a $4,000 boost in household income, a study by economists from the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Federal Reserve Board found that workers in the bottom 90th percentile of their firm’s income scale saw “no change in earnings” from the rate cut. In addition, the authors find that the revenue loss from the decrease in corporate tax revenues far outweighs any boost in output from the tax cut.

When taxes are cut for the wealthy and corporations, the money stays at the top. There is no “trickle-down effect” to everyone else.

Trump’s economic policies are just getting started, and they are about to do some major damage to everyone in the US economy who isn’t already rich.

What do you think about the CAP study? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Leave a comment



This story originally appeared on Politicususa

iPhone buyer's guide fall 2025: iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, or iPhone Air?

0



Apple’s new iPhone 17 range has changed the way you choose your next upgrade. Here’s what iPhone is the best for you in late 2025, depending on your budget.

iPhone 17 buyer’s guide: The iPhone 17 Pro is a good choice if you can afford it.

The fall update to the iPhone lineup is usually quite predictable. Four new flagships arrive, the old Pro models disappear from sale, and the old non-Pro variants are discounted a bit.

For 2025, there’s quite a bit of a difference. For a start, the four new models aren’t just size variants in two tiers. Instead, we have a standard iPhone 17, the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, and the iPhone Air which offers something new.

Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums


This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Here’s what’s going on as Oracle stock rockets 32% higher

0


Image source: Getty Images

When you have blue-chip stocks with a market cap in the hundreds of billions of dollars, getting a large move in the share price is unusual. This is because it’s already a big company, so getting a sharp increase in the value has to come from a factor that could really move the needle. Yet Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) stock is up 32% so far today (10 September), and there’s good reason for it!

Details behind the move

Oracle shares surged dramatically following the release of its fiscal first-quarter earnings. It featured an ambitious forward-looking outlook that clearly got investors excited. The company significantly raised its full-year growth forecast for the Cloud Infrastructure division, projecting a 77% increase in revenue to about $18bn for the current fiscal year.

This guidance came on the heels of four multi-billion-dollar contracts announced during the quarter. This helps to reflect the surging demand for Oracle’s AI-capable cloud infrastructure. Oracle also revealed its backlog of contracted but not yet recognised revenue had ballooned to approximately $455bn. Incredibly, this is up 359% versus last year.

Investors clearly viewed this as a signal that Oracle is transforming from a software vendor into a critical backbone for AI infrastructure. Since everyone is on the hunt for the next big AI stock, the share price jump is understandable. Some contracts, such as a substantial agreement with OpenAI involving a huge amount of computing capacity, underscore Oracle’s growing role in the AI race.

When you put it all together, the jump in the stock today amounts to the largest single-day gain for the company since 1999.

Deciding what’s next

I don’t own Oracle stock. Those who do clearly will be happy today, although the extent of the move higher shows me that this did come as a surprise (albeit a positive one) for many in the stock market.

I think the stock can keep rallying over the coming year if it genuinely can pivot to being a core provider of AI-ready cloud infrastructure. The size of the current backlog suggests it already has large momentum here that will keep it busy growing for some time. Also, Oracle is still in the early stages of its cloud adoption relative to competitors. This means it has more potential for market share gains as clients look to diversify providers for capacity and pricing reasons.

Let’s also remember that Oracle is a large company with significant funding and cash flow. This means it has scope to invest large amounts into new markets if it believes there’s potential.

Of course, nothing is guaranteed. It has a price-to-earnings ratio of 54, which is very high! Even for a growth stock, this level could indicate it’s overvalued. Further, Oracle is pushing into arguably the most competitive and fast-paced sector right now, AI. The pace of innovation means companies can get left behind very fast.

Even with these risks, it’s a stock that has really caught my eye, so I’m seriously thinking about adding it to my portfolio.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Larry Ellison is on the cusp of surpassing Elon Musk as world’s richest person after Oracle’s stock jumped $70 billion overnight

0
  • Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison is about to pass Tesla CEO Elon Musk to claim the title of world’s richest person. The 81-year-old executive chairman has benefitted from Oracle’s growing cloud-infrastructure business; most notably this week, as the company announced it won several billion-dollar contracts in its most recent quarter.

The 81-year-old cofounder of software giant Oracle is on the verge of beating out Elon Musk for the title of world’s richest person. 

Ellison, who cofounded Oracle in the ‘70s and is still its chief technology officer and executive chairman, saw his net worth skyrocket over the past day to $364 billion, just short of Musk’s $384 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire’s Index

Ellison’s wealth rose by $70 billion overnight after Oracle’s stock exploded by double digits after close Tuesday. On Wednesday, Oracle’s shares continued their upward trajectory, up about 40% in early morning trading. The value of the company’s shares has, as of Wednesday, doubled year-to-date. Ellison owns more than 40% of Oracle, and much of his wealth is tied to the company, according to Bloomberg

Oracle has benefitted from large infrastructure investments in its role as a cloud provider and its services have been highly sought after by data-hoarding AI companies since the release of ChatGPT set off an arms race for advanced large language models (LLMs) in 2022. 

The company said in its most recent quarter it won several contracts expected to yield $455 billion in revenue, a huge jump from the year prior, the Wall Street Journal reported. Before the end of the year, several more multibillion-dollar customers are expected to sign up with the company as well, said its CEO Safra Catz.

Oracle’s recent stock gains have lifted Ellison above Meta CEO and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who was previously the second-richest person behind Musk. Musk claimed the title of world’s richest for the first time in 2021 before being toppled by Amazon executive chairman Jeff Bezos and LVMH Bernard Arnault. Musk reclaimed the title in 2024 and has held onto it for 300 days, according to Bloomberg

Meanwhile, as Oracle’s stock is on the rise, Tesla’s shares are falling. The electric-car maker’s stock is down 13% year-to-date and its market share in the U.S. has dropped to its lowest point since 2017, Reuters reported citing data from research firm Cox Automotive.

But there may be hope for Musk, yet. Last week, Tesla’s board proposed a pay package that would make Musk the world’s first trillionaire—so long as he meets several lofty goals like increasing the company’s stock eightfold over the next 10 years.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.



This story originally appeared on Fortune

Marvel Entertainment Showcases John Walker’s Hilarious Roasting In New Thunderbolts Clip

0


Instagram/@marvel

Indeed, there is yet another clip that Marvel Entertainment has most likely dropped from Thunderbolts. It shows Wyatt Russell’s John Walker getting ‘acted upon’ by relentless teasing from his teammates. The irony is immense to the extent that it lends to Walker’s desperate attempt to garner some respect after only a short stint as Captain America. The post advertises the film’s availability on Disney Plus and fuels the intense debates within the fandom about the reviled-but-loved character.

Advertisement

The clip opens with a forceful declaration from Walker, “Not only knows the blood on your hands,” only to be immediately interrupted by one of his teammates who replied, “Pretty ludicrous coming from the Grocery Store Captain America.” That is the tone throughout the rest of the sequence-an hour-long masterclass in humiliation that somehow only endears Walker further. Walker makes a final attempt in defense of his legacy, saying, “It was actually the official Captain America,” and then, immediately with a sheepish grin, ad-libbed, “for like two seconds.” His team erupts into laughter, and Yelena kills him with another jab: “Junior varsity Captain America.”

So it’s worth saying what made this scene an argument for supporters of Walker. One comment felt like it captured the entire consciousness: “Best character in the film, they tried to make us hate him but it didn’t work.” Such sentiments will find echoes in other replies, one of which proclaims: “He was hilarious and real. Loved his character.”

The roasting goes on in the comments. Catalina.lanuza’s remark: “He turns his body cam off,” was followed by explosions of laughter and agreement emojis. Another fan pinpointed, “The taco line was amazing,” which initiated a conversation about the end credits.

Turning this around, it suggests a picture of a character who’s gone past his very first and villainous appearance. One member of the pod states: “Great character arc, goes from being universally hated to sort of tolerated by his teammates.” That seemed to be what Marvel did: a character so flawed, so human, so oddly endearing despite his huge ego and utter lack of self-awareness.

Others have made even bolder comparisons, with one saying: “hot take….I like Walker better then Steve.” Naturally, this led to debates over character writing and performances, with one member venturing to defend Russell’s portrayal: “Russell’s US Agent definitely rocks, far better than Cap (mostly the current one) and one of the best and underestimated MCU characters ever.”

The comment section also shows some knowledgeable references to the comics, with one citing: “Ever since I’ve played MARVEL SUPER HEROES VS. STREET FIGHTER, I was always interested in U.S. AGENT,” sparking a barely niche conversation about Walker’s video game appearances and comic history, showing how the character resonates across mediums.

What’s interesting here is that Walker’s humiliation becomes his redemption. The constant trolling increases his likability as noted in a batch of comments. One user summed it up: “I love how he was roasted nonstop for this entire movie 😂” – with the laughter emoji implying that this treatment is part of his charm.”

The release of this clip has definitely struck a chord with the Marvel fans who want more profound characterization. The transition from despised government-appointed Captain America to reluctantly accepted Thunderbolt is certainly one of the more grey areas in the MCU. As we’ve seen in the comments, the audience has gone on to embrace his flaws, his limitations, and his desperate attempts at being worthy of their judgment despite the unending mockery.

Advertisement

Marvel’s decision to highlight this scene shows an understanding that Walker is interesting not because of heroic deeds but because of his human qualities. These Thunderbolts might give him endless grief, but audiences have collectively decided he’s worth rooting for despite it all.




This story originally appeared on Celebrityinsider

Charlie Sheen Remembers Moment He Felt Dad Martin Deliver ‘Biggest Betrayal’

0


Charlie Sheen has been reflecting on his past a lot recently. One revelation he shared this week was a surprising admission about his father, Martin Sheen. Opening up in a new interview, the actor revealed his dad was responsible for one of the biggest betrayals he ever felt.

Martin Sheen signed his son Charlie Sheen’s arrest warrant

Charlie is doing the rounds to promote his new memoir and Netflix documentary. In an interview with Good Morning America on Monday, the actor opened up about the betrayal he felt following a decision from dad Martin. The older actor signed a warrant for his son’s arrest after he violated his probation.

“It felt like the biggest betrayal you could possibly endure,” Charlie said.

However, his dad’s decision actually came from a good place. He had become concerned about his son’s substance issues following an overdose, and wanted him to get help.

In time, the Two and a Half Men star came to realize this. He explained: “[I] saw it as love eventually. But in the moment, it’s like, in the book when my bodyguard comes to the bedroom door and he says, ‘You know, the US Marshals are on the way. We’re leaving in five…’”

It would be fair to say Charlie’s life had hit rock bottom before his arrest. He was facing charges related to assaulting then-girlfriend Brittany Ashland, had overdosed on injected cocaine and suffered a stroke. Clearly, 1998 wasn’t a good year for the star.

He didn’t end up getting any prison time. Instead, his probation was extended by a year.

Charlie did end up getting clean, and his dad stuck by him throughout. Speaking of how the “Apocalypse Now” actor has read his memoir, Charlie said: “Dad was like halfway through [my book]. He said, ‘Your use of humor in your darkest moments is a gift to the reader,’ is how he described it.”

TELL US – DID MARTIN DO THE RIGHT THING BY SIGNING THE ARREST WARRANT?



This story originally appeared on Realitytea