Wednesday, February 26, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 418

The Picture Show : NPR

0


Tuesdau, Jan. 7: Smoke from a wildfire is seen from the Venice Beach section of Los Angeles, Calif.

Jae C. Hong/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jae C. Hong/AP

Two of the largest fires burning — the Eaton fire in Altadena and Pasadena, and the coastal Palisades fire –remain largely uncontained ahead of windier conditions expected to move.

Aerial firefighters have laid down fire retardant over the mountains, painting the peaks in red lines. Crews from other states, Mexico and Canada have joined in the firefighting effort.

Gov. Gavin Newsom said more than 14,000 personnel are involved in the effort to control the fires.

We take a look at the most dramatic and terrifying photos of the California wildfire devastation.

Tuesday, Jan. 7: A firefighter battles the advancing Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Etienne Laurent/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Etienne Laurent/AP

Tuesday, Jan. 7: A woman cries as flames advance in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Etienne Laurent/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Etienne Laurent/AP

Tuesday, Jan. 7: A firefighter jumps over a fence while fighting the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Tuesday, Jan. 7: The Palisades Fire engulfs homes in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Tuesday, Jan. 7: A firefighter battles the Palisades Fire.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Tuesday, Jan. 7: A resident of a senior center is evacuated as the Eaton Fire approaches in Altadena, Calif.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Wednesday, Jan. 8: A man walks his bike among the ruins left behind by the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles.

Damian Dovarganes/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Damian Dovarganes/AP

Wednesday, Jan. 8: Fire-damaged vehicles are lined up at a dealership after the Eaton Fire swept through Altadena, Calif.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Wednesday, Jan. 8: Megan Mantia, left, and her boyfriend, Thomas, return to Mantia’s fire-damaged home after the Eaton Fire swept through Altadena, Calif.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Wednesday, Jan. 8: Residents are evacuated from a senior living facility as the Eaton Fire approaches Altadena, Calif.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Thursday, Jan. 9: A person walks amid the destruction left by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Jae C. Hong/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jae C. Hong/AP

Thursday, Jan. 9: Fire crews battle the Kenneth Fire in the West Hills section of Los Angeles.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Thursday, Jan. 9: Water is dropped by helicopter on the Kenneth Fire in the West Hills section of Los Angeles.

Ethan Swope/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ethan Swope/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: A firefighter battles the Palisades Fire in Mandeville Canyon in Los Angeles.

Jae C. Hong/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Jae C. Hong/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: Firefighters stand in a fire-ravaged zone while battling the Palisades Fire in Mandeville Canyon in Los Angeles.

Eric Thayer/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Eric Thayer/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: Oliver Braren wipes his eyes as he takes a moment from sifting through the fire-ravaged home of Kaegan Baron’s mother in Los Angeles.

John Locher/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

John Locher/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: Kaegan Baron sits amid the rubble of her mother’s home, which was destroyed by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles.

John Locher/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

John Locher/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: Ella Venne, front, holds a cup she found in the remains of her family’s home destroyed by the Eaton Fire as she searches with Glendale Fire Department Capt. Chris Jernegan, left, and his wife, Alison,in Altadena, Calif.

Mark J. Terrill/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark J. Terrill/AP

Saturday, Jan. 11: Smoke from the Palisades Fire rises over a ridge as seen from the Encino section of Los Angeles.

Richard Vogel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Richard Vogel/AP

Sunday, Jan. 12: The sun rises behind a home destroyed by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades community of Los Angeles.

Noah Berger/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Noah Berger/AP

Sunday, Jan. 12: A car drives past homes and vehicles destroyed by the Palisades Fire at the Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates in Los Angeles.

Noah Berger/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Noah Berger/AP



This story originally appeared on NPR

Harvard study suggests tactic for U.S. jails to reduce inmate deaths

0

County jails may be able to improve access to medical care and lower death rates behind bars through healthcare accreditation, according to new research by Harvard University economists — but the process still leaves inmates frustrated by low standards of care.

The Harvard study shared with The Times looked at 44 midsize jails across the country and found those that earned accreditation from the nonprofit National Commission on Correctional Health Care saw a 93% lower monthly death rate than those that didn’t. Over the course of the study, that reduction could have saved about 15 lives, the researchers said in a preliminary draft of their work, which has not yet been peer-reviewed.

Crystal Yang, a professor at Harvard Law School and one of the study’s co-authors, said jails that seek a stamp of approval from the NCCHC tend to better educate staff about referring inmates for treatment. The purpose is “making sure the processes and procedures for triaging and managing inmate patients are up to standard,” she told The Times.

Becoming accredited takes several months, usually costs $5,000 to $10,000, the Harvard researchers said, and typically involves a facility inspection by NCCHC experts. The jails in the study didn’t hire more staff, change healthcare providers or buy new equipment — but still saw lower death rates than the facilities that did not seek accreditation.

“They were able to provide services better with the capital and labor they had on hand,” said another study co-author, Marcella Alsan, a professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School.

The researchers did not examine whether accreditation resulted in doctors seeing inmates more often, and said it did not result in facilities offering a wider array of services. But they said their findings suggest some healthcare services were offered more frequently and in a more timely manner at accredited facilities — such as intake medical and mental health screenings for new inmates.

Alsan said the accreditation process also spurred better communication between medical and correctional staff, improved compliance with safety and training standards, and boosted job satisfaction.

The research comes as jails across the country — including those in Los Angeles — have seen an uptick in deaths and growing criticism of conditions behind bars. In 2023, 45 people died in L. A. County lockups, driving the county’s jail death rate to more than twice what it had been a decade earlier.

The research does not include the names or counties of the jails that were included in the study, as they were guaranteed anonymity to participate. Nine of the jails were in California, but they all had average daily populations between 100 and 3,000, meaning the Los Angeles jails — which average around 12,800 inmates per day — were not included. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said in an email that its facilities do not have NCCHC accreditation.

The Harvard study contained some indications that accreditation is not a cure-all for troubled jail health systems.

Staff at accredited facilities included in the research self-reported lower levels of respect for inmates than peers at non-certified jails. The inmates interviewed for the study offered dim views of the treatment they received regardless of their jail’s accreditation status.

“Medical staff assume you are lying [about health issues],” one inmate told researchers. The unnamed inmate added they didn’t think the poor level of treatment they’d received in jail — one of the accredited ones — “was possible in this country.” Similarly, an inmate at a facility that was not accredited told the researchers they were treated like “animals.”

In 2021, the researchers identified several dozen jails interested in participating in a study, then paid the costs for them to become accredited. For the next few years, the Harvard team interviewed staff and inmates, and surveyed the facilities as they went through the process.

Two of the jails initially in the study dropped out early on — in one case, because someone in the facility’s medical leadership team had a heart attack, and in the other case because someone in the facility’s custody leadership team was sued for sexual harassment. Of the remaining 44 jails, half were assigned to get accreditation and half were not. Eleven succeeded, and two others are on track to finish. Nationally, about 15 to 20% of jails are accredited, the researchers said.

The 13 jails that completed or will complete accreditation had a 18% higher rate of compliance with safety and prevention standards, and a 25% higher rate of compliance with personnel training standards, the researchers found. And while three people died in the 13 facilities on the accreditation track, their 22 non-accredited counterparts saw 27 deaths in the same time frame.

As to why they found such improvements in healthcare compliance and outcomes, the researchers suggested in a draft of their report that the bar is low to begin with: “It seems the magnitude of our effects are due to the fact that there is considerable scope for improvement among U.S. jails, where information frictions and coordination problems are severe and where health outcomes are much worse than widely believed.”

In recent years, Los Angeles County inmates have died from jumping off railings, banging their heads against a wall and injecting drugs with makeshift needles, The Times has previously reported. At least three inmates died after stuffing paper, sanitary napkins or other items down their throats, asphyxiating before anyone intervened. One man died after he was beaten and left bleeding for four hours before guards noticed. A Times analysis of state and county data last year found that in Los Angeles jails, natural deaths, killings and overdoses were all up compared with 10 years ago.

But ultimately last year proved to be less deadly than the year before; by the end of 2024, the Sheriff’s Department reported that 32 people died in its custody, marking the jails’ lowest death toll since 2019.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Apple teases opening of new downtown Miami store

0


Downloadable wallpaper for Apple Miami Worldcenter

Apple has launched a website and downloadable wallpaper for Apple Miami Worldcenter, a new store due to open on January 24.

As part of its expansion in Miami, Apple has been working on adding a new store in the currently under construction luxury Worldcenter development. It’s now officially due to open on Friday, January 24, 2025.

“Our brand-new store in downtown Miami is opening soon,” says Apple on its new retail website for the store. “Get ready to discover an oasis in the heart of the city, where nature thrives and creativity flourishes.”

“We can’t wait to see what blooms in you,” it continues.

Alongside the store’s theme of “naturally inspiring,” Apple has again included specially-created new wallpapers to download. Depending on the device used to read the site, it will automatically download the Mac, iPhone, or iPad versions.

Apple Miami Worldcenter is the tenth store in Miami, with the first one, Apple The Falls, which opened in 2001. At one point, the new Worldcenter store was expected to be the largest Apple Store in the world, but that now appears to be have been realtor hyperbole, as it’s estimated to be around 16,000 square feet, which is far less than Apple Store UAE in Dubai.



This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Big John sides with Curtis on UFC Vegas 101 stoppage: ‘Don’t stop the fight’

0


Chris Curtis was on the receiving end of another wonky reffing job at UFC Vegas 101.

“Action Man” and Roman Kopylov each had one round going into the third round of their middleweight bout on Saturday night. Then round three got interesting. Kopylov hit Curtis with a low blow and an eye poke, slowing down Curtis’ momentum. And then he landed a big head kick on Curtis that knocked him to the ground. But rather than swarm his opponent, who was getting back to his feet, Kopylov walked away.

The referee stopped the fight as Curtis was rising to his feet. Time left in the bout? 1 second.

This is one of those times where you know there are probably thousands of people who bet on Curtis-Kopylov going the distance that are crazy mad. Chris Curtis himself was crazy mad at the time too, and we don’t blame him for how that shook out. That fight probably shouldn’t have been stopped, but we don’t know what referee Mark Smith saw in Curtis’ eyes that made the decision for him.

According to legendary referee “Big” John McCarthy, though, he wouldn’t have stopped things.

“Going into the third, I had it 1-1,” McCarthy said (via Bloody Elbow). “It was obvious Kopylov was winning the third round, but the stoppage was bad. If Kopylov had gone after Chris, it would’ve been a good stoppage. You’ve gotta stop the fight when the person cannot defend themselves, and at that moment, there was nothing to defend against.”

“You’re taking a look at what happened with Curtis,” he continued. “Curtis got hurt, he got hit with a good kick and goes down on the side, but he’s looking towards his opponent to a point. And his opponent’s walking off? He has nothing to defend! Don’t stop the fight there.”

“If he’s out: stop the fight. But if he’s not, and his opponent’s walking off and you know I’ve already heard the [10 second clapper]. Counting off in my head if you’re doing the job correctly, I don’t stop the fight.”

The outcome wasn’t really changed, though. If the fight had gone that extra second and went to the judges, the decision would have gone to Kopylov anyways. Maybe that’s why Chris Curtis didn’t mention the incident in his post-fight statement (which was followed by a deactivation of all his social media accounts).

“Only job in the world where you can make $200k in a night and still be absolutely heartbroken and questioning where you go from here,” Curtis wrote on Instagram. “No damage, I’m fine. Probably train tomorrow for my sanity. But just frustrated and heartbroken. 8 months off. Hamstring tear, broken foot, and then a calf tear. Trained through it all. Never lost sight of the goal. Just hurts to come up short.”

“I guess I should take some comfort in Fight of the Night, but I only view tonight as a failure. Maybe 170 is the way to go from here.”



This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

See Hints & Solution – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: NurPhoto via Getty Images

The famous New York Times word game, “Wordle,” has become a global addiction. All players have six tries to guess the five-letter answer for each day’s “Wordle” in the games section of the publication. So, what was today’s Wordle answer?

See the hints for the January 13, 2025, Wordle and the answer by scrolling all the way down below.

What Is Today’s Wordle Hint?

The Wordle hint for January 13, 2025, is: A piece of clothing often worn for warmth or mystery.

What Letter Does Today’s Wordle Start With?

Today’s Wordle starts with the letter C.

Are There Any Repeated Letters in Today’s Wordle?

There are no repeated letters.

Who Invented Wordle?

Software engineer and artist Josh Wardle created Wordle during the COVID-19 lockdowns with his partner Palak Shah. He studied media arts at Royal Holloway, University of London, then earned a Master of Fine Arts in Digital Art. Josh worked at Reddit and Pinterest before Wordle became a global sensation.

The game’s title is a play on Josh’s last name. According to The Verge, Josh revealed he had originally considered calling the game “Mr. Bugs’ Wordy Nugz.”

“This is true: I was going to call ‘Wordle,’ Mr. Bugs’ Wordy Nugz,” he previously shared during an on-stage presentation. “Had I called the game Mr. Bugs, I like to think it would not have been successful.”

While developing the prototype for Wordle, Josh only showed it to close friends and family.

“I was trying to do something that was authentic to me. I was trying to build something for someone that I loved,” Josh previously explained, according to The Verge. “It just so happened a bunch of other people loved it.”

Josh advised other innovators to follow their own paths and avoid replicating an invention like his.

“Don’t try to make ‘Wordle.’ Make the thing that you’re passionate about that is meaningful to you,” he suggested. “And then everything else will follow from that.”

What Is the Wordle Answer for January 13?

The answer for Monday’s Wordle is CLOAK.

A new Wordle is available every day, so check back tomorrow for more help on your next challenge!



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife

Holidaymakers urged to never travel with a ‘black suitcase with wheels’ | Travel News | Travel

0


If you’re planning an overseas trip in the near future, it will pay to think about what kind of suitcase you want to bring with you.

While it can be tempting to opt for a brightly coloured suitcase, experts say a plain black suitcase might not be the choice to go for.

Travel expert Johnny Jet claimed on his travel blog that a plain black suitcase is more easily lost.

A luggage executive told Johnny that a hard-sided black suitcase with wheels is “the most common type of suitcase in the world,” and therefore the most likely to get lost and the hardest to find or identify.

“It’s almost regarded as the default bag type. If your bag is missing, you don’t want to be the black hard one, you want to be the green one,” he said.

As well as this, a German airport recently advised tourists to opt for colourful luggage to avoid delays: “Many people travel with black suitcases on wheels which makes identifying them very time-intensive.”

The spokesperson added: “No matter which company you buy your luggage from, just make sure it’s not a black hard-sided suitcase because you want your luggage to be easy to identify.”

However, security expert and CEO of Get Licensed, Shahzad Ali, said that in terms of staying safe and avoiding getting robbed on holiday, dark luggage is the best option.

He explained: “Although a new and colourful suitcase may look more fashionable, it won’t only be attractive to you. It’s best to choose a more common-looking suitcase, and if possible, a worn-out one – as to not stand out from the crowd – and with it, a high-quality padlock.”

Whichever colour suitcase you choose, airport baggage handlers have confirmed that the best kind of suitcase to travel with is a hardshell one with four wheels.

One person who claimed they were a baggage handler posted to Reddit, saying that the best suitcases have “four good wheels, with soft lining on the inside and a hard outer shell.”

The hardshell will protect your luggage from being dropped or thrown, and having four wheels means it can be rolled into the hold without needing to be thrown – keeping your belongings safer.

When it comes to identifying which bag is yours they added: “One good way I’ve seen is to put your own tag on the bag with your name and address so that you can read this and make sure it’s yours. Other ways include using unique straps that wrap around the bags.”

To keep your belongings safe, experts recommend using Airtags so that if your bag is lost you can track where it’s gone. You should also keep a list of how many items you’re travelling with so you will immediately realise if a bag has been left behind or lost.



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

‘Nosferatu’ Sets an Important 2024 Horror Record

0


Nosferatu, Robert Eggers’ outstanding modern adaptation of the 1922 classic by F.W. Murnau, has reached a major milestone in the performance metrics of 2024. Recently released on Christmas Day, 2024, the vampire movie has made more than $135 million at the box office and has sailed past major releases like Longlegs and The Substance, making it the highest-grossing horror movie of the year that wasn’t a prequel or a sequel. Sure, it’s still a remake, so it’s too soon to say that audiences have embraced originality, though it’s a remake of a century-old film (not counting Werner Herzog’s 1979 version).

1922’s loose adaptation of Bram Stoker’s vampire classic Dracula (reworked for legal reasons at the time), Nosferatu has long been esteemed as one of the greatest horror films of all time. 2024’s remake was a passion project for Eggers, whose idea for a new adaptation had been brewing in his mind since he began making Hollywood movies like The Witch. Nosferatu has been his only take on a pre-existing IP, but it doesn’t mean it’s less original than it should be. By the time of writing, it holds an 85% score on Rotten Tomatoes and has the valuable label Certified Fresh, one that’s not often given to horror films.

Nosferatu’s run at the box office has been good enough for the film to claim the title of 2024’s highest-grossing non-sequel, non-prequel horror movie. Per the report by Screen Rant, the title was previously in the hands of Longlegs, Osgood Perkins’ serial killer horror film starring Nicolas Cage and Maika Monroe. The film, distributed by NEON, made $127 million at the box office from a production budget that didn’t reach $10 million. Eggers’ film was much more expensive, as the production budget was reported at a whopping $50 million (much of it was probably spent on paying high-profile actors and shooting locations).

Related


10 of the Most Underrated Horror Movies of 2024

The horror universe of 2024 was vast, and some watchable gems may have fallen under your radar.

Other original horror films that were prominent box office-wise in 2024 include Exhuma ($93.9 million, the highest-grossing movie of 2024 in South Korea), Trap ($82.7 million), The Substance ($79 million), Speak No Evil ($76.8 million, but it’s a remake, so perhaps it doesn’t entirely fit the category of “original horror”), Night Swim ($54.8 million), and Heretic ($51.9 million).

2024 Had Its Fair Share of Horror Bangers

Last year saw the release of excellent horror films that once again proved the worth of the genre in an era of complicated release schedules and where streaming platforms each day become more important for lesser-known movies. The preference is, of course, a theatrical release, but 2024 also proved that a digital release close to theatrical helps a film grow. In the land of streaming, the odds are all the same for horror movies.

The most successful horror film of the year was Alien: Romulus, making well over $350 million. A Quiet Place: Day One follows with $261 million, and Smile 2 follows with $138 million. The odds that Nosferatu will win over the horror sequel by Parker Finn are high, as it only has to make less than $3 million to sit in third spot. One could argue that Beetlejuice Beetlejuice should also be in the race, and if we decide to include it, the legacy sequel would be the highest-grossing horror film of 2024. The Tim Burton film made more than $451 million.

What does this prove? It proves that horror is still the profitable genre it has always been. While franchises and existing IP are still surefire ways to success, the occasional indie can certainly blow up the box office, proving that you don’t need a massive budget to make millions. You only need good marketing. Even something as gory and disgusting as Terrifier 3 can make almost $90 million from a $2 million production budget.



This story originally appeared on Movieweb

The True Story Of Lone Survivor Explained

0


2013’s Lone Survivor is based on an incredible true story, but how accurate is the film when compared to the real events that transpired? Directed by Peter Berg and starring Mark Wahlberg, Lone Survivor is a biographical war film and a retelling of a specific operation during the war in Afghanistan. The strong cast and talented director attached to the film allowed Lone Survivor to become one of the highest-grossing war movies of all time.

Amid the heroic acts in Lone Survivor‘s somewhat sensationalized narrative is a true story that is based on a 2007 nonfiction book. The book is titled Lone Survivor: The Eyewitness Account of Operation Red Wings and the Lost Heroes of SEAL Team 10 and is an incredible true story that was retold by Berg and his team. The film is well-crafted, excellently performed, suitably tense, and exciting. It becomes even more unbelievable when concerning the true story on which Lone Survivor is based.

Lone Survivor Was Based On Operation Red Wings

The Real Event Happened In 2005

The true story of Lone Survivor comes from Operation Red Wings. This operation was highlighted by one of its combatants – Marcus Luttrell ,whom Mark Wahlberg portrayed in the movie. Operation Red Wings, also known as the Battle of Abbas Ghar, was a United States military operation in 2005 during the war in Afghanistan. The operation was a targeted strike against a man named Ahmad Shah by a team of Navy SEALs with the primary objective of gaining sufficient intel on the area and Shah’s activities.

Operation Red Wings

Dare

June 27 – mid-July 2005

Location

Sawtalo Sar Mountain in Afghanistan

Result

Taliban victory

The operation involved a team of four SEALs being fast-roped into the target area by a helicopter, where they were expected to find Shah. However, Operation Red Wings went awry when the four SEALs were discovered, leading to a lengthy conflict that lasted around three weeks. Lone Survivor highlights Operation Red Wings from its beginning to its ending.

Why The Navy SEAL Team Was Targeting Ahmad Shah

He Was The Leader Of The Local Taliban-Aligned Anti-Coalition Militias

Luttrell, Dietz, and Murphy fighting the Taliban in Lone Survivor

Interestingly, one of the few historical inaccuracies of 2013’s Lone Survivor is the listing of Ahmad Shah as a high-level al-Qaeda operative. The film and Luttrell’s original book also stated that Shah was one of Osama bin Laden’s closest associates. However, it has since been disproven that Shah was a member of the Taliban, nor was he a comrade to bin Laden. In reality, the Navy SEAL team targeted Ahmad Shah during Operation Red Wings as he was the leader of the local Taliban-aligned anti-coalition militias.

Related


25 Best War Movies Of All Time

They say all is fair in love and war, and cinema has taken great liberties with the latter. However, it’s also been impressively creative.

The group of SEALs was tasked with surveillance and reconnaissance of several structures that were known to belong to Shah and his men. However, Shah became aware of the SEALs’ location and the latter were ambushed by the former. This derailed Operation Red Wings and led to the deaths of all but one of the SEAL members.

How The SEALs Were Killed During Operation Red Wings (Except Marcus Luttrell)

Marcus Luttrell Was The Lone Survivor

Luttrell, Murphy, Dietz, and Axelson preparing for their mission in Lone Survivor

The titular lone survivor of Operation Red Wings was Marcus Luttrell. Tragically, the other three members of his SEAL team were killed during the Taliban attack. The attack began after civilian goat herders encountered the team. The team debated whether to kill the civilians, as they may have been Taliban sympathizers, or set them free. The SEALs opted for the latter, yet Shah was subsequently alerted to the location of Luttrell and his team. This resulted in a full-on assault by Shah and an overwhelming number of soldiers that faced the four SEALs, resulting in three of their deaths.

Danny Dietz

Lone Survivor Danny Dietz as played by Emile Hirsch

The first SEAL to be killed was Petty Officer Second Class Danny Dietz. Dietz was caught in the brunt of the initial assault by the Taliban. In an interview with CBS News, Luttrell outlined that Dietz was shot multiple times during the initial attack. As Luttrell was dragging Dietz further down the mountain, he was fatally shot in the head.

Michael Murphy

Lone Survivor Michael Murphy as played by Taylor Kitsch

The next death during Operation Red Wings was Lieutenant Michael Murphy. Shortly after Dietz was killed, Murphy scaled the mountain, leaving cover in favor of a clearing in order to get a signal on his satellite phone. Murphy did this in the hopes of contacting headquarters to alert them of Shah’s attack and gain reinforcements. However, Murphy’s exposed position saw him become an easy target for the attacking enemy and he was shot multiple times, dying shortly thereafter from his wounds despite succeeding in calling for help.

Matthew Axelson

Lone Survivor Matthew Axe Axelson as played by Ben Foster

The third and final Navy SEAL to be killed during Operation Red Wings was Sonar technician Second Class Matthew Axelson. Like Dietz, Axelson was gravely wounded during the brunt of the Taliban attack. Reports indicated that Axelson was shot in his chest, yet continued to fend off the attack until he suffered a gunshot wound to the head mere hours after the operation began.

How Luttrell Was Kept Alive From The Invading Taliban

Mohammad Gulab Invoked The Pashtunwali Custom Of Nanawatai

As Lone Survivor depicts, Marcus Luttrell was then left alive as the last remaining SEAL during Operation Red Wings. After this, the story of Luttrell’s survival against the oncoming wave of Taliban soldiers is remarkable. Wounded, Luttrell continued to descend the mountain on which he was pinned until he came across a Pashtun – Afghanistan’s largest ethnic group – civilian named Mohammad Gulab. Gulab invoked the Pashtunwali custom of Nanawatai, in which asylum is granted to protect someone from their enemies.

Gulab took Luttrell back to his village and insisted the other villagers protect him.

As such, Gulab took Luttrell back to his village and insisted the other villagers protect him until U.S. soldiers could safely rescue him. Partly due to the goodwill that had recently been built between the Americans and the civilians of the Shuryek Valley, Luttrell’s sanctuary was welcomed. Through a handful of other civilians, including Gulab, in the Shuryek Valley, a note written by Luttrell made its way to the Marine base in Nangalam. Eventually, Luttrell was extracted from the valley by U.S. Air Force Pararescuemen.

What Happened To The Real Marcus Luttrell

He Returned To Active Duty Before Returning Home in 2007

Marcus Luttrell and his son Axe from Lone Survivor

While the 2013 film Lone Survivor depicts these events, the movie’s ending leaves little exploration of what happened to Marcus Luttrell after his rescue. The real Luttrell was naturally allowed time to recover from his injuries sustained during Operation Red Wings. After his recovery, Luttrell returned to full duty and was redeployed to Ramadi, a city in central Iraq. As such, Luttrell fought in Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2006 as part of SEAL Team Five.

Luttrell’s further service then saw him withstand more injuries including further spinal fractures after suffering the same during Operation Red Wings. Luttrell also had his knees blown out with these injuries resulting in his discharge from the U.S. Army. Luttrell received the Navy Cross, the second-highest military decoration for Navy members, before returning home in 2007. In relation to the aptly titled Lone Survivor film, Luttrell established the Lone Survivor Foundation in 2010 to aid wounded soldiers and their families in light of his trauma during the incredible true story of Operation Red Wings.

What Changes Did The Lone Survivor Movie Make?

Several Changes Were Made To Add Excitement

Lone Survivor montage with Mark Wahlberg

As this is a movie meant to entertain viewers, Lone Survivor made some key changes to the real story in the film. One example is that the movie shows Marcus Luttrell’s heart stop beating during his rescue. That did not happen in real life. Luttrell was not almost dead before his rescue. Instead, he had time to have tea during the debriefing, and some of the villagers were also there during this downtime. Marcus then said goodbye and left, making his exit much less dramatic in real life.

There was also a moment in the movie that was changed from the book. In the novel, there was a vote by the four soldiers on whether they would kill the goatherds or let them go. Many contested this after the book’s publication. In the movie, Taylor Kitsch’s Lt. Mike Murphy said in the film, “This is not a vote,” as they decided the goatherds’ fate. According to Peter Berg, this was done to honor the soldiers’ families since the vote did not happen in real life, but a discussion did. “Mike Murphy made that decision. It wasn’t a vote,” Berg said.

In the movie, there were around 50 Taliban fighters.

As for the battle itself, there are many different versions of how many Taliban fighters attacked the four American soldiers. In the movie, there were around 50 Taliban fighters. The book claims there were between 80 and 200 armed men. However, Marcus Littrell said both of these estimates are high, and there were only 20 to 35 Anti-Calition Militia fighters. Lieutenant Michael Murphy’s official Medal of Honor citation says, “between 30 and 40 enemy fighters besieged his four-member team.”

Finally, the movie’s final fight before Luttrell was rescued was invented to offer a climactic conclusion. The U.S. forces didn’t have to fight off the Taliban to save Luttrell. Also, Gulab was shot in the back, and his house was blown up in Lone Survivor, and neither of those things happened in real life. In reality, Army Rangers and Afghan special forces rescued Luttrell in the woods when Gulab and his villagers were trying to get Luttrell to a safe location.

lone-survivor


Lone Survivor is a dramatization of the United States Navy SEALs’ Operation Red Wing, an unsuccessful military operation that aimed to track down the leader of the Taliban. The film follows the four-man SEAL team, and the danger and psychological strain they faced on their mission.

Release Date

December 25, 2013

Runtime

121 minutes

Cast

Mark Wahlberg
, Taylor Kitsch
, Emile Hirsch
, Ben Foster
, Eric Bana
, Ali Suliman

Director

Peter Berg

Distributor(s)

Universal Pictures



This story originally appeared on Screenrant

LeBron James achieves another NBA record in Lakers’ win over Kings

0


Midway through the first quarter Thursday night, LeBron James checked out against the Sacramento Kings, walking to the bench in the city where he played his first NBA regular season minutes more than 21 years ago.

It would be his last walk off the court before achieving another milestone. By the time his next shift ended in the second quarter, he passed Kareem Abdul-Jabbar for the most minutes logged in the regular season, breaking the previous record of 57,446 minutes.

“I just think it’s just a commitment to the craft and to the passion and love I have for the game,” James said about his achievement — one in which he has spent more than 957 hours playing in professional basketball games.

Still, after all that time, James is capable of making winning plays — the chase-down block, the key defensive stop and the bully-ball dagger all playing a role in helping the Lakers defeat the Kings 113-100.

Austin Reaves led the Lakers with 25 points and James had 19 points, six rebounds and seven assists. He ended the game at 57,471 career minutes after playing 34 minutes.

“I’ve been able to do this at a high level over two decades,” James said. “And to continue to put myself in record books in this game of basketball that I love so much and in the best league in the world is pretty cool and it’s very humbling.”

Despite a slow shooting night, Anthony Davis dominated with 21 points, four assists and season highs of 18 rebounds and six blocked shots. Davis also had three steals.

“He was phenomenal tonight,” coach JJ Redick said. “And it just shows you how elite he is as a player that he can have a seven-for-20 night and still dominate a basketball game.”

The minutes record comes at a time when the Lakers and James have been very in touch with how much he has (and hasn’t) been playing. James missed two games and spent a week away from the team, getting a mental and physical reset after his left foot began to bother him.

He returned Sunday against Memphis and had noticeably more energy on both ends of the court. Redick said the team could look for other opportunities to give the soon-to-be 40-year-old more rest.

Speaking before the game, James said, more so than in the past, he could be open to that.

“I’m just not a guy that likes to sit games if I’m somewhat healthy. It doesn’t matter. It’s just, it’s never been my thing,” James said when asked about it. “If there’s an opportunity where it could benefit my body and benefit my play long-term for the better of the team, then I’m always open to having that conversation. So we’ll see what happens.”

The Lakers, who had three days off since their last game, had plenty of energy, using it against the Kings to storm to an early 14-point lead on the backs of their much-improved defense.

With the Kings playing transition defense, the Lakers were able to create tons of open looks from the perimeter, making seven threes in the first quarter alone.

The game tightened in the second, the Kings taking the lead before the Lakers’ best players took control.

Reaves got to the line and hit big shots. Davis out-battled Domantas Sabonis, a player he’s now bested two games in a row. And James controlled the game without dominating the flow of it. Gabe Vincent, who has struggled to shoot the ball since joining the Lakers, hit four threes.

But it was defensively where the Lakers continued to play their best basketball, holding an opponent to 100 points or fewer for the third time in four games.

“I really felt like this might be my favorite win we’ve had all season just because we weren’t efficient offensively,” Redick said. “But because of our crashing, because we limited them in transition, limited them to one shot — like all of the things that we’ve preached that give yourself a chance to win every night if you have an off-shooting night and an off-offensive night — we did tonight.”

James said that he wasn’t thinking about what his accomplishment meant for the future, not even in regard to Saturday’s rematch with the Kings in Sacramento.

“I just set the all-time [record] in minutes,” he said with a smile. “I am not thinking about this next game yet. I’m about to get to this room, drink some wine, play some Madden and chill the f— out.”

Soon there will be another game and more minutes to play, and whatever works, well, it’s worked.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Philadelphia 76ers will not build contentious $1.3B arena

0


PHILADELPHIA — The Philadelphia 76ers have decided not to build a $1.3 billion downtown arena, a surprising move that comes just weeks after the team received approval for the controversial project from the city council.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported Sunday that multiple council members had confirmed the change in plans. The team has struck a deal with Comcast Spectacor to remain in the city’s sports stadium district, the newspaper said, but further details about the new proposal have not been released.

The 76ers, the mayor’s office and Comcast Spectator — which owns the Wells Fargo Center, where the team currently plays — did not respond Sunday to requests for comment. The team rents the arena from Comcast Spectacor, which also owns the Philadelphia Flyers of the NHL, who play there too.

Opponents of the arena’s move to downtown celebrated the news.

Two City Council members who voted against the plan, Jamie Gauthier and Rue Landau, said the reversal shows that the 76ers’ development arm had not dealt in good faith with the city.

“We’re glad that the Sixers will remain in the stadium district where they best belong. But the way they reached this decision reflects a profound lack of respect for City leaders, stakeholders, and residents,” Gauthier and Rue said in a statement.

The 76ers’ downtown development plan had pitted working-class Philadelphians against each another and the team had pressured City Council to consider a “half-baked” proposal that left open questions about gridlock and the displacement of the city’s Chinatown section, they said.

The council had voted Dec. 19 to approve the downtown arena after more than two years of heated debate over the proposal, and the owners of the NBA team had hoped to move into what would be called 76 Place by 2031. The council vote came despite vocal opposition from nearby Chinatown residents and other activists.

“I’m so livid right now I don’t even know what to do,” Jimmy Harrity, an at-large member of the council, told the newspaper. Harrity, who supported the team’s move, said, “I feel as though I was used as a pawn.”

Mayor Cherelle Parker, a Democrat who had championed the plan, has said the entire city will benefit from what she called a “historic game-changing economic development project.” Supporters had hoped the 18,500-seat arena would help revive a distressed retail corridor called Market East, which runs from City Hall to the Liberty Bell. The area has struggled for years despite redevelopment efforts.

The team owner, Harris Blitzer Sports & Entertainment, had pushed for city approval by year’s end so it could meet the target opening date. It had vowed not to ask the city for any construction funding, although it was free to seek state and federal funds. Instead of property taxes, it would have paid about $6 million in annual payments.

Opponents feared the arena would bring gridlock on game days as well as gentrification and rising rents to the area.

The Chinatown community has fought a series of proposed developments since the 1960s, including casinos, a prison, a baseball stadium and a highway, the last of which dissected the neighborhood when it opened in 1991.



This story originally appeared on ESPN