Tuesday, November 11, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 53

Prince William wins hearts as he cuddles baby handed to him on Brazilian island | World News

0


Prince William has put his fatherly skills to good use, holding a baby handed to him from a sea of well-wishers on an island in Brazil.

William travelled to the Brazilian island retreat of Paqueta, a 50-minute ferry ride from Rio de Janeiro, to learn about its mangrove habitat and sample the slower pace of life on an island, where there are no private cars and bicycles are the main form of transport.

But as dozens of well-wishers excitedly said hello to the future king, 10-month-old Joaquim Monteiro was handed to him for a hug. Joking with his family, William said, “mustn’t drop him!” before giving the little boy a cuddle.

Image:
Prince William takes photos with people on Paqueta Island during an official visit to Brazil. Pic: Reuters

Holding him with the confidence of a father of three young children, William said: “Bless him” before handing him back to his grandmother Christina. Andre Luis Junior, the baby’s cousin and a teacher, said: “Nobody asked him – he just picked him up. It’s probably because he has three kids. He loves kids.”

He added: “It’s amazing. We are so happy, so happy he chose this very small island. We’re very unique in the heart of Rio. Very quiet. We love that he chose to come here. The kids in school were so excited today.”

The prince helped several young children come to the front of the meet and greet in the main square by the waterfront, bending down to be in photographs with them and taking the occasional selfie.

The Prince of Wales takes part in a mangrove planting activity in Guanabara Bay during his visit to Brazil. Pic: PA
Image:
The Prince of Wales takes part in a mangrove planting activity in Guanabara Bay during his visit to Brazil. Pic: PA

Read more from Sky News:
Sir David Beckham receives knighthood from the King
Sudan’s government warns of genocide in Darfur

The island, which only has around 5,000 residents, had declared the visit The Day Of The Prince, and children were given time off school to see him.

William wanted to meet those involved in protecting the island’s mangrove forests, a crucial ecosystem for preventing flooding, coastal erosion, providing a habitat for wildlife, and supporting the fishing community.

The Prince of Wales tours the mangrove area in Guanabara Bay, Brazil. Pic: PA
Image:
The Prince of Wales tours the mangrove area in Guanabara Bay, Brazil. Pic: PA

He travelled on a boat into the Guapimirim mangrove to learn about the restoration work taking place there and helped with a planting activity as part of their reforestation scheme.

The pictures will be particularly important to the prince and his team, emphasising why the world needs to focus minds on the climate crisis, ahead of his appearance at COP 30, the UN’s climate conference in Belem on Thursday.



This story originally appeared on Skynews

‘Teen Vogue’ moves under Vogue.com, 6 staffers are laid off : NPR

0


Teen Vogue signage is seen during the 2025 Teen Vogue Summit at NYA WEST on Sept. 20, 2025 in Los Angeles.

Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for Teen Vogue


hide caption

toggle caption

Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for Teen Vogue

Teen Vogue staffers have taken to social media to share the news they’ve been laid off, just as Condé Nast announced the outlet will be “joining Vogue.com, a transition that’s part of a broader push to expand the Vogue ecosystem.”

Teen Vogue covered fashion and celebrity, but also took in-depth looks at politics and social justice issues. Their writers have tackled everything from climate change to political pressures on universities, celebrity style to Billie Eilish’s recent comments about billionaires.

According to a statement posted on X from Condé United, a bargaining unit of the union the NewsGuild of New York, six of its members who worked for Teen Vogue are being laid off.

The union statement said that most of the six “are BIPOC women or trans, including Teen Vogue‘s politics editor, . . . Teen Vogue now has no writers or editors explicitly covering politics.” The statement also says that after the layoffs, there is only one woman of color on the editorial staff.

A statement posted on Vogue.com said that Teen Vogue editor-in-chief Versha Sharma “will be leaving the company.” Chloe Malle, head of editorial content for American Vogue, will oversee the outlet.

“I was laid off from Teen Vogue yesterday, along with 70% of my incredible team,” Kaitlyn McNab Teen Vogue‘s culture editor, posted on X.Much longer post incoming, but I wanted to say thank you to everyone who has reached out to me with love. God got me. We move.”

The Roosevelt Institute, a progressive think tank which recently awarded Teen Vogue its 2025 Freedom of Speech and Expression awards, criticized the move. “The decision by Condé Nast today to collapse this publication into Vogue and eliminate the politics reporting staff at Teen Vogue is evidence that corporate concentration eliminates innovative ideas and silences voices with less power,” it said in a statement.

Vogue said the move is not intended to diminish Teen Vogue. It said, “The title will remain a distinct editorial property, with its own identity and mission; sitting under the Vogue umbrella will provide a more unified reader experience across titles.”

Vogue Business, for industry professionals, was folded into Vogue.com‘s platform last week.

This story was edited by Jennifer Vanasco.




This story originally appeared on NPR

Disturbing video shows fatal collision between LAPD and skateboarder

0


Los Angeles police have released video of a disturbing incident in which one of their officers fatally struck a skateboarder riding in the middle of the road in Highland Park.

Gerardo “Jerry” Estrada was killed in the Sept. 19 crash, which remains under investigation.

The officer driving was responding to a call in the 6100 block of Piedmont Avenue at 7:15 p.m. and headed north on Figueroa Street to help establish a perimeter while police searched for a felony warrant suspect, said Capt. Mike Bland, a department spokesperson.

The officer, Bland said, was driving with their siren on and emergency lights flashing when they hit Estrada.

In the video, captured by the vehicle’s dashcam, the police cruiser is seen weaving across lanes on Figueroa Street, at times driving on the wrong side of the street to get around vehicles stacked up and blocking lanes at a red light near intersections. Sirens can be heard in the background.

Still from police video of a skateboarder being hit by a patrol car.

(Los Angeles Police Department)

The vehicle is seen steering left toward the center median as it approaches another red light in the distance.

Two officers can be heard talking to each other as the car drives down the street, until one of the officers is heard saying, “Watch out, watch out, watch out!”

In the video, Estrada is seen on a skateboard in the center median. Estrada jumps off the skateboard, and briefly puts up both of his hands before he is struck by the car.

“Oh s—, dude!” one of the officers is heard saying as the patrol car pulls to the far left lane of the street.

“Oh f—!” the other officer says. “F—, man!”

Officers quickly jumped out of the vehicle and found Estrada wedged underneath a parked vehicle nearby, Bland said in a video statement released by the department.

The patrol car involved in the crash.

The patrol car involved in the crash.

(Los Angeles Police Department)

Body camera from one of the officers, also released Tuesday by the department, shows the crash occurred just outside a carnival, where witnesses began to yell and urge officers to do something.

“Do something, there’s somebody f— dying!” one person is heard yelling.

The officers removed Estrada from under the car, and attempted to render first aid.

Firefighters who responded to the scene declared Estrada dead at the scene.

According to Bland, the crash is still under investigation, which could take months to complete.

LAPD officials did not immediately respond to questions on the identities of the two officers who were in the vehicle at the time of the crash.

The day following the crash, Estrada’s mother, Rosa Casares, told KTLA her son was headed home from work that night.

“He was a wonderful kid,” she told KTLA.



This story originally appeared on LA Times

Thandiwe Muriu: She turns African fabrics into optical illusions and the world can't look away

0

Kenyan photographer Thandiwe Muriu is turning heads and bending reality. Her vibrant portraits blend women seamlessly into richly patterned fabrics, creating hypnotic optical illusions that celebrate African identity while questioning how we see beauty, culture and self-expression. Now, Muriu returns to Paris for her third solo exhibition, “Clouds Bring Blessings”, at 193 Gallery. For the first time, she’s created her own tie-dye fabrics, calling nature her “uninvited co-creator”. In this edition of arts24, Muriu opens up about her journey from Kenya’s first female commercial photographer to a global art sensation – and how fabric, light and heritage weave together in her striking visual universe.


This story originally appeared on France24

Four in 10 men wish they had higher testosterone levels to ‘boost’ 1 key thing

0


Four in 10 men consider themselves ‘full of testosterone’ despite many having no idea what it actually does. A poll of 2,000 men revealed 74% know it is linked to sex drive, but many were oblivious to other key functions. While 54% were unaware it is responsible for regulating mood, and 76% didn’t know it affects bone density.

Other lesser-known symptoms included muscle mass (49%), facial hair growth (47%), sperm production (38%) and voice depth (55%). And almost three in 10 (29%) feared they lacked the appropriate amount of testosterone due to issues such as erectile dysfunction.

The research was commissioned by Leger Clinic. Medical Director at the company, Dr Doug Savage, said: “Testosterone plays a more complex role in men’s health than many realise, affecting far more than sex drive and erectile dysfunction.

“Low testosterone can lead to symptoms like fatigue, low confidence, increased abdominal fat and even depression.

“Understanding testosterone’s wider role is vital, because addressing it can transform quality of life far beyond the bedroom.”

The research also found 58% think having low testosterone levels would have a negative effect on their life. Of those, 36% worry it would ruin their relationship – and 28% feel they would be “failing as a man”.

In total, 39% wish they had higher testosterone levels, with 45% believing it would boost how attractive they are to a potential partner.

While almost seven in 10 (68%) would gladly receive a free testosterone check, only 18% of people have ever discussed it with a health professional.

Dr Savage added: “It’s clear many men want to take action – whether that’s by getting checked or making lifestyle changes – and that’s a positive step.

“However, it’s evident there are still barriers, with many not feeling comfortable discussing it with loved ones or even medical professionals.

“There’s nothing to lose by doing your research and getting tested – it’s a simple move that could make a big difference to your health and confidence.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

Below Deck Med Season 10: How the Deck Team Went From Terrible To Being the Best Part of the Show

0


At the start of Below Deck Mediterranean Season 10, the deck team downright sucked. But after a few recent tweaks, these yachties are now our favorite part of this series.

Nathan Gallagher is the bosun, but this is his first season working as a department head. Further complicating his obviously steep learning curve, Nathan got dealt one capable yachtie and two WTF-was-production-thinking-about deckhands. From safety issues to a lot of handholding on deck, this Temu team was a borderline chore to watch. So, kudos to Nathan for leading this team nonetheless, because many other first-time bosuns would have likely ripped up their contracts and shown themselves the exit.

But then, right as many of us were about to throw away our televisions, changes happened. And thankfully, these corrections have turned the tide. Now, we are living for the deck team on Below Deck Med.

The Below Deck Mediterranean Season 10 deck team got off to a rough start

Photo Credit: Fred Jagueneau/Bravo

At the start of Below Deck Med Season 10, Tessa Budd and Christian Trimino appeared as deckhands. To his face, Tessa was kind. But behind his back, she had nothing nice to say about Nathan, her daily scapegoat for her failings.

During her first departure, Tessa struggled with the ramp. Then, she floundered around with the yacht’s nautibuoys, followed by an aimless walk around the yacht. Later, Nathan softballed her a task. All she had to do was fill the jet skis with fuel, but she forgot, and Christian got stranded in the middle of the sea.

Meanwhile, during his first watch, Christian failed to even look at his checklist. So, when Max Salvador woke up, he did Christian’s tasks instead. Immediately after, Nathan asked Christian to blow up the water toys. But that would be too much, Christian dared to argue.

Christian also argued with Max, got someone stranded in the sea, and lacked an overall sense of urgency. But his biggest mistake came when he let a drunk guest convince him to change his mind. This guest wanted to stick his toes in the water at night, when the swells were as high as his blood alcohol level. This guest promptly fell into the ocean, but even still, Christian saw no problems with his behavior.

Nathan Gallagher was forced to make some changes

Nathan Gallagher
Photo Credit: Fred Jagueneau/Bravo

With all these incidents taking place in only the first handful of episodes, Captain Sandy Yawn had no choice but to lay down the law with Nathan. Either Christian or Tessa needed to go, she instructed. Her order left Nathan with a big, cliffhanger-like decision to make at the end of Episode 4. So, which yachtie did Nathan choose to fire?

Shocking many viewers, Nathan made the call to cut both of these deadweight deckhands. Thankfully, Christian understood this decision. He remained respectful in his exit meeting, and he left the boat without any further problems.

Tessa, however, remained professional in front of Captain Sandy and Nathan. But in her confessional, she cursed at Captain Sandy and then blamed her bosun for her failings, per usual.

As Christian and Tessa walked the pier, Captain Sandy reached out to yacht services, since she needed two new deckhands. She also texted several of her former crew members, but two were busy, and one failed to answer. But only a handful of beats later, this yachtie chimed in, letting Captain Sandy know that he was game to help her out. This returnee was none other than Joe Bradley from Season 9.

The refreshed deck team on Below Deck Med are now the best part of the show

Below Deck Med Season 10
Photo Credit: Fred Jagueneau/Bravo

Joe is back, but he only has two hands (that we know of), so Captain Sandy placed Victoria SanJuan on deck for a temporary fix. Sure, she’s a stew, but V has worked on deck before. Right out of the gate, V nailed every assignment. She performed so well that Captain Sandy just assigned her to the deck team in a full-time capacity, and will soon bring in a new steward to take over her interior gig.

However, V’s late boyfriend, Bon, drowned. This tragic incident made V shy away from exterior roles. Knowing this while watching V shine as she heals on deck has been heartwarming. Viewers don’t often get warm fuzzies from this series, so this storyline of resilience and growth is quickly making this deck team our favorite aspect of Below Deck Med Season 10.

The way Nathan, Max, and Joe are all embracing, encouraging, and supporting V is also worth noting. These four are truly presenting as a non-toxic, non-mysogisnistic family. And all of their personalities are such a vibe, especially when combined.

Meanwhile, Joe and Nathan shared such a fun bromance in Season 9. When these two gigglers embraced on the dock this season, it was like a ray of light finally shone down from the heavens onto the deck team. And from everything Joe recently teased to us, he and Max will also join chaotic forces, which further makes the deck team the one to watch this season.

Below Deck Mediterranean is streaming on Peacock.

TELL US – ARE YOU ALSO LOVING THE DECK TEAM NOW? IF SO, WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE ASPECT OF THIS SEMI-NEW CREW?



This story originally appeared on Realitytea

10 TV Show Pilots You Had No Idea Were Completely Reshot Before Airing

0






Most people understand that TV show pilots are often not the best episodes in any series. The reason is simple: Everyone is still trying to find their feet and feel out the dynamic of the show, the cast chemistry, the writing, etc. Essentially, a pilot is a proof of concept for the network or streaming service, showcasing the potential of a program — not its final form. There have been times, though, when a pilot doesn’t go the way anyone expects it to materialize. Rather than cancel the series order after the pilot, the creators and network acknowledge that something is off and reshoot it before the episode hits the airwaves.

Surprisingly, some of the biggest shows of all time, such as “The Big Bang Theory” and “Game of Thrones,” featured much different original pilots than what fans saw on screen for the first time. The success of the respective series reaffirms that everyone did the right thing in redoing the pilot. Yet, as fans, there’s a morbid curiosity to find out what could have been. Even though there’s a strong possibility that everyone would have detested the original pilot, you still want to find out how different some of your favorite TV shows could have turned out.

Having said that, let’s head back in time and check out 10 TV show pilots that were completely reshot before airing. In a few of these cases, if you’re a good-enough sleuth, you might be able to find these episodes online.

The Big Bang Theory

Everyone recognizes Penny (Kaley Cuoco) as one of the most important and beloved characters in “The Big Bang Theory,” but she wasn’t even a part of the original pilot. In that version of the show, Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons) and Leonard Hofstadter (Johnny Galecki) meet Katie, played by Amanda Walsh. Yet, Katie isn’t as nice to the guys as Penny, so much so that the test audience reacted negatively toward the character and how she treated Sheldon and Leonard. “That’s why we rewrote Katie to become Penny and made her much more charmed by the guys and kind to them, as opposed to a woman who would take advantage of them,” the show’s co-creator Chuck Lorre told Entertainment Weekly in 2022.

That wasn’t all, though. Sheldon’s personality deviates from what fans are familiar with, having him be more sexual, while he also has a former flame named Gilda (Iris Bahr) who crushes hard on Leonard. Oh, and fan favorites Raj Koothrappali (Kunal Nayyar) and Howard Wolowitz (Simon Helberg)? They’re nowhere to be found here.

Lorre admitted that CBS asked the co-creators to only recast Katie, but he understood there was a bigger issue he and Bill Prady rectified for the second pilot. “Our script didn’t fully realize what our possibilities were,” Lorre said. “I told Bill, ‘Let’s add more of these brilliant misbegotten characters, and let’s lose the plot entirely. Let’s just spend a half hour diving into the lives of these brilliant misfit characters.'”

Buffy the Vampire Slayer

It’s fair to say that the “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” pilot, “Welcome to the Hellmouth,” is one of the better ones, as it explodes out of the blocks and sets the tone for what’s to come. However, it wasn’t what was originally shot when creator Joss Whedon pitched the show known only then as “Slayer” to The WB.

According to the biography “Joss Whedon: Geek King of the Universe” by Amy Pascale, Whedon produced a compact 25-minute pilot. While several storyline elements from what would eventually be broadcast stay intact here, a few of the important characters that appear in the aired pilot are missing, including David Boreanaz’s Angel (one of the best characters in “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”) and Kristine Sutherland’s Joyce Summers. In addition, there are different people playing Principal Flutie and Willow Rosenberg: Stephen Tobolowsky and Riff Regan, respectively.

The WB wasn’t impressed with the pilot, nor was Whedon who vowed to never release the pilot publicly (it found its way onto the Internet, though, since that’s a law unto itself). Initially, the network passed on commissioning the series, but some of the execs were intrigued by the premise and thought it showed promise. So, when “Savannah” was axed, The WB invited Whedon to have another stab at “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” to fill the slot. Whedon tweaked and expanded upon elements of the pilot, which included recasting Tobolowsky and Regan with Ken Lerner and Alyson Hannigan, and the rest is TV history.

Family Guy

Much like “The Simpsons,” “Family Guy” is one of those rare animated shows that seems determined to outlast humanity and maybe the entire universe. Realistically, no one expects the series to look or be the same as it was when it aired in the late ’90s, but even the original pilot isn’t the same as the first episode, “Death Has a Shadow,” which debuted in January 1999.

Animator Robert Paulson, who worked on the show, uploaded the 1998 pilot of “Family Guy” to his website. What’s instantly noticeable here is the animation style, which looks far less polished than the final effort that appeared on TV. In addition, Lois Griffin has blonde hair instead of the usual red locks she boasts on the show. Another noticeable difference in the unaired pilot is how Chris Griffin is voiced by “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane, who does a lot of voices on the show, but is voiced by Seth Green in the actual series.

As it turns out, MacFarlane did a bulk of the work on this pilot. “[Fox] gave me about $50,000 for a production budget, and the idea was that I animate this thing by myself,” he told The New York Times in 2004. ”I spent about six months with no sleep and no life, just drawing like crazy in my kitchen and doing this pilot. About six months later I handed it in, about 40 pounds lighter, and they were laughing, and they liked it enough to order 13.”

Three’s Company

“Three’s Company” invited viewers to come and knock on the door. What awaited them wasn’t kisses, but the madcap mishaps of Jack Tripper (John Ritter), Janet Wood (Joyce DeWitt), and Chrissy Snow (Suzanne Somers). The terrific trio is the secret sauce of the late ’70s/early ’80s sitcom, and it was never the same following Somers’ departure after the fifth season. It culminated in one of those situations where a TV show replaces a departing star with a new character, and the results prove to be mixed. Here’s the funny part, though: This beloved version of the series only originated on the third pilot!

The first-ever unaired pilot featured Ritter. However, his name is David Bell and he works in Hollywood in this iteration. The premise stays the same — albeit a bit raunchier than the classic “Three’s Company” show that everyone knows and loves — as David lives with two women, who are named Jenny and Samantha here. However, the roles are played by Valerie Curtin and Susanne Zenor — not DeWitt and Somers. This pilot didn’t land well with the network execs, so work commenced on another version of the show.

Another pilot of “Three’s Company” aired on TV, containing the characters of Jack, Janet, and Chrissy. However, in this version, Chrissy is played by Susan Lanier. Ultimately, the execs weren’t convinced by Lanier’s performance as Chrissy, so the role was recast with Somers. From there, everything clicked, and the magic happened.

Two and a Half Men

The undisputed stars of “Two and a Half Men” remain Charlie (Charlie Sheen), Alan (Jon Cryer), and Jake Harper (Angus T. Jones). Their comedic chemistry is something that money can’t buy — though it does help when you’re paid millions of dollars per episode — so this becomes the cornerstone of the sitcom. Make no mistake, another important character in the show is Evelyn Harper (Holland Taylor), Charlie and Alan’s narcissistic and manipulative mother. She appears in many episodes of the series, including the pilot.

However, in the original pilot, titled “Most Chicks Won’t Eat Veal” (a dirty joke from the episode), Blythe Danner plays Evelyn. Despite Danner being an award-winning performer and an experienced sitcom actor in her own right, the show parted ways with her after the pilot.

So, what was the issue here? According to what “Two and a Half Men” co-creator Chuck Lorre told Orlando Sentinel, Evelyn “wasn’t a really good fit for her,” hence the pilot being reshot with Taylor in the role. From the footage that’s circulated of Danner as Evelyn, she plays the character much more differently than Taylor. While it isn’t to say that her performance is better or worse than Taylor’s, it does feel as if Taylor’s Evelyn fits in better with Charlie, Alan, and Jake than Danner’s ever did.

Mighty Morphin Power Rangers

“Mighty Morphin Power Rangers” established itself as a unique series, using stock footage from the Japanese TV show “Kyōryū Sentai Zyuranger” then interspersing this in between the new filmed footage. However, this doesn’t mean the pilot, “Day of the Dumpster,” was easily produced. Quite the contrary, it took three rounds of morphin’ time before airing in the version that fans are familiar with now.

The pilot’s co-writer Tony Oliver revealed the arduous process at the 2007 Power Morphicon. Oliver explained how there’s a different Yellow Ranger actor in this pilot, with Audri Dubois playing Trini. In addition to this, the Rangers hang out at a bowling alley, not their regular hangout spot: The Gym and Juice Bar. (This episode eventually aired as the special “Power Rangers: The Lost Episode” in 1999.) Fox Kids liked what it saw but urged the violence to be toned down. A second pilot went into production — this time replacing Dubois with Thuy Trang — however, it was still seen as too violent for kids, so it underwent a third reshoot.

Years later, on the documentary series “Hollywood Demons” (via Entertainment Weekly), Dubois opened up about shooting the pilot, stating it wasn’t a pleasant working experience. “When we’re shooting the pilot, we’re out in the desert — it’s got to be 110 degrees — and someone has heat stroke,” Dubois said. “It was one of the bad guys in a wet suit with a rubber mask over their head with pinholes for the eyes and mouth. He’s flopping around like a fish.”

Star Trek

If at first you don’t succeed, save the footage because it may become iconic later on. That’s exactly what happened with the “Star Trek” pilot episode, “The Cage.” The show introduces the U.S.S. Enterprise under the command of Captain Christopher Pike (Jeffrey Hunter). Pike’s crew includes Spock (Leonard Nimoy) and the first officer known only as Number One (Majel Barrett). In the episode, Pike is kidnapped by the Talosians, but he needs to figure out what the species wants from him and the Enterprise crew.

According to StarTrek.com, NBC didn’t accept the pilot, but it allowed “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry to have another shot at it and take the network’s notes into consideration. Some of the non-negotiables included that Roddenberry needed to pick between keeping Spock or Number One, so the creator chose to keep Spock for the next iteration of the pilot that saw the Enterprise led by Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner) after Hunter declined to do the series.

Parts of the footage from “The Cage” was used in the episode “The Menagerie,” while “The Cage” was eventually released on home video in 1986. In terms of the adventures of Captain Pike and his Enterprise crew, this became the basis of the series “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds.” It goes to show that Roddenberry’s instincts weren’t wrong. Instead, much like the show, he was ahead of his time.

Charmed

The bewitching supernatural drama “Charmed,” well, charmed everyone. Even though there was a major cast shake-up with Shannen Doherty’s departure after the third season, viewers fondly remember the original Charmed Ones: Prue (Doherty), Piper (Holly Marie Combs), and Phoebe Halliwell (Alyssa Milano). Before the show’s debut episode, “Something Wicca This Way Comes,” hit the airwaves in 1998, there was another pilot filmed with different actors in certain roles.

In the original pilot, Chris Boyd plays police inspector Andy Trudeau — yes, it’s impossible to imagine anyone else but Ted King in this role, but it’s true. Another major change is the absence of Milano as Phoebe. In this pilot, Lori Rom plays the part of the popular Halliwell sister.

Chatting on “The Women of Charmed,” Doherty discussed what the switch from Rom to Milano brought to the series. “We shot the pilot with a different girl playing Phoebe, Lori Rom, who I would say is a great actress and whatever her personal reasons were for not wanting to continue, I understand,” Doherty said. “And it’s really interesting because Alyssa and Lori are so completely different and the show is completely different because of the dynamic that Alyssa brings into it.”

Gilmore Girls

“Gilmore Girls” is one of those shows that hits right in the feels. It’s a comfort watch, as everything falls into place and complements other elements of the series. So, imagine the surprise in finding out the original pilot for the show could be from an alternate universe’s version of the show, with different actors playing fan-favorite roles. Shocking, right?

It’s impossible to imagine anyone else but Melissa McCarthy as Sookie St. James or Jared Padalecki as Dean Forester. Yet, both of these roles featured other actors in the seminal parts: Nathan Wetherington as Dean and Alex Borstein as Sookie. McCarthy secured the gig because Borstein couldn’t continue the part, while Wetherington was recast by Padalecki after the lackluster pilot.

At the time, Borstein was a cast member on “MADtv” and was led to believe she would be able to do both roles. According to Borstein’s comments to BuzzFeed in 2013, “Gilmore Girls” creator Amy Sherman-Palladino agreed to shoot around Borstein’s schedule, and a “MADtv” producer told Borstein it was unlikely to be an issue. “What I didn’t know was the emails behind my back were, like, ‘Absolutely not,'” Borstein said. “I think it was a Fox-WB thing. So it kind of blew up. Very disappointing. But now I feel — I’m not mystical or anything.”

Game of Thrones

When discussing the best HBO series of all time, no one can ignore “Game of Thrones.” From the first episode, “Winter Is Coming,” the show grabs a hold of the audience and refuses to let go. Yet, this monumental episode had to be reshot. According to Yahoo, approximately 90% of the original pilot was entirely scrapped. Some of the omissions included a George R. R. Martin cameo that’s been relegated to the archives as punishment for him not finishing the novel series (just kidding).

This version of “Game of Thrones” also features different actors in popular roles. Khaleesi herself, Daenerys Targaryen, is played by Tamzin Merchant, whom viewers should recognize as Catherine Howard from “The Tudors.” Also, Jennifer Ehle, who can be seen on “Lioness” and “1923,” is the actor portraying Catelyn Stark. Reportedly, it’s not a very good pilot at all, with the general consensus being the series wouldn’t have been what it is had it aired.

“Game of Thrones” co-showrunner David Benioff called the failed pilot a major learning moment for him and D. B. Weiss. Speaking to Variety in 2015, Benioff pointed to a big question mark their trusted friends had after watching the episode. “At the very end of the pilot, Jaime Lannister pushes Bran out the window,” Benioff said. “Jaime is lying with his sister, Cersei, and none of [our friends] realized that Jaime and Cersei were brother and sister, which is a major, major plot point that we had somehow failed to establish.”





This story originally appeared on TVLine

Elon Musk’s future at Tesla in balance as shareholders consider $1 trillion pay package

0

Elon Musk’s future at Tesla could be in the balance on Thursday when shareholders vote on whether to approve his record-shattering $1 trillion pay package.

The controversial proposal, which is scheduled to be considered at Tesla’s annual meeting in Texas, would hand Musk an unprecedented payout tied to a series of performance benchmarks.

Critics – including key proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis and even Pope Leo XIV – argue the proposed salary is excessive. Meanwhile, Tesla chairwoman Robyn Denholm and Musk himself have warned that he could leave the company entirely if shareholders reject the proposal.

“Tesla may lose his time, talent and vision, which have been essential to delivering extraordinary shareholder returns,” Denholm said in a recent letter posted on X.

Tesla shareholders will vote on a nearly $1 trillion pay package for Musk. REUTERS

Musk has framed the vote in near-apocalyptic terms – declaring in an Oct. 29 X post that “control of Tesla could affect the future of civilization.”

The billionaire has argued that he needs greater voting control offered by the stock grants in order to effectively guide Tesla’s future plans for artificial intelligence, which include the robots and full self-driving technology. Musk would control nearly 29% of voting shares if he hits all targets.

The jaw-dropping pay package, unveiled in a September proxy filing, was crafted by Tesla’s board after a Delaware judge struck down a previous $56 billion compensation plan for Musk. The judge ruled that the previous package, which was approved in 2018, was excessive and riddled with conflicts of interest.

Under the latest proposal, one tranche of Musk’s pay would be awarded if Tesla hits a $2 trillion valuation and delivers 20 million vehicles. Another would kick in if Tesla is valued at $3 trillion and delivers 1 million of its “Optimus” humanoid robots.

The new pay package drew a major rebuke this week from Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, which became the largest Tesla stakeholder to say it opposed the plan.

Tesla’s board has warned Elon Musk could leave if the package is rejected. REUTERS

“While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk,” stated Norges Bank Investment Management, which oversees the sovereign wealth fund.

Tesla shares were down nearly 5% in Tuesday’s trading.

Pope Leo XIV previously cited Musk’s pay package as an example of the loss of “the value of human life, of the family, of the value of society.”

“Yesterday, the news [arrived] that Elon Musk is going to be the first trillionaire in the world,” Leo told Catholic news outlet Crux in an interview published in September.

“What does that mean, and what’s that about?” the pontiff continued. “If that is the only thing that has any value any more, then we are in big trouble.”

ISS and Glass Lewis have also recommended that shareholders say no, asserting that the pay is excessive and could dilute the holdings of other investors.

A person sits in a Tesla Cybercab outside the Nasdaq Market site in New York City, U.S., October 27, 2025. REUTERS

Tesla’s largest individual investors, including BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, have yet to reveal how they plan to vote.

Despite the lingering uncertainty, Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said he expects shareholders to give a “bright green light” to the plan.

“With the AI Revolution this is a crucial time for Tesla ahead with autonomous and robotics front and center,” Ives said in a note to clients on Monday.

“We expect shareholders to show overwhelming support for Musk and the xAI stake further turning Tesla into an AI juggernaut with the autonomous and robotics future on the horizon.”

With Post wires



This story originally appeared on NYPost

Tucker Carlson poisons us with hatred — but Trump stands in the way

0


Nick Fuentes hit the jackpot.

The white-nationalist influencer made it on “The Tucker Carlson Show,” the nation’s foremost vehicle for laundering noxious ideas into the conservative mainstream. 

Fuentes is a Holocaust denier and self-avowed racist whose goal is to remake the right in his image. 

Tucker Carlson hosted Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes on his podcast. The Tucker Carlson Show

Carlson, who prides himself on asking the supposedly telling questions when it comes to promoting any number of conspiracy theories, couldn’t really bring himself to ask any of Fuentes.

Instead, he gave the 27-year-old Nazi sympathizer a tongue bath and said at one point of the Fuentes ideological project, “I guess you won.”

This was just another day in the office for Carlson.

The former Fox News host has made it his business to promote antisemitic tropes and conspiracies.

What Stephen A. Smith is to sports talk, Tucker Carlson is to obsessive anti-Zionism.

There is almost no anti-Jewish theme — dual loyalty, usury, sinister plotting — that he doesn’t elevate, although he occasionally stipulates that he likes Israel and has no interest in talking about it. 

When Carlson interviewed Ted Cruz before President Trump launched his strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites earlier this year, he bristled with hostility for the hawkish Republican senator from Texas.

When Cruz noted that Carlson seemed fixated on Israel, the podcaster retreated to his favorite dodge that he was “just asking questions.”

Obviously, though, if your questions all tend toward one set of insinuations — casting aspersions on one country and suspicion on one group of people — you aren’t engaged in genuine inquiry but pursuing an agenda while trying to maintain a modicum of plausible deniability. 

A while ago, Carlson welcomed on his podcast a crank “historian” with revisionist views on World War II, Darryl Cooper, and enthusiastically endorsed him as “the most important historian in the United States” (move over, Gordon Wood, Niall Ferguson, and Allen Guelzo, among others).

While Carlson served as his caddy, Cooper explained that Winston Churchill was “the chief villain” of World War II, while Hitler “didn’t want to fight.”

According to Cooper, the Holocaust was just a product of inept military planning.

With Fuentes, Carlson was like a broadcast morning show host fluffing a celebrity out on a publicity tour for his or her latest movie — except the interview subject, in this case, was a poisonous toad.

Carlson lobbed softballs while Fuentes inveighed against “organized Jewry” and expressed admiration for Josef Stalin. 

It was such a dismal performance that it created an instant backlash and alarm that an ancient hatred — once thought vanquished — has gotten notable footing on the right.  

The good news is that MAGA is not antisemitic.

The movement is almost wholly defined by Trump, who has a Jewish son-in-law, likes Jews and is the most pro-Israel president the country has ever had.

His vision of a new “golden age” for America doesn’t involve kicking Israel to the curb or marginalizing the Jews, and never will. 

Yet Carlson and his allies — most prominently the conspiracy-mongering podcaster Candace Owens — are playing a long game to make anti-Zionism and hostility to Judaism part of right-wing orthodoxy.

If they succeed, they will poison conservatism, morally and electorally.

They will make it turn its back on a significant element of the Western heritage, and on the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, who admired ancient Israel for its contributions of monotheism and the idea of the law.

For a long time, the fever swamp on the right was limited to mimeographed newsletters or lurid email chains.

No more.

We have returned to a version of the 1930s, when such figures as Father Coughlin and Charles Lindbergh had huge megaphones and celebrity they used to assail the alleged malign influence of the Jews.

Just because none of this is visible on broadcast news or — for the most part — among elected politicians doesn’t mean it isn’t insidious and gaining traction.

Tucker Carlson knows what he’s doing, and he’s made it clear that Nick Fuentes is his ideological compatriot and friend.

X: @RichLowry



This story originally appeared on NYPost

The Amazon share price has never been higher. Here’s why it still may be cheap

0


Over recent days, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) stock hit a new all-time high. In fact, Amazon’s long-term performance has been nothing short of spectacular. Its share price gain means that $1 invested in Amazon when it listed in 1997 is now worth over $2,800.

Sure, there are still no dividends. With that sort of price gain, though, I doubt many shareholders are bothered.

In fact, they may well prefer Amazon to keep doing what it has been doing with its spare cash: investing it in further business growth, rather than using it to fund dividends.

Having recently hit an all-time high, it might seem hard to imagine that Amazon stock is even now a potential bargain. But I think it may be.

The lens matters

That depends in part on what approach one takes to investing.

From a short-term perspective, the price-to-earnings ratio of 36 may not seem cheap. (Then again, in the current market, it does not seem outrageously high either for a high-growth company with some massive competitive advantages).

But as an investor, I do not worry about the short term when deciding how to construct my portfolio. Instead, I take the long-term approach to investing.

Over the long term, I think Amazon could yet go from strength to strength.

Building on its strengths

Amazon has been very innovative over many years. By experimenting with new businesses, it has been able to expand its existing competitive advantage.

It has also not been afraid to pull the rug from ventures that it decides are less promising than hoped. I see that as a sign of confident and decisive management.

So its online retail and marketplace has grown bigger and picked up lots of extra elements along the way, from bricks-and-mortar shops to its own cargo airline.

That alone could mean that the historic heartland of Amazon’s business can grow strongly over the long term. Economies of scale and its strong industry position could help it grow profits faster than revenues.

Meanwhile, the bigger story from a long-term perspective may be about AWS (the old Amazon Web Services).

AI is rocket fuel for an already brilliant business

Before the AI gold rush, AWS was already a successful, high-growth business. That has not changed and its server hosting business remains massive.

But AI demand has taken that to a whole new level.

How big?

Put it this way – in the third quarter, Amazon’s operating income was $17.4bn. Of that, AWS was responsible for $11.4bn. That means that around two-thirds of Amazon’s total operating income in its most recent quarter came from AWS alone.

Excitement about the growth potential for AWS explains why the Amazon share price hit an all-time high. AWS sales were up by a fifth year on year.

Can Amazon’s AI-fuelled growth last?

The medium- to long-term demand picture for AI-related hosting remains unclear. I also see a risk competitors may try to win market share by competing on price, potentially eating into AWS’ profitability.

Meanwhile, Amazon’s retail business faces ongoing risks from US tariff uncertainty.

But from a long-term perspective, given its competitive advantages including client base and proven model, I think Amazon’s current share price could come to be seen as a bargain. I see it as a share that investors with a multi-year timeframe should consider.



This story originally appeared on Motley Fool