Thursday, February 13, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 50

Trump angling for nine-figure payout from CBS to settle $10B lawsuit over Harris interview: sources

0

President Trump is angling for a massive payout from CBS – significantly more than what he accepted from ABC and Meta – to settle his $10 billion lawsuit over alleged election interference, The Post has learned.  

Sources with knowledge of the negotiations told The Post that Trump’s lawyers are poised to ask for as much as nine figures – a sum that would vastly exceed the $16 million recently paid by ABC and the $25 million doled out by Meta in recent weeks.

The two sides began “very preliminary” discussions last week over the controversial “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris, which Trump has claimed was deceptively edited to boost the Democrat in the presidential race.

President Trump plans to ask for much more than $50 million from CBS in a settlement. REUTERS

Trump’s team has yet to propose a settlement offer to Paramount, a source with knowledge of the negotiations told The Post.

But a source close to Trump’s legal team said he would not be surprised if the president demanded $100 million — or more.

“Is $100 million or $150 million a possibility? I don’t see why not,” the source said.

The expected nine-figure opening salvo from Team Trump would be similar to the hard-knuckle negotiating tactics used by his legal team against ABC in its defamation suit after star anchor George Stephanopoulos insisted that Trump was “found liable of rape,” the source added.

Those negotiations involved Donald Trump Jr., according to the insider.

Donald Trump Jr. represented his father in settlement talks with ABC. Getty Images

The president’s oldest son, whose participation in the talks has not previously been reported, had reached a tentative deal for around $15 million but then Trump’s lawyers jacked up the demand to roughly three times that amount, the source said.

The two sides finally settled on $15 million being donated to Trump’s presidential library and another $1 million in lawyers’ fees.

“I think what happened with ABC proves Trump will be very aggressive,” the source said.

CBS News released the transcript of the 60 Minutes interview as it starts settlement talks with Trump. 60 Minutes / CBS

ABC declined to comment.

CBS parent Paramount Global and the media giant’s controlling stakeholder Shari Redstone have a lot riding on getting the issue resolved as she looks to finally close the merger with the Larry and David Ellison controlled Skydance Media.

The $8 billion deal – $2 billion less than what Trump is suing CBS for in a Texas court – was expected to close in the first quarter of the year. The Redstone family is set to walk away with $1.75 billion.

But the deal faces intense scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission, which has scheduled a public hearing late next month over “news distortion” allegations against CBS News.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr will decide if Ellison’s Skydance gets to buy Paramount. Anadolu via Getty Images

On Wednesday, Trump-appointed FCC chair Brendan Carr released the unedited transcript and video of Harris’ “60 Minutes” sit-down, which revealed that the venerated news program cut down one of her “word salad” answers about Israel to just 20 words.

“Carr is trying to kick the can down the road so he doesn’t have to make a decision on approving the merger,” a source close to the talks speculated, and will give the parties a chance to settle before the FCC steps in.

Representatives for CBS and the FCC declined to comment.

Trump slammed the network in a post on Truth Social after the release of the transcripts.

“This was election changing ‘stuff’, election interference and, quite simply election fraud at a level never seen before. CBS should lose its license,” he wrote.

A lawyer for Trump also claimed “CBS and its parent company Paramount deceived the American people.”

“Real accountability for CBS and Paramount will ensure that the President is compensated for the harm done to him, and will deter the Fake News from further distorting the facts to advance a partisan agenda,” Trump attorney Ed Paltzik told The Post.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

The border is secure again, thanks to Trump — but Joe & Co. could have fixed it the whole time

0

Hallelujah, the border is finally working again: Border Patrol chief Michael Banks announced Thursday that illegal border-crossing attempts have dropped 90% since President Trump took office less than three weeks ago.

Which is the final proof that the Biden crew could’ve gotten the same results anytime in the last four years — had they actually wanted to.

Instead, they fed the nation nonstop nonsense about how the border being “under control” even as they manufactured more ways to speed up illegal entries and created new paths to “legalize” border-jumping, at least as far as their official statistics were concerned.

For the last year, including all during the presidential campaign, Democrats insisted it was all Republicans’ fault, for refusing to pass a supposed “bipartisan” bill (that in fact would’ve made the crisis worse).

Blam: Hours after being sworn in, Trump declared a national emergency at the border, ended “catch and release,” reestablished “Remain in Mexico,” ordered construction on the wall to resume and sent 10,000 US troops to the border to help beef up security.

Within a week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, with the full support of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, started rounding up and shipping out illegal migrants busted for vile crimes.

And Trump’s threats moved Mexico (and Canada) to start taking their role in sealing the border at least semi-seriously.

It all sent a clear message: No more winking at border-jumpers; there will be consequences for breaking US law.

Biden could have closed the border down at any time, but chose not to — and to lie about it instead.

Joe could have issued the same executive orders Trump did — or just left in place the Trump policies that were working, instead of tossing them on Day 1.

Border towns, along with cities and suburbs across the nation, paid the price; the border chaos also eased the way for fentanyl smugglers.

Banks clearly laid it out: Border Patrol always knew “how to secure the border,” he said.

“All we needed was a president that was going to empower us . . . and a secretary like Secretary Noem that knows exactly what we need to do to secure the border. “

The Biden team caused the border crisis and intentionally let it go on for four years; Trump ended it bim-bam-boom.

Fixing the border was as easy as putting someone in the White House who actually wanted to fix it.

And no wonder that Americans’ approval of (and trust in) the Democratic Party has cratered to a decades-long low.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

£10k invested in Scottish Mortgage shares after the DeepSeek crash is now worth…

0


Image source: Getty Images

Scottish Mortgage (LSE: SMT) shares have had a blistering run. Yet it looked like the fun might stop when cut-price Chinese AI upstart DeepSeek popped up.

The fact that DeepSeek could deliver a product that apparently matched ChatGPT on a shoestring budget sent shockwaves through the S&P 500.

Chipmaker Nvidia crashed by $600bn on 27 January, the largest one-day drop in US stock market history. The US is pouring trillions into AI, money ill-spent if China can do the same job for pennies.

That was a blow to Scottish Mortgage too. The FTSE 100 investment trust is a huge play on the US mega-caps and disruptive tech generally. Amazon, Meta Platforms and Nvidia itself number among its top 10 holdings. And Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is in its top 15.

This FTSE 100 stock bounced back

The Scottish Mortgage share price also fell on 27 January, a drop of 5% from 1,059p to 1,004.5p. It could hardly do anything else.

I thought that was modest. Nvidia plunged 17%. I expected further volatility in the days that followed, but was in for another surprise.

The Scottish Mortgage share price bounced straight back, to 1,090p. That’s above its pre-dip price. If anybody had been nippy enough to take advantage of the sell-off, they’d be sitting on a return of 8.5%. If they’d pumped in £10,000, that would be worth £10,850 before charges.

They’d have had to be fast though. I suspect most were sitting back, dazed, wondering what all this might mean. I was.

At The Motley Fool, we think timing the market is a mug’s game. But we’re not against taking advantage of a market dip to buy cut-price stocks. The aim then is to sit back and hold for the long term, rather than carry on trading for short-term gain.

I’d have held on to my Scottish Mortgage shares even if they’d taken a far bigger beating and taken a lot longer to fight back. I’m glad they didn’t though.

Nvidia has further to go

Nvidia is on the up too. It’s also climbed 8.5% since slumping to around $118 on 27 January. But at $128 it’s well below its recent peak of $147.

Sell-offs are to be expected when investing in shares, especially high-growth ones.

Scottish Mortgage crashed by half in 2022, when we saw a far bigger sell-off. Despite that, it’s still up 75% over five years. Over 12 months it’s grown 40%.

The Magnificent Seven US tech stocks surely can’t ride roughshod over their rivals forever. There’s always a surprise out there. With inflation still a menace, and US interest rates likely to stay high, they may struggle to grow from here. Donald Trump’s trade tariffs are a threat too. The Chinese may have more tricks up their sleeve.

Yet I won’t be selling. The trust plays an important role in my portfolio, giving me diversification from FTSE 100 dividend stocks, my main focus. They’re having a moment right now. As ever, diversification is the best defence.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Should Eagles’ ‘tush-push’ be outlawed? Chiefs say just avoid it

0


Line up, push and pray.

When it comes to stopping the Philadelphia Eagles’ punishing quarterback sneak — dubbed “the tush push” for the unique way players line up behind quarterback Jalen Hurts to push him forward — the Kansas City Chiefs acknowledge they’re not sure if they have the answers entering Super Bowl LIX on Sunday.

“It just comes down to sheer will,” Chiefs defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo said. “They’ve found a way to out-will people on that particular play.”

It resembles a rugby-like scrum when Hurts goes under center and teammates position themselves behind either hip. Lunging forward in a mass of humanity that could reach more than 3,000 pounds, the Eagles have dominated short-yardage situations and goal-line opportunities since they debuted the play in 2022 behind then-center Jason Kelce.

Even with Kelce retired, the Eagles have found success following Hurts and new center Cam Jurgens. Hurts, who famously squatted 600 pounds while at Alabama, led all NFL quarterbacks with 14 rushing touchdowns during the regular season. He has four rushing touchdowns in the postseason.

The Eagles rushed 10 times on fourth-and-one during the regular season and converted on 90% of the attempts.

To Spagnuolo, the way to defend the infamous sneak is to not defend it at all.

“The best one I got is don’t let them get into third- and fourth-and one,” the four-time Super Bowl winning coach said.

If there’s any defensive front that could stop the play, the Chiefs are perhaps the most suited. Lineman Chris Jones, the Chiefs’ anchor in the middle, earned his third consecutive first-team All-Pro honor with five sacks, nine tackles for lost yardage and 20 quarterback hits.

They stopped 6-foot-5, 240-pound Bills quarterback Josh Allen three times on five quarterback sneak attempts during the AFC championship game. The Chiefs ranked eighth in the NFL during the regular season, allowing 101.8 yards rushing per game. Their 4.1 yards allowed per carry was tied for fourth-best in the league.

Copycats have attempted similar versions of the sneak, for instance the larger Allen lining up and getting a push on his attempts. The Baltimore Ravens have run a variation with tight end Mark Andrews as the ball carrier.

It’s different against the Eagles, who have a massive offensive line bookended by 6-foot-8, 365-pound left tackle Jordan Mailata and 6-6, 325-pound right tackle Lane Johnson. The play has been so effective that some have called for banning the unique formation.

“We’re successful at it because of the guys we have up front,” Eagles head coach Nick Sirianni told reporters at the team hotel Thursday.

The NFL has evaluated the play, amending it before this season. Players lined up behind the quarterback have to be at least one yard behind the teammate receiving the snap.

To Jones, the changes shouldn’t stop there.

“They need to make the game even for us,” Jones said sarcastically. “Yeah, ban the play.”



This story originally appeared on LA Times

L.A. native plans billboard campaign to protest Luka Doncic trade to Lakers

0

Many people from the Los Angeles area are thrilled with the blockbuster trade that made former Dallas Mavericks star Luka Doncic a member of the Lakers over the weekend.

Jacob Posner is not one of those people.

That’s because the Palisades Charter High School graduate is a diehard Mavericks fan — and he became one because of Doncic.

“When Luka came into the league and became a Mavs [player], I immediately was like, ‘That’s my guy and I wanna be a Mavs fan,’” Posner told CBS News Texas from a hotel room in Sicily, Italy, this week.

A 20-year-old Dartmouth student who is in Rome to learn Italian, Posner came up with an idea to help himself and other Mavericks express their frustration toward general manager Nico Harrison and the Adelson family, the team’s controlling owner.

“Our plan is to cover the area around the American Airlines Center … with protest billboards, letting the front office know that Dallas Deserves Better when it comes to team decisions,” Posner wrote on the GoFundMe page he started this week to raise money toward the cause.

Trading away Luka Magic has left a deep void in the hearts of Dallas fans. By banding together for this billboard campaign, we’re sending a strong, undeniable message to the Mavs front office: We refuse to be overlooked, and we deserve better decisions.”

At 25, Doncic is considered one of the NBA’s best players. A five-time All-Star, he finished third in the league’s MVP voting last year and helped the Mavericks make the NBA Finals.

News broke late Saturday of the trade that sent Doncic, Maxi Kleber and Markieff Morris to L.A. in exchange for Anthony Davis, Max Christie and the Lakers’ 2029 first-round draft pick (the Utah Jazz also received Jalen Hood-Schifino from the Lakers and second-round picks from L.A. and Dallas to facilitate the trade).

Harrison told reporters Tuesday that the team was looking to get “out ahead” of what might have been tough negotiations with Doncic this summer over a supermax extension that would have been worth nearly $350 million over five seasons. It also has been reported that the Mavericks had concerns over Doncic’s diet and conditioning.

Ultimately, Harrison said, the responsibility for the decision belongs with him. Posner and other fans want him to know that they’re not cool with it.

“Nico Harrison and the Adelson family have done the unthinkable — trading away our beloved Luka Doncic to the Lakers in exchange for an injury-riddled Anthony Davis and just one first-round pick,” Posner wrote. “One pick!!! As a huge Dallas Mavericks fan, I’m reeling from the shock, frustration, and sorrow this trade has brought to our community.”

Posner is asking Mavericks fans to submit designs for the billboards. He has created an Instagram account @dallasdeservesbetter (its bio simply reads, “Protesting the worst trade in history”) where he will post photos and updates as the project progresses.

As of late Thursday afternoon, the campaign had raised more than $37,000 toward Posner’s stated goal of $82,600, an amount he determined after researching the cost of renting billboards that are available around the arena. He wrote Thursday on GoFundMe that he’s working to get the first billboards up before the Mavericks’ next home game, Saturday against the Houston Rockets.

“Whatever amount we raise is going straight to billboards,” Posner wrote, “whether we come in short, meet it, or surpass it. One way or another, these billboards are happening.”




This story originally appeared on LA Times

Mavericks GM getting death threats in wake of Luka trade: ‘Lines have been crossed’

0

The most shocking trade in NBA history is still having ripple effects in the community less than a week later.

Mavericks general manager Nico Harrison undoubtedly hopes that isn’t the case for much longer, but for now, he might be preoccupied with things well beyond basketball — like his livelihood.

Since stunningly trading Luka Doncic to the Lakers early Sunday morning, Harrison has been on the receiving end of death threats by Mavericks fans, ESPN’s Tim MacMahon reported.

“Nico Harrison has been subjected to death threats,” McMahon noted ahead of the team’s Saturday home game at 3 p.m. against the Rockets.

Nico Harrison, general manager of the Dallas Mavericks, traded Luka Doncic last week. NBAE via Getty Images

Saturday will be the Mavericks’ first home game since Jan. 27, several days before the Doncic trade, which returned Anthony Davis, among others, to Dallas from Los Angeles.

“There have been racial epithets included in some of those, security is going to be beefed up. There will be protests outside, or at least those are planned,” McMahon added of the expected scene in Dallas this weekend.

Luka Doncic holds his new jersey while standing alongside general manager Rob Pelinka (L) and head coach JJ Redick (R) during a Lakers press conference on February 04, 2025 in El Segundo, California. Getty Images

McMahon later added that Harrison is unlikely to be in his usual seat to watch the game.

Harrison typically sits in the crowd in the third row at American Airlines Center.

ESPN also reported that Harrison now has full-time security protecting his home.

The Dallas Mavericks won the Western Conference just last season. NBAE via Getty Images

Harrison, 52, was named Mavs GM in 2021 and helped put together a team that reached the 2024 NBA Finals after reaching the Western Conference Finals two years prior.

The Mavericks are 27-25 this season, eighth in the Western Conference.

Davis is expected to debut with the team on Saturday.



This story originally appeared on NY Post

Time to buy Nvidia shares before fresh all-time highs?

0


Image source: Getty Images

Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) shares have taken quite the nosedive. A 17% drop in a single day grabbed most of the headlines, but the stock has been down 22% at its lowest, after kicked off 2025 at an all-time high. The $116 share price was one some talking heads said we’d never see again. Is it time to buy the dip before new all-time highs? Or could this one have further to crash?

AI dominance

To understand the appeal of Nvidia shares, it’s worth taking a moment to assess just how dependent large language models (LLMs) are on its chips. 

When ChatGPT launched, Nvidia made the best GPUs for it. It had a head start. And that resulted in 90% or so of the chips used being from Nvidia. 

But ChatGPT debuted, if you can believe it, nearly two and a half years ago. Tonnes of rival LLMs have hit the market, like Claude, Grok, and Gemini. Surely Nvidia’s competitors have had a chance to catch up? 

Well, not really. The percentage of Nvidia’s chips is thought to still be around 85%. Nvidia is halfway down the track while its competitors haven’t even finished tying their shoelaces.

It’s the kind of seemingly unassailable lead that easily explains why Nvidia shares have multiplied 11 times in value since LLMs burst onto the scene. AMD shares haven’t even doubled. Intel shares are down 38%. Crikey.

Why did the stock drop?

So what’s this drop about, then? A 22% fall is nothing to sniff at. Is it a sign that Nvidia’s dominance has an end in sight? 

Well, the basic story is that a Chinese startup named Deepseek made an LLM for a fraction of the cost of all the others. The relevant point to Nvidia is that it doesn’t need as many chips, which could make a long-term dent in sales.

The counterargument goes that this has kicked the door wide open to widespread adoption of AI. We might see custom models running on the smartphones we all have in our pocket.

If that’s the case, then Nvidia could come out on top again. After all, their chips are still the best in class. The hubbub around Deepseek could end up increasing sales. 

My opinion

Personally, I don’t think the investment case has been harmed much in the last week. An investor lacking exposure to the benefits of AI may want to consider buying in at the discounted price. 

What is informing my decision is the valuations – currently a price-to-earnings ratio of 48 with a forward P/E ratio of 30. Those aren’t cheap, though they aren’t astronomical either for a company with such good growth prospects. 

The issue is that earnings have been elevated thanks to the AI gold rush. It is rumoured that most of the sales come from four or five megacap tech firms. Combined with my exposure in other areas, that seems like too much risk for me.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool

Mistral releases its genAI assistant Le Chat for IOS and Android – Computerworld

0



French AI company Mistral has released several updates to its generative AI assistant Le Chat and made it available on Android and iOS. Mistral describes the tool as a comprehensive genAI assistant for both life and work that can be used to access the latest news, plan daily tasks, keep track of projects, upload and summarize documents, and more.

Le Chat is accessed through a chat-like user interface and, according to Mistral, has the fastest inference model in the world. It is also reported to be significantly better at generating images than OpenAI ChatGPT. But Le Chat does not yet have a voice mode.

The AI assistant is available in both a free version and a new paid version that costs $15.49 per month. The paid subscription provides access to the company’s latest AI model, higher user limits, and the ability to opt out of sharing data with Mistral.



This story originally appeared on Computerworld

Trump administration stops nationwide EV charging program

0


The Trump administration has ordered states to stop a program to build fast EV chargers on highways throughout the country, released by the Federal Highway Administration. The letter informs state transportation directors, who are in charge of instituting the program, that any plans approved by the Biden administration are now suspended “until new guidance is issued.”

The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program was approved by Congress as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It was intended to fill gaps in America’s EV charging network and was supported by $5 billion in grants. President Trump has long decried the program and regularly during the 2024 campaign.

To view this content, you’ll need to update your privacy settings. Please click here and view the “Content and social-media partners” setting to do so.

To that end, Trump would often suggest that the Biden administration spent $9 billion to build eight EV charging stations. Sometimes he would . In reality, 55 charging stations have been built so far, . Just over $2 billion has been allocated to states, and much of it hasn’t been spent yet.

The mandate, as outlined in the new memo, will fulfill the financial obligations of NEVI, so long as a state already has a finalized contract with a charging company. Any unfinished contracts will likely be put on indefinite hold.

Can an organization like the FHA unilaterally put the kibosh on a program that was approved by Congress? The legality here is unclear, but Loren McDonald, chief analyst at the , said “I don’t believe FHWA has the authority to do this.”

Ryan Gallentine, managing director at the national business association Advanced Energy United, said that states “are under no obligation to stop these projects based solely on this announcement.” He went on to call on state leaders “to continue executing this program until new guidance is finalized.”

This move is also expected to be challenged in court. “I’m assuming the lawsuits from states will start soon, and this will go to court and Congress,” McDonald said. “But the Trump administration will succeed in just causing havoc and slowing things down for a while.”

Trump has been since his first day in office. He issued an executive order that to transition half of the country’s vehicles to EVs by 2030. It’s expected that he will soon for electric vehicles.

But won’t this hurt Trump’s bestie Elon Musk? Tesla, after all, was one of the largest recipients of those NEVI grants. It’s worth remembering that this mandate doesn’t rollback any contracts that have already been finalized. In other words, Musk is probably perfectly happy with the from the government. He has also long-approved of the proposed elimination of the federal tax credit, likely because it much more than Tesla.




This story originally appeared on Engadget

Did the Menendez Brothers Know the Kardashians? Find Out – Hollywood Life

0


Image Credit: Getty Images

As Lyle and Erik Menendez‘s case gained nationwide attention last year, Kim Kardashian took it upon herself to visit the brothers in prison as they serve their life sentence for the fatal 1989 shootings of their parents, José and Kitty Menendez. But a 2025 episode of The Kardashians has viewers talking about the family’s long-time connection to the Menendez brothers. So, did the Kardashian-Jenner family know the brothers before their crimes?

Find out everything we know about how long the Kardashians have known the Menendez brothers.

Are the Menendez Brothers Getting Released From Prison?

It’s unclear if Lyle and Erik will be released from prison anytime soon. They presented new evidence last year, and a resentencing hearing was scheduled to take place toward the end of 2024. However, that hearing was delayed to January 30, 2025, in order to give the new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, time to review the case.

Did the Menendez Brothers Know the Kardashians? Find Out
Getty Images

Do the Menendez Brothers Know the Kardashians?

Before Kim visited the Menendez brothers in 2024, alongside actor Cooper Koch, Kris apparently knew both siblings in the 1980s. During an episode of The Kardashians that aired in early 2025, the family matriarch claimed she became acquainted with Lyle and Erik “in the ’80s.”

“You know, I knew those guys in the ’80s,” Kris told Kim before Kourtney Kardashian asked, “You knew the parents?” Kris then replied, “No. I knew the kids because Erik used to come over and play tennis with your dad on the weekends,” referring to the late Robert Kardashian Sr.

During a confessional, Kim pointed out being around 13 years old when Erik and Lyle’s trial took place in the 1990s.

“Now being older and seeing it from a different lens, 35 years later and knowing what I know now about the system, I just have a whole different outlook on it,” Kim said about Lyle and Erik’s case.

Did the Menendez Brothers Know O.J. Simpson?

According to The Menendez Murders author Robert Rand, O.J. Simpson was temporarily held in a jail cell next to Erik’s at one point, per The Hollywood Reporter

“I remember Erik telling me that O.J. was just super friendly with all the deputies, and all the deputies you know, like, came around with signed pictures,” Rand previously told THR. “They were used to having celebrities of O.J.’s level in their custody. So, Erik was calling me like every night giving me updates, ‘This happened today or that happened today.’ But I had the impression that O.J. really appreciated the friendship and advice from Erik.”

In his book, Rand claimed that Lyle also spoke with O.J. and gave him advice about a defense team.

“O.J. and Lyle Menendez spent many hours in the jail’s attorney room while waiting for their attorneys or material witnesses,” Rand wrote in one excerpt. “For 100 hours of contact between the two inmates, the two high-profile prisoners talked openly and exchanged dozens of letters. Lyle advised O.J. he should consider taking a plea deal and O.J. briefly considered that option — according to Lyle — but later told Menendez he couldn’t do that because it would ruin his reputation and he would never work again.”



This story originally appeared on Hollywoodlife