Monday, August 11, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 2054

House Republicans To Pay For Tax Cuts For Rich By Taking Food And Healthcare Away From The Poor

0


PoliticusUSA is ad-free and completely independent, but we need your support. Please consider helping us grow by becoming a subscriber.

House Republicans are putting it down on paper. They plan to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations by taking healthcare and food away from lower-income people.

Politico reported:

The policy menu suggests Republicans could capture major savings from Medicaid — up to an estimated $2.3 trillion. The list includes so-called per-capita caps on Medicaid for states, meaning the program would be paid for based on population instead of being an open-ended entitlement, and would institute work requirements in the program.

The list also includes a policy to equalize payments in Medicaid for able-bodied adults with those of traditional Medicaid enrollment — those with disabilities or low-income children, which would save up to $690 billion.

It would “recapture” $46 billion in savings from Affordable Care Act health insurance plan subsidies, which are set to expire at the end of the year, setting up a major policy battle. It would also limit eligibility for plans based on citizenship status.

The memo claims that Republicans could cut $347 billion in food aid to the nation’s most vulnerable people.

Millions of Americans would lose their healthcare if Republicans slash Medicaid. Millions more could lose their healthcare and go hungry.

This pain could be inflicted on Americans because Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and other billionaires want a massive tax cut.

Republicans are trying to stage the biggest upward redistribution of wealth in nearly 100 years. The lower-income people who voted for Donald Trump had hoped that he would increase their benefits or at least not cut them. Some people voted for Trump because they thought that he would be sending out more stimulus checks.

There will be no stimulus checks under Trump.

Instead, these people will likely lose access to food and healthcare.

The people who have the least will lose the most so that those who have the most can get even more.

This is not what Americans voted for, but it is what they are going to get under Donald Trump.

What do you think of the Republican plan to steal from the poor and give to the rich? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Leave a comment



This story originally appeared on Politicususa

Even CNN Can’t Ignore Frostiness Between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris: ‘We All Know What Happened’ | The Gateway Pundit

0


Freezing temperatures outside the Washington National Cathedral were nothing compared to the glacial climate inside as the president and vice president crossed paths.

It happened as President Joe Biden, first lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and husband Doug Emhoff came together in Washington, D.C., Thursday to pay their respects to the late former President Jimmy Carter.

They joined the nation’s most noteworthy dignitaries, most of whom were cordial to one another — including President-elect Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama, who were surprisingly chummy.

The same couldn’t be said for America’s reigning first and second couple.

As the New York Post noted, the tension between them was so blatant that even CNN’s Jake Tapper couldn’t help but point it out during the network’s live stream of the event.

“There’s President Joe Biden and first Lady Jill Biden. And I think he has 11 days left as president of the United States,” Tapper said over the feed that showed Joe and Jill Biden coming to take their seats next to Harris and Emhoff.

“Obviously, an eventful year, one that he did not plan for,” Tapper went on.

“Started the year as a would-be Democratic presidential nominee, and we all know what happened after that,” he added, alluding to Biden’s decision to drop out of the presidential race, which led to Harris and the Democrats’ spectacular implosion and defeat in November.

“Again, you didn’t see a particularly warm greeting between the first couple and the second couple. But again, we are at a funeral, so one has to take that into account when trying to read the body language of the individuals there,” Tapper said, attempting to temper his astute observation.

But the video doesn’t lie –the first lady took her seat next to Harris without acknowledging her presence, and Joe Biden didn’t make any effort to greet her.

If this were the first of such interactions, the context of the event could explain away the frostiness, but it’s not.

This has been the status quo since Harris’s White House dreams were crushed by the reality that she was even more unpopular than the president the Democrats threw overboard for her.

And Jill Biden, who had a front-row seat for it all, seemed to have that in mind when she gave Harris the cold shoulder when the two met at the 47th Annual Kennedy Center Honors ceremony last month.

Social media commentator Mike Sington shared a video to social media platform X of the icy exchange during Joe Biden’s “final appearance” at the event as president.

If there’s one positive that comes of all of this vicious backbiting and public snubbing, it’s that it forever puts to bed the lie that the Democratic Party is unified and strong.

Now that the gloves are off between the two highest-ranking couples in America, it’s clear that they were never the adults in charge anyway.

It’s rumored that Joe Biden was forced out of his re-election bid by Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — the true power brokers in the Democratic Party — and that Harris was shoehorned in as a last-ditch effort to save the 2024 race.

She failed, and now Harris and the Bidens are making a spectacle of their animosity.

Meanwhile, Obama is now yukking it up with literal Hitler — because Trump knows who’s really been in charge — while even a hip replacement can’t stop Pelosi from rattling cages.

Sadly, Harris and the Bidens are too busy fighting among themselves to notice they’ve been used up and cast aside by the Democratic Party’s machine.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

LA fires: Data and videos reveal scale of ‘most destructive’ blazes in modern US history | US News

0


The fires that have been raging in Los Angeles County this week may be the “most destructive” in modern US history.

In just three days, the blazes have covered tens of thousands of acres of land and could potentially have an economic impact of up to $150bn (£123bn), according to private forecaster Accuweather.

Sky News has used a combination of open-source techniques, data analysis, satellite imagery and social media footage to analyse how and why the fires started, and work out the estimated economic and environmental cost.

More than 1,000 structures have been damaged so far, local officials have estimated. The real figure is likely to be much higher.

“In fact, it’s likely that perhaps 15,000 or even more structures have been destroyed,” said Jonathan Porter, chief meteorologist at Accuweather.

These include some of the country’s most expensive real estate, as well as critical infrastructure.

Beachfront properties are left destroyed by the Palisades Fire, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025 in Malibu, Calif. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)
Image:
Beachfront properties in Malibu were destroyed by the Palisades fire. Pic: PA

Accuweather has estimated the fires could have a total damage and economic loss of between $135bn and $150bn.

“It’s clear this is going to be the most destructive wildfire in California history, and likely the most destructive wildfire in modern US history,” said Mr Porter.

“That is our estimate based upon what has occurred thus far, plus some considerations for the near-term impacts of the fires,” he added.

The calculations were made using a wide variety of data inputs, from property damage and evacuation efforts, to the longer-term negative impacts from job and wage losses as well as a decline in tourism to the area.

The Palisades fire, which has burned at least 20,000 acres of land, has been the biggest so far.

Sentinel
Sentinel satellite imagery of the Pacific Palisades from space, taken around 15 minutes after the Palisades Fire was first reported. The red indicates the area of land that had already burned. Pic: Sentinel Hub
Image:
Sentinel satellite imagery of the Pacific Palisades from space, taken around 15 minutes after the Palisades fire was first reported. The red indicates the area of land that had already burned. Pic: Sentinel Hub

Satellite imagery and social media videos indicate the fire was first visible in the area around Skull Rock, part of a 4.5 mile hiking trail, northeast of the upscale Pacific Palisades neighbourhood.

These videos were taken by hikers on the route at around 10.30am on Tuesday 7 January, when the fire began spreading.

At about the same time, this footage of a plane landing at Los Angeles International Airport was captured. A growing cloud of smoke is visible in the hills in the background – the same area where the hikers filmed their videos.

The area’s high winds and dry weather accelerated the speed that the fire has spread. By Tuesday night, Eaton fire sparked in a forested area north of downtown LA, and Hurst fire broke out in Sylmar, a suburban neighbourhood north of San Fernando, after a brush fire.

These images from NASA’s Black Marble tool that detects light sources on the ground show how much the Palisades and Eaton fires grew in less than 24 hours.

photo-slider visualization

 

On Tuesday, the Palisades fire had covered 772 acres. At the time of publication of Friday, the fire had grown to cover nearly 20,500 acres, some 26.5 times its initial size.

The Palisades fire was the first to spark, but others erupted over the following days.

At around 1pm on Wednesday afternoon, the Lidia fire was first reported in Acton, next to the Angeles National Forest north of LA. Smaller than the others, firefighters managed to contain the blaze by 75% on Friday.

Fires map

On Thursday, the Kenneth fire was reported at 2.40pm local time, according to Ventura County Fire Department, near a place called Victory Trailhead at the border of Ventura and Los Angeles counties.

This footage from a fire-monitoring camera in Simi Valley shows plumes of smoke billowing from the Kenneth fire.

visualization

Sky News analysed infrared satellite imagery to show how these fires grew all across LA.

visualization

The largest fires are still far from being contained, and have prompted thousands of residents to flee their homes as officials continued to keep large areas under evacuation orders. It’s unclear when they’ll be able to return.

“This is a tremendous loss that is going to result in many people and businesses needing a lot of help, as they begin the very slow process of putting their lives back together and rebuilding,” said Mr Porter.

“This is going to be an event that is going to likely take some people and businesses, perhaps a decade to recover from this fully.”


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.



This story originally appeared on Skynews

Huntington Beach seafood spot turns into a wildfire relief hub : NPR

0


Lauren Gruel, pictured at right, celebrates having filled another truck bed with community-donated supplies on Thursday. She and her husband Andrew turned their Huntington Beach restaurant into a donation hub to support wildfire victims in Los Angeles.

Emma Bowman/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Emma Bowman/NPR

HUNTINGTON BEACH, Calif. — Lauren and Andrew Gruel, the husband-and-wife owners of a seafood restaurant in a Southern California surf town, are used to thinking local.

Most of the seafood served up in their Huntington Beach restaurant Calico Fish House is sourced from fishers in the area.

This week, that local ethos has stretched a bit further. About an hour’s drive south of the Palisades and the Eaton Fires are raging in Los Angeles, the Gruels have set up their small business to double as a wildfire relief hub. From there, they’ve been coordinating efforts to get donated goods hauled to their neighbors up north.

The magnitude of destruction in the iconic metropolis is vast. At least 10 people have died in the fires, and authorities say the death toll is likely to rise. Thousands of structures have burned, with countless neighborhood blocks reduced to ash. About 180,000 people have had to evacuate with more than double that under evacuation warnings, according to the LA County Sheriff’s Department.

“It tugs at your heartstrings,” Lauren Gruel said. “I mean, you could see the smoke in the air from here, and just to think of the devastation that they’re experiencing really just breaks your soul.”

A restaurant becomes a sanctuary

Calico Fish House, which opened two years ago, is one of the first businesses you see upon arriving in Orange County from LA if you take the scenic route — otherwise known as the Pacific Coast Highway. Many dislocated Angelenos have come down here seeking safety and slightly better air quality, or to stay with family and friends in the area.

Husband and wife Lauren and Andrew Gruel opened up their seafood restaurant Calico Fish House two years ago.

Husband and wife Lauren and Andrew Gruel opened up their seafood restaurant Calico Fish House two years ago.

Emma Bowman/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Emma Bowman/NPR

Since the owners put the word out on social media that they would house donations for people affected by the fires, a seemingly endless stream of volunteers has shown up to the restaurant ready to help. Some come armed with supplies; others are stopping by with their trucks and trailers to transport the aid to LA.

Boxes and boxes — of clothing, toiletries, diapers, cat food, fresh fruit and cases of water — lined the perimeter of the restaurant on Thursday night, waiting to be hauled away. Almost as quickly as volunteers load up one truck, the piles of aid are replenished with more donations from the community.

“We’ve seen such an outpouring of support,” she said. “My husband and I put out a call to action on our social media, and it kind of just blew up in the best possible way. We’re so thankful and grateful that people have trusted us to bring the items that they donated to where they need to go.”

Most of the help has come from Huntington Beach residents, Lauren Gruel said.

‘They wanted to help’

The city public works department has lent a 20-foot trailer to the cause. The mayor and police chief have also stopped by to lend a hand, she said.

“It’s just really cool, the turnout of our community,” Lauren Gruel said. “That’s what I love about Huntington.”

Local resident Tracy Heffelman stopped by with her two young granddaughters to drop off bags of apples, Gatorade, nuts and other supplies.

“They wanted to help,” Heffelman said. “I showed them some videos, and they were really scared and wanted to help people. So, we went to Costco and they picked out those things personally.”

Fire crews monitor the Palisades Fire in the outskirts of the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, Friday.

Fire crews monitor the Palisades Fire in the outskirts of the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, Friday.

Eric Thayer/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eric Thayer/AP

Andrew Gruel and volunteer residents are spending Friday at Calico cooking up beef and eggs to feed first responders and volunteers in Los Angeles. Bill Larkin, a board member on the city’s Harbour Commission, helped deliver 100 air purifiers to those affected by the Eaton Fire.

Cross-country donations

But people from all over the country, including Oregon, Tennessee and as far away as Florida and North Carolina, have chipped in, Lauren Gruel said. Many have been using Amazon and Wal-Mart to ship their donated purchases to the restaurant.

The Gruels have arranged to drop off the truckloads at a few community centers serving as donation hubs, including the Dream Center in Central LA and the Pasadena Convention Center.

“There’s a huge line there of people needing supplies, which obviously they would need because their entire worlds were shattered,” Lauren Gruel said.

She said some of the biggest needs right now for the scores of displaced Angelenos, many of whom have lost most of their belongings in the blaze, are socks, underwear and baby formula. But it’s not just the bare necessities, she said.

“Kids still need to play with things, you know? So, toys would be great, coloring books would be great,” Lauren Gruel said. “These people have lost everything.”

Calico is also offering a free meal to people affected by the fires. As of Thursday night, more than 50 groups of people had dropped in to take the owners up on the offer, said co-owner Andrew Gruel.

“If you need to stay here, grab a bite to eat, figure out your next step, you’re more than welcome to just hang out here for a few,” he said.

Alex Ordorica, who lives just down the street, brought his truck by to help out with the hauling.

Alex Ordorica, a Huntington Beach native, showed up at Calico Fish House to help load LA-bound trucks with supplies to support fire relief.

Emma Bowman/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Emma Bowman/NPR

“I just thought it was going to help out, you know? That’s what we’re raised to do,” he said. “If you can try to bring a smile on their face in any way, just try to do it, you know?”

He had just returned to the restaurant from his second trip to drop off supplies at the Pasadena Convention Center.

“It seemed like the smoke was just following me the whole way down here, and this dark cloud is over us,” he said. “It’s been a wild, wild couple of days.”



This story originally appeared on NPR

L.A.’s fires will eventually be extinguished. The loss will remain

0


My niece and I walked to the end of the Venice Pier on Tuesday to watch brilliant, orange flames creeping up the Santa Monica Mountains in Pacific Palisades. Thunderclouds of smoke loomed over the ocean as ferocious winds drove them offshore and whipped sand at our faces.

On Thursday, I drove into the Palisades with my friend Chris Coté, who owns a modest home near the bluffs overlooking the ocean. His children grew up there; now he rents it to a couple with three little girls.

At checkpoints along Sunset Boulevard, police blocked access to the now-ravaged community. Only credentialed media, emergency vehicles and work trucks were allowed to pass. Chris and I made it through two police lines before a stern officer at Allenford Avenue refused to let Chris pass.

I dropped him off next to Paul Revere Charter Middle School and continued along the curves of Sunset into the Village, the commercial heart of Pacific Palisades. Stretches of the iconic boulevard, as you’ve undoubtedly seen on the news, looked like the aftermath of a firebombing.

Except for various official vehicles, the streets were mostly empty. Downed utility wires and trees were scattered across roadways. A few residents surveyed the damage here and there. Teenage boys roamed the streets on mini-bikes.

What a stark contrast between the fire that ravaged the town two days earlier and the quiet left in its wake. A fire is all dancing orange flames, flying embers, heat, smoke and terror. But the aftermath is calm and bleak. Adrenaline gives way to overwhelming grief, loss and gloom.

The fire, driven by winds that reached 100 mph, was irrational, making nonsensical choices about what to destroy and what to spare. Some buildings and homes appeared untouched, as if shielded by the wings of an angel. Others had simply evaporated into the inferno.

Much of the Palisades, once vibrant and green, is now monochromatic, like “The Wizard of Oz” in reverse. Brick chimneys rise from the debris, one of the few signs that houses once lined the streets of this suburban paradise — now hell.

From Sunset, I turned left onto Via De La Paz and drove past businesses, some leveled and some — such as a veterinary clinic built of impervious brick — still intact. I parked on North Beirut Avenue, a three-block street that ends at Via De Las Olas, the winding road that runs along the bluffs above Pacific Coast Highway. Normally, from that perch, the view of Santa Monica Bay is postcard-perfect. On this day, though, with fires still ringing the city, a haze hung over the vista, graying everything out.

When I stepped out of my car, the sharp, acrid smell hit me like a campfire blowing in my face. Ashes swirled through the air like poisonous snowflakes. Wisps of smoke rose from smoldering piles of blackened rubble. Utter devastation.

As I write on Friday morning, the four major fires that ring Los Angeles are still burning. At least 10 people have died, an estimated 10,000 structures have been destroyed and the damage is in the billions. The National Guard has been deployed to protect evacuated neighborhoods from looters.

Thousands of people — each with their own heartbreaking story — have been displaced. Schools are closed. My friend Jean De Longe, who teaches first graders at a Palisades school that burned down, told me one of her students, whose family lost their house, was especially upset about losing his stuffies.

The trauma will be with us for a long, long time.

This catastrophe will force a civic reckoning that has already begun. We no longer have a fire season; we have fires all year. You can call it climate change or you can pretend it’s something else. Doesn’t matter: Our world is hotter, weather patterns are more extreme, and none of that is good news for California, which swings between wet and dry years.

Extreme drought conditions coupled with some of the fiercest Santa Ana winds we have ever seen produced this devastation. Fire hydrants ran dry; firefighters were overwhelmed.

Right on cue, the political finger-pointing commenced. Does it really matter that Mayor Karen Bass was not in Los Angeles the day the fire broke out? She was in constant communication with staff and fire officials, a thing that is, you know, entirely common in our hyperconnected era. And will it ever sink in that Bass did not strip money from the Fire Department and that its budget actually grew last year?

President-elect Donald Trump, who never misses the chance to blast his Democratic antagonist Gavin Newsom, has blamed the governor for failing to divert enough water from Northern California to the south, a laughable misunderstanding of the state’s water system.

The chimney is about all that is left of Chris Coté’s home in Pacific Palisades.

(Robin Abcarian / Los Angeles Times)

Conservative cable news pundits have naturally blamed the fire on city diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, measures. But the Fire Department, with its high-paying jobs and exceedingly generous retirement benefits, has been under pressure to diversify its overwhelmingly white, male ranks for decades. And rightly so.

For the first time in our history, the city’s fire chief is a woman — and a gay woman at that — which has provoked the MAGA hordes into mouth-frothing inanity. At this point, I have run out of adjectives for Elon Musk, who wrote on his X platform Wednesday that “DEI means people DIE.”

Meanwhile, in Pacific Palisades, I finally figured out which house belonged to my friend Chris. All that was left standing was the chimney and an iron porch railing.

As I drove back to Venice along Chatauqua Boulevard, I saw a young man walking toward the beach, cradling a deflated football that he had pulled from the ashes. I could only imagine what he had lost.

Bluesky: @rabcarian.bsky.social. Threads: @rabcarian



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Mac mini at 20, Steve Jobs and the tiny Mac

0


It’s once again a fan favorite with its new M4 version, but 20 years after Steve Jobs launched the Mac mini, it has had an extraordinary life of rave reviews — and criticism.

Steve Jobs introduced the Mac mini with the explicit aim of attracting Windows switchers. Yet it never quite seemed to do what Apple wanted, and instead became a cult favorite Mac, even when the company has tried to forget about it.

Jobs unveiled the Mac mini on January 10, 2005. Apple didn’t issue a press release until the following day, though, and the Mac mini itself didn’t ship until January 22.

It’s the Mac that created an industry of firms that hosted hundreds and thousands of Mac minis for remote users. And it’s the entry-level machine that began as the most affordable Mac ever made, and still is — even though it now starts at $200 more than it did in 2005.

Being the cheapest Mac has of course helped its popularity, although you still need to buy a keyboard, display and mouse or trackpad to use it. But it’s small size has been an enormous factor in its popularity too.

That’s most apparent now with the M4 Mac mini being the smallest version by such a very long way, but it has always been the case. A small Mac mini brings the whole macOS experience in a tiny package — and lets firms more easily build up dozens and hundreds of them in server racks.

The M4 Mac mini hasn’t quite been universally well-received, but the only design criticism of it has been to do with the power button being on the bottom. And despite the base model being an undeniable bargain, Apple charges excessively for any upgrades.

Otherwise, everyone seems to love the little M4 Mac mini and everyone loved the original version in 2005.

Yet in between, the reception of the Mac mini and its various iterations has been nothing short of peculiar.

Launching the Mac mini in January 2005

Back in 2005, it was as if Steve Jobs knew we’d all heard the rumors, because his announcement seemed to skip through his usual build up. There wasn’t much stage-setting at all, as he launched straight in to what this new Mac would be.

In fact, it came during the same announcement where he unveiled the iPod shuffle. In that presentation, Jobs put up a slide with a question.

“Why doesn’t Apple offer a stripped-down Mac that is more affordable?” it asked.

“I wish I had a nickel for every time somebody asked that,” said Jobs, before pointing out that actually, Apple already did precisely that. He was talking about the company’s now long-discontinued Xserve servers, which were Macs in racks.

But, he then said, people who asked this question, never meant servers.

“[This] is not what they have in mind. They want a Mac that’s stripped-down, no display, no keyboard and mouse, but they have something else in mind,” he continued. “And so today we know what they have in mind, and we’re introducing it.”

Oddly, Jobs seemed to stumble a little over his speech, repeating that phrase about what people had in mind. And then he showed on screen the words “Mac mini” for the first time.

Watching the video now, it’s apparent that people weren’t too sure about the name. There’s applause, but the video shows people seemingly wondering if this was really the name.

That may have been because while there was precedent for it with the iPod mini that was released the previous year, no Mac had been named this way. There had been the prefix Power before, to make the Power Macintosh, there had been the Macintosh Portable, and before those the Mac Plus.

But otherwise the form had always been the word “Mac” followed by a designator like II, IIcx, or SE. There had not been “mini,” spelt with a lowercase initial letter.

So Jobs worked to underline the name, repeating it, leaving it on the screen, and drawing a comparison to that 2004 iPod.

“It’s called the Mac mini,” he said. “We think people understood the iPod mini, and we think they’re going to understand the Mac mini just as well.”

To some laughter, he then showed that original Mac mini with an iPod mini in front of it. The Mac mini is wider, but the iPod mini looked like it dwarfed the machine.

“So this is a very robust computer,” said Jobs, “but it’s very, very tiny.”

Nothing comes from nothing

The Mac mini did seem “very, very tiny,” but it also seemed like something else. It seemed like roughly half of the old Power Mac G4 Cube.

That failed machine had appeared to be the Steve Jobs’s ideal, it was his aesthetic for what a computer should be. And five years on from that flop, here was the Mac mini — closely replicating its form, but hopefully fixing the Cube’s constraints, and its $1,799 price.

If the Mac mini followed the failed Power Mac G4 Cube, though, it also followed the famous but seemingly unsuccessful Switcher ad campaign.

The campaign aimed to get Windows PC users to switch to the Mac. The reason it’s believed to have been a failure is that Apple dropped the whole campaign in 2003.

So Apple had this failed Cube Mac, and this unsuccessful attempt to win over Windows users. Consequently, Jobs made it very plain what Apple was aiming to achieve with this New Mac mini.

“We want to price this Mac so that people who are thinking of switching will have no more excuses,” he said, before describing the machine as “BYODKM.”

“What does that mean?” asked Jobs. “BYODKM. It means Bring Your Own Display, Keyboard, and Mouse. We supply the computer. You supply the rest.”

“So you can take Mac mini, and you can hook it up to let’s say our 20-inch Cinema Display, right?” he continued. “And our keyboard and mouse.”

“But the great thing about Mac mini is you can hook it up to any industry-standard display, keyboard, and mouse,” he said. “A lot of people already have a display and a USB keyboard and mouse, and so Mac mini will hook up to [those].”

That pricing started at $499, which Jobs repeatedly said made it the most affordable Mac Apple had ever made. “As a matter of fact, it’s the cheapest computer Apple’s ever offered.”

Applause

For a brief moment, the Mac mini shone. The New York Times called it “exceptionally elegant,” for instance, but then people started to use it.

In practice, users tended to find that, yes, it was tiny, but if you wanted anything more than the base version, Apple stung you for so much money that the Mac mini ceased to be anything like a bargain.

Some things never change.

Or rather, they don’t necessarily change much. The same criticism about costly upgrades does apply to today’s Mac mini, but there is a crucial difference.

Today at least a significant number of users can buy the base Mac mini and be perfectly satisfied. In 2005, if you bought the base version, you were in trouble.

The $499 Mac mini came with a 40GB hard drive and only 256GB of RAM. By July, perhaps in response to the criticism, Apple upped that to 512GB RAM.

Unlike today, you could upgrade the RAM yourself. However, you — literally — had to get a putty knife and use it to break open the case

First iterations

As well as that increase of RAM, Apple would soon revise the Mac mini with a more significant update. In 2006, Apple moved the Mac mini from PowerPC to Intel processors.

Plus, since enough users were repurposing the Mac mini as servers, Apple released a version specifically meant to be a server.

In comparison, the 2007 update was unremarkable, but still, two years after launch, the Mac mini was going strong.

Abandonware

There wasn’t any update in 2008, though. The belief at the time was that the Mac mini may have been great, may have been popular with its users, but it wasn’t selling well.

This was the first time that the Mac mini looked abandoned. It was not the last time.

But in 2009, Apple actually updated the Mac mini twice. And in 2010, five years after its original launch, the Mac mini got a significant redesign.


The redesigned 2010 Mac mini compared to its predecessor and the then-new Apple TV.

If the original Mac mini was a Power Mac G4 Cube chopped roughly in half, the 2010 Mac mini was the old version sliced in half again. The new, even smaller, version, was an aluminum unibody design and came in both a regular and a server version.

By now, though, Apple was selling the Mac mini for $699, more than it does today. There’s no question but that the M4 version is a total bargain, but back in 2010, AppleInsider pointed out that Apple was calling it “affordable” far less often.

Apple was still selling it as being for Windows switchers, but the new price was enough to destroy the idea of it meaning “people who are thinking of switching will have no more excuses.”

If it weren’t successfully winning over Windows users, it looked at the time that it was instead being bought chiefly by existing Mac owners.

Perhaps not sure what more it could do to get PC users to switch, Apple made minor updates over the next two years.

Following those updates in 2011 and 2012, there came another abandoned year. There was no update for the Mac mini in 2013, none at all.

Downgraded in 2014

There was a significant update for the Mac mini in 2014, but it was “generally regarded as a downgrade from the 2012 [version],” according to AppleInsider. That’s because while the price was cut back to $499, the then-new Mac mini was actually slower than its predecessor.

So despite Apple releasing a new model, there was once more the suspicion that the company had sidelined the Mac mini. Given that those people who used the Mac mini tended to become fans of the little device, it was a worrying time.

But, as it turned out, 2014’s downgrade was nothing compared to what happened next.

Nothing.

Apple released no new version in the whole of the next year, 2015. Or 2016.

Or 2017.

Apple just kept on selling the same device at the same price, for years. In 2017, Tim Cook weighed in on the criticism that Apple had abandoned the machine.

The attention was enough that Tim Cook responded publicly with an email insisting Apple loves the Mac mini.

Tim Cook responds to Mac mini criticism in 2017
Tim Cook responds to Mac mini criticism in 2017

Then Phil Schiller may have wanted to talk about the Mac Pro, but he was pressed into defending the Mac mini. “The Mac mini is an important product in our lineup,” he said.

Rivals leave the Mac mini behind

Apple’s executives could talk about loving the Mac mini, but they didn’t do anything about it — publicly. There was no update in 2017.

By 2018, Apple’s typical approach of just continuing to sell the same device at the same price for very many years saw it falling behind. Instead of being a bargain computer that would tempt Windows users over to the Mac, PC alternatives were now out-performing it.

Out-performed is possibly too kind a description, as AppleInsider concluded in 2018 that the Mac mini was being trounced.

Small but wide userbase

If Apple really did abandon a particular type of Mac, individuals who owned one could just carry on using theirs for years. But the Mac mini didn’t just have individual users, it also had firms whose whole business was centered on utilizing hundreds of the machine.

Those firms, and those individuals, finally got some good news in October 2018.

“This new Mac mini is an absolute beast on the inside,” said Tom Boger, head of Mac product marketing. “The number one thing our customers wanted us to do is give it more powerful processors… [so this is] by far the most powerful Mac mini we’ve ever made.”

Boger said that the new version was up to five times faster than its predecessor, and Apple had increased the storage, RAM, and processor cores.

Apple had also increased the price, making the base model $799. But for what you got, this was “the biggest update ever,” said Boger.

“Apple’s mightiest mini yet,” saidAppleInsider in its November 2018 review.

The Mac mini was back. All thoughts of Apple abandoning it were gone, and the new 2018 version was a hit.

Except there was no update in 2019.

Enter Apple Silicon

For the first time, though, there was a particularly special version of the Mac mini in 2020 — or if not special, at least niche. For $500, developers could buy a unique version of the Mac mini called an Apple Silicon developer transition kit.

They couldn’t keep it, but they could begin the work of moving their apps to the new Apple Silicon platform.

That was announced during the WWDC unveiling of Apple Silicon in June 2020. And then later that year, the Mac mini was one of the first Macs to be released with the then brand-new M1 processor.

It was a sea change in performance and capability for the Mac mini, and eventually for the whole Mac line. That lineup would also come to include the first brand-new Mac since the Mac mini, the Mac Studio in 2022.

On to today

On the face of it, the Mac mini of today is still Apple’s attempt to have the lowest-cost Mac possible. The company no longer talks about getting Windows users to switch, and perhaps because it’s so successful that it no longer needs them.

But the Mac mini with Apple Silicon — first the M1, then M2 and M2 Pro in 2023 — has blurred the lines of the entire Mac lineup. That very first M1 Mac mini was sometimes capable of outperforming the Mac Pro, Apple’s top of the line Mac.

Then the Mac Studio came in above the Mac mini, both in terms of price and performance. The Mac Studio completed the Mac mini’s hatchet job on the Mac Pro, making the most expensive Mac only worth right for the most niche of uses.

Yet then in 2024, the Mac mini gained the M4 and M4 Pro processors — while the Mac Studio is currently stuck on the M2 Max and M2 Ultra chips.

So even if the current Mac Studio and Mac Pro can beat the Mac mini for performance, the “very, very tiny” machine is no longer a cut down device for switchers.

As well as the gaining the new M4 and M4 Pro processors, though, the reason the latest Mac mini has been widely praised is its size.

You know that it is much smaller, at 5 inches by 5 inches, but it’s hard to appreciate just how tiny that is until you see it in person. Photographs don’t convey how small this machine is.

So even if you haven’t succumbed to buy one yet, take a trip to an Apple Store to see one in person. And while you are there, check out the Mac Studio too.

For the Mac mini is smaller than you realise — and the Mac Studio now seems huge next to it.

Apple will now always sell more of the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air than any desktop Macs. But of those desktop Macs, the Mac mini has had the most remarkable life — and is currently the star of the lineup.

We’ll just have to see what Apple does with it in 2025.



This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Diego Lopes vs. Yair Rodriguez expected to headline UFC Mexico City on March 29

0


Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) returns to Arena CDMX in Mexico City, Mexico, on Sat., March 29, 2025 with an all-action featherweight headliner between Top 5 title contenders on ESPN.

Diego Lopes vs. Yair Rodriguez, according to Home of Fight.

Lopes (26-6) is the winner of five straight, which includes his unanimous decision victory over former featherweight title challenger, Brian Ortega, at UFC 306 last September. As for Rodriguez (19-5, 1 NC), no stranger to 145-pound title fights, he’ll look to rebound from his submission loss to “T-City” at the promotion’s last Mexico City fight card in early 2024.

Here’s the current UFC Mexico City fight card and ESPN lineup:

145 lbs.: Diego Lopes vs. Yair Rodriguez
185 lbs.: Kelvin Gastelum vs. Joe Pyfer
125 lbs.: Edgar Chairez vs. CJ Vergara
125 lbs.: Ronaldo Rodríguez vs. Kevin Borjas
115 lbs.: Yazmin Jauregui vs. Julia Polastri
135 lbs.: David Martinez vs. Saimon Oliveira
185 lbs.: Ateba Gautier vs. Jose Medina

Expect more UFC Mexico City fight card announcements in the coming weeks.



This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

Who Is Joel Schiffman? 5 Things to Know About Hoda Kotb’s Ex-Fiance – Hollywood Life

0





View gallery




Image Credit: Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock

Hoda Kotb and Joel Schiffman called it quits in early 2022. “Joel and I have had a lot of prayerful and meaningful conversations over the holidays,” Hoda said on TODAY, “and we decided that we’re better as friends and parents than we are as an engaged couple, so we decided we are going to start this new year … on our new path as loving parents to our adorable, delightful children, and as friends.” Hoda said that this wasn’t because “something happened,” but that their relationship ran its course.

Despite their split, the exes have remained amicable co-parents to daughters Haley Joy and Hope Catherine. In fact, she had nothing but positive remarks for Joel during a March 2024 episode of TODAY.

“I’ve only been with people who are super polite. Like, when I get up from the table, for instance, Joel got up every time — every time — even if it’s normal dinner,” Hoda explained, referring to how important it is for children to see their parents get along.

As a mother of two daughters shared with Joel, she announced her departure from the TODAY show in September 2024, with her final day on air on January 10, 2025, to spend more time with her children, as she shared during her farewell announcement. She said, “I saw it all so clearly: my broadcast career has been beyond meaningful, a new decade of my life lies ahead, and now, my daughters and my mom need and deserve a bigger slice of my time pie.”

Here are five things you need to know about Joel Schiffman.

Hoda Kotb and Joel Schiffman in 2018 (Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock)

Joel Schiffman Met Hoda in 2013

Hoda met Joel at an event she, apparently, “didn’t want to go to,” according to her appearance on Watch What Happens Live. As she was readying to leave the event, Hoda signed a few autographs when Joel approached her. Their meet-cute left an impression on the Today show host, as she passed along her email address to him. They’ve been together ever since!

After years of dating, Hoda Kotb and her longtime partner, Joel Schiffman got engaged in November 2019. The news was announced on an episode of Today, and Hoda was beaming when she shared the sweet pic from her engagement. The proposal appeared to take place on the beach, where the happy couple stood behind their names, which were written in the sand, as Hoda flashed her stunning ring. Unfortunately, the couple postponed their wedding a few times due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Joel Shiffman Has Been Married Before

Joel had a serious relationship before meeting Hoda and has a grown daughter from that marriage named Kyle Schiffman. Since his relationship with Hoda, Joel has become the father to Haley and Hope, whom Hoda adopted. During her appearance on The Wendy Williams Show, Hoda shared that she “knew I’d chosen the right man” when she asked Joel about adoption.

Joel Shiffman Told Hoda He Loved Her First

During an episode of TODAY, Hoda shared with her co-host, Jenna Bush Hager, how Joel revealed his true feelings. Upon hearing him say those three magic words, Hoda said she had “to sit with that for a minute.” After a brief pause, Hoda told Joel she loved him, too!

Joel Schiffman Works in Finance

As of 2021, Joel worked as the Head of U.S. Defined Contribution and Insurance Sales at an investment management company. Before his current job, he was the Vice President and Director of Financial Institutions for Janus Henderson Investors for over three years, according to his LinkedIn.

Joel Shiffman Has Two Major Degrees

Joel attended the University of California and graduated with his Bachelor’s degree in 1981. After a number of years, he attended the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, which is the business school of the private, Ivy League university, and finished his degree in 1995.




This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

If an investor put £10,000 in Aviva shares, how much income would they get?

0


Image source: Getty Images

For me, Aviva (LSE: AV) shares will always be the ones that got away. When loading up my self-invested personal pension (SIPP) last year, I bought almost every high-yielding, dirt-cheap FTSE 100 financial stock I could find.

I didn’t buy Aviva, which went onto outperform the lot. While its shares have idled in recent months, they’re still up 10% over one year and 20% over five. That isn’t exactly Nvidia territory, but top UK blue-chips like Aviva have a different role to play in a balanced portfolio.

Instead of quick-fire growth, they offer the prospect of solid long-term returns, in periods measured over years or even decades. That doesn’t just come from a rising share price, but the steady stream of dividends they pay investors.

Can this top blue-chip give me growth too?

FTSE 100 stocks pay some of the most attractive dividend yields in the world. Currently, shares on the index pay average income of 3.6% a year. That compares to a meagre 1% on the growth-friendly S&P 500. Those dividends close the difference between the two over time (although not totally, sadly).

Aviva has a bumper trailing yield of 7.31%. It also has a solid track record of increasing shareholder payouts, year after year. It’s not perfect though, having suspended the dividend during the pandemic. It’s recovered since, as this chart shows.


Chart by TradingView

Aviva CEO Amanda Blanc is aiming to increase shareholder payouts every year, targeting “mid-single-digit growth”. The forecast yield for 2025 is an even more tempting 7.82%. Blanc has also promised “further regular and sustainable returns of capital”, probably via share buybacks.

If an investor put £10,000 into the stock today, they would potentially get income of £782 this year. Any share price growth would be on top.

The 12 analysts offering one-year share price forecasts have produced a median target of just over 550p. If that pans out, it would mark an increase of more than 16% from today’s 472p. Combined with that yield, this would give investors a total return of around 24%. Time will tell.

This FTSE 100 stock has plenty of cash

Aviva has a healthy balance sheet and generates plenty of cash, but as with any stock, there are risks. First, it looks like interest rates are going to stay higher for longer. That’s bad news for income stocks like Aviva, because it gives investors a decent return from cash and bonds, with no risk to their capital.

Higher interest rates will also squeeze stock markets generally, hitting the value of its £376bn of assets under management.

Aviva is also under pressure to make a success of its £3.6bn takeover of Direct Line. While it stands to make potential savings, the anticipated £125m of capital synergies will only arrive if the board gets its strategy right.

Eight out of the 14 analysts following Aviva name it a Strong Buy. None recommend selling. Sadly, I’ve already made my choice. Having bought rivals Legal & General Group, M&G, and Phoenix Group Holdings, another insurer would be overload.

All three FTSE 100 stocks have even higher yields than Aviva. Now I just hope they can match its share price performance.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Prediction: these FTSE 100 stocks could be among 2025’s big winners

0


Image source: Getty Images

Which FTSE 100 stocks have the best chance of leading the index by the end of 2025? I think the odds are good for these three.

BP (LSE: BP.) is among the top 10 FTSE 100 buys at Hargreaves Lansdown of late, and I think I can see why.

Yes, the world has to turn away from fossil fuels eventually. And yes, renewable energy investments might prove to be profitable in the long term — if we can find the right ones.

But I’m seeing a change in sentiment, with the love for alternative energy stocks fading a bit. And there’s a growing feeling that big oil could provide fat profits for some years yet.

BP’s low valuation

The BP share price had been sliding in 2024, but its already started to pick up. Why? Maybe because investors are looking past the expected earnings fall for 2024 and to a forecast price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just eight for 2025?

Oh, and there’s a 5.6% dividend yield on the cards.

Vodafone comeback?

After falling 55% in five years, can Vodafone (LSE: VOD) switch into top gear in 2025? I see a very good chance of it.

I think it could all depend on results for the year ending March 2025, due in May. We all know the dividend should be slashed to half of last year’s.

That’s part of CEO Margherita Della Valle’s plans to kickstart the company, launched in 2023. And 2024’s dividend was the last at the old rate.

Still, with the Vodafone share price falling since then, we’re already back up to a projected yield of 8.5% for this year.

Show us the results

Will the full-year update show results of the company’s shake-up, and provide confidence in the dividend going forward?

That’s what I think any possible 2025 resurgence could hinge on.

Sporting rebound?

JD Sports Fashion (LSE: JD.) was one of the worst FTSE 100 performers in 2024, losing more than 70% after the Christmas 2023 trading season fell short of expectations.

But it’s started to pick up a bit this year, and as we await 2024 festive figures.

One of my colleagues at The Motley Fool recently spoke of healthy footfall at JD. So I poked my head into my local branch, and yes, there were plenty of people in there.

Current fundamentals might not make JD look like a screaming buy, not with a forward P/E of 12 and only a 1% dividend yield. But that’s after a tough 2024. And analysts see the P/E dropping to around 7.3 in the 2025-26 year.

Watch for recovery

If JD looks like it might be hitting those forecasts, I wonder if it might even become a takeover target in 2025? I’d never buy just on that hope. And it’s always important to be cautious about forecasts. Oh, and retail could still face a tough year.

But JD Sports is one of my top recovery candidates to consider in 2025.

Eyes peeled

Will I buy any of these myself? I’m not sure yet.

I do think all of them stand a good chance of coming out on top in 2025. But I want to get a better handle on where I think they might go in the next five years first.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool