Kevin O’Leary is talking about buying TikTok again, but this time with more specifics.

The social media app is less than two weeks away from facing a potential ban, though the Supreme Court is set to rule on a pause on Jan. 10 after TikTok and its parent company, China-based ByteDance, asked the Court to hold the Jan. 19 deadline.

In April, U.S. lawmakers passed a bill that forces ByteDance to sell TikTok, though the company has repeatedly said it is not for sale and would prefer to shut it down.

Related: Meta Outage, Looming TikTok Ban Has Creators Questioning How Much of Their Business They Really Control

Still, that hasn’t deterred O’Leary, a.k.a “Mr. Wonderful.”

This week, O’Leary announced that he is joining billionaire and former L.A. Dodgers owner Frank McCourt in a plan to purchase the social network. McCourt launched Project Liberty in 2021 to help build and advocate for a safer and more equitable internet, according to its website.

In May, McCourt revealed that Project Liberty was “building a consortium to purchase TikTok and rearchitect the platform to put people in control of their digital identities and data,” which is known as “the People’s Bid for TikTok.”

“We’ve built a clean, American-made tech stack and continue to be the only viable bidder that can offer a seamless transition for everyone on TikTok without the existing algorithm, said Frank McCourt, founder of Project Liberty, in a press release. “With the addition of Kevin and his countless followers to our bid, The People’s Bid enters a new phase.”

Project Liberty’s investor group has committed to more than $20 billion of capital, according to a spokesperson.

O’Leary has been vocal about wanting to buy TikTok since March 2024, after the news broke of a potential ban. He told Fox & Friends that month, “If this order goes through, it’s got to be sold. I’m going to put up my hand and say I’ll buy it.”

“It’s the largest entertainment and business network in America as it stands today, so it’s of great interest and great value,” O’Leary said last March.

McCourt also noted that he looks forward to “working with President-elect Trump to save TikTok.”

“Kevin and I, along with the thousands of supporters who have come forward to back The People’s Bid, firmly believe we can build a better TikTok – one that protects our national security and becomes a safe, secure platform that millions of people on the app will trust,” McCourt said.

Related: Remote Work Enthusiast Kevin O’Leary Does TV Appearance Wearing Suit Jacket, Tie and Pajama Bottoms

O’Leary talked about his bid for the app in a news appearance this week in his signature pink pajama pants and flip-flops.

Federal Reserve officials at their meeting Dec. 17-18 expected to dial back the pace of interest rate cuts this year in the face of persistently elevated inflation and the threat of widespread tariffs and other potential policy changes.

Minutes from the meeting, released after the typical three-week lag, also showed clear division among the Fed’s 19 policymakers. Some officials expressed support for keeping the central bank’s key rate unchanged, the minutes said. And a majority of the officials said the decision to cut rates was a close call.

Ultimately, the Fed chose to cut its key rate by a quarter-point to about 4.3%. One official, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, dissented in favor of keeping rates unchanged.

Still, there was widespread agreement in the minutes that after reducing rates for three straight meetings, Fed officials felt it was time to undertake a more deliberate approach to their key rate.

Fewer rate cuts will likely mean that borrowing costs for consumers and businesses — including for homes, cars, and credit cards — will remain elevated this year.

Policymakers said that the Fed “was at or near the point at which it would be appropriate to slow the pace of policy easing,” the minutes said. In projections released after the meeting, Fed officials said they expect just two cuts next year, down from an earlier projection of four.

The minutes also showed that “almost all” Fed policymakers see a greater risk than before that inflation could stay higher than they expect, in part because inflation has lingered in several recent readings and because of “the likely effects of potential changes in trade and immigration policy.”

The Fed’s staff economists considered the economy’s future path particularly uncertain at the December meeting, in part because of the incoming Trump administration’s “potential changes to trade, immigration, fiscal, and regulatory policies,” which the staff said are difficult to assess in terms of how they will impact the economy. As a result they included several different scenarios for the economy’s future path in their presentation to policymakers.

And the staff projected that inflation this year would be about the same as in 2024 because they expected Trump’s proposed tariffs would keep inflation elevated.

Fed officials sent stock markets plummeting Dec. 18 after they reduced their outlook for rate cuts. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said at a news conference after the meeting that the decision to reduce rates had been a “close call.”

Powell also said that recent signs of stubborn inflation have caused many Fed officials to pare back their expectations for rate cuts. Inflation, according to the Fed’s preferred measure, ticked up to 2.4% in November, compared with a year ago, above the Fed’s target. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, it was 2.8%.

In addition, some officials have started to consider the potential impact of President-elect Trump’s proposals, such as widespread tariffs, on the economy and inflation next year, the minutes said.

Economists at Goldman Sachs, for example, have estimated that Trump’s tariff proposals could push inflation by nearly a half-percentage point later this year.

Earlier Wednesday, Fed governor Christopher Waller said that he still supported rate reductions this year, in part because he expects inflation to steadily head down to the Fed’s 2% target. He also said he didn’t expect tariffs would worsen inflation and wouldn’t change his preference for lowering borrowing costs.

Waller also said, in a question and answer session, that he didn’t think Trump would ultimately impose the universal tariffs he promised in the campaign.