Sunday, July 6, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 59

One-Way vs. Round-Trip Flights: Which Should You Book?

0


A question that often comes up in the Prince of Travel Community is whether it’s better to book one-way or round-trip flights. Of course, it differs with each individual situation, but there are some general principles to go by, which is what we’ll cover in this article.

In many cases, booking one-way flights offers greater flexibility and customization. This isn’t always the case, though, and you’ll want to think about the cost, routing rules, cancellation fees, and the use of vouchers when making a decision to book a one-way or round-trip booking.

Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of booking one-way and round-trip flights, especially as it pertains to award travel.

Generally Speaking, Book One-Ways

For my personal bookings, and in the majority of cases for award booking recommendations, I almost always book one-way flights. Sure, it adds another booking reference to keep track of, but I find that it works best for me.

One of the reasons why I book one-way flights is that my travels don’t tend to be simple and linear. For example, for a recent trip to Australia, I had the following flights booked:

  • Toronto to Brisbane via Vancouver (Air Canada, booked with Aeroplan points and eUpgrades)
  • Gold Coast to Sydney (Virgin Australia, booked with Aeroplan points)
  • Sydney to Canberra (Virgin Australia, booked with Aeroplan points)
  • Canberra to Hobart via Melbourne (Qantas, booked with British Airways Avios)
  • Hobart to Melbourne (Qantas, booked with cash)
  • Albury to Sydney (Qantas, booked with cash)
  • Sydney to Victoria via Vancouver (Air Canada, booked with Aeroplan points and eUpgrades)

In total, I had seven one-way bookings with two different loyalty programs and the rest with cash booked directly with the airlines.

When it comes to the long-haul flights to and from Australia, if I needed to change or cancel any of my points bookings, having them booked as one-ways would allow me to avoid repricing the entire round-trip, which could result in a massive increase in Aeroplan points under dynamic pricing.

Air Canada business class
Booking one-way flights with Aeroplan on Air Canada flights can help avoid costly changes with dynamic pricing

Even if your travel tends to be less dynamic than a trip like the above, I still would argue that one-ways are the way to go for most award bookings.

Sometimes, plans change, and missing any flights on a round-trip itinerary invalidates the rest of the itinerary. Having a trip booked on two separate one-way itineraries allows for maximum flexibility, in that you won’t lose out on the rest of your flight if your plans change and you miss a connection.

If you’re savvy, you might compare the cost of each one-way flight with points and cash prior to booking. You may encounter an excellent price for one direction, only to find that the other way is much more expensive.

In this case, you could book the cheaper price with cash, and then use points to cover the cost of the other direction, which helps to squeeze more value out of your points.

Of course, this doesn’t usually work for international bookings, where one-way cash tickets are often nearly as much as a round-trip, which we’ll discuss below.

Book Round-Trip Flights with Vouchers

There are some compelling reasons to book round-trips in place of one-ways, though, so one-way flights won’t always be the most ideal way to go about booking a trip.

One of the main reasons for booking round-trip flights is any time you have a voucher to redeem. This could be in the form of a companion voucher from a credit card, such as the Air Canada Annual Worldwide Companion Pass, the WestJet annual companion voucher, the VIPorter companion pass, or the British Airways Companion Award eVoucher.

Credit Cards for Earning Companion Passes

Credit Card Best Offer Value

Up to 140,000 Aeroplan points

$599 annual fee

Up to 140,000 Aeroplan points $3,680
Apply Now

130,000 Aeroplan points

$599 annual fee

130,000 Aeroplan points $2,682
Apply Now

60,000 Avios†

$165 annual fee

60,000 Avios† $899
Apply Now

Up to 85,000 Aeroplan points†

$599 annual fee

Up to 85,000 Aeroplan points† $871
Apply Now

85,000 Aeroplan points

$599 annual fee

85,000 Aeroplan points $764
Apply Now

Up to 70,000 VIPorter points

First Year Free

Up to 70,000 VIPorter points $735
Apply Now

70,000 WestJet points†

$119 annual fee

70,000 WestJet points† $556
Apply Now

You can squeeze more value out of a companion voucher by booking a round-trip fare instead of a one-way. This is simply because you usually stand to save more on two or more flights instead of just one.

The savings can be enough to justify the annual fee on a premium credit card, so it’s best to consider using them for high value cash bookings, such as for last minute travel or travel during peak periods.

Other types of vouchers, such as Priority Rewards earned by travellers with Aeroplan Elite Status, also are more valuable when redeemed for round-trip flights instead of one-ways.

For example, a Priority Reward redeemed by a Super Elite is good for 50% off of a round-trip business class booking with any Aeroplan partner anywhere in the world.

A round-trip flight from Toronto to Bangkok via Istanbul on Turkish Airlines regularly costs 87,500 points each direction, but a Priority Reward knocks down the cost to 87,500 points for a round-trip.

Sure, you could use a Priority Reward for a one-way flight to Asia and still save a handsome amount of points, but since you have to spend money to earn Priority Rewards, you’re best suited to using them on a round-trip booking for the best value.

Book Round-Trip Flights to Lower Costs

Another factor to consider when choosing between round-trip and one-way bookings is the cost.

For domestic and transborder flights, airlines tend to price out fares as the sum of two one-ways.

For example, a one-way flight from Toronto to Vancouver might cost $200 in one direction and $150 in the other. It makes no difference if you book as a round-trip or two one-ways – you’ll wind up paying $350 either way.

The same isn’t usually true for international flights. This is due to the way fares are constructed, and it’s almost always a much better deal to book a round-trip cash fare for international flights versus one-ways. The exception to this rule tends to be with low-cost carriers, which price out international flights as the sum of two one-ways.

For example, a one-way flight from Vancouver to Paris might cost $875 with Air France, and from Paris to Vancouver, a one-way flight might cost $1,956.

Those same flights booked as a round-trip price out at only $983, which results in a massive $1,848 in savings.

One advantage of booking flights with points is that you usually aren’t subject to the same differences in one-way versus round-trip pricing. With fixed-cost programs, the pricing generally doesn’t change at all between round-trips and one-ways – you’ll pay the same whether you book one round-trip or two one-ways.

For programs that use dynamic pricing that is tied to the actual cost of flights, you’ll want to ensure that you look at the cost per direction to make sure it’s not cheaper to book a round-trip than two one-ways.

Another cost factor to consider is that the taxes and fees are calculated by the originating airport on a booking.

Taxes are calculated by the province from which you depart

For example, if you book a round-trip flight to Toronto out of Edmonton, you’ll be charged 5% GST, as that is the current tax rate in Alberta. If you were to book two one-ways, you’d be charged 5% GST for the ticket from Edmonton, and then 13% HST on the flight from Toronto.

While the difference is negligible for award bookings, the costs can add up if you are paying cash for flights, especially on more expensive tickets. On business class fares, the difference in booking a round-trip instead of two one-ways could result in hundreds of dollars in savings.

Book Round-Trips to Save on Cancellation Fees

If you’re unsure of whether or not you’ll actually go on a trip, you’ll want to make sure that you can recover your costs if things go sideways.

For award bookings, you’d only be on the hook for one cancellation fee if you make a round-trip booking, versus having two cancellation fees for two one-ways.

Let’s use Aeroplan as an example. Depending on the fare, cancelling a single round-trip booking online could cost as much as $150, while cancelling two one-way bookings online could be double at $300.

Aeroplan cancellation feesAeroplan cancellation fees

Of course, one method to avoid this is to book a flexible fare to begin with, though you’ll incur a greater cost in points by doing so.

You’ll want to check the cancellation policies for the points program you’re booking with, as some, such as Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan and American Airlines AAdvantage, offer free cancellation on reward bookings.

Lastly, you’ll want to consider the routing and stopover rules before deciding on a one-way or a round-trip booking. This largely applies to award bookings, but it can also affect cash fares if the fare rules allow for extra stops on a round-trip booking.

Some programs, such as Aeroplan and Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan, allow stopovers on one-way bookings. Indeed, this is a great perk with both programs, and one that can be quite beneficial to travellers.

Japan Airlines business class – AmenitiesJapan Airlines business class – Amenities
Book a stopover on a one-way flight with Japan Airlines using Alaska miles

Other programs, such as Cathay Pacific Asia Miles, ANA Mileage Club, or Saver awards through Singapore Airlines KrisFlyer, only allow stopovers on round-trip bookings.

Therefore, if you want to stretch the value of your points with redemptions in these programs, you’ll want to book a round-trip over a two one-way bookings.

Conclusion

In the majority of cases, booking one-way journeys allows for greater flexibility with complex routings and also allows you to optimize the use of points and cash. In most cases, it’s best to book two one-ways over a round-trip.

There are exceptions to this, though, and in some cases, it’s much better to make a round-trip booking than two one-way bookings.

These situations can include using vouchers, booking international flights with cash, considering the various costs, and taking advantage of routing and stopover rules.



This story originally appeared on princeoftravel

Why Every Entrepreneur Must Prioritize Ethical AI — Now

0


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

It’s not a secret to the world that artificial intelligence is here, and it’s no longer just a buzzword — it’s quickly becoming a fundamental force that’s reshaping thought processes and actual landscapes for entrepreneurs everywhere. Whether streamlining operations, enhancing customer experiences, unlocking innovation within the workforce or just dabbling and playing around with what AI can do, it is occurring at an unprecedented scale today.

The technology presents boundless opportunities and exponential value … once tamed. However, with all of this innovation, opportunity and great potential comes even more responsibility. As we rapidly accelerate the adoption of AI, many, many entrepreneurs are facing significant, urgent questions revolving around the ethics, fairness and responsibility of such technology.

Countless entrepreneurs are now asking themselves, “How can I harness the power of AI without losing sight of the ethical principles?” How can early-stage startups today continue to grow quickly while ensuring they’re also thinking of responsible, socially conscious decisions? With every new technology, the ethical repercussions are always a part of the decision to adopt. They’re not theoretical; they’re very practical, critical if missed, as today, customers, investors and regulators are increasingly focusing on how startups are answering this very important question.

Related: 4 Steps Entrepreneurs Can Take to Ensure AI Is Being Used Ethically Within Their Companies

Do you understand ethical AI and what it means today?

If you’re thinking ethical AI is simply just a matter of avoiding harm, you’d be a ways away from fully understanding the overall concept. Ethical AI isn’t simply avoiding harm; it’s facing it head-on and understanding what to do in the moment. It’s actively ensuring that AI systems are fair, transparent and accountable as they can be from development into the hands of consumers. Today, there’s too much ambiguity and uncertainty within systems, whereas consumers and stakeholders of the organization expect it to align with the values of fairness, inclusivity and transparency, especially in the face of utilizing AI.

In a 2023 study, Deloitte revealed that a majority of consumers would stop buying from companies found using AI irresponsibly or unethically. Today, ethical AI is imperative, and embracing it doesn’t just minimize risks for entrepreneurs; it could potentially enhance brand value and customer trust over others.

Quick check:

  1. Does your AI application being developed respect the privacy of users and adhere to the transparency standards of your respective country or location?

  2. Are you clearly communicating with customers and internal employees on how your AI makes decisions?

Fairness and bias: It isn’t subsiding — it’s a growing concern

When it comes to bias within a system, many think of different things and different outcomes. When algorithmic biases are prevalent, AI systems unintentionally introduce and reinforce existing societal biases. This is quickly becoming one of the biggest ethical concerns of the AI industry as it continues to grow. Many biases are completely hidden, and you would never know you’ve been introduced to them. Many times, these biases often appear extremely subtle, such as within hiring algorithms that feed ATS systems, financial approvals within banks and personalized marketing programs.

MIT’s Media Lab is no stranger to AI. Research from the institute highlights instances where biased AI has negatively impacted hiring, explicitly disproportionately excluding women and minorities within qualified job applications. This is crucial to identify and recognize early on within AI applications. A company that proactively audits their AI algorithms being developed for fairness, unbiased results and analysis not only helps mitigate such risks but also positions your organization as a responsible and forward-thinking trusted party.

Related: Avoid AI Disasters and Earn Trust — 8 Strategies for Ethical and Responsible AI

Transparency builds trust

In today’s AI marketplace, transparency isn’t optional — it’s essential to ensure consumers of your products know how decisions that could affect their lives are being made. Regulators worldwide are increasingly identifying ways to require businesses to disclose AI processes in a clear and understandable way. Whether these regulations stay around or not, the concept of regulating this new emerging technology was still there.

You must look at transparency as building credibility and trust, two increasingly important aspects for brand reputation. You don’t need to go far to see a major player within the AI game promoting just this concept. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman underscores the importance by saying, “AI must be understandable to earn trust; transparency isn’t a burden — it’s a strategic advantage.”

Privacy and data responsibility

We’re in the age of Big Data, and it’s data that fuels AI like wildfire — but mishandled and inaccurate data can turn AI into a quick reputational disaster. Entrepreneurs must be ethical when obtaining data. They must balance company and product innovation with a rigorous effort on privacy protections, ensuring the security of personal data within frameworks such as GDPR and CCPA.

Apple has one of the most stringent proactive privacy stances within the industry, highlighting a competitive advantage: a 2022 Consumer Reports study found that 82% of customers prefer brands that actively protect their data privacy. Prioritizing consumer privacy, whether a customer or not, isn’t just responsible — it’s good business practice.

Taking a stand for ethical AI: Your entrepreneurial imperative

Ultimately, emerging technologies with such potential as AI inherently come paired with significant responsibilities for those developing such technology. Entrepreneurs with ideas that thrive within the age of AI won’t simply be those who utilize the most advanced systems but instead those who fully and completely understand the inherent risks and ethical implications that come with it.

Related: What Will It Take to Build a Truly Ethical AI? These 3 Tips Can Help.

The call to action here is clear: For those creating and developing such technologies, proactively embedding ethical standards into your AI strategies now will go a long way, safeguarding not only your customers but also your business continuity, reputation and future growth.

If you take one thing away here, it is to remember that ethical AI isn’t about avoiding the problems that will present themselves; it’s about seizing opportunities. The ethical image and leadership that you portray can define your brand, differentiate you from your competitors and position your startup as one of the premier AI companies seeking to succeed responsibly and sustainably in the ever-fast-changing world.

It’s not a secret to the world that artificial intelligence is here, and it’s no longer just a buzzword — it’s quickly becoming a fundamental force that’s reshaping thought processes and actual landscapes for entrepreneurs everywhere. Whether streamlining operations, enhancing customer experiences, unlocking innovation within the workforce or just dabbling and playing around with what AI can do, it is occurring at an unprecedented scale today.

The technology presents boundless opportunities and exponential value … once tamed. However, with all of this innovation, opportunity and great potential comes even more responsibility. As we rapidly accelerate the adoption of AI, many, many entrepreneurs are facing significant, urgent questions revolving around the ethics, fairness and responsibility of such technology.

Countless entrepreneurs are now asking themselves, “How can I harness the power of AI without losing sight of the ethical principles?” How can early-stage startups today continue to grow quickly while ensuring they’re also thinking of responsible, socially conscious decisions? With every new technology, the ethical repercussions are always a part of the decision to adopt. They’re not theoretical; they’re very practical, critical if missed, as today, customers, investors and regulators are increasingly focusing on how startups are answering this very important question.

The rest of this article is locked.

Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

Trump eyes Fed vacancy in early 2026 to appoint Powell successor: Bessent

0

The Trump administration is considering using the next expected Federal Reserve Board of Governors vacancy in early 2026 for appointing a successor to central bank Chair Jerome Powell, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday.

“There’s a seat opening up, a 14-year seat opening up in January. So we’ve given thought to the idea that perhaps that person would go on to become the chair when Jay Powell leaves in May, or we could appoint the new chair in May,” Bessent said on Bloomberg TV. “Unfortunately, that’s just a two-year seat.”

Governor Adriana Kugler’s term on the board expires on Jan. 31, 2026, providing an option for President Donald Trump to name a governor for a full 14-year term who could later be promoted to chair.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, left, and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell at last month’s G7 Finance Ministers meeting in Banff, Alberta. AP

Powell’s term as chair ends in late May 2026, while his own seat on the board only extends to January 31, 2028. Powell is not required to leave the Fed after his term as its leader lapses, but by custom most past Fed chairs have opted to leave.

The board seats held by Kugler and Powell are the only two scheduled to expire during Trump’s term.

Bessent, in responding to a question whether it would cause confusion to appoint someone in January with a thought of that person ascending to chair later, appeared to confirm that at least one current board member is in the running for the job.

“Obviously there are people who are currently at the Fed who are under consideration. So why would there be confusion, if you add another candidate in January,” he said.

Governor Adriana Kugler’s term on the board expires on Jan. 31, 2026, providing an option for President Donald Trump to name a governor for a full 14-year term who could later be promoted to chair. AFP via Getty Images
Trump has said he would not give the job to anyone who does not align with his demands for the Fed to cut rates. REUTERS

Governor Christopher Waller, appointed by Trump during the president’s first term, is reported to be among those Trump is considering for the job. Waller recently has said he would like to resume interest rate cuts as soon as the Fed’s next meeting in late July.

Others said to be in the running include Bessent, Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett and former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh.

On Friday, Trump said he would not give the job to anyone who does not align with his demands for the Fed to cut rates.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Pelosi’s prime profits prove it’s time to ban Congress’ stock trading

0

Gee, look at that: Nancy and Paul Pelosi had yet another “lucky” year on the stock market in 2024. What will it take for Congress to crack down on its members’ insider trading?

New required disclosures show the former House speaker and her hubby raked in $7.8 million to $42.5 million last year, bumping their estimated net worth to as much as $413 million. (The law doesn’t make them share exact numbers.)

And a good chunk of that eye-popping wealth comes from their impressive stock portfolio, which is so consistently lucrative that entire social-media accounts are dedicated to tracking the Pelosis’ buys and sells.

Nancy maintains that she owns no stocks (it’s all hubby Paul) and (says a mouthpiece) she “has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions.”

Which, even if she said that herself, under oath, leaves plenty of room for Paul to trade on the basis of inside information — whether things she learns on the job, or info fed to either of them for favors past, present or future from the ex-speaker.

Certainly, Paul has made some uncannily sharp moves in the markets.

In fact, his portfolio outperformed every major hedge fund last year.

In July, he sold 5,000 shares of Microsoft months before the Federal Trade Commission announced an antitrust investigation into the company.

And he dumped 2,000 Visa shares months before the Justice Department sued the company for allegedly monopolizing the debit-card market.

If he were an average Joe, the Securities and Exchange Commission would be picking through his records with a fine-tooth comb — because that kind of foresight reeks of insider knowledge.

Fine; maybe Paul is a modern-day Nostradamus, somehow working his market magic without the least bit of impropriety.

But it sure is fishy for any top official’s family member to pull in millions this way, year after year after year.

We doubt hard proof will ever come to light; the Pelosis are far too smart to leave a clear trail.

But they’re only the most notable examples of this game: Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle regularly make good money off the market; the portfolios of dozens of Democrats and Republicans in Congress beat the S&P 500 in 2024, according to watchdog Unusual Whales.

Maybe they’re just really good at making trades — but the simple fact is that neither the House nor Senate does anything serious to prevent such abuse of privileged information.

Even if all (or the majority) don’t use that knowledge, allowing them to make trades offers too many opportunities for corruption.

And when they keep scoring big on market bets for decades, a la the Pelosis, it reeks.

House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have both signaled they would support a ban on congressional stock trading — the kind that Nancy blocked repeatedly as speaker.

Getting that passed before next year’s midterms should be a priority for Republicans — clear proof that they want to clean up Congress.

If a career in the House no longer makes it easy to get rich, the next potential Pelosi might just go into an entirely different line of work.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

5 reasons buying shares in an investment trust can be a good idea

0


Image source: Getty Images

An investment trust is a type of pooled investment. The trust typically has a portfolio of investments (such as shares, although many different types of trust exist). Its own shares are traded on the stock market.

So, someone could invest in an investment trust simply by buying its shares (or even a single share) on the market.

Such an approach can be very lucrative but it does not always go well. It depends, as with any share, on specifically what the investor buys and how much they pay for it.

Here, though, are a handful of reasons why putting money into an investment trust can be a good idea for at least some investors.

1. Professional management

Many trusts employ professional managers who make decisions about how to allocate the funds. Legendary fund managers like Jim Slater achieved excellent returns for their investors.

There are star managers in every generation that can do well even in bad markets. However, there is lots of evidence that many professional investment managers cannot even beat the market on a sustained basis.

Still, I do see the appeal of expert managers at some investment trusts. Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust (LSE: SMT) has moved up 21% in the past five years, underperforming the FTSE 100 index. Over 10 years, though, Scottish Mortgage is up 291%.

That reflects its managers’ strong focus on growth companies like Tesla and Nvidia.

2. Navigating international markets more easily

I would feel comfortable assessing Tesla or Nvidia myself as an investor. They publish information for investors in English.

Still, directly buying American shares can involve complications that do not necessarily arise when buying shares in a London-listed investment trust that owns such shares. US tax rules are one example for British investors — and can be a headache.

What if my target was not the US but, say, Japan or Argentina?

From language challenges to different accounting practices, investing abroad can be a minefield. I reckon professional fund managers specialising in a certain market will likely understand it far better than I do.

3. Diversification on a tight budget

An important risk management tool for any investor is diversification.

On a small budget that can be difficult, as minimum dealing fees can add up.

But one share of Scottish Mortgage currently costs just over £10. That in turn effectively offers a shareholder diversification thanks to the investment trust’s holdings in almost 50 different firms based in countries including the UK, US, China, Taiwan, France, and Canada.      

4. Access to unlisted companies

One of those companies is SpaceX. In fact, it is the single biggest holding in Scottish Mortgage’s portfolio right now, accounting for 7.8% of the total fund.

SpaceX is a private company, so not easy to invest in directly. A small private investor with a few hundred pounds to invest is extremely unlikely to be able to buy SpaceX shares.

Often, though, such an investor can gain exposure to such unlisted businesses through putting money into an investment trust that owns a stake.

5. Some trusts sell at a discount

Some shares sell at a discount to the sum of the parts. That applies to investment trusts too.

For example, the Scottish Mortgage share price currently sells at a discount of around 10% to its net asset value.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

‘Miley Cyrus Something Beautiful’ Special on Hulu Release Date

0



‘Miley Cyrus Something Beautiful’ Special on Hulu Release Date






























You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

ad









Quantcast





This story originally appeared on TVLine

Warren Buffett donates another $6 billion in Berkshire Hathaway shares

0
  • Warren Buffett has given away another $6 billion. The latest philanthropic donation went largely to the Gates Foundation, with the remainder going to charities run by his children.

Warren Buffett has given away the biggest chunk of his fortune since he began distributing it in 2006.

The soon-to-be-former CEO of Berkshire Hathaway has donated 12.36 million Berkshire Class B shares, worth $6 billion, to the Gates Foundation and four family charities. The Gates Foundation received the majority of the shares, with a gift of 9.43 million.

Of the remaining nearly 3 million shares, 943,384 went to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation. And 660,366 shares were given to three charities led by his children: the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, Sherwood Foundation (run by daughter Susie) and NoVo Foundation (run by his son Peter).

Buffett, 94, donated $5.3 billion in shares last June and distributed another $1.14 billion last November, in what has become a Thanksgiving tradition for him.

“Father time always wins,” he wrote in November. “But he can be fickle – indeed unfair and even cruel – sometimes ending life at birth or soon thereafter while, at other times, waiting a century or so before paying a visit. To date, I’ve been very lucky, but, before long, he will get around to me.”

Buffett, last month, announced he would be stepping down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at the end of the year. In a preview of his will, he noted that donations to the Gates Foundation will end following his death, with most of his fortune being funneled into a new charitable trust that will be overseen by his children—and the three must decide unanimously on how the money is distributed, he said.

Buffett is currently ranked as the world’s eighth richest person on the Bloomberg Billionaire Index, with a value of $152 billion.

Introducing the 2025 Fortune 500, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in America. Explore this year’s list.



This story originally appeared on Fortune

How Long He Might Serve in Prison – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images for Sean “Diddy” Co

Sean “Diddy” Combs is currently on trial for sex trafficking-related charges. The record exec and rapper — who also went by the names P. Diddy, Puffy and Puff Daddy over the years of his music career — was indicted in September 2024 after feds commenced an investigation against him. So, how long could he serve time in prison?

Hollywood Life has compiled all the details about Diddy’s possible prison sentence, below.

Diddy’s Prison Sentence Details

It’s unclear what Diddy’s sentencing is at the time of publication; his trial began on May 12, 2025. Former New York City prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Paul Callan told Us Weekly that a sentence “of 10 to 20 years” is “likely” if Diddy is convicted.

“Given the severity of the charges, a lengthy jail sentence is a virtual certainty if he is convicted,” Callan told the publication in September 2024. “If convicted, he can expect to spend most of his remaining life behind bars. Federal prosecutors generally obtain guilty pleas or convictions after trial in more than 90% of the cases they bring.”

Callan added that prosecutors “presented a strong case to both federal judges that Combs was likely to flee and/or threaten witnesses in the case if released.”

“In such cases, the federal courts will sustain pretrial incarceration,” he added. “The lower court decision can be appealed but I believe a reversal of the lower court order is unlikely.”

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Sentencing: How Long He Might Serve in Prison
(Photo by Gilbert Flores/Variety via Getty Images)

Why Is Diddy in Jail?

Diddy is behind bars at MDC Brooklyn because he was indicted for multiple charges related to racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Combs was accused of running a “criminal enterprise” to “facilitate his abuse and exploitation of women” from 2008 to the present. Furthermore, Diddy allegedly “committed crimes including sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice.”

Diddy pleaded not guilty to the charges.

What Did They Find in Diddy’s House Raids?

Diddy’s Miami and Los Angeles properties were raided by Homeland Security in mid-2024. Feds seized various items in both homes, including “Freak Off supplies, including narcotics and more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant.”

If you or anyone you know has been sexually abused, call the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673). A trained staff member will provide confidential, judgment-free support as well as local resources to assist in healing, recovering and more.

If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, please call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 for confidential support.



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Panic in Spain holiday hotspot as tourists warned that areas could be left without water | Travel News | Travel

0


Residents and tourists in Pollensa, a popular holiday hotspot in northern Majorca, are being urged to consume as little water as possible following a breakdown in supplies from the Alcudia desalination plant. A series of restrictions have been introduced until the problem is resolved, all while temperatures sit around 36C today on the island.

To make matters worse, on Monday morning (June 30), it was reported that some areas could be left without water. Those in the region have been banned from filling their swimming pools, watering their gardens and cleaning their vehicles and terraces, with water being reserved for only essential needs. A spokesperson for the local water board said: “We continue to recommend using water only for strictly essential needs. We apologise for the inconvenience.”

The statement added: “We continue to implement all emergency measures to maintain the water supply: activation of the Gotmar and Can Colet wells, which, together with our other wells, are operating 24 hours a day. Despite these efforts, the supply is affected and there may be drops in pressure or temporary service interruptions”.

According to the Water Board, supply cuts will occur in Llenaira, Es Pinaret, Putxet, Gotmar, Can Singala, Urbanización de Bóquer, Air Base and Siller. The cuts are expected to take place between 1pm and 7pm local time (2pm and 8pm BST) on Monday, reported the Majorca Daily Bulletin.

There is growing concern in the region, particularly due to the fact that Pollensa hotels and apartments are nearly at 100% occupancy as the busy tourist season begins. 

Pollensa has a high tourist-to-resident ratio, one of the highest in the Balearic Islands. In August, the number of tourists can exceed the number of residents. Specifically, Pollensa has a tourist-to-resident ratio of 24.8 – significantly higher than the Balearic average of 10.25 and more than four times that of Barcelona on the mainland. In August last year alone, the town had just under 59.5k tourists.

The ancient town has been heralded as one of Majorca’s must-see areas. It features attractive narrow streets and an impressive main square lined with cafés, restaurants and bars. All this is just a few miles from Port de Pollenca, a resort particularly popular with Brits for holidays and second homes.

The town has several places of interest to visit, including the still operational Roman bridge, “Pont Roma”, and the Puig de Pollensa, a small mountain topped by a monastery, just outside the town. The Plaça Mayor, dominated by a Parroquial church dating back to the 18th century, is the scene of one of Majorca’s best Sunday markets, attracting many nationalities. The square offers several good cafes where you can enjoy a café con leche and watch the world go by.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Apple dials a ride to lower-cost Macs with A-series chips – Computerworld

0



What these Macs did well is likely what Apple envisions for the speculated upon new model. Think web browsing, casual Mac use, access to web services, writing, reading, Apple Music and iCloud. It also likely means Apple Intelligence, access to cloud-based AI and almost certainly movies, light image editing, and so forth.

It won’t be the Mac you use for anything more sophisticated, but for a lot of people it is likely to be all the Mac they need. Thin, light and underpowered in contrast to MacBook Pro, it’s a model that could prove popular, particularly as the A-series chip means battery life should at least compete with other Macs. 

Building the business

Will Apple be cannibalizing its existing notebook markets with a system of this kind?



This story originally appeared on Computerworld