Monday, July 7, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 1721

Gavin Newsom failed California and ruined his political prospects

0

The emperor has no clothes — and no empathy.

It’s likely, though, he still does have a standing reservation at the French Laundry.

Of course, it’s Gavin Newsom, of whom I write.

The smug and ambitious progressive California Governor whose political aspirations went up in flames as Los Angeles continues to burn to the ground, leaving a shocking number of residents’ lives in tatters.

And it’s Newsom, who has become the arsonist, setting the fire to his political fortunes with a series of unforced errors — putting a cap on years of mismanagement and abandoning crucial infrastructure in favor of useless far left policies that made social justice and climate warriors feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Gov. Gavin Newsom passes the buck to ‘local folks’ when asked about hydrants running out of water in Pacific Palisades CNN

Since the inferno broke out, Newsom has shown that he’s ill prepared and shameless: shifting blame to others and trying to ditch one of his devastated constituents.

It’s like he and the epically feckless Karen “I’d rather be in Ghana” Bass had made a political suicide pact for 2025.

As Pacific Palisades was ablaze, Anderson Cooper asked Newsom about the dry hydrant situation there. Instead of owning any failure, he passed the buck.

“Look, the local folks are trying to figure that out,” he told Cooper.

Actually, Gov., you should have ensured the local folks had it sorted as risks were well known.

Gavin Newsom tried to dodge Palisades resident Rachel Dervish who confronted the Governor. Sky News
During the devastating wildfires, California Governor, Gavin Newsom has failed spectacularly on both a political and human level. AP

This all stops with the top, even if it was a “local” issue. This apocalyptic inferno wasn’t some freak accident in a backwater that no one could find on the map. This was Los Angeles, home to millions, and a city that remains under constant threat of wildfires.

Then he cowardly tried to use a fake phone connection to brush off an anguished mother sifting through the rubble of her community.

“Governor! Governor! I live here, Governor! That was my daughter’s school!” said Pacific Palisades resident Rachel Dervish, running after Newsom as he tried to hightail it back into his SUV.

“I’m literally talking to the president right now to specifically answer the question, of what we can do for you and your daughter,” he said with all the blessed chutzpah of Jan Brady speaking on the phone with George Glass.

When Dervish asked to hear the call, “because I don’t believe it,” Newsom, who was clearly not on a line with anyone, then switched tact. He said he was trying to get ol’ Joe on the horn but he had no service. He explained that he had tried five times and was walking around looking for a signal.

She continued to press him on the lack of water in the hydrants.

Newsom during his altercation with a woman who demanded answers as to why there was no water to fight the fires in her area. Sky News
Firetrucks in Pacific Palisades battle the out of control fires that turned the community to rubble. ALLISON DINNER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

“Why was there no water in the hydrants, Governor? Is it going to be different next time?” she asked.

“It has to be, it has to be, of course,” he said when she told him he was doing nothing.

She was desperate and grief stricken. She was also – like so many in her neighborhood – angry.

There were red flag warnings and yet, Bass was in Africa and Newsom was out to lunch. Why wasn’t he micromanaging their preparedness and their water supply.

Natural disasters are a fact of life in the Golden State and it’s impossible to guess mother nature – but there are also ways to prepare for battle and mitigate the damage from her wrath.

Take Ron DeSantis, who every year is faced with a destructive hurricane season. He is an extremely competent crisis manager who prepares for the worst, marshals all resources and communicates extremely effectively with Floridians.

Ron DeSantis has been roundly mocked for his rain boots, but he is extremely skilled at managing a crisis. DeSoto County Sheriff’s Office/Facebook

He seems to revel in the details, in the foresight and in the aftermath, helping residents return to normalcy as soon as possible.

The act of governing is not sexy. Just look at the Florida Governor’s terribly unflattering white rain boots. Karl Lagerfeld he is not.

Newsom, on the other hand, is slick and handsome. But he is empty and incompetent. He is skilled in delivering platitudes about diversity and inclusion, hyper-focusing on “marginalized communities,” including the endangered Delta smelt, according to Trump.

And for all his talk about tolerance, he was cold and dismissive to Dervish. Sometimes being a leader means listening and being a soft place to land. Expressing both confidence and humanity.

It’s what George W. Bush understood when he stood on the pile at Ground Zero and said, “I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you.”

Newsom, who was very high in the dem’s presidential depth chart, spectacularly failed this moment on both a political and a human level.

Voters will not forget.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

WordPress developer hours cutback may or may not slow innovation – Computerworld

0



“Automatticians who contributed to core will instead focus on for-profit projects within Automattic, such as WordPress.com, Pressable, WPVIP, Jetpack, and WooCommerce,” the statement said. “As part of this reset, Automattic will match its volunteering pledge to those made by WP Engine and other players in the ecosystem, or about 45 hours a week that qualify under the Five For the Future program as benefitting the entire community and not just a single company. These hours will likely go towards security and critical updates.”

The implication is that the labor reallocations would be reversed were WP Engine to drop its lawsuit. Mullenweg said recent changes that WP Engine has made has altered his demands. He is no longer asking for money, for example.

His original demand had been for payment; in late October, Mullenweg said WP Engine “could have avoided all of this for $32 million. This should have been very easy,” and he then accused WP Engine of having engaged in “18 months of gaslighting” and said, “that’s why I got so crazy.” 



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

Meta’s right-wing reinvention also includes an end to DEI programs and trans Messenger themes

0


Meta isn’t stopping at moderation changes. According to both Axios and The New York Times, the company is also pulling the plug on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. That includes removing diversity hiring goals, eliminating the chief diversity officer position and no longer prioritizing minority-owned businesses as vendors, per The Times‘ reporting.

When asked to comment on ending DEI initiatives, Meta confirmed the reporting was accurate.

Internally, the company is apparently pinning the decision on a shifting “legal and policy landscape,” according to a memo to employees Axios acquired.

“The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI,” Janelle Gale, Meta’s VP of Human Resources says in the memo. “The term ‘DEI’ has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others.”

The current Supreme Court is not exactly friendly towards systemic attempts to address issues of race, gender and sexuality, but in the context of Meta’s other recent changes, it seems like there’s more going on than the company being afraid of a possible lawsuit.

At the same time that Mark Zuckerberg was announcing that Meta was abandoning third-party fact checking and changing what kind of speech it allows on its platform, 404 Media reports that the company removed the Trans and Non-binary themes from Messenger, and posts it made announcing them. The company also added Trump supporter and UFC CEO Dana White to its board this week, a confirmation of Zuckerberg’s continuing UFC fandom but also a signal that it’s eager to listen to conservative voices. It all seems to add up to less of a reaction to the current climate and more like the way people in charge want to be doing business going forward.



This story originally appeared on Engadget

Senate Democrats Mocked Over Cringeworthy Video Where They Suddenly Claim to be Fighting for Average Americans | The Gateway Pundit

0


Senate Democrats are trying to rebrand themselves. After years of constantly working to stop anything Trump wanted to do, they suddenly want everyone to know that they are not here to be ‘against’ anyone.

They suddenly claim to want you to be able to keep more of your paycheck and that they want to work to bring down the cost of living.

The video that they produced to deliver this message is pure cringe and they are getting dragged for it on social media.

FOX News reports:

Montage of Senate Democrats pledging to oppose Trump’s bad policies mocked as ‘cringe’

Senate Democrats released a video on Thursday to message their priorities ahead of President-elect Donald Trump taking office, however the video was met with criticism for being out of touch and “cringe.”

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. shared the video on his X account and captioned with, “Senate Democrats are here to fight for you.”

In the video, Senate Democrats spoke directly to the camera, promising to work with “anyone” that would make life better but would oppose President-elect Donald Trump and Republicans if they “do things to hurt you.”

Several Democratic senators, who are from close states or are up for re-election, were noticeably absent from the video. Sens. John Fetterman, Pa., Jeanne Shaheen, N.H., Maggie Hassan, N.H., Ruben Gallego, Ariz., Mark Kelly, Ariz., Jon Ossoff, Ga., Gary Peters, Mich., Chris Murphy, Conn., did not appear in the video.

Watch this:

What were they thinking?

It’s as if these Democrats took advice on making a video from a bunch of liberal Hollywood celebrities. It’s so bad.




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

They are hurting but managing to find hope in ‘tomorrow’ – the residents who have lost everything in the LA fires | US News

0


They are the displaced and there are tens of thousands of them, 600 in an evacuation centre we visited.

From elderly people who fled without their medication, to pregnant mothers desperate to escape the smoke, they had nowhere else to go.

Jim Mayfield, who has lived in the northern suburb of Altadena for 50 years, wept as he told me his dogs, Monkey and Coca, were all he had left.

He said: “The fire was coming down, a ball of fire, it hadn’t made it to my house, but then I woke up and I seen it so I had to start evacuating.

“I had to grab my dogs, I didn’t have enough water and my house is burned down to the ground.”

Image:
Thousands of buildings have been burned to the ground since the fires in Los Angeles started

Sheila Kraetzel, another elderly resident, relived the sense of terror as homes were engulfed by the flames.

She said: “I smelt smoke, I was sleeping, and my dog alerted me that there was trouble.

More on California Wildfires

“When I looked outside, there were embers floating across my yard.

“My whole neighbourhood is gone.”

“It was a beautiful, unique place,” she added, smiling.

Thousands of firefighters have been working around the clock to contain the wind-driven fires in California
Image:
Firefighters have been working around the clock to contain the wind-driven fires

Asked how she could smile, she fought back tears and replied: “Well, there’s tomorrow you know.”

How anyone could find hope amid the destruction we have witnessed here is beyond me.

Read more:
Scale of ‘most destructive’ blazes in modern US history
In pictures: Before and after the blazes
What caused the fires?

There are people handing out food and water, medical staff doing what they can. Volunteers have rallied from far and near.

Buildings destroyed in fires

One of them, Stephanie Porter, told me it felt “heavy” inside the centre.

“You walk through and see the despair on people’s faces, not knowing what their next step is, not knowing if their house is still standing,” she said.

“I had to take a few moments… and kind of cry, and then you go back to serve.

“It just breaks your heart.”

Three miles up the road, Altadena resembles a war zone, but residents have not been allowed to return.

When they finally do, they’ll discover there’s nothing left of the material lives they left behind.



This story originally appeared on Skynews

Fox News headed for trial over Smartmatic election fraud claims : NPR

0


Fox News appears headed for trial over false election fraud claims made after the 2020 election, after a New York state appellate court chose not to dismiss a lawsuit brought by voting tech company Smartmatic.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Spencer Platt/Getty Images/Getty Images North America

Fox News appears to be headed once more to court over the lies involving election fraud it aired about the 2020 presidential race. This time, it’s over the false claims that election tech company Smartmatic sabotaged the re-election of then-President Donald Trump.

In April 2023, on the eve of a trial in Delaware in which Fox founder Rupert Murdoch was set to testify, the network and its parent corporation agreed to pay $787.5 million to settle a defamation suit filed by Dominion Voting Systems.

A flood of revelations from the pre-trial process of discovery yielded damning internal communications. The judge found that network figures from junior producers to primetime hosts, network executives, Murdoch and his son Lachlan knew that Joe Biden had won the election fairly. Yet, they allowed guests to spread lies that Trump had been cheated of victory to win back Trump viewers. Some hosts amplified and even embraced the claims.

Now, an appellate court ruling in New York state is allowing Smartmatic’s parallel, $2.7 billion suit to press ahead. The same ruling also dismissed some counts against the network’s parent company, Fox Corp.

Pro-Trump Fox hosts including Maria Bartiromo and the late Lou Dobbs invited guests making unsubstantiated and wild claims about Smartmatic on the air, and at times appeared to endorse those allegations themselves.

Fox forced Dobbs off the air just a day after Smartmatic filed its suit in February 2021. Two weeks later, Fox News and Fox Business Network ran an awkward segment with a voting tech expert, Edward Perez, to present viewers with a rebuttal to those outlandish claims. Newsmax, a right-wing channel in competition with Fox for viewers who supported Trump, did much the same.

“Today, the New York Supreme Court rebuffed Fox Corporation’s latest attempt to escape responsibility for the defamation campaign it orchestrated against Smartmatic following the 2020 election,” Smartmatic’s lead attorney, Erik Connolly, said in a statement. “Fox Corporation attempted, and failed, to have this case dismissed, and it must now answer for its actions at trial. Smartmatic is seeking several billion in damages for the defamation campaign that Fox News and Fox Corporation are responsible for executing. We look forward to presenting our evidence at trial.”

Unlike Dominion, whose voting machines were used in two dozen states, Smartmatic says its technology was used only in Los Angeles County in 2020. Fox has sharply questioned the value of Smartmatic and the contracts it says were jeopardized and lost.

“We will be ready to defend this case surrounding extremely newsworthy events when it goes to trial,” a network spokesperson said in a statement. “As a report prepared by our financial expert shows, Smartmatic’s damages claims are implausible, disconnected from reality, and on their face intended to chill First Amendment freedoms.”

In the Dominion case, Fox also relied on arguments that its shows and hosts were simply relaying inherently newsworthy allegations from inherently newsworthy people — the then-president and his allies. The presiding judge in Delaware, Eric M. Davis, rejected that argument; he found that Fox’s executives, stars, and shows had broadcast false claims and defamed Dominion in doing so.

Fox has said that the New York case offers a new venue, with slightly different implications, although Davis applied New York defamation law in his Delaware proceedings.

Fox settled, as it has in many other cases, before opening arguments of the trial with Dominion. It maintains it will fight the allegations Smartmatic is making in court.



This story originally appeared on NPR

After frantic evacuations, Palisades residents desperate to access homes

0

Michelle Sy just wants to get her two sons’ Nintendo Switch. That and her mother’s cancer medication, the 9-year-old’s EpiPen and their family photo albums. But mainly the Switch.

She and her husband, Bendick, had just 20 minutes to pack their car and evacuate as the Palisades fire bore down on their Pacific Palisades home Tuesday night.

They grabbed Michelle’s Kindle, Bendick’s laptop, some important documents, and the boys’ stuffed animals and Pokémon cards, and headed to their relatives’ house in Cerritos.

“I knew they would cry if I didn’t save their Pokémon cards,” said Michelle, 42.

On Friday, the couple left their kids with Michelle’s parents and made the hour’s drive from Cerritos to Santa Monica. Their goal was to collect their belongings from their and their septuagenarian parents’ houses, which neighbors have told them remain standing while many houses around them have been reduced to rubble.

They were among the many Pacific Palisades residents who have been turned away at the checkpoints that ring the evacuation zone that has spread across much of the neighborhood and surrounding areas this week.

For much of Wednesday and Thursday, people say the lockdown was significantly less strict and many displaced families were able to access the areas on foot, bicycle or e-bike. By Friday, even pedestrians were being blocked from entering.

The increased security Friday came a day after police reported that 20 people were arrested on suspicion of looting homes in L.A. County wildfire zones.

The Sy family arrived in Santa Monica in their blue minivan shortly before 2 p.m. and headed to the California Incline. Within seconds, a Santa Monica police officer told them they couldn’t proceed onto the ramp connecting Ocean Boulevard to Pacific Coast Highway.

“Hi, we’re residents. Can we get medicines?” Bendick, 46, yelled from the van window.

“Not right now,” the officer barked back, then directed them to park and walk back if they wanted to talk further.

When they got back to the Incline, they spoke with two members of the National Guard.

“Locals aren’t allowed to drive in. It’s just firefighters, police, some press,” one said. “But anyone is free to actually walk over there.”

Erika Aklufi, a spokesperson for the Santa Monica Police Department, said it tightened security at its checkpoints between Wednesday and Thursday because they “just couldn’t handle the volume of people” who were trying to access the burn zone. The goal was to “funnel” people to LAPD-managed checkpoints, where people could request police escorts to their homes.

“I don’t think you understand how much of a problem we’ve had with people trying to get in,” she said. “It wasn’t trying to be punitive in any way; it was really trying to help manage a chaotic situation.”

LAPD Sgt. Hector Guzman said residents can go to any of seven checkpoints between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. and can be escorted to retrieve necessities. The locations are: Sunset Boulevard and Kenter Avenue, Sunset Boulevard and Kenter Avenue, Sunset Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, Sunset Boulevard and Amalfi Drive, Temescal Canyon Road and Pacific Coast Highway, Channel Road and Pacific Coast Highway, and Amalfi Drive and Channel Road.

The Sys weren’t interested in walking five miles through burning hills to their home, and then five miles back with their belongings. So they argued their case there on the Santa Monica street, trying to find an angle that would allow them past the makeshift checkpoint in a vehicle. They mentioned the needed medications, their treasured belongings, their belief that they should be allowed as residents to return to their own homes.

“My house is still standing,” Bendick pleaded. “So I’m actually worried about the looters.”

No luck. The Guard members told them Santa Monica police weren’t allowing anyone through.

They headed toward a checkpoint near the Brentwood Country Mart, but even before they got there it was clear they wouldn’t be getting by. Nobody else seemed to be. They didn’t even try.

“I almost broke yesterday because this is so sad,” Michelle said as they sat in their van considering their next move. “I was hoping today to get some of my stuff and some of the stuff on Jacob’s list,” she added, referring to their 13-year-old.

“He wants his books, his trophies,” Bendick said, reading through a hand-scrawled list of wanted items Jacob had asked them to fetch. “He wants his black belt, and even his dojo is gone.”

Some other residents weren’t as easily deterred. Some of those who chose to walk up PCH tried their luck hitchhiking with the few vehicles that had been able to cross into the evacuation zone.

Even if they made it to Pacific Palisades, the journey was far from over.

Family members checking on the homes of relatives were turned away by Los Angeles police officers guarding the neighborhoods of winding streets because they didn’t have IDs showing local addresses. Residents were shuffled into lines where some had to wait for hours for an official escort.

At the checkpoint at Sunset Boulevard, the crowd hummed with anxiety. One couple tried — unsuccessfully — to break through on bikes. Another couple tried on foot, feigning oblivion to the officers blocking the road.

“We live there!” exclaimed resident Ivo Venkov as he was waved down by an LAPD officer.

It didn’t matter. He and his wife, Rossi, were told to put their name on a list and wait their turn, which, they quickly learned, could take hours.

“The thing is — people are saying they have medication to get,” the officer explained to the crowd. “But they’re going inside and grabbing everything.”

It’s hard to blame them. All had fled with a tiny fraction of their belongings as flames crept nearer to their homes.

“It was like a medieval description of the inferno,” Venkov said of his evacuation. “Dante, Bosch, you name it.”

One woman had been waiting patiently for an hour and a half to see whether she even had a home. The answer lay just around the curve, about 300 yards from where she stood.

“We’re doing our best with one little pickup truck and two staffers,” said Juan Fregoso, district director for Los Angeles City Councilwoman Traci Park, whose district includes Pacific Palisades, and was helping organize the checkpoint.

Matt Mass, 16, knew his home was still standing thanks to security cameras inside. He had walked from Santa Monica with his cousin, 17-year-old Asher Sarraf, to try to get medication for his brother from his home. After being told it could take a few hours — and with a 6 p.m. curfew approaching — he gave up.

Farther up Sunset beyond the checkpoint, there were few signs of the residents who called the neighborhood home.

The Palisades was more like a ghost town than ever before, with checkpoints the tightest they’d been since the fire broke out. The streets were eerie and barren, populated almost entirely by first responders and news crews.

Jack, another 16-year-old who made the trek Friday and declined to give his last name, was one of the few exceptions. In search of his laptop, he and his friend had made an eventful two-hour journey from Santa Monica, with their phones turned off. The constant emergency alerts were getting annoying, he said.

“When we got stopped by the cops, we just said OK and walked backwards and just found another route,” he said.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Apple’s 2025 annual shareholder meeting is on February 25

0


Apple’s 2025 shareholder meeting will take place on February 25, at 11 a.m. Eastern Time.

Apple is holding its annual shareholder meeting on February 25 at 11 a.m. Eastern Time, which is when participants will be able to vote and ask questions.

Annual shareholder meetings are held to vote on matters presented by shareholders and how future goals are being met. During such meetings, the company’s performance during the previous year is also discussed.

As part of Apple’s meeting on February 25, participants will vote on the re-election of the Board of Directors, approval of executive compensation, and will ratify Ernst & Young — Apple’s accounting firm.

The 2025 shareholder meeting was announced by Apple in an SEC filing on January 10. In the filing, Apple CEO Tim Cook shared a letter to shareholders, highlighting the iPhone maker’s accomplishments and overall success in 2024, such as the launch of Apple Intelligence and the Hearing Health features for AirPods Pro 2.

“Last year, we launched a new era with our first products built from the ground up for Apple Intelligence — which brings together personal context with powerful generative models to deliver intelligence that’s relevant and useful to you,” said Cook. “As always, I am especially proud of how teams at Apple bring together groundbreaking innovations with the values that guide our work.”

The SEC filing is simply a proxy statement emphasizing Apple’s achievements and various accomplishments throughout 2024. As a result, the information is hardly surprising for those who pay attention to the company’s financial sector. The shareholder meetings themselves are rarely of interest to the general public, either.

According to Apple’s SEC filing, the company has an all-time revenue record in its Services sector, which is up 13% year-over-year. The company has also experienced significant success in many emerging markets, including South Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.

Apple’s annual shareholder meeting will be held on February 25, 2025, at 11 a.m. Eastern Time. To attend, vote, and submit questions during the meeting, visit Apple’s meeting portal and enter the control number in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, voting instruction form, or proxy card.



This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Report: UFC 311 likely headed to Las Vegas if dangerous wildfires force L.A. lockdown

0


Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is already discussing the possibility of moving the upcoming UFC 311 pay-per-view (PPV) card from Inglewood, California to Las Vegas, Nevada, as unprecedented wildfires still spread across Los Angeles. As of this writing, UFC 311 is still scheduled to take place inside Intuit Dome on Jan. 18, but the venue just canceled two events for this weekend and fight fans are beginning to worry.

Unfortunately, Los Angeles is still battling ongoing wildfires and the massive destruction that has come as a result. In turn, L.A. and the surrounding areas have begun to go into a bit of a lockdown until the chaos is under control. This includes cancelations of television show tapings, movie production, and now live sporting events and concerts.

On Friday, MMA journalist, Ariel Helwani, revealed that UFC officials are already in talks to move UFC 311 from Inglewood to “Sin City” if the wildfires prevent Inuit Dome from re-opening before next weekend’s PPV event. Luckily, T-Mobile Arena is open to host the event on Jan. 18 so the transition wouldn’t be all too difficult.

“UFC has had talks about the status of UFC 311 next weekend, I’m told.

“UFC 311 is currently slated for the Intuit Dome in Inglewood, Calif. Obviously, that region is facing a devastating wildfire crisis at the moment.

“The NFL announced yesterday that they are moving the Rams x Vikings playoff game, scheduled for Monday at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood to Glendale, Ariz.

“As of right now, 311 is staying at Intuit. The hope is it remains there. But they are monitoring and ready to move the card, if need be. No talks of delaying the card. Obviously that call needs to happen soon. The event is eight days away.

“Vegas would be the frontrunner. Worth noting: T-Mobile Arena is not booked next Saturday, Jan. 18.”

Helwani posted additional notes below regarding UFC 311’s potential move:

“Nevada State Athletic Commission reps tell me no serious talks about bringing the card to Vegas have transpired at this time.”

Thoughts on all of this? Where do you think UFC 311 will actually take place?

Let us know!




This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

Why Is TikTok Getting Banned in 2025? The Reason – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images

TikTok quickly became one of the United States’ — and the world’s — most popular social media and entertainment apps. At one point, its popularity surpassed Google. The app is a short-form video creation service, and it allows users to get updates from news, TikTok creators and more. However, American TikTok users are facing a possible ban soon. So, why is TikTok getting banned in the United States., and is it actually happening?

Below, learn why TikTok might be banned and what this means for users.

Is TikTok Actually Getting Banned in 2025?

The TikTok app could disappear from app stores on smartphones on January 19, 2025. The only way this won’t happen is if the Supreme Court blocks the federal law from enforcing its ban. However, as of January 10, 2025, it appears the Supreme Court is not blocking the law. So, the ban on TikTok can proceed.

Why Is TikTok Being Banned in the U.S.?

TikTok is facing a ban in the U.S. due to security concerns. American lawmakers are worried that China’s government could obtain access to users’ data through the app and use it to spread misinformation. TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company. The company’s ties with China led Congress to pass legislation on banning TikTok unless it was sold to a U.S. government-approved owner. President Joe Biden signed the legislation into law in April 2024 and gave ByteDance until January 19, 2025, to halt its ownership over TikTok.

TikTok argued that the U.S. ban on the app violates the first amendment, but federal judges rejected the dispute. Since the legislation carried, the ban on TikTok has not been halted. However, president-elect Donald Trump has expressed an interest in negotiating with the Supreme Court to keep TikTok in America.

Can TikTok Users Still Have an Account?

Yes, TikTok users in the U.S. who have the app downloaded on their phones can keep their accounts. However, they cannot download it again from an App Store.

Furthermore, the ban could impede on TikTok’s ability to send users updates on bug fixes and security repairs, which could gradually damage the app’s quality and make it unusable, according to the Associated Press.

A few ways to work around the ban is if a user has a virtual private network (VPN). A VPN could help hide one’s location.




This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife