A single tweet from J.K. Rowling has truly set Twitter afire and made the responses a lot crazier than a poorly managed Quidditch match. Drawn into five blunt statements by the author of Harry Potter, the world has gone wild. In all honesty, that’s the kind of chaos we thrive on.
Advertisement
Firstly, she crushed the rumor that she lived in Merchiston and knew Lord Hodge. Then she made a comment about us somehow getting stuck in the 1950s. But the real kicker? A “great thing” in her mentions was India Willoughby, a trans woman British TV personality, followed by the frank statement “India is still a man”. Yup, she went for it.
The replies? Well, everything support, outrage, lunacy. Some saw it as a triumph, like Jan Sykes who called Rowling a “superstar” and praised her marching her own way. TheDanishcookie, on the other hand, said to Willoughby that she should stop being nasty towards women while claiming one of her own hypocrisy. Then you’ve got Jeff jesting that Judge Hodge IS J.K. Rowling in disguise. Now we’re talking conspiracy theories? That took a while.
But not all were laughing. One of the comments was by wawylyxxx, who said it was complete diversion from what they see as homophobia and transphobia on the part of Rowling: “Still think it’s just about men in dresses, ey? Nah you all homophobic too.” HawaiianGypsy44 was trying to be reasonable by arguing that it’s not hate, it’s just truth to call someone a “trans woman” instead of simply a “woman.”
Then there is entirely random utter chaos, such as the crazy comment by Dick Ball claiming that, as he read Rowling’s tweet, India Willoughby was ruining rhinestone tiaras. What does that mean? Absolutely no idea, but it is funny. And not as if strengthening our argument was needed, James Dreyfus compared Willoughby’s singing to “someone throttling a seal.” Ouch.
Now it’s funny. The original Tweet did not mention India Willoughby per se, but just tagged her, and that sent them spinning. User Mike Humphs straightforwardly tagged Willoughby in response almost saying, “You seeing this?” Meanwhile, Ben Kelly just laughed at the whole thing and referred to Willoughby as “really something.” Quite frankly, understatement of the year.
Rowling’s tweet reignited the free speech debate, some users like Sarah Walker maintaining that the suppression of opinions creates many more problems than it prevents. However, on the counter, Terri Bailey hits back by terming the allegations of racism against Rowling as preposterous since one Black character among all the whiteness does not qualify as racist.
And there you have it; in the end, whatever it did best, Rowling did it with her tweet: divide the internet in two. Some call her an honest fearless truth-teller; others see a provocateur with hornets’ nest on her stick. But she would not shut up, and Twitter is eating it up.
Advertisement
Next thing? More tweets, more chaos, and surely more meltdown of the reply section. If we are honest? We’re here for it. The web was pretty much spun for these kinds of moments.
This story originally appeared on Celebrityinsider
