Monday, July 7, 2025

 
Home Blog Page 56

BREAKING NEWS: Trump threatens trade war again — demands Spain spend 5% on defense or face double tariffs.


In a new chapter of transatlantic tensions, U.S. President Donald Trump has targeted Spain, threatening to double tariffs if Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s government does not raise military spending to the 5% of GDP demanded by NATO.

During the recent summit in The Hague, Spain became the only country to openly reject this commitment, triggering Trump’s fury and concern among allies.

Sánchez, trapped in his progressive bubble, appears more interested in appeasing his leftist base than in ensuring Western security.

An article in El Mundo titled Trump Goes After Spain Again Over Sánchez’s NATO Stance: ‘He Tried Not to Comply, But He Will—Guaranteed’” outlines how Trump described Spain’s stance—clinging to 2.1% of GDP in military spending—as «terrible.»

“Spain is terrible. They want to stick with 2%. I think it’s terrible. And, as you know, they’re doing very well. The economy is doing very well. And that economy could completely collapse if something bad happens,” Trump stated, according to the newspaper.

The warning is clear: Spain could face a devastating trade war.

Sánchez, in a display of quixotic optimism, insists that “Spain is always the solution, never the problem.”

However, his rhetoric rings hollow against mounting NATO pressure. His refusal to increase the military budget reflects the demands of his progressive allies, such as Sumar, who see any defense spending as a betrayal of their ideals.

While Sánchez boasts of sovereignty, Spain finds itself isolated, projecting weakness at a critical moment for the Atlantic alliance.

The backlash on social media was swift. Fierce criticism abounds, with users accusing Sánchez of prioritizing ideological agendas over national security.

Some even suggest his decisions reflect submission to interests opposed to the West—though such claims lack concrete evidence. What is clear, however, is growing discontent among sectors that see Sánchez as more focused on progressive optics than international responsibility.

Trump’s threat is no bluff. Spain, with a €5.173 billion trade deficit with the U.S. in 2025, is vulnerable to sanctions.

Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo acknowledged that the U.S. has the power to impose tariffs, though he is counting on EU support. Wishful thinking?

The automotive and agri-food sectors, already hit in the past, could bear the brunt of this rebellion.

Sánchez signed the NATO declaration, but his “no to 5%” has been labeled a Sanchista maneuver: commit publicly, back out privately.

Defense Minister Margarita Robles tried to defend Spain’s position by stating that “Spain takes no lessons from anyone,” but her words do little to mask the country’s isolation. While progressives celebrate their “independence,” Trump prepares the blow.

Can Sánchez maintain his defiance without sinking the economy? Time will tell if his progressive posturing is worth the price Trump promises to extract.

About The Author




This story originally appeared on TheGateWayPundit

'Iranians don't trust the sky anymore, they don't trust the ground as before'

0

Following the military escalation between Iran and Israel, Iranian opposition groups, both domestic and in exile, fear increased political repression. Observers warn that the regime may use the wartime context to tighten security, justify new arrests, and silence dissent. This strategy, seen in past crises, aims to consolidate power by invoking national unity against an external enemy. For in-depth analysis and a deeper perspective, FRANCE 24’s Erin Ogunkeye welcomes Azadeh Pourzand, Senior Fellow and Head of the State-Society Relations Research Unit at the Center for Middle East and Global Order (CMEG).


This story originally appeared on France24

UFC returns to Abu Dhabi for UFC 321 on October 25th

0


The UFC is officially headed back to Abu Dhabi for UFC 321.

The promotion has been going to the capital city of the United Arab Emirates for an annual pay-per-view since 2019, and 2025 will be no different. This year’s big numbered event will take place on October 25th at Etihad Arena.

The UFC announced the event and date on social media, and is encouraging fans to register their interest in going for further updates regarding tickets and lineup.

Abu Dhabi is a special place for UFC — it is the home of some of their earliest business investors, and the UAE saved the promotion’s bacon during the COVID-19 pandemic, setting up a bubble zone that would end up being called Fight Island.

For those reasons (and we’re sure a continued big site fee), the UFC always brings big fights to Abu Dhabi. 2024 featured Ilia Topuria vs. Max Holloway and 2023 was headlined by Islam Makhachev vs. Alexander Volkanovski 2.

What will 2025 feature? Islam Makhachev vs. Jack Della Maddalena is right there, as is Tom Aspinall’s first fight as undisputed champion. The UFC seems to have a lot of big name fighters looking to compete at the end of 2025, so there’s no shortage of options.

For now, though, we’ll have to make due with just the date and event designation. MMAMania.com will keep you updated with all future developments related to UFC 321.



This story originally appeared on MMA Mania

Brits are skipping crucial step in their oral hygiene routine, study shows

0


A shocking four in ten Brits are neglecting  their gum health, focusing solely on maintaining clean teeth, according to a recent study. The survey, commissioned by Corsodyl and involving 2,000 adults, revealed that a staggering 45 percent rarely consider the health of their gums. It was also found that 74 percent have never thought about angling their brush to clean between the gum and tooth.

The research carried out to mark the brand’s 50th anniversary showed four in ten brush for less than 90 seconds on average, with one in ten experiencing bleeding gums every few weeks. Dr Kate Fabrikant, from parent company Haleon, emphasised: “We need to continue raising awareness of gum health importance, they are just as essential to our overall oral health as our teeth.

“There is still a lot of work still to do to achieve good gum health in the UK, and that’s why we are empowering individuals to make it a bigger priority,” Dr Kate added.

The study also revealed that a third of adults wouldn’t recognise if their gums were in poor health.

Despite many having experienced receding gums or having known them to bleed, many were unaware that these were symptoms of unhealthy gums, along with tenderness and swelling.

How healthy are your gums? Take this quiz to find out.

“The gums in our mouths play a crucial role in supporting and protecting the teeth, acting like a cushion and barrier against bacteria,” Dr Kate added.

“Healthy gums keep the teeth firmly anchored, shielding them from infections that could lead to serious dental problems.”

A staggering 70 percent of Brits confess they don’t floss daily, a crucial step in keeping gums healthy and happy.

Moreover, three quarters don’t steer clear of sugary treats, and two thirds never clean their tongue, only adding to poor oral hygiene.

Dr Kate emphasised: “Maintaining optimal gum health is crucial for overall oral hygiene and well-being.

“Healthy gums are typically pink and firm, fitting snugly around your teeth without bleeding, swelling, or pain – while unhealthy gums can lead to gum disease, tooth loss, and even impact heart health.

“Regular dental check-ups, proper brushing with the right toothpaste, and flossing techniques are all essential practices to ensure your gums remain in good health.”



This story originally appeared on Express.co.uk

OpenAI Is Fighting Back Against Meta Poaching AI Talent

0


Meta has reportedly been compiling a list of top talent to poach in the AI talent wars — and OpenAI researchers are on it.

According to recent reports, Meta has successfully poached eight OpenAI staff members in the past two weeks for its AI efforts. Now, OpenAI leadership is reassuring staff that the company is fighting back against Meta in the war for AI talent.

OpenAI Chief Research Officer Mark Chen sent a memo to staff on Saturday stating that OpenAI would take steps to counter Meta stealing talent. The memo was sent to employees in Slack and obtained by Wired.

“I have a visceral feeling right now, as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something,” Chen stated in the memo. “Please trust that we haven’t been sitting idly by.”

Chen said that he was collaborating with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to talk to employees with competing offers from Meta. Company leadership is “recalibrating” compensation and “scoping out creative ways to recognize and reward top talent” in response to these offers, Chen wrote.

Related: Meta Is Reportedly Offering Up to Nine-Figure Pay for Researchers on Its New Superintelligence AI Team

However, while OpenAI wants to keep its staff, it also wants to keep compensation “fair” among employees.

“While I’ll fight to keep every one of you, I won’t do so at the price of fairness to others,” Chen wrote in the memo.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Last week, Meta reportedly hired top OpenAI researcher Trapit Bansal and three other OpenAI employees who set up the company’s Zurich office: Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Xiaohua Zhai. The Information reported on Saturday that Meta had hired four more OpenAI AI researchers: Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi, and Hongyu Ren.

Meta’s hiring push is due to the company’s focus on a new superintelligence lab. The team will consist of roughly 50 employees who will work closely with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to develop superintelligence, or AI that exceeds human intelligence in reasoning, memory, and knowledge. Zuckerberg reportedly wants Meta to be the first company to achieve superintelligence, with the goal of bringing advanced AI capabilities to Meta’s products, like its chatbot and smart glasses.

Related: Meta Is Reportedly Planning to Release New AI Smart Glasses With Oakley and Prada

Zuckerberg has been prepared to compensate new superintelligence employees handsomely. The New York Times reported that the CEO offered potential new hires compensation in the millions.

Altman said earlier this month that Meta was trying to recruit OpenAI researchers with “$100 million” signing bonuses and “more than that” in compensation, but that none of OpenAI’s “best people” had taken the offer.

However, Meta leadership has pushed back against Altman’s statement. At Meta’s leaked all-hands meeting last week, Meta’s Chief Technology Officer, Andrew Bosworth, said that Altman was “being dishonest” about the size and scope of the offers. One of the OpenAI employees Meta poached, Lucas Beyer, also posted on X that he did not receive a $100 million signing bonus.

Meta was up over 23% year to date at the time of writing.

Meta has reportedly been compiling a list of top talent to poach in the AI talent wars — and OpenAI researchers are on it.

According to recent reports, Meta has successfully poached eight OpenAI staff members in the past two weeks for its AI efforts. Now, OpenAI leadership is reassuring staff that the company is fighting back against Meta in the war for AI talent.

OpenAI Chief Research Officer Mark Chen sent a memo to staff on Saturday stating that OpenAI would take steps to counter Meta stealing talent. The memo was sent to employees in Slack and obtained by Wired.

The rest of this article is locked.

Join Entrepreneur+ today for access.



This story originally appeared on Entrepreneur

Meghan Markle Risks Alienating As Ever Fans With Rosé Wine Launch, ‘Expert’ Claims

0


As Meghan Markle is gearing up to launch her brand As Ever’s first wine, the Napa Valley Rosé, it might reportedly pose a risk to the brand’s loyal fanbase. Caitlin Jardine, social media manager at Ellis Digital, analyzed the potential drawbacks that the new product could bring to the brand in terms of its customers’ response. According to the expert, the introduction of wine could distance the fans, who would feel that she is “going against her core” of the brand’s wellness-centered values.

Wine launch could ‘alienate’ some of Meghan Markle’s fanbase, says ‘expert’

Meghan Markle’s lifestyle brand, As Ever, will be introducing its first wine on Tuesday, July 1. The Napa Valley Rosé, which the company describes as “launching just in time for summer entertaining,” reportedly has its advantages and disadvantages for the brand’s relationship with its customer base. According to Daily Mail’s exclusive report, Caitlin Jardine shared that the product could “alienate” its fans.

The Duchess of Sussex, who has been associating herself with wellness-centered topics, will be “entering a highly competitive” market with the wine launch, Jardine claimed. According to the expert, Markle and As Ever will be dipping their toes in an already “established market,” catering to “a more expansive audience.”

The launch will especially pique the interest of “those who see wine as more than just something to drink but an accessory to their lifestyle.” Jardine also shared that the introduction of the Napa Valley Rosé will have fans and loyal customers think that it could “contradict her values around mindful living.”

However, the social media manager explained that the wine launch can bring about many positive changes to As Ever as well. She believes that the Rosé will add “versatility” to the brand’s current product line. The expert told the outlet, “Rather than one that is more rigid and ‘clean,’ it reflects one that is more in tune with her diverse audience and how they live.”

Meanwhile, celebrity publicist Sarah Schmidt said that the wine launch will see a shift in how people view As Ever’s brand identity. According to this expert, Markle’s move indicates that the company isn’t just a “pantry brand,” but a “lifestyle ecosystem.” As Ever boasts an interesting lineup of products, including Apricot Spread, Orange Blossom Honey, Flower Sprinkles, and more.



This story originally appeared on Realitytea

Trump Drops Bogus Lawsuit Against Iowa Poll And Gets Absolutely Nothing

0


PoliticusUSA is independent news that you can trust, so please consider supporting us by becoming a subscriber.

It was announced via a court filing that Donald Trump dropped his lawsuit against The Des Moines Register and former pollster Ann Seltzer over a poll that they conducted in 2024 that showed Kamala Harris leading the state.

The filing stated, “Plaintiffs President Donald J. Trump, Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, and Former State Senator Bradley Zaun, give notice of their dismissal of this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(1)(A)(i).”

Seltzer and the newspaper didn’t pay Trump $20 million to his “presidential library,” or apologize. The defendants didn’t have to enter into a settlement with Trump/ or give him anything at all.

In fact, Donald Trump got absolutely nothing.

The dropping of the Iowa Poll lawsuit is newsworthy because it shows what can happen when the media doesn’t cave to Trump’s threats and lawsuits.

Trump didn’t get paid off, so he dropped the case, because he knew that there was nothing to it, and he couldn’t win.

Standing up for the First Amendment and not settling bogus lawsuits used to be normal for the media, but a series of corporations bent the knee to Trump and settled lawsuits that they knew were bogus because they wanted to get on Trump’s good side.

The right thing to do in all of these cases has been to tell Trump to go kick rocks. 60 Minutes did nothing wrong, but the parent company of CBS is working out a settlement with Trump because they have a piece of merger business that they need Trump administration approval for.

Big corporations and mainstream media have sold out the First Amendment and journalistic independence to Trump.

The Tribune Company, which owns The Des Moines Register, and Seltzer did not, which is why Trump is walking away with nothing.

Trump’s effort to manipulate polling through intimidation has failed, as standing up to the bully once again proves to be the best strategy.

What do you think of Trump dropping his lawsuit? Let’s discuss it in the comments below.

Leave a comment



This story originally appeared on Politicususa

Apple Vision Pro secret unreleased features stolen, lawsuit

0


The current Apple Vision Pro

Apple is suing a design engineer who allegedly copied Apple Vision Pro research and is using it in his new role at Snap, maker of Snapchat and smart glasses.

There’s probably now a standard pro forma lawsuit that Apple gets out every year, as this latest example of alleged trade secret theft is far from the first. In 2022, an employee leaked confidential information to the press, while in 2023, three ex-Apple engineers were accused of stealing Apple Car.

And in 2024, Apple finally settled with Rivos, a startup firm accused of taking both trade secrets and poaching engineers from Apple.

According to SiliconValley.com, 2025’s trade secret lawsuit concerns the ex-Apple engineer Di Liu. He is accused of stealing what Apple’s suit says is a “massive volume [of] various novel Apple technologies that are embodied in Apple Vision Pro or not yet released.”

Neither Liu nor any legal representative of him has commented, so the only details are as laid out by Apple in its lawsuit. Those details allege that Liu specifically told Apple that he was resigning to spend more time with his family instead of going to another firm.

If he’d disclosed that Snap had offered him a new job, he would have been immediately cut off from access to Apple’s network. As it was, he continued working there for a two-week notice period, and it was at least during this time that he allegedly copied files from his Apple-issued laptop and into his personal cloud storage.

While Liu deleted files that would reveal precisely what details he is said to have taken, Apple argues that “the overlap between Apple’s proprietary information that Mr Liu retained and Snap’s AR products… suggests that Mr Liu intends to use” what he is believed to have taken.

Apple wants the court to force Liu to return these allegedly stolen trade secrets, although it’s not clear how that would work — or how it would help. Apple does also want unspecified damages.

Note that Snap is not accused of any wrongdoing. A Snap spokesperson said that the company had examined the suit’s claims and has “no reason to believe they are related to this individual’s employment or conduct at Snap.”

Separately, Snap launched smart Spectacles in 2017 — six years before Apple Vision Pro was announced — though they sold poorly. A second version, aimed at developers, was launched in May 2021.



This story originally appeared on Appleinsider

Trump blasts AT&T over tech issues during call with faith leaders: ‘Get its act together’

0


President Trump slammed AT&T on Monday after technical issues interrupted his scheduled conference call with American faith leaders.

Trump called on “the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be” to get involved and address the situation, saying there were “tens of thousands of people on the line” at the time of the glitch.

“I’m doing a major Conference Call with Faith Leaders from all over the Country, and AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “This is the second time it’s happened.”

AT&T is currently led by CEO John Stankey. The company’s shares rose 3% in Monday trading, but had turned slightly negative after-hours following Trump’s criticism.

President Trump criticized AT&T. Andrew Leyden/Zuma / SplashNews.com

In a second post, Trump apologized to faith leaders “for the long wait” as he tried to connect to the call.

“AT&T ought to get its act together,” Trump wrote. “Please pass along the word to the tens of thousands of people who are there. We may have to reschedule the call, but we’ll use another carrier the next time. AT&T obviously doesn’t know what they’re doing!”

Shortly after Trump’s posts, AT&T said it had “reached out to the White House and (is) working to quickly understand and assess the situation.”


John Stankey
AT&T CEO John Stankey is pictured. Getty Images for Advertising Week New York

Trump had previously clashed with AT&T during his first term in office. At the time, the telecom giant owned CNN.

The current spat surfaced just days after the Trump family unveiled plans to launch its own branded “Trump Mobile” wireless service and a $499 smartphone.



This story originally appeared on NYPost

‘Big beautiful’ AI rule means feds must act NOW to stop Big Tech’s abuses

0

The Senate broke out in heated debate Monday over a controversial rule within President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act — one carrying enormous implications for the rapidly developing artificial intelligence sector.

The proposal would block any state governments from regulating the AI industry for years.

It has some appeal, because few think it’s a great idea for a patchwork of conflicting state laws to slow AI’s rocketing development.

But passing that rule without any federal regulation would make the AI industry a law-free zone, where Big Tech companies can essentially do whatever they want with an untested, sometimes exploitative new technology.

That’s why the Senate could throw out the idea.

And it’s why we still urgently need federal regulation on AI companies. With or without a moratorium on state regulation, we need some uniform federal standards to govern AI.

If the AI industry is going to grow sustainably and responsibly, we need legislation to provide guardrails and clear rules about how to protect the creators of content that AI tools use — publishers, authors, journalists, artists, musicians and creatives of all types.

Right now, those content creators are AI’s victims.

Big Tech and AI companies scrape vast amounts of content to build and operate their generative AI products, which turn content into GenAI outputs for users.

Sometimes they just reproduce content creators’ passages word for word — without credit or compensation.

AI companies admit these unfair and un-American tactics are fundamental to their businesses, but they refuse to pay because it’s cheaper to steal.

Even worse, this predatory behavior lets AI models act as information gatekeepers.

If Big Tech is left to its own devices, Americans will have less access to accurate information, and certainly no one to hold accountable for errors and mistakes.

Reporting on stories that Americans need to know will dwindle as the AI companies undermine the business models of publishers, opening the door to viewpoint suppression and creating opportunities for foreign propagandists.

How dire these problems will become is a matter of guesswork — because AI development is currently a black box.

Developers do not share information on whether or how they are obtaining consent for using publisher content. (News reports suggest that when they do share information about these methods, it is sometimes misleading.) 

Publishers must hire experts to reverse-engineer how their content has been taken, a costly process that overburdens small publishers and can’t always identify all works that were used in training the models. 

This lack of transparency hinders the enforcement of intellectual property rights and distorts regulatory decisions, business development and more. 

Federal legislation could address these issues by requiring recordkeeping and full disclosure.

AI companies must let publishers know whether a generative AI model was trained on their work — and must also explain whether certain publications have been specifically excluded from AI models, so that the public can judge any bias.

Further, AI companies must disclose the sources they use to keep their models’ responses current.

Simple rules such as these will prompt commercial GenAI developers to enter agreements with publishers to use their content — agreements that will likely block AI companies and foreign actors from distorting the news that the public receives.

The benefits will be widespread. These rules would strengthen America’s position in the AI race by making its products more trustworthy and preserving the journalism that lies at its foundation.

Protecting intellectual property and homegrown content is what gives American AI companies an international competitive edge. Strong federal rules will also keep many small media businesses viable, and protecting thousands of workers and their communities.

The White House blueprint for AI wisely recognizes that AI development must be responsible and aligned with American values, including respect for intellectual property and the rule of law.

Congress seems to understand that AI needs regulation. It’s time to set this growing but potentially dangerous industry on a solid foundation.

Danielle Coffey is president and CEO of the News/Media Alliance, which represents more than 2,200 publishers nationwide.



This story originally appeared on NYPost