Sunday, July 13, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 1691

10 Batman Movie Decisions That Aged Way Better Than Any Of Us Expected

0


The many Batman movies have all had their fare share of controversy, but many of their initially unpopular decisions have aged like a fine wine. Batman is a character that gets a lot of scrutiny with his adaptations from fans, being so beloved as to inspire strong opinions on every errant detail. While some aspects of Batman movies have aged poorly, a wide variety of cinematic choices for the character that were initially deemed unpopular were more than vindicated by the passage of time.

Many announced Batman movie choices fans were initially unsure of have to do with the casting of Gotham’s various important players, not just the live-action Batmen themselves, but his roster of villains, as well. Other choices regarding the story, tone, or set dressing of the various Batman films also have come under scrutiny at first, only to justify themselves as venerated classics in due time. For the most part, Batman audiences are better off trusting filmmakers when they unveil a bold new direction to take Batman in.

10

Casting Robert Pattinson As Batman

The Batman

The first of the three live-action Batmen who got the most negative press upon their casting announcement, Robert Pattinson wasn’t a surefire hit for many dedicated fans. Pattinson is still best-known as Edward Cullen in the hilariously bad Twilight movies to most, a series that’s nothing short of pure anathema for long-time Batman lovers. As a result, many were unsure that he had what it takes to once again lead a franchise as a brooding protagonist, especially one as important to so many people as Batman.

What Robert Pattinson’s detractors failed to realize was his excellence in more recent movies outside of Twilight‘s shadow, like The Lighthouse or Tenet. In these films, Pattinson exemplified how his physicality, ability to tackle tortured characters, and sheer range of emotion would lend itself excellently to Batman and Bruce Wayne. Sure enough, by the time The Batman was released, Pattinson was able to win over even the most vocal skeptics with his atmospheric performance.

9

Making The LEGO Batman Movie

The LEGO Batman Movie

Batman in The Lego Batman Movie

Will Arnett’s Batman was one of the most charming parts of The LEGO Movie, using a growly Christian Bale impersonation to poke fun at the overly-tragic character while re-imagining him into a sort of apex frat bro. Despite how funny he was, the announcement that Batman would be getting his own focused LEGO film wasn’t fondly received by many Batman movie completionists, who had long grown unused to the idea that Batman could be comedic. Extracting a whole plot out of Arnett’s one-note version of the character also seemed to be a Herculean task.

However, The LEGO Batman Movie is quietly one of the best Batman movies in general, let alone among his more humorous incarnations. Despite Batman’s immaturity and oafishness in the film, the story actually has quite a strong emotional core about opening up to new people. For those that gave it a chance, The LEGO Batman Movie was a pleasant surprise worthy of the Batman IP.

8

Making Batman Begins An Origin Story

Batman Begins

Christian Bale as Batman gliding in Batman Begins

By the time it was Christopher Nolan’s turn to helm a Batman franchise, the character had been through the ringer. After being recast twice in the span of the same quadrilogy, which rapidly eroded the tone of the films from a serious, gloomy melodrama to a campy toy-selling machine, Batman’s public image was in dire straights. That’s not even to mention the multiple canceled Batman films leading up to Nolan’s The Dark Knight trilogy, which further cast doubt as to whether Batman could ever dominate theaters again.

With all that being the case, Nolan’s announcement that Batman Begins would be an origin story focused on Bruce’s early days fighting crime and the training he received to transform himself into a one-man army was met with hesitance. Batman’s origin had already been explored via flashback in 1989’s Batman, and audiences were unsure that a concept could carry a whole film. Luckily, Batman Begins ended up being just the thing the franchise needed to wipe the slate clean and start over with an excelent serious Batman story.

7

Casting Ben Affleck As Batman

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Ben Affleck as Batman looking moody
Custom image by Milica Djordjevic

The entirety of the DCEU was rife with controversy, and Batman’s place in it was no exception. The closest thing Batman ever got to a solo movie in the entire universe, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice made waves when it was announced that Ben Affleck would be playing the Caped Crusader. Affleck’s previous attempt at portraying a cowl-wearing vigilante in 2003’s Daredevil had some disastrous results, and even the most loyal Snyder apologists were worried that Affleck would once again fumble an iconic superhero character.

Shockingly, Ben Affleck truly stepped up to the role of Batman throughout the DCEU. It’s easy to tell through his performance that he has a deep respect and admiration for the character, injecting an amount of passion into his film appearances that simply wasn’t present in Daredevil. Affleck still might not be many people’s favorite Batman, but he deserves kudos as a solid live-action interpretation of the beloved hero.

6

Casting Heath Ledger As The Joker

The Dark Knight

Heath Ledger's Joker pulling a string in The Dark Knight

To this day, The Dark Knight remains the best Batman movie for many people, thanks largely to Heath Ledger’s brilliant interpretation of The Joker. From his chilling, insidious laugh to his genuinely funny sense of humor, Ledger forever changed the character with his haunting performance. It may be difficult to imagine, but there was a time when Heath Ledger’s casting was not only looked upon with unfavorability, but downright outrage.

At the time, Heath Ledger was best known for his tender acting in Brokeback Mountain, an LGBTQ Western romance film that carried a far different set of tones and expectations compared to a Batman movie. Most fans didn’t think Ledger had it in him to pull off such a famous villain, and the first glimpses at his ratty green hair and smeared makeup didn’t convince skeptics any better. Of course, actually seeing him in action is a much different story, and instantly converted nonbelievers into how amazing of a casting decision Ledger’s Joker truly was.

5

Casting Michael Keaton As Batman

Batman (1989)

michael keaton in ball as batman

Heath Ledger was far from the first Batman movie casting choice to be met with forgotten criticism upon announcement back in the day. Going even further back to the late 80s, the transformation of Batman from a campy pun-spewing hero to a brooding force of vengeance seemed to be hampered by the casting of Micheal Keaton as The Dark Knight himself. At the time, Keaton was best known for comedies like Beetlejuice, Mr. Mom, and Touch and Go.

Knowing that Tim Burton was trying to bring Batman back to his comic roots with a more serious movie portrayal, the concept of a mostly comedic actor wearing the cape and cowl didn’t sit well with dedicated fans. However, Micheal Keaton was able to prove his acting range with Batman, balancing both a stoic performance as Batman himself and a smooth billionaire playboy as Bruce Wayne. Even if he does have moments of levity, Keaton does a great job keeping things serious throughout his three movie appearances as Batman.

4

Making Pattinson’s Batmobile A Car Again

The Batman

the batman batmobile chase

The evolution of the Batmobile in movies is quite the interesting lineage to follow. First appearing as a funky sports car in Adam West’s Batman series, the famous vehicle slowly became more militaristic, utilitarian, and tank-like as time went on, culminating in the Tumbler of The Dark Knight trilogy fame and Ben Affleck’s jet fighter on wheels in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. By the time first images of Robert Pattinson’s Batmobile were shown off, some fans who had gotten used to these designs expressed critcism.

Pattinson’s Batmobile is more of a traditional muscle car with some added jet engine power haphazardly welded to the back, not impressing a vocal minority of tank Batmobile aficionados. However, these qualms were made irrelevant by the fact that Pattinson’s Batmobile is behind one of The Batman‘s best scenes, the highway chase with Penguin. Growling with a furious vengeance, the Batmobile is almost its own character in the film, looming in the distance like a horror movie monster and screeching with power Batman barely has a handle on.

3

The Addition Of Rachel To The Dark Knight Trilogy

Batman Begins

Rachel Dawes in court in The Dark Knight

In his adaptation of the Batman mythos, Christopher Nolan wasn’t afraid to make some big changes in order to suit his own desires and unique brand of storytelling. Part of this authorship meant the introduction of several original characters into Gotham City’s streets, most importantly, Rachel Dawes. Considering that Batman already has so many important love interests to pull from in the comics, including Vicki Vale, Catwoman, and Talia al Ghul, the need for a wholly original civilian romance option rubbed some prospective audiences the wrong way.

However, Rachel soon became almost a ubiquitous name in the Batman mythos thanks to Nolan’s Batman universe. Katie Holmes does a decent enough job in Batman Begins, but recasting Rachel with Maggie Gyllenhaal in The Dark Knight truly allowed the character to shine. Rachel is great for not only giving Batman a motivation and a stronger link to Bruce Wayne’s world, but for acting as a boots-on-the-ground perspective on Gotham’s war on crime from the legal side of things.

2

Drowning Colin Farrell In Prosthetics To Become The Penguin

The Batman

Oz/The Penguin (Colin Farrell) with tears in his eyes after strangling Victor in The Penguin Season 1 Ep 8

The Joker isn’t the only Batman villain to have had some controversial casting choices. Initially, Colin Farrell seemed to be an utterly bizarre choice for the role of The Penguin, being an Irish actor known for meditative dramas like In Bruges and The Lobster more so than superhero blockbusters. In fact, his previous attempt at a cinematic comic book villain as Bullseye in Daredevil was one of the most laughably strange superhero movie choices ever. All that besides, Farell isn’t exactly an obvious fit for The Penguin physically.

It’s truly a testament to Farrell’s acting ability that he’s able to disappear into the prosthetics of Oz Cobb so swimmingly. His thick New York accent and bombastic personality as The Penguin works wonders in Matt Reeves’ The Batman universe, convincing audiences enough not only to enjoy him in The Batman, but in his own solo dedicated spin-off show as well. Few actors working today vanish into a role as completely as Colin Farrell does with The Penguin.

1

Batman Being Older In The DCEU

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Split image of Ben Affleck as DCEU Batman
Image By Zoe Miskelly

A consequence of Ben Affleck being cast as Batman was the fact that the decision would leave the character as the oldest cinematic interpretation of Bruce Wayne yet. When he was cast in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Ben Affleck was already 43 years old, over a full 10 years older than Henry Cavill. This was another talking point brought up against Affleck when his casting was announced, with some fans unsure as to how an older Batman would realistically keep up with The Man of Steel.

However, an older, wiser, grizzled veteran Batman ended up being just what the movies of the DCEU needed to string themselves together. After so many origin stories and fresh starts, it was great to see an experienced Batman that had already been made somewhat cynical by many years of superhero work, and Affleck worked well as a mentor-type character to heroes like The Flash. It’s hard to say if cinema will ever see a middle-aged Batman ever again, making the choice only age better as time marches on.

Upcoming DC Movie Releases



This story originally appeared on Screenrant

Thunder say Chet Holmgren to be reevaluated in 3-5 weeks

0


The Oklahoma City Thunder said Friday that Chet Holmgren continues to make progress in his recovery from a pelvic fracture and will be reevaluated in three to five weeks.

Holmgren was hurt Nov. 10 after he took a hard fall when he went to challenge an Andrew Wiggins drive midway through the first quarter of a 127-116 home loss to the Golden State Warriors.

The team diagnosed him with what it said was a right iliac wing fracture and did not provide a timetable for his return at the time, only saying he’d be reevaluated in eight to 10 weeks.

Through his first nine games, he had averaged 18.2 points, 9.2 rebounds and 2.9 blocks. The No. 2 pick in the 2022 NBA draft, Holmgren missed the first NBA season after he was drafted because of a Lisfranc injury. He played all 82 games last season.

The Thunder (34-6), tied with Cleveland for the NBA’s best record entering Friday’s games, haven’t missed a beat without Holmgren this season, earning a lopsided victory over the Cavaliers on Thursday.



This story originally appeared on ESPN

Daniel Hillier leads Dubai Desert Classic with Rory McIlroy 7 shots back

0


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Daniel Hillier birdied the final two holes to shoot 2-under 70 on Saturday and take a one-stroke lead into the final round of the Dubai Desert Classic as the No. 223-ranked New Zealander goes for the biggest win of his career.

Tyrrell Hatton shot 68 in the third round and was the closest challenger to the 26-year-old Hillier, whose only win on the European tour came at the British Masters in July 2023. He hasn’t had a top-10 finish since the Open de España in October 2023.

Hillier was 13-under par for the week.

“It would be life-changing,” Hillier said.

“Last year was pretty tough. It was a bit of a grind. I was getting pretty frustrated with myself towards the end of the year. Gave myself a little bit of a break and time to reset, and I’m feeling refreshed. Yeah, excited for tomorrow.”

Rory McIlroy, seeking a third straight title at the prestigious tournament, was seven shots off the pace in a tie for 12th place after a round of 69. He was 1 over after the front nine, having failed to make a single birdie.

“I’d need to go out and shoot 63 tomorrow,” the No. 3-ranked McIlroy said. “If the conditions are right, I’ve been able to do that before, especially if you can make a score on the front nine before that scorable back nine.

“My key tomorrow is if I can get off to a faster start and shoot three or four (under) on the front, then I have a chance.”

Ewen Ferguson of Scotland led after the second round but could only shoot 74 to drop to third place on 10 under, three strokes behind Hillier.

Hatton, who plays on the LIV Golf circuit, looks to be the biggest threat to Hillier. The seven-time winner of a European tour title rolled in an 8-foot putt for eagle at No. 2 and then recovered from three bogeys in a six-hole span to close the front nine with four birdies and five pars coming home.

“I remember as a kid waking up early in the morning on Thursday and Friday and being excited to watch the Desert Classic,” the 17th-ranked Hatton said. “It’s an iconic event on the DP World Tour, and I think it’s certainly one of those events that you could probably ask any player out here, and it’s one that they would love to have on their CV.”



This story originally appeared on ESPN

Netflix’s ‘Maria’ and Angelina Jolie get Maria Callas all wrong

0


Here we go again.

In Hollywood’s ongoing cheerless attempts to contest the joy of music by cutting stellar classical musicians down to size, “Maria” joins the curt parade of “Tár” and “Maestro.” The new biopic of Maria Callas follows the takedowns of fictional conductor Lydia Tár and larger-than-life Leonard Bernstein with a dramatization of the most compelling singer I’ve ever encountered — live, on recording, on video anywhere. (I’m hardly alone in this estimation.) All three films have this in common: Over-the-top musicians are tragically brought down by their own hubris and turn monstrous. Each is a victim of her or his celebrity — something celebrity-incubating Hollywood happens to be pretty good at.

“Maria,” which began streaming on Netflix this week, focuses on Callas’ reclusive last years when she was, if you care to believe this account, pitifully self-destructive. She had lost her voice and her lover, and she had nothing to live for. She could not recapture the mythic La Callas nor make peace with the woman, Maria. It’s an ignominious tale of woe and quixotic temperament.

The gloomy film begins and ends with Callas’ solitary death. In typical flashback fashion, we witness her decline and delusions as she tries to recapture her voice, the attentions of Aristotle Onassis and the adoration of the public. Flashbacks mix in bits and pieces of documentary footage, glimpsing a few highlights of her life.

Throughout, the improbable Angelina Jolie captures Callas’ style in her dress, her public manner and her movements. She sports to glossy perfection sensational ’50s and ’60s hairdos. She’d make a great plastic doll of Callas.

The real Callas was striking in a different way. Her face didn’t have Jolie’s spectacularly exact proportions. In fact, Callas made herself out of what she considered to be an ugly duckling. When she first appeared onstage in the late 1940s, she immediately demonstrated a voice to be reckoned with and a fervent vocal theatricality. But she was a large woman and said to be somewhat awkward onstage. Director Franco Zeffirelli described her as big in every way — big eyes, big nose, big mouth, big body — and compared her to the Statue of Liberty.

Seeing the 1953 film “Roman Holiday” made Callas determined to look like its diminutive star, Audrey Hepburn. Callas lost 80 pounds in a single year. She had already been working with great directors, especially Luchino Visconti, but now she had the physical means to go much further and invent the modern concept of opera as drama. Her voice had lost some of its sheen, and those who disliked her blamed the weight loss, which wasn’t the case. It was, instead, her compulsion to put all of her being into a raging theatrical intensity.

On the surface, Callas had become an icon of elegance, but now she could make her big eyes, big mouth and big voice penetrate like nothing anyone in opera had ever experienced. She transformed not just herself but the art form.

Callas’ career in opera lasted less than two decades and was over by 1965. She was only 42 when she sang her last staged opera performance, a production of “Tosca” at Covent Garden in London. People came up with all kinds of reasons why her voice went so early. Only after her death 12 years later did we learn that she suffered from dermatomyositis, which causes muscle weakness that can affect the vocal cords and likely also led to her heart failure at age 53.

Jolie’s voice has been slightly mixed with Callas’ in such a way that it ever so slightly sanitizes Callas’. Jolie’s speaking voice sounds almost like Callas’ but without the hint of Callas’ New York accent. She lacks, crucially, Callas’ disarming smile. None of this might matter so much had director Pablo Larraín concentrated less on supplying glamour shots of Jolie.

The film is called “Maria” for a reason. Callas’ was, indeed, a life of conflicts between the artist who grandly became La Callas and the woman who was Maria. But you need to understand both. She undoubtedly stopped singing because of her physical condition. Still, her greatness gave her a remarkable capacity for transcending biology. Yet her need to become more of the woman she wanted to be drove her obsession with the ultimately toxic Onassis.

I saw just how exceptional the transcendent part of this complex equation could be in her 1974 ill-fated comeback tour with tenor Giuseppe di Stefano. A graduate student at the time, I had a top balcony seat at War Memorial Opera House in San Francisco. The acoustics are best up there, and I bought a pair of opera glasses just to see her.

She sounded pretty bad. The voice was gone. But not the intensity, not the presence. This became, in fact, some of the greatest singing I’ve ever encountered. She seemed at the same time superhuman and a super-suffering human. You cannot possibly experience the wizardry of Callas and the music becoming one on the awful underground recordings of the concert found on YouTube and elsewhere.

Better to watch Pier Paolo Pasolini’s 1969 film “Medea,” in which Callas stars in a purely acting role. Like Larraín with Jolie, Pasolini was fascinated by Callas’ face, particularly her nose. He scrutinizes her expressivity, its extraordinary power. She no longer needs opera, it’s inside her. Pasolini uses music as though he were filming a Noh play but with masks off. The fact that this film has so little regard in the opera world and even among Callas fanciers demonstrates how, if you pay close enough attention, she remains ahead of her time.

Her radical sophistication and courage were in further evidence in 1974 when she addressed a Verdi musicology conference in Chicago. She appeared dignified, eloquent, unsentimental and downright revolutionary. She had no need to waste her time with musicologists and their talk of neglected early Verdi masterpieces. Knowing what mattered and what didn’t, she suggested that they take the best bits from those operas and make something modern and meaningful. She also blamed Puccini for making singers and audiences lazy, because he wasn’t challenging enough.

A year later, Onassis died, which is said to have caused Callas to lose interest in life. He had left Callas, whom he never married, to wed Jacqueline Kennedy, but the flame burned in Callas to the end. Her last two years were obviously very difficult, what with drugs, depression and dermatomyositis, all of which come across as tawdry in “Maria.” I wonder whether she became a recluse in part because patients suffering from dermatomyositis are supposed to stay out of sunlight. Her body was failing her.

A more affectionate and fanciful portrait of Callas in those years is the basis of Zeffirelli’s 2002 biopic, “Callas Forever” starring Fanny Ardant, with Jeremy Irons as her agent. Zeffirelli had worked with Callas and knew her well. To best understand Callas, turn to Tony Palmer’s 2007 documentary “Callas,” in which Zeffirelli is particularly illuminating.

All the adoration, the glamour, the high life was, for Callas, a purposeful life of bread and roses. Rather, her art had always been the way she boldly filled such emptiness with incredible meaning. “Maria,” on the other hand, offers little more than pathos and poses.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Katy Perry Reflects on Attending Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour

0


Katy Perry couldn’t be more thrilled about her experience attending Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, which she caught during a brief trip to Sydney in February 2024.

In a new interview, the 40-year-old pop star shared her excitement about being part of the historic stadium tour and her emotional reunion with Swift.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

“I actually went and did a show in Australia very quickly and I had one day off before the show and I was like, ‘Hey girl, I’m gonna come to the show,’” Perry revealed in a TikTok video shared by U.K. radio station Capital on Friday (Jan. 17).

“And [Swift] was so excited and I was so excited,” the “Dark Horse” singer added, showing a photo of the two stars embracing at the show.

Perry also took a moment to praise the fans at Sydney’s Accor Stadium, describing them as “an adorable, sweet community.” She fondly remembered exchanging friendship bracelets with some of the Swifties in attendance, with some even gifting her their handmade creations.

“I was so excited. People gave me bracelets, and I think Rita Ora gave me a bracelet. I loved it. It’s just like a big community,” she told Capital.

Beyond the concert, Perry and Swift had a chance to catch up, with Perry expressing her deep affection for the singer. “I love her so much,” Perry said.

After attending Swift’s Eras show in 2024, Perry also shared several photos and videos from the concert on Instagram, including a joyful backstage selfie with Swift.

Swift’s Eras Tour, which grossed $2 billion, concluded in December 2024 after an extensive run across the globe. The tour marked an incredible year for Swift, which also saw her win 10 Billboard Music Awards in December, including the coveted Top Artist honor.

Perry’s comments come after the two pop stars mended their relationship following a highly publicized feud. The pair reconciled in 2018, and a year later, Perry made a memorable cameo in Swift’s music video for “You Need to Calm Down,” where they appeared together in matching hamburger and French fry costumes.

Perry has also expressed gratitude for how their friendship evolved. In a 2020 interview with Howard Stern, the singer said, “What I’m so grateful for is we did get to make up publicly and got to be an example of redemption for young girls.” Perry added, “I always wanted the best for her and now we can talk about the best we want for each other.”




This story originally appeared on Billboard

Renée Zellweger Goes for Super Short Hair on British Vogue Cover

0


Not many celebrities can rock a pixie haircut with as much finesse and grace as Renée Zellweger. The actor recently debuted a dramatic hair transformation in her appearance as British Vogue‘s February 2025 cover star. Not only did she effortlessly pull off the bob style, but she also modeled various suits that blended concepts of power and androgyny elegantly. For the cover story, Zellweger spoke about reprising her career-defining role of “Great British Everywoman Bridget Jones” in the movie “Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy.”

Renée Zellweger pulls off short hair in British Vogue photos

Marking her fourth run as Bridge Jones in the 2025 film “Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy,” Renée Zellweger is subverting stereotypical notions of femininity in her recent British Vogue cover. The actor debuted a dramatic pixie haircut for the photos alongside interesting outfits. For the interview, she engaged in all things fun with co-star Hugh Grant, where the duo reflected on their shared memories.

In the cover photo titled “Mad About Renée, by Hugh Grant,” the actor radiates a glow that is both graceful and charming. Hairstylist Syd Hayes styled Renée Zellweger’s slicked-back pixie haircut, which marked a significant departure from her usual style. Hayes shared that the star was open to experimenting with the new hair and that “she believed in it.” Furthermore, the hairstyle was also reflective of the actor as a person rather than her character, Bridget Jones.

In one photo, Zellweger stood in front of a grey backdrop wearing a Giorgio Armani suit, which she paired with Charvet’s polka-dot print scarf. In another, she sat on a stool in a crisp pink Prada shirt. She styled it with brown trousers and a matching belt. 

The British Vogue cover story also depicted the star in black and white portraits. One of the photos captured Zellweger from behind, wearing a checked cotton coat by Bottega Veneta. In another, she posed stylishly, layering an oversized wool coat over a white tank top and trousers by Gucci. The actor further paired her outfit with Tiffany & Co. earrings. 

One of the most striking portraits was one where photographer Nikolai von Bismarck captured Renée Zellweger in different frames. The “Bridget Jones” star wore a twill cape coat over a wool trouser suit and cotton shirt by Saint Laurent. Other accessories included Christian Louboutin shoes and Laird Hatters’ hat. 

Meanwhile, the movie “Bridget Jones: Ma About the Boy,” will witness the reunion of Renée Zellweger and Hugh Grant. It will premiere on February 13 on Peacock. 

Originally reported by Varsha Narayanan on Mandatory.




This story originally appeared on Realitytea

Jennie Garth Reflects on Impact of ‘Beverly Hills 90210’ & What Made Show So Special

0


Jennie Garth has enjoyed connecting to fans on a deeper level through the iHeartPodcasts  “I Choose Me” and “90210MG” alongside her Beverly Hills 90210 bestie Tori Spelling. At the same time the actress, known to many as Kelly Taylor through the many iterations of the TV drama’s franchise, has also enjoyed making the nostalgic convention rounds. 

The star has built a brand and found inspiration in the character she played over the last few decades. Garth remains grateful to have continued to impact others whether it’s through acting or her other business endeavors. Here the 52-year-old chats about seeing her 90210 former castmates on the regular and wanting to see more of another old favorite. 

The popularity of 90210 remains strong. What do you think Beverly Hills, 90210 at its peak would be like in today’s social media world? I can imagine the buzz about Kelly’s love triangles and other big moments Donna Martin graduates. 

I feel like it was huge in the 1990s without social media. I can’t imagine the places it would go nowadays with social media. The ability to be a part of all these online communities and be so connected with our audience. That would have opened up a million great things. Also, it was cool to not have social media when we were doing that. There was something so special about watching the show and not knowing anything about us really. Being able to really invest into the show and storylines rather than invest into us as people. I think that was a gift. 

Beverly Hills 90210 cast reunite – Rebecca Gayheart, Ian Ziering, Tori Spelling, Jennie Garth, Jason Priestley at 90s Con (Nick Cinea, courtesy of Thats4Entertainment)

You’ve had a chance to reunite at these conventions. Have these events made you look at your career and things you’ve done differently? 

We love it as a cast to get to see each other and spend time together. That’s a great gift also. The conventions are very hard work to be honest. It’s very time-consuming and energy  draining. When you have person after person come to your booth, you want to give them your all and give them their moment. Their one moment to meet me and have that dream fulfilled. I know I and my fellow castmates take that very seriously. We’re so generous with our energy. 

At the same time it’s reciprocal because their energy revives something in me. I also think it’s inspiring. Hearing women my age, maybe a little younger or maybe a little older, say to me, “Oh my gosh, when I saw that episode where you had to choose between Brandon and Dylan. You said, “I choose me.” That was mind-blowing to me because I didn’t know at that age I could choose myself. Your character showed you can step out on your own and be strong and empowered.” That was part of the catalyst for me to get this brand and company going. At the core of all of it, the messaging of “I Choose Me.” That is impactful and meaningful for me. 

Jennie Garth - Beverly Hills, 90210

How would you describe the landscape of television today? Aging in Hollywood seems to be different than it was back then, especially when you see all these reboots like your past shows and now we’re hearing Melrose Place coming back. 

I think the nostalgia factor is huge. People love a time when there was no social media. They love the memories of the time they watch that show. Whether it was the 1990s or 1980s or whatever. The 2000s I even had What I Like About You. I think people need that and want that. It’s a comfort for them. I think it’s hard for me to say where the landscape is today. There are so many great TV shows streaming. From Nobody Wants This to Silo, which is fun. I’m watching a show with Richard Gere. It’s fun to be able to see them at this point. They are casting faces from the past and faces from the present day. They are doing such a great job bringing in actors who have been around for a while and seasoned and bring their own thing to these casts. I’m a consumer. I’m a fan of TV. I love good TV shows I’m excited about what is happening. 

Is there one role out there you want to step into if given the chance? 

I’m torn. I really like doing comedy like when I was on What I Like About You so much. I would love to do another sitcom. I also love drama. I would love to do something like The Burning Bed with Farrah Fawcett.  

Speaking of What I like About You. I’d love to see a What I Like About You re-watch podcast because you know? You don’t have enough on your plate. 

Yes! You know I would love to do a reboot of that show. 

 




This story originally appeared on TV Insider

Here’s how a stock market novice could start investing with under £1,000

0


Image source: Unilever plc

Does it take thousands of pounds to start investing in the stock market? No. In fact, it does not even take one thousand pounds.

Here is how someone who had not bought shares before could start investing with less this month.

Principles of good investment

Although it is possible to start investing with a few hundred pounds, that does not mean it is a good idea to plunge headlong into the stock market without understanding it.

In fact, that strikes me as a very bad idea – and a likely way to lose money. The point of investing is the opposite, trying to build not destroy wealth.

So I think it makes sense for the would-be investor to learn about how the stock market works and also some principles of good investing, like diversifying across different shares.

Setting up a share-dealing account

It would also be necessary to set up a way to invest, such as share-dealing account or Stocks and Shares ISA. With lots of different options, it is worth spending time to make the best choice for individual circumstances.

There can be a lag between starting this process and having cash put into the account available to invest, so it seems smart to do this even before choosing particular shares to buy.

How to invest on a limited budget

Having less than £1,000 to invest does mean that any beginner’s mistakes would hopefully be less costly than with £1k at stake.

But there are less attractive practical implications too. One is the potential for minimum fees to eat up a proportionately bigger amount of an ISA than if it had a larger sum (one reason why spending time finding the right ISA can be a good investment in itself).

Another is diversification. It is harder to spread, say, £800 across a range of shares than investing a larger amount. It is still possible though, and diversification is a sensible risk-reduction strategy for investors at all levels.

Erring towards simplicity, not complication

When people start investing they can make the mistake of trying to find little-known companies in the hope they become huge. I say “mistake” because, although that strategy can sometimes work, it can also be an abysmal failure.

My own approach is to start with a product I understand, like soap powder, and then look for a business that has a sustainable competitive advantage in that field. Unilever (LSE: ULVR) is an example, thanks to its strong portfolio of premium brands and proprietary technology (another is Reckitt).

I then consider the company’s balance sheet to see how healthy its debt position is. I also consider risks. Based on all this, I make a judgment about whether I would like to own a stake in the company.

If so, I decide what I think is a reasonable price and if the share costs more, it will go on my watchlist but not my shopping list.

While I like Unilever, its price-to-earnings ratio of 20 is higher than I would like, given risks such as ongoing uncertainty about whether spinning off its ice cream division will create or destroy value.

So I have no plans to buy the share. But the reason why illustrates my thought process when investing.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Inauguration Chair Steve Witkoff Under Fire for Terror Links after Forcing “Disastrous” Deal with Hamas on Israel | The Gateway Pundit

0


Baby Kfir has been kidnapped by Hamas for 468 days with his mother and brother.

Today is the second birthday of Baby Kfir Bibas, who has spent more than half of his life in Hamas captivity since the Oct. 7 Jihad massacre. The incoming Trump administration has put the Netanyahu government under pressure to reach a hostage deal that would free 2000 Hamas terrorists and killers and declare a “ceasefire” that will leave Hamas alive to commit more acts of unspeakable terror down the road. Especially the role of Trump Middle East negotiator Steve Witkoff and his ties to Hamas-supporting Qatar have come under scrutiny.

After seven hours of discussion, the Israeli cabinet today approved a deal to release around 2,000 terrorists, over 100 of whom are serving life sentences for mass murders, in exchange for 33 hostages living or dead. be released in first stage of deal. 24 ministers voted in favor of the deal, and 8 opposed, including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, as well as Minister of Diaspora Affairs Amichai Chikli and MK David Amsalem from Netanyahu’s Likud Party. The deal will take effect on Sunday, Arutz  Sheva reported.

Josh Waller of The Israel Guys called the Hostage Deal “disastrous” and a “sinister scheme going on behind the scenes”.

“33 out of 98 hostages are being released, but that means there are still a lot of hostages being held”, said Rabbi Jeremy Gimpel, host of “Israel Inspired” podcast, on Josh’s show. “After all we fought since Oct. 7 – 840 soldiers have fallen, 917 civilians have been murdered, 77 police officers and security agents in Israel (have been killed). To bow to this evil, barbaric Hamas organization is a hit to the country.”

According to an account in left-wing Ha’aretz, Trump Middle East negotiator Steve Witkoff flew in from Qatar Jan. 11 and ambushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Sabbath, the Jewish holy day.

Netanyahu’s aides “politely explained that was in the middle of the Sabbath but that the prime minister would gladly meet him Saturday night. Witkoff’s blunt reaction took them by surprise. He explained to them in salty English that Shabbat was of no interest to him. His message was loud and clear. Thus, in an unusual departure from official practice, the prime minister showed up at his office for an official meeting with Witkoff, who then returned to Qatar to seal the deal”, Ha’aretz wrote.

While Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has so far resisted pressure from the “international community” to reach a deal with the Hamas terrorists, he has now apparently caved to pressure from the incoming administration “because he fears Donald Trump,” Middle East expert Daniel Pipes wrote.

Trump had boxed himself into a corner by stating on Jan. 7 that “all hell will break out” in the Middle East if Hamas did not release the captives it held, including four Americans, Edan Alexander, Omer Neutra, Sagui Dekel-Chen and
Keith Siegel.

Now, the Trump administration seems to have forced a deal that Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called “horrific,” announcing he would leave the Netanyahu government with his Jewish Strength party over it.

The deal is basically the same deal that the weak, failed Biden Administration has been trying to force on Israel since May 31, 2024, only now backed by Trump administration muscle.

The Tikva Forum, a patriotic organization that represents hostage families, called on cabinet members “to resign immediately and not be part of a government that betrays dozens of hostages, leaving them in captivity!” Tikva Forum has called for any Ceasefire deal to include the release of all hostages, as President Trump had demanded on Jan. 7.

Journalist Caroline Glick shed light on the role of Steve Witkoff and his business ties to Hamas-supporting Qatar.

“They have an enormous amount of money that they use to buy influence in the West, and especially in Donald Trump’s circle. And one of those people is Steven Witkoff”, Glick said.

“Witkoff owned a property on Central Park South called the Park Lane Hotel that had gone into a lot of difficulties because his Malaysian partner was exposed as a fraudster and fled to China”, Glick cited a story by the Jewish Insider:

In the summer of 2023 … Witkoff had sold Manhattan’s troubled Park Lane Hotel, which had also counted Abu Dhabi’s investment firm as a stakeholder, to the Qatar Investment Authority, the country’s sovereign wealth fund, for $623 million — adding to a push into New York real estate.

But in addition to being a potential asset for Witkoff, who reportedly views Middle East geopolitics as “one giant real estate deal,” his past dealings with Qatar in particular could place the incoming envoy in an uncomfortable position, experts say — as the Gulf state has faced bipartisan criticism in Congress for hosting Hamas leadership.

The Park Lane sale came after Qatar had engaged in an aggressive and widespread lobbying effort during Trump’s first term, as the president-elect sided with Saudi Arabia and other neighboring states that had imposed a blockade on the Gulf country. 

Seeking to build goodwill with the U.S., Qatar launched a campaign to influence hundreds of people close to Trump, including Witkoff, who was among several American executives to meet with Qatari officials, according to foreign lobbying disclosures that broadly describe a series of “introductions” to “facilitate collaboration” and discuss “business opportunities,” among other things. 

Nick Muzin, a Republican operative who helped lead the Qatari lobbying operation, said in an email to JI that he had “introduced” Witkoff “to the Qatari leadership in 2017-2018,” but he did not respond to follow-up questions regarding the substance of their discussions or who was present for the meetings.

Ben Baird, the director of advocacy for the Middle East Forum, a conservative policy think tank, expressed concerns that Witkoff had been targeted by Qatar — suggesting the hotel sale was part of what he called an ongoing “charm offensive” reaching within “Trump’s inner circle of billionaire policymakers,” including Elon Musk and others. 

“The fear in Jerusalem is that Witkoff was planning to make an even more expansive deal along the lines of what the Biden Administration was trying to do, and use the May 31 offer for the basis of even more profoundly pro-Hamas deal-maiking”, Glick said. “When I heard the news (of the deal) I was stunned. Why would they do that? Then when the story came out about his business relationship with Qatar, which is the state sponsor of Hamas, and the Taliban, Al-Qaida, ISIS., etc., things started to look very disturbing.”

Steve Witkoff is also the co-chair of President Trump’s inauguration committee, which has come under fire for inviting a radical Pro-Hezbollah Imam to lead a prayer at the Inauguration Monday.

Imam Husham Al-Husainy of the Karbalaa Islamic Educational Center in Dearborn, Michigan has a “significant history of extremism”, the Middle East Forum revealed. “In 2015, he and his organization hosted a rally … in which he wished death upon Saudi Arabia, and denounced Saudis as “agents of the Jews” whose “Zionist” planes “rain down” death upon the people of Yemen.”

In 2006, at a pro-Hezbollah rally in Dearborn, Michigan, Al-Husainy “held the picture of Hezbollah leader [Hassan] Nasrallah aloft on the stage.”

In 2007, Al-Husainy had a shouting match with Fox News host Sean Hannity on air over his support for Islamic terror organization Hezbollah.

This was at at time when Iranian- and Hezbollah-linked Jihadis were killing approx. 4500 US service members in Iraq.

 

It is unclear why the Trump inauguration committee invited a radical terror-supporting preacher on Jan. 20.




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

Danielle Collins: Tennis star says ‘nobody got hurt’ as she brushes off booing from crowd | World News

0


US tennis star Danielle Collins was booed by the Australian Open crowd on Saturday when she walked on court and also when she left following her defeat to compatriot Madison Keys.

It comes after Collins, 31, played the role of “pantomime villain” as she taunted the crowd during her second-round win on Thursday over home favourite Destanee Aiava.

Collins, who was runner-up at Melbourne Park in 2022, shrugged off the abuse she got from dissenters in the match against the 24-year-old local qualifier as she blew kisses to the crowd, cupped her hand to her ear and touched her bottom – in a signal to hecklers to kiss her backside.

After her victory on Thursday, Collins said in a message to hecklers – “bring it on”, as she said the money she was earning during the tennis tournament was “all going towards the Danielle Collins fund”.

“One of the greatest things about being a professional athlete is the people that don’t like you and the people that hate you, they actually pay your bills,” Collins said.

The player, whose Instagram handle is DanimalCollins, said the cash would go towards a luxury holiday for her and her friends.

“I can guarantee you that cheque is going to go towards our next five-star trip, hopefully to the Bahamas,” she said.

After her straight sets defeat to 29-year-old Keys on Saturday, losing 6-4 6-4, Collins said: “The biggest thing is that nobody got hurt. Maybe some feelings got hurt or things were taken personally, and they probably shouldn’t have been taken personally by the crowd.”

“I feel like people take life way too seriously sometimes. I think in our sport, it’s like somebody was telling me that the average age of people watching and the fans of tennis is, like, 65.

“We need to kind of bring some entertainment to the game. I think we can try to make jokes and laugh.

“I don’t have a big ego when it comes to this.”

Image:
Danielle Collins had treatment on her knee during the match. Pic: AP

Read more from Sky News:
TikTok could go dark: What does this mean for users?
Cameron Diaz says retirement from acting was ‘best 10 years of my life’

Collins postponed her retirement from tennis due to “fertility problems” from endometriosis at the end of last season and was the tournament’s 10th seed.

She also said she had friends asking to join her for the Bahamas holiday and she revealed “six different sponsorship opportunities” which came up during the competition.

“That’s a great signal for me. Every fan contributes to that. It’s been a real blessing.”

Collins wins AU $290,000 (£147,000) for losing in the third round.



This story originally appeared on Skynews