Monday, July 14, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 1686

Beneil Dariush hoping UFC 311 payback includes fights against Dustin Poirier, Max Holloway, or Michael Chandler

0


Beneil Dariush drew the short straw at UFC 311.

When Arman Tsarukyan bailed on the lightweight main event against Islam Makhachev, the promotion poached Renato Moicano from the pay-per-view (PPV) main card, leaving Dariush without a date for the big dance last Sat. night (Jan. 18) in Los Angeles.

The promotion paid the longtime veteran both his “show” and “win” purse but Dariush is hoping he’ll also be rewarded with a premium booking against one of the top names at 155 pounds, including his own personal white whale.

“in an ideal world, I would get somebody ranked ahead of me — and the the options there are Dustin Poirier, Max Holloway or Michael Chandler,” Dariush told Submission Radio. “I believe I can beat anybody, so I think I match up well with him. I think I’ll be fine in the striking and I think I have a big advantage in the grappling. The reason why I said Max Holloway is because he’s now in the rankings.”

Holloway moved up to lightweight following his knockout loss to Ilia Topuria.

“But my personal favorite would be Poirier,” Dariush continued. “I know I’ve mentioned this before, and the only reason I say it is because for a while, he’s like ‘I don’t want to fight Dariush, it doesn’t make sense for me,’ blah, blah, blah. And then he went and fought Benoit Saint-Denis. I don’t know how his brain works, but maybe something clicks again in his brain and he’ll be like, ‘Okay, maybe I do want this fight.’ Max Holloway, obviously I’ve been a fan of his for a long time. To be able to fight him would be great. I think he’s one of the best fighters, you know, ever. And then Chandler, I don’t really want to fight him because I don’t think he’s that tough, but he’s ranked ahead of me.”

The 35 year-old Dariush (22-6-1) has not competed since his knockout loss to Arman Tsarukyan at the UFC Austin event back in Dec. 2023, but remains ranked in the division Top 10 for his consistency against contending lightweights over the last several years.

As of this writing, Poirier, Holloway, and Chandler remain unbooked for 2025.



This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

Weight loss jabs ‘may cut risk of silent killer brain disease’ | UK | News

0


Weight loss jabs such as Wegovy may reduce risk of dementia by easing inflammation in the brain, scientists say.

The drugs have been approved for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes, as well as for prevention of deadly heart problems in people who are overweight.

A major US study suggests their benefits may extend even further to conditions including Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, pneumonia and addiction.

Researchers analysed data from two million veterans including 215,000 who were taking weight loss jabs for treatment of diabetes.

Dr Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist and kidney expert at John J. Cochran Veterans Hospital in Missouri, said: “Given the drugs’ newness and skyrocketing popularity, it is important to systematically examine their effects on all body systems – leaving no stone unturned – to understand what they do and what they don’t do.”

The findings highlighted some “previously unrecognised benefits” including a reduced risk of seizures and addiction to substances such as alcohol, cannabis, stimulants and opioids.

People taking the weight-loss drugs also experienced lower risks of suicidal ideation, self-harm, bulimia and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia.

And they had a reduced risk of neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.

Dr Al-Aly said: “Interestingly, GLP-1RA drugs act on receptors that are expressed in brain areas involved in impulse control, reward and addiction – potentially explaining their effectiveness in curbing appetite and addiction disorders.

“These drugs also reduce inflammation in the brain and result in weight loss; both these factors may improve brain health and explain the reduced risk of conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.”

Writing in the journal Nature Medicine, the experts noted that the benefits of treatment were “modest” and reduced risk by around 10-20% for most conditions studied.

Dr Al-Aly added: “However, the modest effect does not negate the potential value of these drugs, especially for conditions where few effective treatment options exist, for example, dementia.

“This may also imply that these drugs are most beneficial when used in conjunction with other interventions, such as lifestyle changes or other medications.”

Known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, the drugs work by mimicking hormones that regulate appetite. The study also highlighted some known side effects including increased risk of gastrointestinal problems such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and in rare cases paralysis of the stomach.

In rare cases, the drugs were also found to have negative effects on the pancreas and kidneys. Dr Al-Aly said: “GLP-1RA drugs can have broad health benefits. However, they are not without risks.

“Our findings underscore the possibility for wider applications for these medications but also highlight important risks that should be carefully monitored in people taking these drugs.”

Professor Sir Stephen O’Rahilly, an expert in clinical biochemistry and medicine at the University of Cambridge who was not involved with the research, said such studies needed to be “interpreted very cautiously”.

He added: “The people studied have not been randomly allocated to GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment, so any difference between those taking and not taking the class of drug could potentially be attributable to factors other than the drug.

“As the data comes from the US Veterans Administration it is heavily skewed to older white males. That said , the study provides useful reassurance about the safety of this class of drugs.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Why Traditional Job Descriptions Aren’t Cutting It Anymore

0


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Let’s talk about jobs. Not in the old-school, “What do you do for work?” way, but what a job really is. For decades, a job was described through a title and a list of responsibilities. You get hired, and you’re given a job description; that’s your professional identity. But frankly, that system is breaking down — and quickly.

The structure of work today isn’t designed for how companies function anymore. Now that all these things are changing, static roles or rigid hierarchies will never be able to keep up with changes in technology, business models or customer expectations. This is like trying to run a modern app on a ’90s computer — things crash. The old job description? Dead. What’s replacing it? Modular, project-based systems, where work is completed by pulling together the right people with the right skills for a specific assignment. Let’s break this down.

Related: Why Job Titles Don’t Always Reflect the Value of Employees

Why the traditional job structure doesn’t work anymore

The old work paradigm was designed for predictability. A company brings a bunch of people in to do specific tasks, and those tasks rarely change. An accountant crunched numbers, a marketing manager wrote campaigns, and the IT guy fixed your printer. Everyone stayed in their lane.

But most industries — and I’d argue most innovation — don’t work that way today. Things shift constantly. Today, you may need a cybersecurity expert, tomorrow a cloud architect and next week a data analyst, all on the same project. There are fewer businesses than ever, but job roles haven’t kept pace. The inflexible job description doesn’t match this new reality, and clinging to it is costing companies agility and talent.

You should also consider skills as they develop. Individuals these days do not fit neatly in a box. A great marketer, for instance, may also know how to do data analysis, build no-code tools and even do some graphic design. But if their job description reads only “marketing strategy,” you’re leaving half their potential on the table.

The rise of modular, project-based work

So, what’s taking the place of these well-worn roles? Modular work systems. What does that mean? Rather than hiring people in fixed roles, companies deploy talent on a project basis. You aren’t hiring “an employee.” You are hiring a skillset, a brain or even a team for a defined outcome.

Let’s say you’re an app company that’s just launching a product. Rather than pushing this project through tiers of departments (marketing, development, customer support, etc.), you form an agile, cross-functional team: a UX designer, a software developer, a marketing strategist and a project manager. When the app launches, that team disbands, and those people move on to different projects. The work is done faster, smarter and with less bureaucracy.

This is reminiscent of how many startups and creative agencies already operate. They value speed and expertise more than rigid structures, and it’s a major reason why they’re out-pacing more traditional companies. That’s also why freelance platforms like Upwork or Toptal are booming — companies seek access to a talented pool without the baggage of a full-time hire.

What this means for workers

Let’s get real: Not everyone is enamored with the idea of project-based work. For workers, it’s a transition from the predictability of a defined position to a merit-driven marketplace where your worth is tied to your skills and your capacity for reinvention. Some can work well in these conditions — others, less so.

But here’s another point: Project-based systems allow workers greater freedom. You’re not stuck doing the same things for years because they’re in your job description. You can pivot, acquire new skills and give back in ways that actually interest you. It’s much more dynamic and, to be honest, more in line with how people want to do their jobs now.

The question of job security is also relevant. If companies transition to project-based hiring, does that equate to fewer full-time opportunities? Maybe. However, it also offers opportunities for workers to pursue careers as independent contractors or consultants. In some ways, it’s a return to craftsmanship — you are valued for what you deliver, not for how many years you’ve been melting your face off in a cubicle.

Related: Scouting All-Star Talent For Your Business: A Four-Step Playbook

What businesses need to do differently

For companies, this transformation isn’t simply a matter of replacing job descriptions with project charters. It’s a whole new mindset. Here’s what needs to change:

1. Focus on outcomes, not tasks

Agencies must stop thinking about what an employee does on their daily grind and instead consider what outputs they’re responsible for. There’s no “social media manager,” but hire someone who can “grow brand engagement by 30% in six months.” It’s a small but profound change.

2. Invest in skill development

If work going forward is project-based, employees will have to continuously refresh their skills in order to remain relevant. Businesses that offer continual training and learning opportunities will be more attractive to better talent and will receive more value from their teams.

3. Rethink hiring processes

Traditional hiring processes — résumés, cover letters and multi-round interviews — are too slow for this model. Companies want more efficient assessments of skills, such as portfolio reviews, skills tests or short-term trial projects.

4. Build flexible teams

In a project-based world, you’re not only managing employees; you’re managing networks. Some members of this team may be full-time staff, while others may be freelancers, contractors or even AI tools. In response, companies require systems to efficiently manage these hybrid teams.

5. Embrace technology

Tools such as Slack, Asana and Airtable already aid project-based work, but we have only begun to scratch the surface. AI and automation will trump in this regard and start delegating tasks, tracking progress and even helping match the best talent to the projects.

Challenges ahead

Let’s not make any bones about it; the transition isn’t going to be easy. For companies, transitioning from hierarchies to networks requires rethinking everything from org charts to performance reviews. For employees, that means abandoning the traditional career ladder. Instead of moving via the classic ladder, you’ll be leaping from project to project, developing a portfolio of work that will get you places.

There’s also the risk of burnout. When employees arrayed across projects spin through one logo or event to the next without sharp boundaries, it’s easy to overburden people. Companies will need to embrace work-life balance in the new system, or they’ll lose talent just as quickly as they acquire it.

Why this shift is inevitable

If you’re still doubtful, consider that the tools we use to work have already unbundled how we do the work. Canva, ChatGPT and Notion are some examples of apps that have enabled people to do things that used to take entire teams. A logical next step is for their roles to be unbundled.

It’s also playing out in the gig economy. Platforms such as Uber, DoorDash and TaskRabbit have broken work down into discrete, outcome-based tasks. Although those examples are primarily in service industries, similar principles are beginning to operate in knowledge work. Writing, coding, design and even project management are all breaking down into modular, task-based services.

Related: Master The Flexible Talent Search: Seven Critical Questions To Ask When Building A Competitive On-Demand Workforce

People need to know the days of the static job description are over. Both businesses and workers are moving toward a more flexible, project-based model that better matches the velocity and multiplicity of our fast-changing world. It’s not a perfect system, and there will definitely be growing pains. But for companies that lean into this change — and for workers who adjust — it’s a tremendous opportunity.

We’re moving into a world in which work is less about where you land on an org chart and more about what you can bring to a particular objective. It’s quicker, more dynamic and (fingers crossed) a more fulfilling experience for everyone around. And if you still hold on to the old ways, you’re going to be left behind. It is time to unbundle work and rethink what a job actually is.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

Immigration, foreign wars, God By Reuters

0


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President-elect Donald Trump said he would sign a series of executive orders on Monday and promised to begin “the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense,” in his inaugural address, while being sharply critical of outgoing president Joe Biden and Democrats.

GLOBAL CHANGES

“A tide of change is sweeping the country. Sunlight is pouring over the entire world, and America has the chance to seize this opportunity like never before, but first, we must be honest about the challenges we face.”

CRITICISM OF BIDEN

“We now have a government that cannot manage even a simple crisis at home, while at the same time stumbling into a continuing catalog of catastrophic events abroad. It fails to protect our magnificent law-abiding American citizens but provides sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals, many from prisons and mental institutions that have illegally entered our country from all over the world.”

REFERENCE TO FOREIGN WARS

“We have a government that has given unlimited funding to the defense of foreign borders, but refuses to defend American borders, or, more importantly, its own people.”

HEALTH, EDUCATION CHANGES

“We have a public health system that does not deliver in times of disaster, yet more money is spent on it than any country anywhere in the world. And we have an education system that teaches our children to be ashamed of themselves, in many cases, to hate our country, despite the love that we try so desperately to provide to them. All of this will change, starting today, and it will change very quickly.”

SAVED BY GOD

“Over the past eight years, I have been tested and challenged more than any president in our 250-year history … Those who wish to stop our cause have tried to take my freedom and indeed to take my life. Just a few months ago, in a beautiful Pennsylvania field, an assassin’s bullet ripped through my ear, but I felt then and believe, even more so now that my life was saved for a reason. I was saved by God to make America Great Again.”

DRILL BABY DRILL

“The inflation crisis was caused by massive overspending and escalating energy prices. And that is why today I will also declare a national energy emergency. We will drill baby drill.”




This story originally appeared on Investing

TikTok awaits Trump reprieve as China signals it is open to deal

0

President-elect Donald Trump is expected to grant TikTok more time to strike a deal after he returns to power on Monday as China has signaled it would be open to a deal to keep TikTok in the US market.

The short video service used by 170 million Americans was briefly taken offline for US users on Saturday, hours before a law that said it must be sold by its Chinese owner ByteDance on national security grounds took effect on Sunday.

US officials had said that under ByteDance, there was a risk of Americans’ data being misused.

TikTok restored access on Sunday, and thanked Trump for providing the assurances TikTok and its business partners that they would not face hefty fines to keep the app running.

TikTok briefly went dark in the United States on Sunday before it came back online as a new law banning the service went into effect. Christopher Sadowski

The app and website were operational on Monday, but TikTok was still not available for download in the Apple and Google app stores, suggesting the two companies were waiting for clearer legal assurances.

“Frankly, we have no choice. We have to save it,” Trump said at a rally on Sunday ahead of his inauguration, adding that the US will seek a joint venture to restore the app used by half of Americans.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew attended a service at St. John’s Episcopal Church in Washington with Trump on Monday. Chew was joined by several Big Tech chief executives including Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

Trump had earlier said he will issue an executive order to give TikTok a reprieve from the ban after he takes office, a promise TikTok cited in a notice posted to users on the app.

That comes as China indicated for the first time it would be open to a transaction keeping TikTok operating in the US.

President Donald Trump has indicated that he wants TikTok to stay online for the time being. REUTERS

When asked about the app’s restoration and Trump’s desire for a deal, China’s foreign ministry told a regular news briefing on Monday that it believed companies should “decide independently” about their operations and deals.

“TikTok has operated in the US for many years and is deeply loved by American users,” ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said.

“We hope that the US can earnestly listen to the voice of reason and provide an open, fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment for firms operating there.”

The debate over TikTok comes at a tense moment in US-China relations.

Trump has said he intends to place tariffs on China but has also indicated he hopes to have more direct contact with China’s leader.

Trump saving TikTok represents a reversal in stance from his first term in office. In 2020, he aimed to ban the app over concerns the company was sharing Americans’ personal info with the Chinese government.

Shou Zi Chew, chief executive officer of TikTok, is lobbying Trump to keep the platform online in the US. Bloomberg via Getty Images

More recently, Trump has said he has “a warm spot in my heart for TikTok,” crediting the app with helping him win over young voters in the 2024 presidential election.

In August 2020, Trump signed an executive order giving ByteDance 90 days to sell TikTok but then blessed a deal structured as a partnership rather than a divestment that would have included both Oracle and Walmart, taking stakes in the new company.

Not everyone in Trump’s Republican Party agreed with efforts to get around the law and “Save TikTok.”

Republican senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts said in a joint statement: “Now that the law has taken effect, there is no legal basis for any kind of ‘extension’ of its effective date. For TikTok to come back online in the future, ByteDance must agree to a sale that satisfies the law’s qualified-divestiture requirements by severing all ties between TikTok and Communist China.”

The US has never banned a major social media platform.

The law passed overwhelmingly by Congress gives the incoming Trump administration sweeping authority to ban or seek the sale of other Chinese-owned apps.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Climate change fanatics want to bankrupt the entire world for little to no reward

0

Across the world, public finances are stretched dangerously thin. Per-person growth continues dropping while costs are climbing for pensions, education, health care and defense.

These urgent priorities could easily require an additional 3%-6% of GDP. Yet green campaigners are loudly calling for governments to spend up to 25% of our GDP, choking growth in the name of climate change.

If climate Armageddon were imminent, they would have a point. The truth is far more prosaic.

Two major new scientific estimates of the total global cost of climate change have been published recently.

These are not individual studies, which can vary greatly (with the costliest studies getting copious press coverage). Instead, they are meta-studies based on the entirety of the peer-reviewed literature. 

One is authored by one of the most cited climate economists, Richard Tol; the other is by the only climate economist to win the Nobel prize, William Nordhaus. 

The studies suggest that a 3 degree Celsius temperature increase by the end of the century — slightly pessimistic based on current trends — will have a global cost equivalent to between 1.9% and 3.1% of global GDP.

To put this into context, the United Nations estimates that by the end of the century, the average person will be 450% as rich as he or she is today. Because of climate change, they will feel “only” 435%-440% as rich as today. 

Why is this so different from the impression we have been given by the media?

Alarmist campaigners and credulous journalists fail to account for the simple fact that people are remarkably adaptable and tackle most climate problems at low cost.

Take food: Climate campaigners warn we’ll starve, but research shows that instead of a 51% increase in food availability by 2100 if there were no climate change, we are on-track for “only” a 49% increase.

Or weather disasters: They killed half a million people annually in the 1920s, whereas the last decade saw fewer than 9,000 fatalities each year.

The 97.5% reduction in mortality is because people are more resilient, because they’re richer and can access better technology. 

Extremist climate campaigners and far-left politicians reveal their true colors when they push for “de-growth” to cut emissions.

Making people worse off and reversing gains against extreme poverty would be a tragic mistake, making it harder to address all our other problems.

Moreover, it is laughable to envision that the West’s strategic adversaries like Vladimir Putin will embrace a similar approach. 

More responsible politicians “only” want to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. But this approach still means slowing growth in the name of climate change, by forcing businesses and individuals to use less-efficient green energy instead of fossil fuels.

The total costs would be enormous, $15 trillion to $37 trillion each year throughout the century, equivalent to 15%-37% of global GDP today. 

Given wealthier OECD countries will foot most of this bill, the price-tag will be the equivalent to each person in the better off nations paying north of $10,000 every year.

The real cost of inefficient climate policy is that it distracts resources and attention from other priorities.

Europe offers an abject lesson. Twenty-five years ago, the European Union proclaimed that with massive investments in R&D throughout the economy, it would become “the most competitive and the most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world.”

It abjectly failed: Innovation spending hardly budged and the EU is now far behind the US, South Korea, and even China.

Instead, the EU switched focus and with a near-myopic climate obsession opted for a “sustainable” economy over a sound one.

The EU’s decision to increase its 2030 emission reduction targets was pure virtue signaling.

The cost is likely to top several trillion Euros, yet the entire effort will merely reduce temperatures by the end of the century by a trivial 0.008-degrees Fahrenheit. 

Not focusing on innovation has stunted Europe. The Euro area has seen anemic annual growth over the past decade of just over 1% per person.

For the two trillion euros it has spent on symbolic climate policy, the EU could have lived up to its own innovation spending targets for two decades.

Investment in innovation could have made the EU and the world €60 trillion richer in the long run, generating 500 times more benefits than its symbolic climate policy benefits.

Crucially, it would have allowed the EU more leeway to tackle other key challenges like pensions, education, health care, and defense.

The rest of the world needs to pay heed to Europe’s example, and stop wasting money on bad climate policies. 

Bjorn Lomborg is President of the Copenhagen Consensus, Visiting Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, and author of “False Alarm” and “Best Things First.”



This story originally appeared on NYPost

2 FTSE 100 growth shares that could be about to soar!

0


Image source: Getty Images

Looking for the best FTSE 100 growth shares to buy? Here are two I think could rebound this year after a tough 2024, and are worth consideration.

Persimmon

Housebuilder Persimmon (LSE:PSN) started the New Year on the back foot. But it’s picking up momentum thanks to a stream of positive data from the housing market.

I think this could continue if a (likely) fall in interest rates ignites strong pent-up demand in the UK.

Fresh commentary today (20 January) from Rightmove affirmed the underlying strength of the housing market right now. It showed property prices up 1.7% in January, representing the biggest jump in prices at the start of the year since 2020.

For the full year, Rightmove predicts a 4% increase in property prices, and an increase in total sales, to 1.15m.

This follows a perky trading update from Persimmon itself last month. Then, the builder said that “customer enquiries and sales rates have been consistently ahead of the prior year since the spring selling season“. It also said forward sales were up 8% year on year, at £1.1bn.

The housebuilders aren’t completely out of the woods. There’s no guarantee that interest rates will drop, hampering an ongoing recovery in homebuyer affordability. Cost inflation is also a danger to these companies’ profits.

But on balance, I think Persimmon, for one, is in good shape to recovery strongly from this year on. City analysts agree with me, and are tipping earnings growth of 16% in 2025 and 20% in 2026.

I don’t think the FTSE firm’s low valuation reflects this bright outlook. Its price-to-earnings growth (PEG) ratio, at 0.8, sits below the benchmark of one that implies a stock is undervalued. This leaves further scope for a share price rebound, in my view.

Ashtead Group

Like Persimmon, Ashtead (LSE:AHT) is highly sensitive to interest rates and their impact on property markets. In fact, the impact has been worse than anticipated, with the business publishing another profit warning in December.

Back then it slashed its full-year sales growth target, to between 3% and 5%, from 5%-8% previously.

The rental equipment supplier also faces uncertainty as US President Trump flouts the idea of new trade tariffs that could cool the domestic economy. Ashtead makes almost nine-tenths of sales from the US.

Yet, as for the housebuilder, I believe things are generally looking up for Ashtead as central banks respond to falling inflation. It’s why City analysts are tipping earnings growth of 14% for both the financial years to April 2026 and 2027. A 5% drop is predicted for the current fiscal period.

There are also significant growth opportunities for the FTSE 100 company to exploit in the coming years. One of these is a substantial jump in the number of so-called mega infrastructure projects slated for the next few years.

Ashtead puts the total value of these at $974bn between financial 2025 and 2027. That’s up significantly from the $509bn between 2022 and 2024.

Through its ambitious expansion strategy, Ashtead is positioning itself to better take advantage of this upswing, too, as well as the eventual recovery in local construction markets. I expect its share price to rebound strongly over the next couple of years.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Panda Express Chow Mein Copycat Recipe

0


This website may contain affiliate links and advertising so that we can provide recipes to you. Read my disclosure policy.

This copycat Panda Express chow mein recipe is better than what you get at the restaurant. It combines tender noodles, sweet onions, and crisp cabbage tossed in a wonderful umami sauce. The best part is, it’s ready in 30 minutes!

Overhead shot of Panda Express chow mein in a pan with two wooden serving spoons. Overhead shot of Panda Express chow mein in a pan with two wooden serving spoons.

Reasons You’ll Love This Recipe

  • Budget Friendly: Taking your family out to eat keeps getting more expensive! The ingredients in this recipe won’t break the bank, and you can feed way more people than what you get from the restaurant.
  • Customizable: You can adjust the recipe to suit your taste preferences. Add more veggies, a protein, or even more or less seasonings.
  • Family Meal: Gather your family and make a fun Asian-inspired meal with this chow mein. Pair it with my Panda Express copycat Beijing beef and honey walnut shrimp, with crispy air fryer egg rolls for a complete meal.

Healthier Copycat Recipe

I don’t know about you, but my kids LOVE going out to eat! Don’t get me wrong, I do as well. With everything getting so expensive, I wanted to make this simple copycat recipe at home. It not only saves me time and money, but I know exactly what I am feeding my kids and can make healthier choices for them.

Ingredients for Panda Express Chow Mein

How to Make Panda Express Chow Mein

This copycat recipe is simple, uses only a few ingredients, and is ready in 30 minutes. You will love how the simple flavors combine to make something so delicious. My kids love Panda Express, and I love making this instead of spending the money to get takeout!

  1. Noodles: Cook the chow mein noodles according to the package directions. Drain the noodles and set them aside.
  2. Cook: Heat the vegetable oil in a wok or skillet. Add the onion and cabbage, and cook the vegetables, stirring occasionally, until tender -about 5 minutes.
  3. Whisk: In a small bowl, whisk together the garlic, ginger, soy sauce, hoisin sauce, and salt and pepper to taste.
  4. Stir: Add the noodles to the skillet, then pour the sauce over the noodles and vegetables. Toss and stir to coat everything in the sauce. Cook for a few minutes, remove from heat, and serve fresh!

Chow Mein Tips and Variations

I had to try this recipe a couple of times to get it right. I noted down a few tips and variations for you to adjust to make it how you like.

  • Get your veggies in! Panda Express chow mein is pretty simple. You can add more vegetables and/or protein to it and serve it as the main dish. Try carrots, broccoli, peas, water chestnuts, chicken, pork or beef.
  • Can I switch up the noodles? You can use regular spaghetti noodles, udon, or yakisoba noodles. Or any kind of stir-fry friendly noodle instead of the chow mein. 
  • Seasoning Packets: If the only chow mein noodles you can find are the kind that comes with seasoning in an individual package, leave out the packet and just use the noodles.  

Overhead shot of a bowl of Panda Express low mein with chopsticks. Overhead shot of a bowl of Panda Express low mein with chopsticks.

How to Store Panda Express Chow Mein

I love making a big batch of these delicious noodles. My kids enjoy heating them up after school.

  • Fridge: Store chow mein leftovers in the fridge in an airtight container for up to 4 days. 
  • Freezer: This can be stored in the freezer for up to 2 months. When you are ready to eat, let thaw in the fridge and reheat in the microwave.

Side shot of chopsticks pulling up a large bite of panda express low mein noodles from a bowl. Side shot of chopsticks pulling up a large bite of panda express low mein noodles from a bowl.

More Asian-Inspired Noodle Dishes

Pin this now to find it later

Pin It

  • Cook the 6 ounces chow mein noodles according to the package directions. Drain the noodles and set them aside.

  • Heat the 2 tablespoons vegetable oil in a skillet, add the 1 cup thinly sliced onion, and 2 ½ cups sliced green cabbage,and cook the vegetables, stirring occasionally, until tender -about 5 minutes.

  • In a small bowl whisk together the 1 tablespoon minced garlic, 1 teaspoon ginger paste, 3 tablespoons soy sauce, 2 tablespoons hoisin sauce, and Salt and pepper to taste.

  • Add the noodles to the skillet, pour the sauce over the noodles and vegetables, and stir to coat everything in sauce.

  • Cook for a few minutes, remove from heat, and serve fresh!

Calories: 268kcalCarbohydrates: 41gProtein: 9gFat: 8gSaturated Fat: 1gPolyunsaturated Fat: 4gMonounsaturated Fat: 2gTrans Fat: 0.04gCholesterol: 0.2mgSodium: 1160mgPotassium: 179mgFiber: 4gSugar: 6gVitamin A: 44IUVitamin C: 20mgCalcium: 36mgIron: 2mg

Nutrition information is automatically calculated, so should only be used as an approximation.




This story originally appeared on TheRecipeCritic

Up 23% today! Has the death of this FTSE stock been greatly exaggerated?

0


Image source: Getty Images

By lunchtime today (20 January), Reach (LSE:RCH) was the third-best-performing stock on the FTSE.

Its rise of 23% followed the release of a positive (but brief) trading update, which said that the news publisher now expects to “deliver results ahead of current market expectations for the full year”.

A better headline

This is welcome news for longstanding shareholders who’ve seen the company’s share price decline by 27% since January 2020.

Worse, the stock market valuation of the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Daily Express and Daily Star has fallen 77%, since its September 2021 peak.

So perhaps today’s announcement is evidence that reports of the death of the newspaper industry are something of an exaggeration.

But Piers Morgan, who used to edit the Daily Mirror, doesn’t think so.

He recently bought his ‘Uncensored’ YouTube channel from Rupert Murdoch and says the future of news is going to be online. Morgan believes print and traditional broadcast media are in terminal decline. He recently told the Financial Times: “Linear network stuff is just dead now. It’ll take a while to die, but it’s dead … in 10 years’ time none of them will exist.”

An apparently attractive valuation

However, on paper, the shares of Reach do look cheap.

Prior to today’s market update, analysts were expecting 2024 earnings per share of 22.3p, meaning the stock was trading on a forward multiple of 3.2. Following today’s update, its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio has crept above four. But this is still remarkably cheap by historical standards.

The stock also appears to offer good value using an assets-based approach. Its market cap is 55% lower than its book value. Having said that, over two-thirds of its assets are accounted for by an internal valuation of its 120 newspaper titles. Without approaching potential buyers, it’s difficult to know whether this is accurate or not.

Even so, income investors might be tempted to consider taking a position.

Since June 2022, Reach has kept its interim and final dividends unchanged. If this continues, it’ll pay 7.34p a share in respect of its 2024 financial year. This implies an attractive forward yield of 8.1%.

Not for me

However, despite these positives, I don’t want to invest.

The group’s improved financial performance only came in the last quarter of 2024. As the saying goes, one swallow doesn’t make a summer.

I also agree with Piers Morgan about the long-term decline of newspapers, which can be seen in Reach’s results. During the six months ended 30 June 2024, print revenues fell by 6.1%, compared to the same period in 2023.

However, digital sales were also lower (1.3%). And the latter only contributed 22% to total revenue — the group’s still heavily reliant on traditional news consumption.

In my opinion, despite the group doing well during its last quarter, I think it faces some challenges that it’ll struggle to overcome. I don’t think younger people place as high a value on traditional news as the newspaper-reading generations before them, which means putting journalism behind a paywall isn’t going to be as profitable.

And this probably explains why the shares appear cheap. Instead of seeing this as a buying opportunity, I believe this is a warning sign that other investors don’t see a ‘good news’ growth story. Therefore, I don’t want to buy.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Abby Champion Shines in Tommy Hilfiger Denim Spring 2025 Ad

0


Abby Champion poses in Tommy Hilfiger Denim’s spring-summer 2025 campaign. Photo: Tommy Hilfiger

Tommy Hilfiger Denim’s spring 2025 collection takes center stage, with Abby Champion leading a campaign that exudes simplicity. The stark studio backdrop places full focus on the collection’s effortless designs, highlighting button-up denim shirts, relaxed jeans, and branded details.

Tommy Hilfiger Denim Spring 2025 Campaign

Tommy Hilfiger spotlights denim and underwear styles for spring 2025.
Tommy Hilfiger spotlights denim and underwear styles for spring 2025. Photo: Tommy Hilfiger

The clean lighting heightens every texture, from the structured fabric of the shirts to the refined washes on the jeans, offering a timeless appeal.

Abby Champion for Tommy Hilfiger Denim spring-summer 2025 campaign.
Abby Champion for Tommy Hilfiger Denim spring-summer 2025 campaign. Photo: Tommy Hilfiger

Champion, who also appeared in last fall’s campaign, brings a relatable energy to the collection. In a statement, she shares her love for denim, noting how its versatility and ease make it a cornerstone of her personal style.

Tommy Hilfiger Denim spring-summer 2025 collection.
Tommy Hilfiger Denim spring-summer 2025 collection. Photo: Tommy Hilfiger

Abby appreciates how each piece in the collection allows her to mix and match while still feeling confident and true to herself. From tailored fits to more relaxed styles, the spring 2025 collection reimagines classic denim staples with modern proportions.



This story originally appeared on FashionGoneRogue