Friday, August 15, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 1631

They patrol L.A.’s streets in search of ICE, Trump immigration raids

0


Driving north on Griffith Avenue in South Los Angeles on Monday morning, Azusena Favela and Adalberto Ríos kept an eye out for unmarked American-brand vehicles with dark tinted windows and government license plates, anything that may point to the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

As Favela turned left on 23rd Street, she noticed a white truck with yellow flashing lights stopped near an intersection in the distance.

“Do you see it?” she said.

Azusena Favela drives around her community for Unión del Barrio.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

“¿Las luces?” Ríos said.

“Yeah,” she muttered.

Ríos grabbed a two-way radio he had in hand and spoke into it: “What’s your location, Lupe?”

“27th and San Pedro [streets],” she said, amid the static noise.

Two white and blue megaphones sit in a car.

Megaphones sit in a car before Unión del Barrio patrols the streets of Los Angeles.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

“We see some lights,” he said. “We’re going to check it out, will let you know if we see anything.”

Across the country, community groups and immigrant rights advocates began preparing for President Trump’s mass deportations by organizing know-your-rights workshops, street demonstrations and legal representation for people facing deportations.

In Southern California, many groups banded together to patrol neighborhoods to alert residents of immigration sweeps and inform them of their constitutional rights.

At the forefront of this effort is Unión del Barrio, an independent political organization advocating for immigrant rights and social justice. The organization, which is based in San Diego, has helped organize the launch of the Community Self-Defense Coalition, a network of more than 80 community groups.

Unión del Barrio says it has helped train coalition members on how to spot federal immigration agents by zeroing in on the vehicles they use before following them and using social media to alert residents in the area. When they are able to trail agents during immigration sweeps, the coalition members keep at a distance but use megahorns to inform residents about their rights.

The patrols, organizers say, also help curb misinformation shared on social media. They say residents, who are already on heightened alert and afraid, will sometimes make false reports or mistake a civilian vehicle for ICE.

Four people talk behind a car in a parking lot.

From left, Francisco Romero, John Parker, Lupe Carrasco Cardona and Adalberto Ríos talk after a patrol for Unión del Barrio.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

“We’re not violent, we’re not trying to break any laws, but we’re doing everything within our legal means to protect the community,” said Ron Gochez, a member of Unión del Barrio.

For years, Gochez said, the organization has been conducting community patrols. They were pivotal during immigration enforcement crackdowns in the 1990s as well as those under the Obama and first Trump administrations.

Nearly a month ago, Favela said they came across ICE agents who had detained a man who was preparing to drive to work.

She said the agent had a folder with a photo of a person who they believed to be the driver. She said the driver told the agent that he was not the person in the photo and refused to exit the car.

“The agents saw that we were there and that we were filming and so they left,” Favela said.

Gochez said the patrols helped disrupt at least two operations on Sunday, amid rumors that federal law enforcement agents planned to carry out large-scale immigration enforcement action in the Los Angeles region. He said more than 150 coalition members were on the lookout.

It was one of those patrols that stumbled upon an operation in Alhambra. The coalition members followed ICE agents from a staging point at a Target store to an apartment complex.

A video posted on Instagram shows members standing at a distance from federal agents while using a bullhorn to communicate with residents inside the building.

A woman in a jacket ties a bandana to a vehicle's mirror.

Azusena Favela ties a bandana to identify the Unión del Barrio car to community members.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

“They can have their own warrants that are not signed by a judge, they are not valid,” a man is heard saying with a megaphone in the video before it ends.

The Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles — a lockup run by the Federal Bureau of Prisons — had been asked to prepare for an influx of up to 120 new bookings from expected immigration raids, but by the end of Sunday officials had dropped off about a dozen people for processing, a source familiar with the situation told The Times.

Richard Beam, a spokesman for ICE, did not respond to requests for comment.

A bandana is tied to a vehicle's mirror, where a palm tree is reflected.

A bandana acts as an identifier of the Unión del Barrio car.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

Favela and Ríos kept driving toward the truck with lights.

At least five other volunteers had joined them, including members from the Harriet Tubman Center for Social Justice and Association of Raza Educators.

Before the patrols, Ríos had placed magnetic car banners on some of the vehicles. The red and black banners show an image of a shield with the words “Community Patrols.” Next to it, are the words: “Protecting communities from ICE and police terror.”

Terror is not a word used loosely by the coalition members. They point to a long history of police abuses and discriminatory laws that have targeted Chinese, Japanese and Mexican immigrants and their descendants.

Ríos said the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, which is primarily focused on Latino communities, has caused so much fear that some people rush in and out of stores. People have even confused a Los Angeles city landscaping truck for ICE.

“The truck was white and it had a green stripe,” Ríos said.

“I think what you hear from folks is that they’re afraid to go to work but they don’t have a choice,” Favela said, adding that they’ve received requests from residents about patrolling their streets.

“There’s a lot of fear and that for me is terror. We shouldn’t have to wake up every morning and wonder if that is the last time we’ll see our family.”

Ríos echoed that sentiment.

A white car sits in a dimly lit parking lot.

Volunteers sit in a car that Unión del Barrio uses to patrol the streets of Los Angles for ICE activity.

(Carlin Stiehl / For The Times)

“We’re just trying to help the community protect itself.”

Residents in the area said they were grateful for the patrols and for the volunteers helping inform residents about their rights.

Along Central Avenue and 20th Street, Juan Gonzales, 65, said he was in the area when volunteers stopped and distributed red cards that list constitutional rights under the 4th and 5th Amendments.

“The cards give people an advantage,” he said. “They tell you how to respond in a situation with ICE because these enforcements can happen just about anywhere.”

Farther up the street, Ricky Lewis, 69, said he opposed any immigration enforcement that separated families. He said community patrols were a good thing.

“I think informing people helps them know what their rights are,” he said, adding that it helps people make informed decisions.

Favela and Ríos said it’s a good day when there are no ICE sightings.

As they approached the white truck, the pair looked at the truck as they slowly moved past it. After a glimpse at the vehicle, the pair concluded that it belonged to someone in the neighborhood, not ICE.

Relieved, they continued with their patrols. It would be one of those good days.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

UFC Vegas 103 preview: ‘Kape vs. Almabayev’ main, co-main event predictions

0


Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is just one day away from the upcoming UFC Vegas 103 mixed martial arts (MMA) event, which is set to go down tomorrow night (Sat., March 1, 2025) on ESPN+ from inside APEX in Las Vegas, Nevada. UFC Vegas 103 features a flyweight main event between Top 10 title contenders Manel Kape and Asu Almabayev, a five-round showdown with possible title implications for late 2025 and beyond.

Before we dive into the main and co-main events, which include the middleweight showdown between Julian Marquez and Cody Brundage, check out Andrew Richardson’s “X-Factor” breakdown for the rest of the UFC Vegas 103 main card by clicking here. Get all the latest “Kape vs. Almabayev” odds and betting props courtesy of FanDuel right here. For UFC Vegas 103 live results for this weekend’s “Sin City” fight card click here.

125 lbs.: Manel Kape vs. Asu Almabayev

Manel “Starboy” Kape
Record: 20-7 | Age: 31 | Betting line: -220
Wins: 12 KO/TKO, 5 SUB, 3 DEC | Losses: 0 KO/TKO, 2 SUB, 5 DEC
Height: 5’5” | Reach: 68” | Stance: Southpaw
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute: 5.05 | Striking accuracy: 56%
Strikes Absorbed Per Minute: 4.15 | Striking Defense: 58%
Takedown Average: 0.47 (33% accuracy) | Takedown Defense: 77%
Current Ranking: No. 6 | Last fight: Technical knockout win over Bruno Silva

Asu “Zulfikhar” Almabayev
Record: 21-2 | Age: 31 | Betting line: +180
Wins: 3 KO/TKO, 9 SUB, 9 DEC | Losses: 1 KO/TKO, 0 SUB, 1 DEC
Height: 5’4“ | Reach: 65” | Stance: Orthodox
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute: 2.11 | Striking accuracy: 56%
Strikes Absorbed Per Minute: 1.02 | Striking Defense: 59%
Takedown Average: 5.08 (50% accuracy) | Takedown Defense: 50%
Current Ranking: No. 8 | Last fight: Unanimous decision win over Matheus Nicolau

Manel Kape finds himself in the position of many top contenders before him, apparently not worthy of a division title shot for whatever reason. Magomed Ankalaev, Belal Muhammad, and Leon Edwards are some of the more recent examples of combatants who were not considered box office material, though I would argue that Kape’s repeated failures to make the 125-pound limit — and already losing to flyweight champion Alexandre Pantoja at UFC St. Petersburg — may be as much to blame as anything else.

“Starboy” got off to a rocky start in his UFC career, falling to 0-2 after crossing over from RIZIN but has since compiled a 5-1 record with three knockouts, including his destruction of Bruno Silva at UFC Tampa last December. His lone defeat during that span came against undefeated flyweight Muhammad Mokaev, who will no longer prove to be a championship hurdle after drawing his walking papers from the head cheese himself. Kape is not currently ranked in the division Top 5 but Brandon Royval and Brandon Moreno already lost to the flyweight champion while Amir Albazi and Tatsuro Taira are both coming off losses. A “Starboy” victory at UFC Vegas 103 may be the final rung in the contendership ladder.

“Brandon pulled out. Winning against Brandon Royval, I would’ve been No. 1 in the ranking. It’s not my fault. I’m here doing my job,” Kape said during the UFC Vegas 103 media day (watch it here). “And again, Deiveson Figueiredo pulled out, Alex Perez pulled out, Kai Kara-France pulled out, all these fighters been pulling out. I’ve been doing my work. So after Asu, 100 percent I’m getting my title shot. I was supposed to fight Brandon Royval, he’s a taller guy. I was expecting to work him a lot on the body, the body shots, so I don’t have to reach too much his head. Asu is more short guy, so his head is going to be there and is a target. His chin is going to be there. His nose is going to be there, so I believe there’s going to be bad blood. His face is going to be a bunch of blood on Saturday night. He’s short, and he’s a good target for myself.”

Asu Almabayev is a relatively new addition to the still-growing flyweight roster but certainly no spring chicken when it comes to time served in the MMA big house. Prior to joining UFC, Almabayev tore through the ranks of M-1 Global and Brave Combat Federation. That trend continued inside the Octagon and “Zulfikhar” — which Google translated to “Sword of Ali” (pretty cool nickname) — is a perfect 4-0, having recently defeated Matheus Nicolau at UFC Vegas 99, a performance that landed him at No. 8 in the flyweight rankings.

Whether or not you think Almabayev is capable of defeating Kape may depend on your opinion of his competition thus far in UFC; which in my eyes, has been nothing special. That said, he remains one of the division’s most punishing wrestlers, averaging just over five takedowns per fight. It’s worth noting that “Starboy” — despite his high percentage in takedown defense — was blanked on the mats in decision losses to both Mokaev and Nicolau. Expect Almabayev to follow that blueprint tomorrow night in “Sin City” because Kape has the power to end it with one punch.

“You know when it comes to the title fights, it’s like I’m asking myself, ‘Why don’t I get this chance to fight for the title? Why isn’t it my turn?’ Because like you said, there was a debut guy that was fighting for a title,” Almabayev said during the UFC Vegas 103 media day (watch it here). “There were guys in the top 10 that were fighting for it. There were all these different fighters that got a chance and all those fighters who got a chance, you see they lost. They got losses. I’m 4-0 in the UFC. I’m ready. I’m excited. If I get this chance to fight, I think it should be me and nobody else.”

If this was a three-round affair, I would probably lean toward Almabayev for the dump-and-hump victory. I just find it hard to believe that “Zulfikhar” will be able to maintain that pace for 25 minutes while also avoiding the incoming fire from his heavy-handed foe. Look for Almabayev to start strong only to fade midway through the fight, where Kape finally finds his sea legs and drowns his opponent with a fiery blitzkrieg.

Prediction: Kape def. Almabayev by technical knockout

185 lbs.: Cody Brundage vs. Julian Marquez

Cody Brundage
Record: 10-6 | Age: 30 | Betting line: +115
Wins: 5 KO/TKO, 3 SUB, 1 DEC, 1 DQ | Losses: 2 KO/TKO, 2 SUB, 2 DEC
Height: 6’0“ | Reach: 72” | Stance: Orthodox
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute: 1.62 | Striking accuracy: 54%
Strikes Absorbed Per Minute: 2.63 | Striking Defense: 41%
Takedown Average: 2.31 (50% accuracy) | Takedown Defense: 68%
Current Ranking: Unranked | Last fight: No Contest against Abdul Razak Alhassan

Julian “Cuban Missile Crisis” Marquez
Record: 9-5 | Age: 34 | Betting line: -135
Wins: 6 KO/TKO, 3 SUB, 0 DEC | Losses: 3 KO/TKO, 0 SUB, 2 DEC
Height: 6’2“ | Reach: 72” | Stance: Orthodox
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute: 4.85 | Striking accuracy: 45%
Strikes Absorbed Per Minute: 5.06 | Striking Defense: 50%
Takedown Average: 0.00 (0% accuracy) | Takedown Defense: 53%
Current Ranking: Unranked | Last fight: Technical knockout loss to Zachary Reese

Cody Brundage returns to action after a 2024 he’d probably like to forget. At UFC 300, Brundage was handpicked to serve as the latest stepping stone in the comically slow build of middleweight phenom Bo Nickal, then returned at UFC Denver just a few months later, where he was flattened by elbows from Razak Al Hassan early in the opening frame. The bout was ruled a “No Contest” and Brundage hasn’t seen the win column since late 2023. Honestly, there are not a lot of great things I can say about Brundage, who was creamed on Dana White’s “Contender Series” but called back to plug a hole in the UFC 266 fight card. His record thus far inside the Octagon is 4-5 and one of those victories came by way of disqualification. Brundage is a good offensive wrestler and has power, so it will be interesting to see if he can exploit his opponent’s spotty takedown defense.

“We’re not best friends, but we’re friendly,” Brundage said during the UFC Vegas 103 media day (watch it here). “I don’t wish anything bad upon Julian. We’re both in a spot where you can’t say no. I’m on the last fight of my contract, he’s on a three-fight losing streak, so when the UFC calls, you’ve got to say yes. I don’t know how it’s going to go. I’ve never fought someone that I trained with. I would imagine that he’s comfortable with knowing what I’m going to do and I’m comfortable knowing what he’s going to do, and we’ll see how it plays out in the fight. We trained together for an extended period of time. We both know what we bring to the table, and I think it’ll be a good fight.”

Unlike Brundage, Julian Marquez was able to win his “Contender Series” fight and looked like he was on his way to becoming a major player in UFC after jumping out to a 3-1 start, even with a rare latissimus dorsi injury that kept him sidelined for over two years. Unfortunately, it’s all been downhill since getting decapitated by Gregory Rodrigues and “The Cuban Missile Crisis” is now the loser of three straight — with all three losses coming by way of knockout. To make matters worse, Marquez turns 35 in just a few weeks and could be in danger of being remembered for nothing but his Miley Cyrus fumble from early 2021. On the plus side, Marquez is a heavy-handed striker with sneaky submissions, so Brundage can’t just barrel in with a reckless takedown or he may get slept with a front choke (a lesson Darren Stewart learned at UFC on FOX 26 back in late 2017).

“When we first got it I was sitting there like, ‘Woah we used to train together man, what are we doing? We don’t fight teammates.’ Then it got there that he accepted the fight and I was like okay, that’s it, we’re here to battle,” Marquez said during the UFC Vegas 103 media day (watch it here). “This is where we are. This is the business we’re in. Has nothing to do with the friendship that we have, has nothing to do there. We both have to fight for our job. So when I got that I was like, ‘Hell yeah, let’s go, got another fight.’ I don’t feel any betrayal at all. The opportunity comes to his door, he has to make the judgement, and then our manager comes to talk to us. That’s it. It’s the business. He owes no explanation. I understand.”

Marquez is the more well-rounded fighter but he’s looked dreadful in his last few fights. The “Robocop” knockout is forgivable but getting smoked by Marc-Andre Barriault — who sports a losing record in UFC — is not. I think Brundage plays it safe, avoids a couple of big shots, and wrestles his way to a close decision win.

Prediction: Brundage def. Marquez by decision

Don’t forget to check out the rest of the UFC Vegas 103 main card predictions RIGHT HERE.

MMAmania.com will deliver LIVE round-by-round, blow-by-blow coverage of the entire UFC Vegas 103 fight card RIGHT HERE, starting with the ESPN+ preliminary card bouts at 4 p.m. ET, followed by the remaining main card balance on ESPN+ at 7 p.m. ET.

To check out the latest and greatest UFC Vegas 103 news and notes be sure to hit up our comprehensive event archive here. For the updated and finalized “Kape vs. Almabayev” fight card and ESPN+ lineup click here.



This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

ESR Is Ready With the Best iPhone 16e Case & Screen Protector

0


ESR is ready for iPhone 16e with MagSafe cases and screen protectors. Image source: ESR

Apple’s latest iPhone has just launched, and ESR revolutionizes protection and brings MagSafe functionality to the iPhone 16e. Here’s a look at the best iPhone 16e case options available.

It’s been a long time coming, but the iPhone 16e is here and it features a classic design, single rear camera, and notched display with Face ID. The device may look similar to an iPhone 14, but legacy cases won’t fit.

It can be frustrating when Apple releases altered product designs, because it can mean customers will go without must-have protection at launch. However, ESR isn’t leaving customers hanging by offering its latest cases and screen protectors today.

Place an order now and you’ll have everything you need for your new iPhone 16e by the time it arrives at your home.

ESR HaloLock Cyber Tough Case

The best iPhone 16e case from ESR is its flagship HaloLock Cyber Tough Case. It offers 23-foot military grade drop protection and MagSafe magnets that are twice as strong as the competition.

A rugged smartphone with a glowing blue lightning symbol impacts rocky surface, causing debris and sparks to fly.
The ESR HaloLock Cyber Tough Case and HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case are available for iPhone 16e. Image source: ESR

The rated drop protection is 7 times the military-grade rating thanks to its 3-layer design. There’s a PC backing, a flexible TPE soft shell, and an inner PORON lining.

The magnetic lock has a rated strength of 1,500g versus 700g in other MagSafe cases. This ensures your attached car mounts and wallet stands aren’t going anywhere while in use.

MagSafe compatibility means the HaloLock Cyber Tough Case for iPhone 16e allows Qi compatibility and MagSafe products like wallets and battery packs to attach to the iPhone and pass a charge through. Note that iPhone 16e doesn’t support MagSafe, just standard wireless charging, but the magnets in the case still work the same way.

The camera is protected by a 2.4mm camera guard that keeps the lens scratch-free. The rim around the display is 1.7mm tall and helps stop the display from being damaged when laying flat on a surface.

Get the ESR HaloLock Cyber Tough Case for $19.99.

ESR HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case

The best iPhone 16e case from ESR for those looking for a slim form factor without sacrificing durability is the HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case. Despite its thin edge and transparent back, it still offers 11-foot drop protection.

Two sleek smartphones with clear cases illuminated by a blue light, set against a rocky, sky-lit background.
ESR HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case provides protection without the bulk. Image source: ESR

It has reinforced Air Guard corners which help it achieve the 3 times military-grade rating. Protective cases don’t have to be bulky, and iPhone 16e shouldn’t have to be encased in rubber to keep it safe.

Like with the HaloLock Cyber Tough Case, the HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case has a 1,500g magnetic strength rating. MagSafe compatibility and strong magnets mean wireless Qi charging without the worry of sliding or slipping.

The case has a 1.2mm raised edge for the display and a 0.7mm camera guard to protect the display and camera from scratches. The acrylic back is scratch-resistant while staying crystal clear to show off your iPhone 16e’s color.

Get the ESR HaloLock Classic Hybrid Case with a limited-time deal for just $9.88.

UltraFit Screen Protector Series

ESR’s UltraFit Screen Protector Series is also available for the iPhone 16e at launch. It ships with an UltraFit tray that helps users get the perfect application every time.

Smartphone with several layers of screen protectors next to a box labeled 'Press here' in a mountainous landscape.
ESR has also updated its UltraFit Screen Protector Series to be compatible with iPhone 16e. Image source: ESR

The UltraFit Armorite Screen Protector is certified to withstand drop ball tests from up to 6.5 feet and edge pressure impacts of up to 8x stronger drop protection than competing brands. It is made with 9H tempered glass and offers edge-to-edge protection for up to three years.

ESR is also extending the advanced protection offered by its latest screen protector technology to more Apple iPhone models. Products from the iPhone 13 to the iPhone 16e are supported.

Get the UltraFit Armorite Screen Protector for $16.99.

The UltraFit Classic Screen Protector is certified to withstand drop ball tests from up to 1.6 feet and edge pressure impacts of up to 2x stronger than competing screen protectors. It is also made from 9H tempered glass and offers edge-to-edge protection for up to one year.

Get the UltraFit Classic Screen Protector for $9.99.

ESR CryoBoost MagSafe chargers

While the ESR CryoBoost MagSafe Charger lineup isn’t directly compatible with iPhone 16e, users can pair them with a MagSafe case or any MagSafe-compatible iPhone. If you’re in a household with more than one iPhone with devices or cases compatible with the feature, then CryoBoost can enhance your charging experience with active cooling.

Get the ESR 3-in-1 MagSafe Charger with Qi2 and CryoBoost or the ESR MagSafe Car Charger with Qi2 and CryoBoost.



This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

The rise of Sweepstake Casinos – A rewarding gaming experience – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Pexels

Sweepstake casinos have quickly become a popular choice for players seeking a legal and exciting gaming experience in regions where traditional online gambling is restricted. Unlike conventional online casinos, sweepstake casinos operate under a unique model that allows players to win cash prizes without directly wagering real money on games. This innovative approach not only complies with legal requirements but also provides a thrilling and engaging platform for gaming enthusiasts. Often, players acquire sweepstakes entries through promotional activities or by purchasing “Gold Coins,” which they can then use within casino games to win real cash prizes. This gaming environment fosters a community-driven experience, as participants often engage in forums and online discussions to share tips, strategies, and their latest wins. As the digital gaming landscape continues to evolve, sweepstake casinos are poised to remain a significant part of the conversation, offering entertainment and rewards to a growing audience.

Understanding the appeal of Sweepstake Casinos

Many wonder why sweepstake casinos have garnered such widespread attention and popularity. One central appeal is the allure of winning substantial cash prizes without the need to gamble real money directly. This model attracts a diverse audience, including those who may be risk-averse but still hopeful for a chance to win big. Additionally, sweepstake casinos are often intertwined with social gaming elements, making the experience not just about gambling but also about enjoying strategic, skill-based games with friends and an online community. By participating in various online challenges and competitions, players are immersed in an ecosystem that is both rewarding and competitive. Furthermore, sweepstake casinos often incorporate advanced graphics and thematic elements that rival those of traditional online casinos, enhancing the overall gaming experience.

Legal considerations and responsible gaming

The legality of sweepstake casinos is a significant factor contributing to their growing popularity. These platforms operate under sweepstakes laws, allowing them to offer prize-based gaming legally across various jurisdictions. However, clarity and transparency regarding their operations are crucial, ensuring that players understand the terms and conditions associated with the games. Responsible gaming is also emphasized, with many sweepstake casinos implementing measures to prevent gambling addiction and promote fair play. This includes providing self-exclusion options and resources for players who may need support. According to a detailed overview of gambling laws, operators and the companies that provide the systems used maintain that they operate in accordance with laws governing promotions and sweepstakes. Moreover, the accessibility of sweepstake casinos enables a broader demographic to engage in gaming, including individuals from regions where traditional casino play may be restricted by law. This openness is further complemented by the operators’ commitment to providing a secure and fair gaming environment.

The future of Sweepstake Casinos in the gaming industry

The future of sweepstake casinos looks promising as they evolve to meet the dynamic needs of the modern gamer. With the integration of technology, these platforms are constantly developing new features, such as virtual reality experiences and live dealer games, to entice and engage players. Additionally, by maintaining a strong presence on social media and other digital platforms, sweepstake casinos reach an ever-increasing audience. As legislation around online gambling continues to change, these innovative platforms have the potential to expand their reach further, offering services to broader markets. An article discussing legal considerations in Florida and beyond highlights the evolving landscape and potential challenges sweepstake casinos may face as they seek to grow their market presence. The commitment to tradition and player satisfaction will remain central to their operations, ensuring that sweepstake casinos will not only survive but thrive in the ever-evolving gaming landscape.



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Cruise expert shares common dining mistake many guests make | Cruise | Travel

0


A respected travel personality has urged tourists planning to go on a cruise holiday to avoid making one mistake during their first day on board the ship.

Gary Bembridge runs the YouTube channel Tips For Travellers, publishing videos in which he offers tips that can help tourists get the most from their time at sea without spending a fortune.

In a popular video, Gary urges passengers to avoid going up to the buffet during their first day on board, warning that it is often the busiest part of the ship.

He advised: “The first thing that smart cruisers never do is go to the buffet at the wrong time. They all choose really carefully about when they do and don’t use the buffet. For a start, smart cruisers generally don’t go to the buffet during embarkation day lunch.

“Not only is it busy, but there are better options and things that can help them get ahead of the crowd by not eating there. There are always better alternatives that are less busy and offer an elevated dining experience.”

Embarkation day is one of the busiest times on board a cruise ship, with many new passengers unpacking and getting to grips with their home at sea.

As a result, many passengers looking to grab a bite to eat will head up to the buffet. However, Gary warned that its popularity among new passengers makes it incredibly busy and stressful.

However, all major cruise ships will give passengers a considerable choice in dining options, with Gary suggesting that tourists check for alternatives that will almost always be quieter and therefore more enjoyable.

In particular, the cruise expert recommended that passengers try the main dining room for their first meal on board, particularly if they have any dietary requirements or want to be at a nice table for the rest of the trip.

He explained: “Smart cruisers mostly go to the main dining room instead of the buffet for two key reasons. First of all, to make sure they can get a great table if they are on fixed dining.

“The other reason is to get food allergy requirements sorted. The main dining room maitre’d usually handles this and is the one that must be spoken to. It’s really important to do this, because the buffet restaurant could actually be riskier for passengers with dietary issues.”

Gary also noted that many cruise lines offer a loyalty scheme which gives experienced travellers a unique menu during the first day on board that should not be missed.

He continued: “If you have a loyalty status, check whether there is a main dining room lunch menu exclusively for you. Many lines do, and I’ve had them on P&O Cruises, Princess, and Celebrity in the past

“Or, if the weather’s good, I might head up to the pool grill and have a burger, I did that on my last Holland America cruise, or a pizza from the on-deck pizzeria.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

People with common skin condition warned ‘call 111’

0


While eczema is a common condition and typically not life-threatening, it can escalate into a serious medical situation if the rashes become infected.

This could even develop into a severe condition known as eczema herpeticum, as the NHS, highlighted certain red flags that patients should be aware of.

It advises those with eczema to monitor any changes in their rashes, especially if accompanied by a high fever or generally feeling unwell, as this could suggest an infection.

You or your child’s eczema could be infected if it has any of the following symptoms:

  • Blistering that crusts over, leaks fluid or develops pus-filled spots
  • Painful or swollen rashes that feel warm
  • Suddenly worsens or grows

The NHS advised contacting 111 for assistance or arrange an urgent GP appointment if you notice these combinations of symptoms.

Eczema affects approximately one in five children and one in 10 adults in the UK, according to the National Eczema Society. The society noted it’s “highly likely” that individuals with eczema will encounter a bacterial, fungal or viral skin infection at some stage in their lives, adding: “All of these infections require intervention to clear them up as they do not improve on their own.”

Eczema can compromise the skin’s protective barriers, leading to further complications such as eczema herpeticum. This “serious condition” arises when the herpes simplex virus infects the skin, often necessitating hospital treatment with intravenous medication.

Atopic eczema is the most prevalent type of eczema, typically presenting as itchy, dry, or scaly patches that differ in colour from the surrounding skin and may also blister or bleed.

Nonetheless, there are several forms of this skin condition. Discoid eczema creates round or oval patches that may discharge fluid and cause the adjacent skin to become hot, swollen, or sore if infected.

Pompholyx targets hands and feet with persistent itchy blisters; signs of infection include green or yellow pus or a crusty yellow-brown coating.

Finally, varicose eczema stems from blood flow issues in the leg and must be treated to prevent potential leg ulcers. These are wounds that usually take more than two weeks to heal.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

James Mangold Looks To Be Making His ‘Dawn of the Jedi’ Movie Before DCU’s ‘Swamp Thing’

0


There have never been as many new Star Wars

movies in production as there are right now, with several high-profile filmmakers all working on their own additions to the ultimate space adventure franchise. Among those is one being worked on by Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny helmer James Mangold

, who appears to be so in demand that several big projects are on hold waiting for him. As Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy

recently revealed, this is something that she is happy to do, but that could be bad news for his DCU Swamp Thing

project.

Last week, during a DC update from James Gunn and Peter Safran, the latter revealed that the previously announced Swamp Thing movie is currently not going anywhere due to Mangold deciding to take on the Bob Dylan biopic, A Complete Unknown. Now, Kennedy has suggested that once his promotion of that movie ahead of this year’s Academy Awards is complete, he will be turning his attention back to his Dawn of the Jedi movie, leaving Swamp Thing at the back of a long queue.

Related


James Mangold Reveals Inspiration Behind Upcoming Movie Star Wars: Dawn of the Jedi

James Mangold discusses his inspiration for Star Wars: Dawn of the Jedi, set 25,000 years in the past and explores the origins of the Jedi.

In an extensive interview with Deadline, Kennedy addressed many things, including rumors of her impending retirement, and she was asked whether the James Mangold prequel movie was still happening. She said:

“Yep. He’s working on this script right now. Simon’s working on scripts right now. Shawn, we had been working with him already for about a year and a half. These guys are available now. Jim, he got delayed a bit because of the Dylan movie and the awards season. You have to accommodate top talent to a certain extent. And quality is so important with what it is we’re trying to do. I like to wait for people that I think are passionate and really good to step into Star Wars.”

DC Studios Are Happy to Wait for Mangold, Even If ‘Swamp Thing’ Never Gets Made

Image from Swamp Thing TV Show
Warner Bros.

In an almost identical statement a few days ago, Peter Safran addressed DC Studios’ new iteration of Swamp Thing, and suggested, similar to Kennedy, that they expect Mangold to return to work on their movie sometime in the future. At the time, Safran said:

“[Swamp Thing’s] writer/director went off to make another little movie, A Complete Unknown. We hope that he’ll come back to Swamp Thing when he’s ready. Because, again, that was one of those ones, we love him as a filmmaker, so we’re happy to wait for him. Swamp Thing is not integral to the larger story that we’re telling.”

Based on Kennedy’s new comments, it looks like Mangold’s next stop could well be the galaxy far, far away before he dabbles in the world of comic book movies again with Swamp Thing. Having previously worked on the final Indiana Jones movie, Mangold already seems to have a strong rapport with Lucasfilm and Disney, so it would make sense that he would gravitate back there. Where this leaves his Swamp Thing movie is yet to be seen, but fans shouldn’t expect to see much movement on Swampy’s big screen return anytime this year.



This story originally appeared on Movieweb

Lucy Ending Explained

0


At the end of Lucy, Scarlett Johansson’s Lucy transforms into a living computer and leaves Morgan Freeman with the keys to taking the human race to the next step of its evolution. The 2014 sci-fi thriller movie written and directed by Luc Besson features performances from Scarlett Johansson, Morgan Freeman, and more. However, the Lucy ending and general plot have become far more of a talking point than its all-star cast in the years since its release.

After Lucy is kidnapped and forced to traffic the experimental drug CPH-4, surgically hidden in her own body, the bag is broken, flooding her system with the drug and allowing her brain to unlock new levels of consciousness. Initially, Lucy’s abilities manifest as higher levels of learning and intelligence, but as her brain changes even more, her connection to time and space continues to shift. By the time Lucy unlocks 100 percent of her brain’s ability at the end of Lucy, she becomes something else entirely.

Related


5 Sci-Fi Movie Premises Debunked by Real Science

We take a look at 5 science fiction movies that force us to suspend disbelief in actual science fact.

Is Lucy Scientifically Accurate?

Do We Really Only Use 10 Percent Of Our brains? Is CPH-4 Real?

The basic premise of Lucy is that the human brain has far greater abilities than most people can access. While this is true on a number of levels, the notion that humans only use 10 percent of our brain was thoroughly debunked by a number of scientists, including an article at Journal Nature, after Lucy‘s theatrical release. The notion that human beings don’t utilize all of our cognitive potential has been a sentiment among philosophers and scientists for centuries, although the specific 10 percent claim seems to have originated with Lowell Thomas’ forward to Dale Carnegie’s book How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936.

When it comes to CPH-4 miracle drug that unlocked Lucy’s potential, Lucy claims it’s a natural chemical produced in tiny amounts by pregnant mothers to help babies rapidly grow their skeleton and nervous system, but that’s also not entirely accurate.

The claim that humans only use 10 percent of their brain isn’t only inaccurate according to imaging scans and other scientific measurements, but it’s also an entirely wrong paradigm to even use to measure cognitive capacity. While there’s time and energy constraints on what humans are capable of accomplishing in a single day, physical and cognitive accomplishments continue to excel throughout time, so to say only 10 percent of the brain was being utilized would imply knowledge of a fixed upper limit of human potential and where we currently exist within that limit, which would be impossible to know unless the day comes where humanity actually hits the hypothetical limit.

When it comes to CPH-4 miracle drug that unlocked Lucy’s potential, Lucy claims it’s a natural chemical produced in tiny amounts by pregnant mothers to help babies rapidly grow their skeleton and nervous system, but that’s also not entirely accurate. CPH-4 itself is an entirely fabricated substance, although there are special chemicals produced by mothers to facilitate rapid fetal development, just not any that are synthesized as a street drug, and certainly not any that are known to unlock brain capacity in adults. Most processes that facilitate rapid development in fetuses or young children result in cancerous growth when present in adults.

Related


15 Secrets Behind The Making Of Lucy

Scarlett Johansson took 2014 by storm when she starred as Lucy, the unexpected superhero who was a surprising mega-hit at the box office.

Why Didn’t CPH-4 Affect Anyone Else The Way it Affected Lucy?

If Jang Knew The Real Effects Of CPH-4, He Would Have Taken It Himself.

CPH-4 unlocked the unused 90 percent of Lucy’s brain, but it worked very differently for her than it did for anyone else. The only other person to be shown consuming any of the product was the test subject in Jang’s office. He only inhaled a small particle, and while it clearly had some sort of effect on him, Jang shot him in the head before any clear results manifested. Meanwhile, Lucy was exposed to CPH-4 when the bag inside her stomach ruptured, releasing a large quantity directly into her bloodstream. It was immediately clear how it hit her differently, since she levitated up the wall, which the test subject in Jang’s office didn’t do.

If anyone in the test process had achieved any major cognitive boost, surely Jang would have exploited it for his own purposes, if not before Lucy, then certainly after.

Surely other test subjects used at least small amounts of CPH-4 during the drug’s development process, but based on how little CPH-4 the test subject in Jang’s office took, it’s likely they never saw even a hint of the kind of effects experienced by Lucy. Additionally, Jang shot the man in his office who snorted just a single grain, and if that’s indicative of how other test subjects were treated, it makes sense that Lucy is the only one to achieve the states she did. If anyone in the test process had achieved any major cognitive boost, surely Jang would have exploited it for his own purposes, if not before Lucy, then certainly after.

What Did Lucy Become at 100 Percent?

Lucy Is Everywhere Now

Lucy gained more and more access to her brain’s abilities throughout the movie, but when she reached 100 percent, she became something else entirely. She had to sit still in a chair for several minutes as a shiny black substance covered her body and stretched out to all the computers and network equipment in the room, seemingly consuming them in the process. During this time, her body and mind completely changed on a cellular level as the movie depicts cells combining and other changes happening on both a molecular and cosmic level as she reached her full potential. When she reached 100 percent, she completely dematerialized.

Instead of asking “what” Lucy is at the end of Lucy, it would be more appropriate to ask where and when Lucy is.

After Lucy was gone, all she left behind was a cosmic-looking flash drive for Professor Norman. Del Rio also received a text from her saying “I am everywhere.” Instead of asking “what” Lucy is at the end of Lucy, it would be more appropriate to ask where and when Lucy is. She hasn’t simply transcended into a new physical being, she’s seemingly transcended space and time altogether, leaving behind the cosmic flash drive like a miniature obelisk from 2001: A Space Odyssey to guide humanity on the next step of its evolution.

Related


Scarlett Johansson’s 10 Best Movies, Ranked

Scarlett Johansson is one of the most accomplished and popular actors of her generation thanks to her fantastic work in these great movies.

Lucy’s Ending and True Meaning Explained

What’s Lucy’s Real Message?

The opening scene of Lucy shows Lucy, posited by some scientists as the first-ever human based on a partial skeleton discovered in 1974. The scene has a voiceover from Scarlett Johansson’s Lucy saying “life was given to us a billion years ago, what have we done with it?” During the ending of Lucy, as she prepares to reach 100 percent and begins to transcend time and space, she goes to see the prehistoric Lucy and reaches out to touch her hand, launching into a cosmic vision as Lucy sees the world rolled back, cells combine, and the universe unravels in reverse before her eyes ending with 100 percent.

Lucy’s voiceover at the end of Lucy saying “now you know what to do with it” is a charge for Norman (and presumably the audience) to push forward and expand the scope of human consciousness.

At the end of Lucy, Lucy has evolved beyond a need of a human body and returns to the same question from the opening, instead saying “life was given to us a billion years ago. Now you know what to do with it.” There’s a few things going on in this moment. Lucy is passing on all the knowledge she gained from her evolution following her consumption of the CPH-4 on to Professor Norman so humanity can evolve, but she may also be introducing a bit of a paradox, as one reading could suggest she went back in time to give the prehistoric Lucy a spark of intelligence, touching fingers in a reference to Michelangelo’s The Creation of Adam painting.

As Lucy explains to Professor Norman, our concept of time is entirely determined by our limited ability to experience it linearly, so what someone who is (hypothetically, using the movie’s logic) only utilizing 10 percent of their brain would perceive as a paradox would appear entirely differently to someone who’d reached 100 percent actualization. Regardless of the reading, Lucy’s voiceover at the end of Lucy saying “now you know what to do with it” is a charge for Norman (and presumably the audience) to push forward and expand the scope of human consciousness.

How The Lucy Ending Was Received

Opinions Were Split

Morgan Freeman with several scientists in Lucy

The final moments of Luc Besson’s 2014 sci-fi thriller proved to be as polarizing as they are provocative, as the Lucy ending has sparked extensive debate among audiences and critics alike. On Rotten Tomatoes, Lucy holds a Tomatometer score (critical rating) of 67%, reflecting just how much the movie split opinions. Ending the story with Scarlett Johansson’s Lucy becoming, essentially, God, was definitely ambitious – but it also proved to be controversial.

Some critics and viewers praised the Lucy ending for fully leaning into its central premise and taking it to a more extreme conclusion than stories with a similar setup (such as Limitless). Others, however, felt that the final moments were too outlandish.

When it comes to those who appreciated the Lucy ending, supporters of the film’s conclusion commend its boldness and philosophical depth. For example, Matt Zoller Seitz of Roger Ebert describes the film as “a fun, confident work” that is “fast and tight and playful even when it’s sadistic and violent.” He notes that the movie “keeps introducing potentially rich narrative veins,“, but also noted that some of this momentum had been lost by the ending:

“Like many films by Besson -” The Professional,” “The Fifth Element,” “The Messenger” and other high-octane shoot-’em-ups – Lucy starts out riveting but becomes less engaging as it goes along. It keeps introducing potentially rich narrative veins and then failing to tap them. It too often falls back on gunplay and gore just when you think it might finally delve into the notions that it keeps serving up with such fanfare.”

This perception that Lucy had a strong start but lost its way by the ending is, of course, mirrored by critics who didn’t appreciate the 2014 movie. Many reviews claim that the ending undermines the film’s initial promise, such Alyson Shontell of Business Insider. Shontell directly criticizes the final scenes Lucy, stating that while the movie presents a “cool concept,” it culminates in a “laughably outdated ending.” As an example to prove her point, she singles out the incongruity of a superintelligent being resorting to “a USB flash drive, a technology from the late 90s that is rapidly falling out of use,” to transfer vast amounts of knowledge.

The almost down-the-middle split in critical reception highlights the subjective nature of interpreting the Lucy ending. While some viewers embrace its speculative and metaphysical exploration of human potential, others find fault in its pacing and general coherence. However, this schism of opinion underscores the film’s capacity to provoke thought and discussion, solidifying its place as a memorable – if contentious – piece of science fiction cinema.

Did Lucy’s Ending Set Up A Sequel & Will One Happen?

The Story Concluded, But There May Be A Spin-Off

Lucy pointing a gun in Lucy

The ending of Lucy didn’t seem to set up a sequel, and with a decade gone since it released in 2014, there are still no plans for Lucy 2. Still, despite the ending closing off the story, there does seem to be some financial incentive, as Lucy managed to make over $460 million on a $40 million budget (via Box Office Mojo). With this in mind, it does seem surprising that Universal Pictures (the distributing studio behind Lucy) didn’t option Lucy 2. Director Luc Besson has also been asked about a sequel to Lucy, and his comments seemed to rule one out:

“I don’t see how we can do one. It’s not made for that. If I find something good enough, maybe I will, but for now I don’t even think about it.”

Besson’s comments were made in 2014 (via Collider), and he followed them up in 2017 with a Facebook post to confirm that he wasn’t working on a Lucy sequel despite rumors at the time reporting that a script was in development. Still, while the story of Lucy was wrapped up nicely, there are some routes a sequel could go. For example, another person could use CPH-4 to gain a similar amount of power, giving the godlike Lucy something of an antagonist to face for the future of humanity.

While Lucy 2 doesn’t seem to be in the works, there was a spin-off series announced in 2023. While details are still scarce, including potential release date and what the cast will be, it was revealed that Morgan Freeman is in talks to reprise his role. Should the series go ahead then the story of Lucy will continue after all.




Lucy

5/10

Release Date

July 25, 2014

Runtime

90minutes

Director

Luc Besson






This story originally appeared on Screenrant

Heart’s Ann and Nancy Wilson on 50 years of sisterhood

0


Half a century after the release of 1975’s “Dreamboat Annie,” Ann and Nancy Wilson of Heart are set to hit the road Friday night in Las Vegas. The tour, which will stop at Crypto.com Arena in downtown Los Angeles on Monday, wasn’t necessarily designed to mark the 50th anniversary of the band’s debut album: Heart started playing concerts again in 2023 — the Wilsons’ first gigs together since before the pandemic — only to call off dates last July when Ann announced that she’d been diagnosed with cancer.

Yet the rescheduled road show offers as good a reason as any to consider Heart’s journey over the last five decades from the clubs of the Pacific Northwest to heavy rotation on MTV to an affectionate embrace by rock’s next generation. (Don’t forget that Ann and Nancy appeared on the soundtrack of 1992’s “Singles” alongside Pearl Jam and Alice in Chains.)

Ahead of opening night, the sisters — whose relationship was tested in 2016 when Ann’s husband, Dean Wetter, assaulted Nancy’s twin teenage sons backstage at a show in Washington state — gathered recently on Zoom for a chat. Ann, 74, was at her home in Nashville and Nancy, 70, at her home in Northern California.

How you feeling at the moment, Ann?

Ann: I’m feeling like myself again. I got done with a course of chemotherapy a few months ago — that was brutal. But I’m clear.

Did the brutality of chemo come as a shock?

Ann: I mean, they’re putting poison into you. What do you expect?

What’s it been like to get the show back on its feet after a lengthy break?

Nancy: We need plenty of rehearsing. Unlike a lot of entertainment, we do a 100% skin-in-the-game live rock show. That requires a lot of warmup and a lot of physical training to have flexibility and strength underneath you.

You’re saying Heart doesn’t use pre-recorded tracks. Is that a matter of ethics in your view?

Nancy: I don’t have a big, fat opinion about people who use playback — everybody kind of uses it these days — but I think what’s been missing in music is the authentic, real thing. There’s a few old, dogged bands like Heart that are still out there doing it the old-fashioned way, which is actually singing and actually playing. When we were out last time, I made a great big blooper on the guitar while I was doing my famous intro to “Crazy on You” — totally train-wrecked it. But everybody in the audience was like, “Wow, how cool is a mistake?” It wasn’t a perfect playback of something that’s not really happening, and I got congratulated for making a human error on a live stage.

You guys did an acoustic performance on Kelly Clarkson’s TV show last year where the vocals were super dialed-in. This is kind of dark to consider —

Ann: Let’s get dark for a minute.

If you lost the ability to sing at that level, would you feel you had to quit?

Nancy: I don’t know what we’d do. Bring in a small ensemble of singers to help us get through the more challenging vocal spots? It’s pretty challenging music to sing and play. It’s more than four chords.

You didn’t make it easy on yourselves.

Nancy: There’s times we curse ourselves for writing music that was purposefully complex. We were trying to show off when we were in our 20s, and now we have to live up to it.

Beyond your commitment to the music, last year’s tour seemed like a way for the two of you to reconnect after a period of turmoil.

Nancy: Being onstage with each other, no matter what grief or loss or challenge we’re going through emotionally as sisters — it’s a healing process.

Ann: When you get a cut or a scrape, it doesn’t just heal overnight. It takes maybe a couple of weeks to come back to its new form. I think every time we go onstage together, we get a little bit farther back to the inside jokes and the language we developed through our childhoods. We came up together side by side — learned how to play guitar together and how to sing by sharing a bedroom in our parents’ house and just doing nothing but that all day long. It’s a lot to come back to.

Could that work of reconciliation continue after the tour was interrupted?

Ann: The stage is where most of the healing takes place. It’s a safe place for us to be.

You both spoke candidly to Rolling Stone about the backstage incident in 2016. A lot of celebrities would avoid talking about it.

Ann: I think that people who love Heart and care about Nancy and I deserve the truth.

Nancy: We didn’t come from a Hollywood-style upbringing.

Ann Wilson, center right, and Nancy Wilson perform with Heart in Pittsburgh in May 2024.

Ann Wilson, center right, and Nancy Wilson perform with Heart in Pittsburgh in May 2024.

(Criss Cain)

When Chris Cornell inducted Heart into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 2013, he said, “Somehow it never occurred to us that Ann and Nancy Wilson were women.” Obviously he meant it in an admiring way. But that quote illustrates a historical tendency to describe Heart’s greatness in masculine terms.

Ann: That’s always been a pretty deep-seated frustration of mine — that being a woman means you’re just trying to replicate what men are doing.

Nancy: Coming into it, people were like, “How do you maintain your femininity and still strut around with a big rock guitar?” Why should doing something really powerful be exclusive to one gender or the other?

Ann: It’s getting better, though. Taylor Swift has opened doors in that she can go out there with her innermost musings about her life, and people love it. They don’t say, “Come on, Taylor — be more of a badass.” Nobody’s really done that since Joni Mitchell.

Rock Hall aside, do you think Heart has gotten its due?

Ann: I don’t. We’ve just always felt like we’re the last to be considered — never been asked to be on “SNL,” all that kind of stuff. There’s some “No, these guys aren’t hip enough” role that’s in place, and we’ve never understood what that is.

Nancy: In the ’90s, we kind of started to say, “Are we legends yet?” We’d been around for years, from the ’70s through the successful ’80s albums — the videos and the big hair and the kabuki of it all — into the ’90s when it was cool to be with the grunge players that we loved. Then we put out an album [“Desire Walks On”] that kind of stiffed. We were like, “S—, we’re not legends yet.”

Given your background as songwriters, did you have mixed feelings when “These Dreams” and “Alone” — songs you didn’t write — became huge hits in the ’80s?

Ann: Only because we were still writing then and most of our songs were looked at with this quirky expression — like, “Where are you gonna get this played?”

Nancy: In the case of “Alone” and “These Dreams,” we couldn’t deny how great those songs were. “Alone” is a song you could’ve heard in World War I — in a black-and-white film or in a cabaret somewhere in Europe. “These Dreams” is similar. It’s a complex, romantic, ethereal song that some great singer in any era could’ve made beautiful. But there were other songs from the L.A. songwriter stable — star-maker-machinery songs — that we kind of resented.

What’s an example?

Nancy:Who Will You Run To.” What irked us about those songs is the victim thing — [whines] “Why don’t you call me back?” — instead of somebody going, “How do I get you alone?,” which is proactive, you know?

Ann: That song was a real low point in our nightly set list. There was just no substance to it that we could find. We had a jokey name for it, which was “Where You Gonna Park Your Butt At”?

Nancy: It was a little too high school. Even one of our own songs, “Magic Man,” there was a time when Ann didn’t want to sing it.

Ann: I was 24 when “Magic Man” was written. That was my first love, and so I’d do anything — I’d go home and wash the sheets by hand and hang them outside to dry. It was romantic, right? Later in our career, in the ’80s and ’90s, I couldn’t relate to that 24-year-old anymore. I found it hard to get up there live and put that song across with any kind of force.

How about now?

Ann: Now I can do it because I’ve got enough distance from it.

Nancy, why did you sing lead on “These Dreams”?

Nancy: I’m a guitar player, but I love singing — I love trying to sing. I heard that song while we were auditioning demos with our producer Ron Nevison. A lot of them really sucked, but at the end Ron said, “This is never gonna be a good Heart song, but it’s really interesting and it’s got lyrics by Bernie Taupin.” He put on “These Dreams,” and I knew immediately I could do it because it was so different from a Heart song. The management company at the time said, “No f—ing way,” but I pushed really hard and finally got a chance to do it. Everybody was like, “Wait a minute — that really worked.” They said, “Remind us never to say no to you again.” I guess I was right, because that was our first No. 1 song.

What was your takeaway from that?

Nancy: That the guys in suits, their ears are painted on.

The story goes that Taupin and his co-writer, Martin Page, first offered “These Dreams” to Stevie Nicks. Did you know that when you cut it?

Nancy: No, Bernie told me later. But I can see why they did — it’s got that fairy-tale witchiness that Stevie has.

What’s a great power ballad that you wish Heart had gotten?

Ann: Donna Summer’s “The Woman in Me,” which we actually covered. “The Living Years” [by Mike + the Mechanics], that was another one.

Nancy: I was so mad that we didn’t do Shania Twain’s “You’re Still the One.” I wanted to be the singer on that song so bad.

After the glossy big-hair moment, Heart was one of the relatively few bands from that era to survive into the alt-rock ’90s.

Ann: It was like some kind of purge.

Nancy: We thought everyone was gonna hate us because they were pushing back against the hair bands and the L.A. scene. We weren’t from L.A., thank God, and at the time it was cool to be from Seattle. We were saved by the skin of our teeth.

Ann: In the ’80s, we felt comfortable for maybe the first and second of those albums. After that, the constant repetition of clothes and video-making and too many shows — it’s really not good for a person’s emotional house of cards. I think the artifice had reached a point of being inauthentic. We had to just strip back all the bulls— and get real.

Nancy: We took off the corsets and put on the combat boots. It was a great time in music. I remember the first time I heard “Smells Like Teen Spirit.” I was like, Somebody’s playing guitars again!



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Cynthia Erivo Talks New Single ‘Replay,’ Upcoming Album & More

0


It’s obviously been a major year for Cynthia Erivo. The star, who portrayed the iconic Elphaba in Jon M. Chu’s Wicked, is in the running for best actress in a leading role at this year’s Oscars ceremony and her inimitable vocal ability has been the inspiration behind many social media users attempting to recreate her otherworldly vocal run at the end of the film’s “Defying Gravity” number.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

But she’s not done just yet. Erivo chatted exclusively with Billboard about her brand new single, “Replay,” which arrived on Friday (Feb. 28) and marks her first solo release since 2021. “I’m sort of leaning into vulnerability these days,” she says with a laugh, and that sentiment is clear on the Justin Tranter co-written track, which delves into the emotional rollercoaster of being human. “I’m a constant work in progress, and I can’t keep fears at bay,” she opens the pop-leaning track with, before proclaiming in the chorus: “My mind is like a record, setup on auto-replay.”

“I’ve always wanted to be a music artist outside of being an actress, and my journey to it has just been different,” Erivo explains. “Some people come to it pretty early and some people come to it when the time is right, and this is the time for me.”

With that in mind, the 38-year-old artist wants to introduce herself musically on her own terms, as the upbeat pop production of “Replay” leads listeners away from the ballads that they might be used to her belting for films in the past — to hopefully see Erivo as Cynthia, not as some of her famous onscreen roles. “I think people are really used to me singing a particular kind of way and particular kind of songs, but those songs are other people’s songs. Working on this music has been sort of a stream of consciousness that ended up being the page,” she says. “I think sometimes we’ll apply genre to a person, when the person hasn’t actually given you the genre that they are. I just happen to love to sing, but sometimes you don’t want to make big sounds, and you actually just want to tell a story, and that was what ‘Replay’ was about.”

She continues, “The song gives people the opportunity to get to know me a lot better, to get to know what goes on in my head from time to time, to get to know what I’ve thought in the past and sometimes even now, and the things that I have experienced. It’s almost like a personal lullaby that tells people who I am and that I’m human too, just like everybody else.”

Beyond its relatable and clever lyrical content, the production of “Replay” was just as personal to Erivo, inspired by the 90s Brit-pop she grew up with. “As a Brit, I wanted to bring something that felt particularly English, from my time, because I felt like we haven’t heard anything that feels like that in a while,” the London native explains.

“Everything that you hear in there — all the backing vocals, all of the pads, all of the whistling, even some of the percussion — that’s all me,” she adds enthusiastically. “I’m using my nails for what would sound like a clap. The whistle in the background is actually me whistling. The vocal padding and that vocal arrangement, that’s all me. If you listen carefully, you’ll feel the tempos speed up and then slow down again. It’s on purpose. It starts at 89 beats per minute, goes to 94 beats per minute and goes right back to 89 beats per minute, because it feels like what the heart rate does. It speeds up when things are getting a little bit strange, and then it comes back down.”

With her passion about “Replay” so evident, it’s no surprise Erivo is gearing up to release a full-length album, which she began working on in August 2023 and throughout her time filming Wicked. “I have to say that this is probably one of the most valuable experiences I’ve had in my life. I’ve written albums before, and it didn’t feel like this,” she says. “I knew the things I wanted to talk about and I knew the stories I wanted to tell. I knew the colors that I wanted in it — literally and figuratively, because some of the songs literally are based on a color. Like, what color do I want to write? Green! Then, one day I want to write about sex and, one day, I want to write about love or, today, I want to write about heartbreak, or maybe something in the color of blue.”

Overall, Erivo is ready for this next chapter in her career, keeping her heart on her sleeve as she always does and has become beloved for. “I want people to see that I’m a musician, like a person who understands the language of music implicitly and is willing to use it in loads of different ways,” she says. “It would be easy for me to sing a big ballad. Trust me, there’s a ballad on this album. But, more than anything, I love the making of music, the creating of music. I love using the music to tell the story. My story.”

Listen to Erivo’s “Replay” here.



This story originally appeared on Billboard